Taj Mahal Premium Lager - United Breweries - UB Group

Not Rated.
Taj Mahal Premium LagerTaj Mahal Premium Lager

Educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
63
poor

193 Reviews
THE BROS
53
awful

(Read More)
Reviews: 193
Hads: 402
rAvg: 2.61
pDev: 15.71%
Wants: 2
Gots: 20 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
United Breweries - UB Group
India

Style | ABV
American Adjunct Lager |  4.50% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes & Commercial Description:
Beer added by: BeerAdvocate on 03-08-2002

No notes at this time.
View: Beers (14) | Events
Beer: Reviews & Ratings
Sort by:  Recent | High | Low | Top Raters | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Taj Mahal Premium Lager Alström Bros
Reviews: 193 | Hads: 402
Photo of MoreThanWine
3/5  rDev +14.9%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Part of a series of Asian beers I tried recently, like the others it was a fairly ordinary knock-off of cheap American pilsners. I noted though my sample as brewed here instead of there, so no wonder it seemed among the freshest in the series. Mild sweetness, little malt, that' basically it. (292 characters)

Photo of vandemonian
2.97/5  rDev +13.8%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 2 | overall: 3.5

This beer is clear and pale with a head that lasts a little while. It smells like yeast and hops. This beer has a grainy taste which morphs into a roasted malt aftertaste. It's very thin in the mouth with a small amount of carbonation. Still a fairly drinkable beer. (266 characters)

Photo of Gobzilla
2.68/5  rDev +2.7%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 4

A: poured a pale straw yellow with a half finger of head and left a little lacing sticking to the glass.

S: the major of the aroma is a combination of various grains, wheat, and sweet malt notes. I also got faint citrus in the background.

T: the various grains and sweet malts run the show on the palate with slight citrus accents but also had very slight underlying corn notes.

M: the brew was light in body with a moderate amount of carbonation which had a wheaty crisap finish.

D: it drank really good due to how light in body and flavor but went quite well paired with chicken vindaloo. (594 characters)

Photo of TheHoppiest
2.93/5  rDev +12.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Poured from a 22 oz bottle with a yellow label into a pilsner glass at the Cafe Tandoor in Westlake, Ohio. Served cold.

Pours a clear pale canary yellow, with minimal white head. Mild carbonation.

Smells faintly of barley malt and mild hops. Nothing much doing here.

Very mild, inoffensive malt taste, with a slight sweetness to it.

A crispy and smooth beer, it's not bad, there just isn't much going on here.

As a session beer, it seems fine, a kind of "drink and forget about it" beer. Given that I'm about to have spicy curry, I think a hoppier beer would be more in order. However, it doesn't seem that many of the beers served at Indian restaurants take this into account, always serving some of the blandest brews around. (733 characters)

Photo of mikesgroove
1.71/5  rDev -34.5%
look: 2.5 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

and so it begins another adventure down the road of the bottom of the barrel. stopped in the store on the way home and grabbed a few more tonight. served cold and poured into a pint glass, this one was consumed on 08/16/2010.

the pour was actually slightly better then what i was expecting. nice light golden color with a light head of white that was about two inches high and faded down quickly into a thin film that barely covered the sides.

aroma is off, musky wet hay, corn, lots of grain, just that macro lager aroma that is just wrong on so many levels. clean, clear taste, but nothing more to it then glorified water to be honest. highly carbonated with only a hint of dry hops on the finish.

overall while not a drain pour, it was close. again these things are ok freezing cold, but when they warm up look out. (821 characters)

Photo of KeefD
1.41/5  rDev -46%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 1 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 1

Well, I saw this bottle was only 2 months old, so I figured if I'd ever try it, might as well be now, and probably the freshest I'll ever get. Pours a very pale golden color with a tiny white head that was gone in a flash. Lots of carbonation. Not getting much in the way of aroma, mostly some damp grains, and no hops. Flavor is.. ummm... interesting. It reminds me of the way a wet dog smells. hairspray, mild grains and adjuncts. Ugh. This is terrible stuff. Light body, basically undrinkable. I can't finish this thing. (523 characters)

Photo of drabmuh
2.14/5  rDev -18%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

Indian food with the wife. I figured this was as good a time and place as any to try this beer. I won't have to do that again.

500 ml bottle served in a stein. Beer is dark yellow and clear. Forms no head (to speak of) and is moderately carbonated with very large bubbles. Looks a little odd. No lacing at all.

Beer has a sulfury and corn like aroma to it. Its kind of strong and kind of gross.

Beer is not too sulfury though. Not spoiled or light struck. Kind of grainy, light in body, some aftertaste, at times I get some boiled vegetable flavors...normally light lagers are quite drinkable but I had to force myself to finish this one. And I won't ever drink it again. (674 characters)

Photo of ktrillionaire
2.57/5  rDev -1.5%
look: 2 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

A - Straw yellow, no head

S - Faintly decent aroma; honey-yeasty

T - The taste is about as the nose, vaguely decent. Not terribly cheap-tasting, on the bright side. Not very good tasting, on the down side.

M - The feel is a bit limp.

D - It is not very good, but it pairs okay with Indian Food. (298 characters)

Photo of PartyBear
2.09/5  rDev -19.9%
look: 1.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Pours a very pale watery yellow/green. Massive amount of carbonation, and a huge foamy white head. The nose it dry and full of grain, with a touch of lemon and a very faint hint of malts. The taste is very watery, and bland, it's hard to pick out any flavour at all...at a push I'd say this is a week bready malt lingering somewhere and you might be able to taste a hop or two. The feel is thin, watery, slightly oily, and surprisingly flat considering the appearance. This is the sort of thing that give lager a bad name. Don't bother with this. (546 characters)

Photo of ChainGangGuy
2.71/5  rDev +3.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 2.5

650ml bottle - $3.49 at Total Wine & More in Kennesaw, Georgia. Manufacturing date listed as 03/10.

Appearance: Pours out a clear, standard lager yellow body with a wispy, white head.

Smell: A tedious odor of limp malts, cooked corn, and cider with some pervasive, all-too fragrant solventy tones.

Taste: Ultra pale maltiness with some flecks of maize, a taste of bargain bin cider, and a mite bit of detergent. Light bitterness. Another round of odd, icky flavors until the merciful ending. My advise is to not allow these tastes to take hold -- drink this one cold, drink this one fast.

Mouthfeel: Thin-bodied. Medium-plus carbonation.

Drinkability: Bleh! This one falls somewhere between irksome and unpleasant. Now I wonder what is Hindi for "foul, dumpy lager." (771 characters)

Photo of KickInTheChalice
2.7/5  rDev +3.4%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Poured from a 22 oz. bottle into a pint glass.

Appearance: Pours a light straw color. 1 cm white head, not much retention. No lace. Not much character here.

Smell: Very sweet. Some honey aroma, but mostly a sweet processed corn type aroma. Cooked veggies.

Taste: I have no idea how they brew a beer to have this sweet, industrial taste like this. It is like night and day with cleaner, tastier beers. Funky, grassy, metallic taste. Soft sweetness provides the only pleasantness here.

Mouthfeel: Grainy and oily, but a little thin. Medium carbonation.

Drinkability: Actually gave me a bit of a headache. Not as bad as some of the beers I had while I was actually in India, but this is no treat, even as adjuncts go. (721 characters)

Photo of cudmud
2.5/5  rDev -4.2%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

I ordered this at an Indian restaurant, and I was very disappointed.

Appearance: Very pale, one finger of foam that quickly dissipates, and poor lacing.

Smell: Faint hops; wet grass

Taste: Little flavor up front and a faint aftertaste of hops.

Mouthfeel: Thin.

Drinkability: One word: insipid. (298 characters)

Photo of tugdriver7
2.87/5  rDev +10%
look: 2 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3.5

I wouldn't go so far as to say "avoid" this one, but it's definitely not worth the premium price for the larger bottle. Wan yellow sparkling in the glass with a small white head... like Ginger Ale. Euro skunk was present but not overly so and the initial taste was a weak, slightly sweet biscuity malt with a definite euro hops aftertaste. All in moderation and (sad to say) in balance, rendering the whole thing quite drinkable. And at 4-1/2 % ABV, you could put the whole bottle down, at least with food (as I did). Better than some euro macros, but definitely not worth looking for. (585 characters)

Photo of alysmith4
2.1/5  rDev -19.5%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

I was (obviously) not impressed by this beer. It was a toos up between ordering this one and a King Fisher, but I avoided the KF because I thought it might be skunk-y. That's exactly what this beer was. From what I can tell, this is common for Indian Lagers. Not much flavor or aroma. Even my friend commented, "Budwiser tastes better than this!" I would have to agree. It's funny that the label bragged about only the "finest malt and hops," but I didn't detect any of that. I guess Bud claims the same thing though. (517 characters)

Photo of chiefydawg
3.11/5  rDev +19.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

Bomber birthday gift. Suspecting what I was basically in for, I drank a leftover Beast Ice ahead of time to give the Taj a fair shake.

Yellow, fizzy, clear. White foamy, quickly dissipating head. Seems vaguely familiar. Oh, like 90% of the macro lagers in the USA. I hope nobody paid too much to import this.

Not skunked like I would expect an Indian beer to be; at least they have the sense to use brown bottles. Sweet grain, corny, horse-feed scent. A bit of a perfumy, ripe fruit fruitiness. Fermented too warm? I'm telling ya, there is some caramel here too. Not exactly inviting, but not overly offensive really.

Grainy, corny, and sweeter than expected. There's that toffee/caramel again. Little sharp, chemical fruitiness. I think I almost detected a faint hop taste as it warmed, and there is a tad of bitterness countering the sweet.

Not as clean as our macros; but hey, that may not be such a bad thing. Some lager yeast coming through in fruit and the faintest sulfur. Refreshing, though leaving some residual on the palate. Slick and smooth on the tongue. Not much to balance here, but there is some.

OK, maybe I am being too generous because I did just have a worse beer and because it was free. But I'm going to bet that this got some worse grades than it deserves because it is an American Adjunct Lager. When judging, I believe we should consider the style. That said, I never plan to buy one unless eating Indian Cuisine. (1,444 characters)

Photo of budgood1
2.83/5  rDev +8.4%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

pours out a semi clear straw/gold colour with a thin rocky head supported by some huge bubbles from the carbonation. wispy lace. light grainy aroma...a little herbal...euro lager like. taste is more of the same...a stiff pale malt flavour with hints of biscuit and white toast. i swear it's like biting into a loaf of white bread, yeasty and all. after that it's pretty boring and the slight back end hop bitterness only adds a zesty zing rather than any balance to the fleeting sweetness. it has a light beer like mouthfeel and the overall body is like any other typical lager. drinkability is ok...i'm sure it wash down some spicy curry dish admirably.

otherwise, as Officer Barbrady would say..."move along, nothing to see here." (733 characters)

Photo of beerthulhu
3.53/5  rDev +35.2%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

slowed brewed for the Connoisseur. MFD 11/08. Consumed 1/10. Batch 222 US

A: Poured a pale gold with a brilliant clarity and a quickly rising 3 finger snow white head that was well lasting with a equal mixture of foam and froth. A near full sheet coating sticks nicely to the glass walls while a visible carbonation provided a strong showing with a medium density of rapidly rising bubbles. Overall I thought this was a really nice presentation of a pale lager with the head leveling to a solid creamy whipped capping that remained so for the entire drink along with the solid carbonation.

S: The nose was pale grains with a good supporting scent of both hay and straw highlights. There is a sense of fresh greenery leaves and vines that give this an earthy appeal as well. For a lager this showed a pretty decent nose strength wise, with nice grainy attributes.

T: The initial flavor starts off with some sweet pale grains, slightly dry, with lightly buttered bread. Dry lemon grains along with hay and straw also add to the drinks grainy appeal. There is a soft sense greenery and fresh flowers as well balancing the initial sweetness that soon moves in as well with a slight hint of buttered fresh croissant. The grains are truly the focus here while the hops add more then there share of fresh greenery and flowery appeal. Overall I thought this was a nice change of pace, the flavor was clean and crisp, with a slight buttered touch that was balanced very well with a soft essence of herbal hops.

M: The mouthful provided a nice tingle like a good lager should, giving this a nice bite from the carbonation. The texture was buttery smooth with a surprisingly near medium full body that sits pretty well on the tongue per style.

D: Drinkability was fairly decent. I certainly wouldn't turn one down. At 4.5% abv was a light refreshing lager making for a good picnic beer that both craft and micro drinkers should both be able to enjoy with little complaint. A nice clean crisp quality that showcases the good brewing technique. Should hit the spot well on a hot summer day for a light affair. Definitely worth checking out if you respect the style and just want to put back a few and not get filled up. (2,214 characters)

Photo of BeardedBoffin
2.21/5  rDev -15.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

The label declares: "Slow Brewed for the Connoisseur" We'll see.

It pours a very light golden color with a few centimeters of white foam. Surprisingly visible lacing was left on the glass.

The aroma, however, did not broadcast a positive harbinger for things to come. The aroma was dominated by, what I interpreted as, corn. Light and slightly grainy on the palate, but not much flavor overall. It finished with the slightest bitterness. As it warmed more corn starchiness emerged.

I think I will pass next time. (517 characters)

Photo of Beerandraiderfan
1.61/5  rDev -38.3%
look: 1.25 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 1.75 | feel: 1.25 | overall: 1.75

Pours almost invisibly. Pale straw color, little bubbles, smells like a dive bar. Tastes like, a dive bar. Imagine if they tweeked Bud Light just a little, with ah, maybe more water. Easy drinking beer, but for the price your probably paid for it, you're thinking that Pabst is much more worth it. You could drink a lot of these in a sitting, but why you'd ever want to, I have no idea.

Do they get any points for a cool label? (428 characters)

Photo of wahhmaster
1.78/5  rDev -31.8%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 1 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Poured from a 22 oz. bottle into a 0.5L Pilsner Urquell-branded pilsner glass.

Appearance: Pours a translucent, very pale (almost white) yellow color. The head is large and fizzy and leaves considerable lacing on the glass as it quickly dissipates.

Smell: Has a slight whiff of hops but it's very fleeting. Besides that, corn and other adjuncts dominate.

Taste: This is one of the worst-tasting beers I've found. I don't even know where to begin. It starts with a grainy bitterness and finishes sickly sweet. This actually tastes worst than most American macro and light lagers. I actually would prefer some light American lager to this. This is terrible.

Mouthfeel: Thin and watery with waaay too much carbonation.

Drinkability: Ugh...This beer is barely drinkable. It might be better with food, but I doubt it. Stay away!! (829 characters)

Photo of dstc
2.89/5  rDev +10.7%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Pours a golden color with a big white head. Head falls slow leaving very decent lace.

Does not smell as good as it looks. Aroma is of grains and very metallic.

Tastes like an adjunct lager but with a little more there. Not great, just average.

Medium bodied in the mouth with plenty of carbonation.

Does it's job of washing down curry. (339 characters)

Photo of srandycarter
3.23/5  rDev +23.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

Indian restaurant and the guy had no clue regarding the 8 Indian beers they had. I picked blind.

A - Clear straw, .25 inch thick, densly bubbled white head.

S - Grainy, very light and muted.

T - rice lager flavor. Interesting slight twang at end.

M - Light bodied and well carbed.

D - Very easy, if not boring. (315 characters)

Photo of wertperch
2.53/5  rDev -3.1%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

I had one of these at a local curry house. Poured into a pilsner glass, it had a skinny off-white head which didn't hang around very long. The colour is pale straw, fairly bubbly, and if you like that sort of thing, I suppose it looks quite good.

What little nose there is doesn't bode well. A hint of grain and very little hop, faintly musty. It drinks like any other lager, with a fairly thin dry body, a light maltiness and the faintest tang of hop and grassiness. I did find it a little sour rather than sweet, which detracted from the overall enjoyment for me.

It's quite effervescent, not at all sweet, and sadly devoid of character. It's a simple and fairly refreshing brew, simple and unassumingly refreshing, as I would expect from the style.

I'm afraid I have little to say about this, other than it's an American-style adjunct lager that didn't make me retch, and washed down a chicken jalfrezi quite easily. (922 characters)

Photo of biboergosum
2.56/5  rDev -1.9%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

A new hole-in-the-wall Indian restaurant opened up a few months ago, right across the street from my place, and I think I've waited the appropriate amount of time to let them settle before sampling their culinary offerings. As for the beer, they actually offer more than the ubiquitous Kingfisher (or god forbid, Minhas) on their Indian Beer list, which is nice.

Into a Rani (yuck, I know) mini pint glass, this 330ml bottle pours a clear medium golden yellow colour, with two fingers of thinly foamy, soapy off-white head, which leaves a bit of streaky sky trail lace around the glass as it quickly fades to nil.

It smells of grainy, cereal-heavy pale malt, some pithy, musty corn mash, solvent, and slightly grassy, dead weedy hops. The taste is more grainy pale malt, overripe green apple, a soft corn/rice, er, buttery character, and earthy, grassy, and mildly skunky hops.

The carbonation is average, a bit tightly bubbly here and there, the body a surprising medium-light weight, and sort of sticky smooth. It finishes off-dry, the grainy malt and some stale vegetal essence lingering.

While not something I would ever choose to have again on its own merits, some kind of brain-palate association made this beer go down well enough with some very decent lamb vindaloo, which I suppose is the point of the geographical food/beverage connection, real or imagined. (1,371 characters)

Photo of gfreed
1.46/5  rDev -44.1%
look: 2.5 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 1

Let's see... it didn't ruin a great Indian meal... it rinsed the food into my gullet... its low ABV didn't leave me feeling like I couldn't drive... it came in a pils glass... it wasn't the worst thing I've had to drink. Was it beer? It was yellow (but then, so are a lot of other things); it had almost no carbonation; it had a puffy head for a short while; it was cold. No aroma, no taste.

Pass. (399 characters)

Taj Mahal Premium Lager from United Breweries - UB Group
63 out of 100 based on 193 ratings.