1. Extreme Beer Fest. March 20 & 21, 2015 in Boston, Mass. Join us!
  2. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  3. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Ambar Pale Ale 1900 - La Zaragozana S.A.

Not Rated.
Ambar Pale Ale 1900Ambar Pale Ale 1900

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
66
poor

15 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 15
Reviews: 10
rAvg: 2.38
pDev: 37.39%
Wants: 0
Gots: 1 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
La Zaragozana S.A. visit their website
Spain

Style | ABV
English Pale Ale |  4.80% ABV

Availability: Spring

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: BeerAdvocate on 03-04-2002)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
Ratings: 15 | Reviews: 10 | Display Reviews Only:
Reviews by jhtipton:
Photo of jhtipton
2.63/5  rDev +10.5%
look: 2 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Not sure about the legal requirements in order to use the term "Pale Ale" in Spain but it perhaps was a misprint on the label. The bottle is interesting enough but the product lack what I was hoping for, a decent domestic pale ale in Spain. Pours a very light golden slightly fizzy small head into my cerveza mug. The nose is weak and more reminiscent of belgian than pale ale. Has that yeasty sweet rotten banana taste and smell more than pale ale. Not any hops flavor at all. Mouthfeel is light bodies and a little fizzy-average with macrolager being the benchmark. Drinkability is also below average as I won't be hunting this down. I'll stick to Crz Cam[o for my domestic fix, if at all.

jhtipton, Nov 11, 2010
More User Reviews:
Photo of rastaman
2/5  rDev -16%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Pale Ale, my arse, my rating should end right here, but gotta right a bit more (rules are rules!!!!). A sweetish pils/lager style beer, very thin and in no way complex, boring.

rastaman, Aug 12, 2002
Photo of Misterefe
1.5/5  rDev -37%

Misterefe, Sep 06, 2013
Photo of adamcthomp
2.5/5  rDev +5%

adamcthomp, May 04, 2012
Photo of cfalovo97
3/5  rDev +26.1%

cfalovo97, Nov 07, 2012
Photo of jdhilt
3.38/5  rDev +42%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Not a bad beer, I was pleasantly surprised. More sweet than hoppy, difficult to classify, definitely not pale as the label says, more a golden or a pilsner. Bought in Madrid and not available in this country (USA). Worth looking for if traveling in Spain. It did keep two months before I drank it. The brewery is in Zaragoza, Spain.

jdhilt, Mar 04, 2002
Photo of tesguino
2.63/5  rDev +10.5%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

An english style beer made in Zaragoza spain; its fermentation in hot make this beer smell like ester, or mature banana; its taste oily, little smoky and with body; try this with american food, drink from the bottle or serve in a pint or pilsner glass; 70% recommended.

tesguino, Oct 24, 2005
Photo of janubio
1.55/5  rDev -34.9%
look: 1.5 | smell: 1.25 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 2

330 ml. bottle, pours a golden colour with almost no head. Smell of hop and herbs and some skunky thing. Medium body, boring palate. Taste of malt and some caramel. So, smell of hops, taste like malts and it pretends a pale ale when it really looks a like a common lager and if it wasn't for the sweetness it would taste like a common lager. Confusing? Yes. And bad.

janubio, May 03, 2013
Photo of SylviaFaye
1.73/5  rDev -27.3%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 2

Appearance: very fizzy, small head, body is a light yellow

Smell: This doesn't have much of a nose to it. It's a bit malty and sweet, but I can't pick up much else.

Taste: malty, bitter aftertaste, slightly sour, bread tones, watery, lacking in texture and mouth feel, not very well-balanced, more like a lager than an ale

Conclusion: This beer is lacking in many respects, but it might go well with a tapa like cured ham. However, it is impossible (and I mean impossible) to enjoy this alone. The taste is highly disorganized and unbalanced.

SylviaFaye, May 09, 2010
Photo of flyingpig
2.28/5  rDev -4.2%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

A pale golden colour with tinges of yellow and a tiny patch of white for a head. The beer is quite clear and has a few bubbles rising to the surface too.

There was some corn and grassy aromas once you really made an effort to notice them. Some basic malts made a brief appearance as well and the beer had a ever so slightly skunky aroma to it towards the end.

Some cheap malts and a little bit of malts had me thinking this was more of a pale lager than a pilsener. It was poor and pretty bland overall.

Bland on the palate with a slightly skunky feel and some grain in there too. There was a slightl tang to the drink but nothing much if I'm honest.

A rather awful excuse for a beer in my book and I definitely need some clarification on what style of beer this one is meant to be. It tastes, looks and almost smells like a pilsener or pale lager but it claims to be a pale ale so I'm confused. Either way it wasn't a good beer.

flyingpig, Dec 11, 2012
Photo of batty
1.95/5  rDev -18.1%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

wow, this beer is bad. pretty sure it's not retired though, I bought one yesterday (April 2008) at a normal grocery here in Spain. but then, maybe it's just that no one buys them...

appearance is a fast rising (and dropping) bright white head, medium density, light straw-gold color, very fizzy looking. lace does stay.

smell is banana-y, but combined with some funk i can't quite place.

taste is all over the place, mostly bad, and always very poorly balanced. starts off like an american macro lager, the very very light malt and fizzy, with that bitter taste in there, not a good hop bitter, but like something else weird is going on. then you got a slight sweet as the macro lager fades into a sweet bland banana water which then goes down, leaving a sticky-fizzy bitter on the palate.

mouthfeel is similar to american macro lager, a shitty one though. drinkability is low because of the wack flavor, as well as the sticky-ick finish. good luck is all i got to say.

batty, Apr 24, 2008
Photo of endovelico
2.17/5  rDev -8.8%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

Poured into pokal. Reviewed under high artificial light. Best before date: 29-11-2011. Batch: L623.

Appearance: Straw clear brew with fizzy white head that quickly recedes. Medium to medium high effervescence. Weak lacing and head retention.

Aroma: Not much in the way of smell. Faint sweet corn and german hops notes. Metallic smell is also evident.

Taste: Very insipid profile. Some metallic and adjunct character but otherwise nothing. The overall taste is very mild, which is a good thing to be honest.

Palate: Medium high carbonation. Low to medium low bitterness. Earthy / dusty lingering taste. Light bodied.

Drinkability: Lacks everything and very flawed. Probably one of the most insipid beers without going into terrible territory. Not even the high fermentation helped this beer.

On a final note: Unlike other users, i don't doubt for a second that this beer is an "Ale" in the true sense of the word. See, Ale only means that it uses yeast that ferments at high temperatures / rises to the top during fermentation.

It's perfectly plausible for an Ale yeast to be neutral in the contribution to the taste profile (see American yeast strains) so it shouldn't come as a surprise that theres a bland, flavorless Ale counterpart to the Macro-lagers / American adjunct style (read, full of adjuncts and very light malts with little hopping).

This is part and parcel the reason i dislike categorizing beers based on anything other than the taste/palate/aroma profile. Since theres no official style for such a type of Ale, it ends up being labeled an EPA, which it most certainty isn't. But it's an Ale, so you can't call it an Adjunct lager.

In closing, i won't be having this adjunct macro Ale in the near future.

endovelico, Aug 04, 2010
Photo of AlexLMS
1.4/5  rDev -41.2%
look: 2 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 1 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 1

First of all this beer seems more like a lager than an ale.

Appearance: clear gold colour. Very small white head (almost non-existent), which disappears as the beer is being poured.
Aroma: sweet malts and some red fruits.
Taste: cooked vegetables and cardboard off-flavours. Awful.
Mouthfeel: dry, average carbonation, average alcoholic and a medium body.
Finish: mouth puckering and cardboard again.

Overall: I really did not like this one. Horrible stuff. It was almost an ordeal to get to end of the bottle.

AlexLMS, Dec 13, 2007
Photo of Petertauro
5/5  rDev +110.1%

Petertauro, Apr 17, 2013
Photo of rekel
2/5  rDev -16%

rekel, Nov 28, 2011
Ambar Pale Ale 1900 from La Zaragozana S.A.
66 out of 100 based on 15 ratings.