1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Taj Mahal Premium Lager - United Breweries - UB Group

Not Rated.
Taj Mahal Premium LagerTaj Mahal Premium Lager

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
62
poor

349 Ratings
THE BROS
53
awful

(view ratings)
Ratings: 349
Reviews: 189
rAvg: 2.57
pDev: 24.9%
Wants: 4
Gots: 4 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
United Breweries - UB Group
India

Style | ABV
American Adjunct Lager |  4.50% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: BeerAdvocate on 03-08-2002)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Taj Mahal Premium Lager Alström Bros
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 349 | Reviews: 189 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of UCLABrewN84
UCLABrewN84

California

2.51/5  rDev -2.3%

Bottled 1/2013.

Pours a clear gold with a foamy off-white head that settles to wisps of film on top of the beer. Small dots of lace slowly drip into the remaining beer on the drink down. Smell is of malt, grain, and slight grassy aromas. Taste is much the same with grain and cardboard flavors on the finish. There is a very mild amount of hop bitterness on the palate with each sip. This beer has a lower level of carbonation with a slightly crisp mouthfeel. Overall, this is a pretty poor beer with a cardboard-like flavor that is not all that pleasant.

06-20-2013 03:55:44 | More by UCLABrewN84
Photo of djrn2
djrn2

New Jersey

1.75/5  rDev -31.9%

05-18-2014 21:00:35 | More by djrn2
Photo of metter98
metter98

New York

2.38/5  rDev -7.4%

A: The beer is slightly hazy pale yellow in color and has a light amount of visible carbonation. It poured with a very thin white head that quickly died down, leaving some swirls of bubbles on the surface and a thin ring of bubbles around the edge of the glass.
S: There are light aromas of apple juice in the nose along with some hints of corn.
T: Similar to the smell, the taste has light flavors of apple juice with notes of corn.
M: It feels light-bodied and a bit thin and watery on the palate with a light amount of carbonation.
O: The flavors aren’t that bad compared to other adjunct lagers but then again this beer doesn’t have much of a taste.

03-23-2012 23:50:30 | More by metter98
Photo of BuckeyeNation
BuckeyeNation

Iowa

3.25/5  rDev +26.5%

Glassy lemon yellow with a shockingly bright white head that is filling at least half the glass at the moment thanks to a zesty amount of carbonation. The cap is stiff, sticky and impressively rocky as it descends, making it all the more surprising that more lace doesn't adhere to the glass. Even so, this is one of the best looking beers of this style that I've seen. Ever.

The nose is the very definition of grain-like, but I don't mean that in a negative sense. As far as I'm concerned, American Macro Lagers should smell like fresh grain, as this one does. Mildly musky hops great my nose as well. Thankfully, there are no off-aromas to spoil the party. Simple, clean, effective.

The beer isn't so wonderful on the palate, although it isn't bad either. The first thing that occurs to me is how balanced it is. Lightly sweet untoasted pale malt and grassy, modestly bitter Euro hops coexist in perfect harmony. Unfortunately, it doesn't taste quite as fresh as it smelled. I was expecting that corny AML sweetness to be present, yet it really isn't to any great degree.

With a 50% increase in hop content, Taj Mahal would make a pretty decent pilsener. It has that same clean, crisp, drying finish and is a good thirst quencher as a result. I imagine that it would be a more than adequate washer-downer for a plate of Chicken Tikka Masala. The subtle flavor would probably disappear altogether if paired with spicy food, but it could be downed by the gallon with no trouble at all.

The body/mouthfeel is adequate. It's much closer to light-bodied than to medium-bodied, although it wears that lightness well by not deteriorating at either mouthful's or bottle's end. The carbonation loses something in the second half while still managing to retain enough spunkiness to keep the mouthfeel active.

The Taj Mahal (which means, literally, 'the best of buildings') is the eighth wonder of the world. Taj Mahal the Indian Pale Lager is a wonder in the sense that it's the best beer from that nation that I've ever had and has exceeded my expectations by a country mile. I won't be buying it again to drink solo, but I won't hesitate to order a bottle or two if I happen to see it in an Indian restaurant.

06-14-2006 23:21:09 | More by BuckeyeNation
Photo of acurtis
acurtis

New Jersey

1.75/5  rDev -31.9%

05-18-2014 20:57:20 | More by acurtis
Photo of BEERchitect
BEERchitect

Kentucky

2.28/5  rDev -11.3%

Eeeek. The bottle say's it's for the true connisuer. Aparently India does not set their standards very high when it comes to beer appreciation. Though the beer does not smell or taste or look or feel bad, it's certainly far from good. Totally emensed with cereal grain, particularly rice and / or corn. A little too sweet - to the point that it detracts from the cleanliness and crispness. The subtleties that make great lagers great are either missing or covered up by adjuncts. It would be a fine beer -- if it were free.

02-01-2006 17:51:08 | More by BEERchitect
Photo of mikesgroove
mikesgroove

South Carolina

1.7/5  rDev -33.9%

and so it begins another adventure down the road of the bottom of the barrel. stopped in the store on the way home and grabbed a few more tonight. served cold and poured into a pint glass, this one was consumed on 08/16/2010.

the pour was actually slightly better then what i was expecting. nice light golden color with a light head of white that was about two inches high and faded down quickly into a thin film that barely covered the sides.

aroma is off, musky wet hay, corn, lots of grain, just that macro lager aroma that is just wrong on so many levels. clean, clear taste, but nothing more to it then glorified water to be honest. highly carbonated with only a hint of dry hops on the finish.

overall while not a drain pour, it was close. again these things are ok freezing cold, but when they warm up look out.

08-17-2010 01:11:27 | More by mikesgroove
Photo of ygtbsm94
ygtbsm94

Virginia

1/5  rDev -61.1%

08-01-2013 04:28:39 | More by ygtbsm94
Photo of spycow
spycow

Illinois

2.75/5  rDev +7%

03-11-2013 06:49:07 | More by spycow
Photo of GRG1313
GRG1313

California

2.45/5  rDev -4.7%

Pours a light honey yellow color with a very thick and pillowy white head. Nose of sweet peaches and stone fruit.

Pleasant light bodied with floral light flavors and a hint of light honey. Very thin; no real character. Very short on body, flavor and character. Light carbonation amplifies this lager's simplicity and shortcomings. Would likely be one of those refreshing summer drinks one would have simply in lieu of water. Nothing special.

07-15-2009 01:19:27 | More by GRG1313
Photo of ChainGangGuy
ChainGangGuy

Georgia

2.7/5  rDev +5.1%

650ml bottle - $3.49 at Total Wine & More in Kennesaw, Georgia. Manufacturing date listed as 03/10.

Appearance: Pours out a clear, standard lager yellow body with a wispy, white head.

Smell: A tedious odor of limp malts, cooked corn, and cider with some pervasive, all-too fragrant solventy tones.

Taste: Ultra pale maltiness with some flecks of maize, a taste of bargain bin cider, and a mite bit of detergent. Light bitterness. Another round of odd, icky flavors until the merciful ending. My advise is to not allow these tastes to take hold -- drink this one cold, drink this one fast.

Mouthfeel: Thin-bodied. Medium-plus carbonation.

Drinkability: Bleh! This one falls somewhere between irksome and unpleasant. Now I wonder what is Hindi for "foul, dumpy lager."

05-15-2010 04:03:48 | More by ChainGangGuy
Photo of jaydoc
jaydoc

Kansas

2.5/5  rDev -2.7%

12-03-2013 04:20:27 | More by jaydoc
Photo of zeff80
zeff80

Missouri

2.69/5  rDev +4.7%

A - Poured out a clear yellow color with no head or lace.

S - Smelled of corn and some grassy hops.

T - It tasted of corn and some malt. A slight hop bitterness.

M - It was crisp and very smooth. A light to medium-bodied beer.

D - Not bad for the style or price. Very smooth and a light hoppiness.

03-23-2007 04:10:00 | More by zeff80
Photo of JAHMUR
JAHMUR

Connecticut

2.5/5  rDev -2.7%

02-16-2012 17:46:53 | More by JAHMUR
Photo of biboergosum
biboergosum

Alberta (Canada)

2.58/5  rDev +0.4%

A new hole-in-the-wall Indian restaurant opened up a few months ago, right across the street from my place, and I think I've waited the appropriate amount of time to let them settle before sampling their culinary offerings. As for the beer, they actually offer more than the ubiquitous Kingfisher (or god forbid, Minhas) on their Indian Beer list, which is nice.

Into a Rani (yuck, I know) mini pint glass, this 330ml bottle pours a clear medium golden yellow colour, with two fingers of thinly foamy, soapy off-white head, which leaves a bit of streaky sky trail lace around the glass as it quickly fades to nil.

It smells of grainy, cereal-heavy pale malt, some pithy, musty corn mash, solvent, and slightly grassy, dead weedy hops. The taste is more grainy pale malt, overripe green apple, a soft corn/rice, er, buttery character, and earthy, grassy, and mildly skunky hops.

The carbonation is average, a bit tightly bubbly here and there, the body a surprising medium-light weight, and sort of sticky smooth. It finishes off-dry, the grainy malt and some stale vegetal essence lingering.

While not something I would ever choose to have again on its own merits, some kind of brain-palate association made this beer go down well enough with some very decent lamb vindaloo, which I suppose is the point of the geographical food/beverage connection, real or imagined.

09-30-2009 17:19:02 | More by biboergosum
Photo of NeroFiddled
NeroFiddled

Pennsylvania

2.78/5  rDev +8.2%

Crystal clear straw gold. Full and creamy bright white head that displays good retention and leaves some nice lace. The nose is limited but delivers some grainy malt and a bit of hops. The body is light and it's mildly crisp on the tongue - smooth and lightly creamy across the palate. The flavor, however, is lackluster with the same lightly grainy malt and hops found in the nose. It's well made, clean and very well-balanced; but that's about it. It is somewhat refreshing, however... ... ...but then again, so are most light beers.

06-04-2003 14:29:07 | More by NeroFiddled
Photo of RblWthACoz
RblWthACoz

Pennsylvania

2.78/5  rDev +8.2%

Oh yeah. You know this is going to be good. Slow brewed for the "connoisseur". Right.

Pours a clear straw with a sizeable white head that leaves a bit of lacing on the drop. Nose is sweet and almost soapy. Taste like old hops with a dirty after taste. Maybe the bottle is off, but I doubt it matters. Feel is thin and weak as expected. Drinkable? Well if you are stuck in the middle of India and your choices are limited, I guess. But why would you want to with so much else available to us in the U.S.. At least I get to add another new country to my stats.

12-30-2007 21:07:36 | More by RblWthACoz
Photo of TheManiacalOne
TheManiacalOne

Rhode Island

1.53/5  rDev -40.5%

Poured from a 22oz. bottle into a US tumbler pint glass.

A: The beer is a pale yellow color with a very thin white head that fades quickly and leaves a thin lace on the glass.

S: The aroma is of grain, corn, malt and a little bit of hops.

T: The taste is slightly sweeter than most macros, with flavors of corn adjunct & barley. The label reads “Brewed from the finest malt and choicest hops.” Well, the malt character seemed “fine” meaning thin, not premium and the hops are almost undetectable. The after-taste is grainy and slightly sweet.

M: Crisp but not very smooth, light-to-medium body, way too high carbonation, finish is dry and clean.

D: Not very tasty and it’s not the easiest beer going down. The label also reads “Slow brewed for the connoisseur” in 4 different places, but since this just seems like fizzy-yellow-beer from India to me and the bomber cost only $0.99, I’m not really sure what type of connoisseur they brewed this for. Maybe a Bud drinker that wants to be able to say he tried a beer from India?

02-11-2007 03:03:56 | More by TheManiacalOne
Photo of nickfl
nickfl

Florida

3.03/5  rDev +17.9%

A - Pours with one finger of white foam on a clear, yellow body. The head dissipates quickly and leaves no lace.

S - A sweet, grainy aroma with a hint of herbal hops.

T - Sweet, grainy bread up front. Some light malt in the middle and a grainy finish with light hops.

M - Medium-light body, moderately high carbonation, and a lightly sweet finish.

D - Not much to say about this one. Its a standard indian lager, light but refreshing.

04-15-2011 00:22:03 | More by nickfl
Photo of Jason
Jason

Massachusetts

2.17/5  rDev -15.6%

Presentation: Slender 22 oz brown bottle with no freshness date.

Appearance: Thin ring of white lace, pale yellowish straw colour. Not much head at all quite sad looking.

Smell: Faint solvent alcohol in the grainy and cooked veggie aroma (DMS).

Taste: Odd slickness on the tongue, adequate carbonation with a light body. Cooked veggie, husky grain and faint solvent flavours show inferior characteristic to the lager style. Strain sweetness toils its way to the taste buds. Thin malt and quite bland. The best thing about this beer is the sharp, clean and semi-spicy bitterness. Weird funky grainy finish is not appealing at all.

Notes: I don’t suggest this beer at all, there are many other sub-premium imported lagers that are not only cheaper in price but cleaner and more flavourful.

07-02-2002 20:53:38 | More by Jason
Photo of drabmuh
drabmuh

Maryland

2.13/5  rDev -17.1%

Indian food with the wife. I figured this was as good a time and place as any to try this beer. I won't have to do that again.

500 ml bottle served in a stein. Beer is dark yellow and clear. Forms no head (to speak of) and is moderately carbonated with very large bubbles. Looks a little odd. No lacing at all.

Beer has a sulfury and corn like aroma to it. Its kind of strong and kind of gross.

Beer is not too sulfury though. Not spoiled or light struck. Kind of grainy, light in body, some aftertaste, at times I get some boiled vegetable flavors...normally light lagers are quite drinkable but I had to force myself to finish this one. And I won't ever drink it again.

07-25-2010 11:45:33 | More by drabmuh
Photo of Slatetank
Slatetank

Pennsylvania

3.25/5  rDev +26.5%

05-25-2013 16:00:19 | More by Slatetank
Photo of StonedTrippin
StonedTrippin

Colorado

3.28/5  rDev +27.6%

i dont think this is as bad as the masses say, and i definitely think its better than a lot of other large scale indian brews. it pours a mostly clear piss yellow color with a surprisingly vigorous white head almost two inches tall. the nose is weak light bready malts and nothing more than bittering hops, quite boring to smell really, but not at all offensive. the flavor i think is pretty decent. it has an odd carbonated water sort of taste, minerally, but refreshing. it also has more hops than the nose suggests, finishing actually a little bit bitter, and very dry as well. the feel is decent too, its light but not too light in terms of body. its sharp enough to cut through spicy indian cuisine, but delicate enough to not ruin the palate. i think in that context its a pretty good beer. in a craft brewed pale lager contest it isnt a contender, but i really enjoyed this with my meal last night, and will definitely order this before i get a kingfisher or a royal challenge!

09-26-2012 22:07:36 | More by StonedTrippin
Photo of WesWes
WesWes

New York

2.8/5  rDev +8.9%

The beer pours a pale gold color with a thick frothy white head. The aroma is decent. It boasts of mainly pale malts and lager yeast. It has a slight grainy scent. The taste is horrible. It is extremely light and watery with an intense musty aftertaste. The mouthfeel is average. It is a low bodied beer with decent carbonation. This was a real disappointment. This is a less than average lager.

03-05-2004 22:53:38 | More by WesWes
Photo of jwc215
jwc215

Wisconsin

2.28/5  rDev -11.3%

650 ml bottle - small freshness date on back.
Poured straw yellow with carbonation was stronger on one side than on the other. A foamy, one-finger, steady head left some lacing.
The smell was a hint of grass, some adjuncts and a touch of skunk (similar to that found in some Euro-macros).
The taste was of oily grass, a touch of an unpleasant bitter bite that didn't seem to fit with other flavors in the drink, cooked veggies, starch and a hint of sweetness as the drink progressed. A touch of salt became noticeable in the second pour (as the pint glass could not hold it all at once.) The flavors did not mesh well.
The mouthfeel was thin, sweet and oily, but rather dry at finish. Overall, quite bland.
The label states "for export out of India"...so, obviously you can't get it there...
"Slow brewed for the connoisseur"...hmmm...slow brewed or over-cooked?
Don't bother with this one It's overpriced for what it is and not it's not a tasty brew.

08-02-2006 14:53:24 | More by jwc215
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Taj Mahal Premium Lager from United Breweries - UB Group
62 out of 100 based on 349 ratings.