Taj Mahal Premium Lager - United Breweries - UB Group

Not Rated.
Taj Mahal Premium LagerTaj Mahal Premium Lager

Educational use only; do not reuse.

400 Ratings

(view ratings)
Ratings: 400
Reviews: 200
rAvg: 2.59
pDev: 24.32%
Wants: 2
Gots: 19 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
United Breweries - UB Group

Style | ABV
American Adjunct Lager |  4.50% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes & Commercial Description:
Beer added by: BeerAdvocate on 03-08-2002

No notes at this time.
View: Beers (14) | Events
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Recent | High | Low | Top Raters | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Taj Mahal Premium Lager Alström Bros
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 400 | Reviews: 200
Photo of mattmarka1
2/5  rDev -22.8%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

My first review was truly awful, but this review needs to be at least 5 words so...... truly awful.

Photo of EdTheEdge
1.96/5  rDev -24.3%
look: 2.25 | smell: 1.75 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Shared this with a friend. Poured into a pint glass. This beer has no redeeming qualities. It smells like dirty water, there is very little taste. This beer only manages to look like beer and then only for a short while as the head falls away quickly and there is zero lacing. It degrades into a dark golden liquid. I would not recommend this beer to anyone.

Photo of JMS1512
3.25/5  rDev +25.5%
look: 3.25 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3.25

It was very, very "eh"

Photo of deesbeers
3.14/5  rDev +21.2%
look: 2.75 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.25

I'm not sure why this gets such a bad rap. It's not amazing, but it's a drinkably crisp, mild lager.

Photo of Furlinator
3.42/5  rDev +32%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

A standard lager. Nothing to write home about.

Photo of YumaLaowai
4/5  rDev +54.4%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

I thought it was a great 8/10 pre salt and/or lime. With a 8.7-9.0
Very good. Smooth with a good malt flavor that gave it a well needed kick

Photo of 302BeerGuy
3.75/5  rDev +44.8%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 3.75

Fuck you Todd and mother fuck you BA rating system and your outlier crap !!!!
This beer is GOOD !!!
650ML Bottle for $2.99

Photo of rob99er
2/5  rDev -22.8%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

A little better than our American Adjunct Lagers.

Photo of Tilly
3.13/5  rDev +20.8%
look: 4.75 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.75 | overall: 3.25

straw color, with a nice two finger white head that disappears in short time to a scim of white foam. Smells like yeast and malt. Taste is not very exciting but not disapointing. Pleasant fresh bread with a very small lemon taste. Mouth feel is clean. Not a bad beer for a lager! I realize now why I'm not a lager fan. I think this would be a great beer on a hot summer day.

Photo of Pegasus
2.75/5  rDev +6.2%
look: 2.75 | smell: 2.75 | taste: 2.75 | feel: 2.75 | overall: 2.75

Appearance: Medium golden-orange in color, with a small, off-white head, which soon fades to a scattering of foam. Fine-beaded, patchy lacing adorns the glass walls. The carbonation is slight and slow-rising.

Aroma: Somewhat cider-like aroma, with notes of cooked vegetables, and grain. An undertone of earthy and grassy hops notes are present as well.

Taste: Opens rather dry and a bit tannic, the taste could almost be described as dusty. As the taste progresses, some herbal and medicinal hops assert themselves. Faint hints of apple ring are present as well. These dominate the taste, with mildly toasted malt seemingly a mere afterthought. Finishes with a lingering, mild herbal bitterness, a bit of toasted malt, and a faint sweetness.

Mouth feel: Thin, with slight stinging carbonation.

Drinkability/notes: This beer seems to be crafted for an oppressively hot climate. With its light body and low alcoholic content, it might well be a fine "lawnmower"beer, this from someone reviewing in early winter.

Presentation: Packaged in a Euro-style twenty-two ounce (650 ml) brown glass bomber with a pry-off crown, served in a New Belgium Brewing chalice.

Photo of avwrite
2.38/5  rDev -8.1%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Decent enough but had a poor aftertaste. It really lingers in your mouth and not in the good way.

Photo of iheartmyTHO
3.5/5  rDev +35.1%

I bought of bottle of this to drink at the Indian dinner put on by my neighborhood pool club. It paired well with the food, I'd say.

Overall, the Taj Mahal, reminded me of a tasty version of Budweiser i.e. it has more flavor. The beer was light tasting but also had a bit of hops and malt. It wasn't anything spectacular, but not anything awful either.

Photo of ordybill
3.8/5  rDev +46.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.75

This Indian Lager is a very good American styled lager beer. I bought it from a "Whole Foods" store in Marietta, GA and it traveled well from the brewery. No hint of skunkiness, a good crisp taste. A non-overpowering aroma and a pretty full body for a lager. I would definitely drink this again. I would compare it with the other well known Indian brew "Kingfisher", Interesting label to boot, not shiny and eclectic like many micro-brews but an old school label that did get me to notice it in the cooler.

Photo of JuicesFlowing
2.09/5  rDev -19.3%
look: 1.75 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.25 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Poured into a shaker pint glass.

Look: Clear golden body with a white head that disappears immediately. No retention or lacing.

Aroma: Sour corn adjuncts or vegetables, faint sourness.

Taste: Harsh on the palate immediately. Slightly alcoholic opening despite the low ABV, followed by a metallic middle. Adjuncts come into play bringing notes of cabbage or other sour veggies. A tangy, sour finish.

Mouthfeel: Carbonated and thin.

Overall: I rate according to style, and I was not impressed with this one.

Photo of jimmah120
3.09/5  rDev +19.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

22oz bottle, got it for $3 on a whim. bottled in april so it's ~8mo old.

smell is corny grain, some sugar cookie dough. sweet and skunky. poured a little out to check the appearance, it's piss yellow with a bubbly froth that fades to a rim before your eyes.

starts light, clean, bitter, but sweet; ends with a slight metallic tinge and some other off flavors. amazingly, considering the style, there's noticeable hop flavor.

Good, but pricy for what it is.

Photo of UCLABrewN84
2.54/5  rDev -1.9%
look: 3 | smell: 2.75 | taste: 2.25 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2.25

Bottled 1/2013.

Pours a clear gold with a foamy off-white head that settles to wisps of film on top of the beer. Small dots of lace slowly drip into the remaining beer on the drink down. Smell is of malt, grain, and slight grassy aromas. Taste is much the same with grain and cardboard flavors on the finish. There is a very mild amount of hop bitterness on the palate with each sip. This beer has a lower level of carbonation with a slightly crisp mouthfeel. Overall, this is a pretty poor beer with a cardboard-like flavor that is not all that pleasant.

Photo of M_C_Hampton
2.09/5  rDev -19.3%
look: 2.75 | smell: 1.25 | taste: 2.25 | feel: 2.75 | overall: 2.25

A: poured from a 650 ml bottle into a pint glass, golden straw colored with a short white head that dissipates quickly leaving no lacing, clear

S: skunky grain and grass, not pleasant

T: little flavor, some slight malt flavor, little hops, not too sweet

M: thin, not too carbonated

O: probably would be better washing down a vindaloo curry

Photo of RonaldTheriot
4.2/5  rDev +62.2%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.25

Taj Mahal has a thick, white head and a clear, bubbly, straw appearance, with some lacing left behind. The aroma is of sweet, bready, barley malt, and the taste is the same, with a predominate paperyness and some subdued hop bitterness to round it out. Mouthfeel is light and watery, and Taj Mahal finishes crisp, clean, and refreshing. Yes, this is really nice, and I score it as such.


Photo of mfnmbvp
3.32/5  rDev +28.2%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

650 ml (1 pint 6 fl oz.) bottle with the back of the bottle reading manufactured 07/2011, batch no. 988. A fairly old, dusty brew, sitting in the cooler alongside the Yuksom Brewing India Special Quality Beer I drank a few weeks ago. Another imported American adjunct lager from India, and if it's anything like the last one I had I can at least expect better things than Bud Light or Miller Lite. I should note that my bottle has a yellow label rather than the white label pictured on BeerAdvocate.

Poured into a Firestone Walker pint glass.

A - Aggressive pour yields about two fingers of thin bubbly white head, dissipating pretty quickly, on top of a clear gold lager colored body.

S - Malts. Green apples. Carbonated champagne like tartness. Grainy, but definitely a more authentic grain type smell as opposed to the adjunctive garbage that goes into beers like Bud Light and Coors Light.

T - Thin, light, carbonated, but definitely a lot better than the trill mass-marketed American adjunct lagers actually brewed in America. Sweet, grainy, appley. Light carbonation, but it is welcomed in a beer of this sort. Simple and to the point, and damn tasty for what it is.

M - Sweet, tart, crisp, clean finish. Remotely resinous hop / sugary feel, but still very light and smooth.

Overall, light bodied, highly drinkable stuff, with a moderate 4.50% abv. An imported style on the wretched American adjunct lager that I am slowly becoming more fond of. Even at well over a year old, this beer retained itself nicely, and came out better than any swill ass American malt beverages that I've tried so far. If you ever have the opportunity to try this beer or a similar India imported AAL, I highly recommend it.

Taj Mahal Premium Lager Beer ---3.5/5

Photo of Aaron_Ramson
2.83/5  rDev +9.3%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

My only guess is that this is India's attempt at a cheap adjunct lager. It is extremely pedestrian with a color similar to bud light, close to no aroma-a light smell of corn and rice possibly-, a taste that is very bland and light; it doesn't even have the sour tang of an American adjunct lager. It is highly inoffensive and I don't mean that in a good way. I'm sure Pellegrino has more flavor than this. Avoid this beer if you perchance see it at an Indian restaurant, and just order an Anheuser Busch product as it will definitely have more flavor.

Photo of SeamusDoyle
2.73/5  rDev +5.4%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Poured clear pale color with a medium frothy white head that was mostly lasting with good lacing. Moderate sweet grass aroma. Medium body with a smooth texture and soft carbonation. Medium crisp sweet flavor with a medium sweet finish of short to moderate duration. Overall nothing amazing, but it did go well with my vindaloo.

Photo of beergoot
2.44/5  rDev -5.8%
look: 2 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Straw yellow body topped with, initially, a tall, big-bubble white head that quickly disappeared. Aroma comes across with a moderate sweet, corn-like scent with a hint of mint. Mild, corn-like flavor with a slightly metallic bitterness at the finish. Light body, crisp, dry.

Quite an underwhelming beer. No worthwhile, memorable characteristics other than it's wet and has a bit of mild alcohol content.

Photo of Bryan17
1.95/5  rDev -24.7%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 2

Bottle said Mnfd. 5/11, reviewed 10/12.
A: Very pale yellow, lots of carbonation, small head that dissapated completely after 10 seconds.
S: Reminds me of a cheap light beer.
T: Not too much flavor of its own. Essentially tasted like seltzer mixed with vodka. Could easily taste the alcohol.
M: Very thin, waterlike, and bubbly.
O: Never again. This goes down in the books as one of the worst beers I've ever had. It had absolutely no character.

Photo of tdm168
3.08/5  rDev +18.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

A - light copper with little head

S - grainy, warm

T - grainy, grass, sweet

M - medium bodied, smooth, crisp

This is a nice, light, sessionable beer. The adjuncts are there but they're unoffensive. There are also some noticeable hops which balance out the corn-like sweetness. This is better than more adjunct lagers, but in the end it's probably not a beer I'll buy again.

Photo of StonedTrippin
3.25/5  rDev +25.5%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

i dont think this is as bad as the masses say, and i definitely think its better than a lot of other large scale indian brews. it pours a mostly clear piss yellow color with a surprisingly vigorous white head almost two inches tall. the nose is weak light bready malts and nothing more than bittering hops, quite boring to smell really, but not at all offensive. the flavor i think is pretty decent. it has an odd carbonated water sort of taste, minerally, but refreshing. it also has more hops than the nose suggests, finishing actually a little bit bitter, and very dry as well. the feel is decent too, its light but not too light in terms of body. its sharp enough to cut through spicy indian cuisine, but delicate enough to not ruin the palate. i think in that context its a pretty good beer. in a craft brewed pale lager contest it isnt a contender, but i really enjoyed this with my meal last night, and will definitely order this before i get a kingfisher or a royal challenge!

« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Taj Mahal Premium Lager from United Breweries - UB Group
62 out of 100 based on 400 ratings.