1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Suprema - Cerveceria La Constancia S.A. / BevCo Ltd

Not Rated.
SupremaSuprema

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
72
okay

62 Ratings
THE BROS
78
okay

(view ratings)
Ratings: 62
Reviews: 39
rAvg: 3.05
pDev: 20.33%
Wants: 0
Gots: 0 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Cerveceria La Constancia S.A. / BevCo Ltd visit their website
El Salvador

Style | ABV
American Adjunct Lager |  4.50% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: BeerAdvocate on 04-06-2002)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Suprema Alström Bros
Ratings: 62 | Reviews: 39 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of BlesstheHarvest
BlesstheHarvest

Texas

3.5/5  rDev +14.8%

06-29-2012 14:37:24 | More by BlesstheHarvest
Photo of RoryOMoore
RoryOMoore

New Jersey

3/5  rDev -1.6%

02-27-2012 06:56:09 | More by RoryOMoore
Photo of LJWalker
LJWalker

Alabama

3/5  rDev -1.6%

02-06-2012 17:28:30 | More by LJWalker
Photo of rangerred
rangerred

Tennessee

1.93/5  rDev -36.7%

11.2oz bottle poured into a pint glass.

Appearance is a clear light yellow with the tiniest of fizzy heads. Head is quick to fade but ok lacing.

Smell grainy with corn and cooked cabbage. Not very appealing.

Flavor is corn and the same cooked cabbage that was in the smell. Also some grape flavor. The beer is pretty sweet throughout with a tannic bitterness towards the finish.

Glad I got to try a beer from El Salvador but not something I would pick up again.

01-15-2012 21:58:20 | More by rangerred
Photo of kjkinsey
kjkinsey

Texas

3/5  rDev -1.6%

12-12-2011 18:58:14 | More by kjkinsey
Photo of ChainGangGuy
ChainGangGuy

Georgia

2.35/5  rDev -23%

330ml bottle - $1.79 at Total Wine & More in Alpharetta, Georgia.

Appearance: Decidedly clear body, faint pale golden hue with a decent-looking, airy, white head. Minute lacing on the way down.

Smell: A tad sweetish in the nose, some lackluster graininess, a mice-tear worth of uningratiating acetone, and a small serving of chilled creamed corn.

Taste: Mildly grainy with a sweet pop of light corn syrup. Ultra faint herbaceous hops, near nil bitterness, but, then, a trace of chemically astringency that holds firm until the sweetish, soft finish.

Mouthfeel: Thin-bodied. Medium carbonation.

Overall: Sometimes you luck out with a simple and innocuously inoffensive pale lager, but, sometimes it's kinda icky, as is the case with Suprema.

11-28-2011 22:46:31 | More by ChainGangGuy
Photo of Rayek
Rayek

Colorado

2.7/5  rDev -11.5%

Pours into my pilsner glass glass a pale straw color with great clarity and big bubbles. A soapy white cap quickly falls to a broken film. Leaves a fair amount of lace.

There's not a lot going on here. Lightly cooked veggies and not much else. A fizzy super-light body isn't helping. The beer tastes like little more than water mixed with some rice and straw. Bitterness is very, very light and tasteless. Finishes with a metallic flavor and a bit of cooked cabbage.

It's light and flavorless and not much else. A couple of off flavors provided the only interest. This is not a beer worth revisiting.

04-08-2011 01:26:56 | More by Rayek
Photo of Bouleboubier
Bouleboubier

Pennsylvania

2.7/5  rDev -11.5%

Getting past one of the most horrendous odors I've come across in my travails through the pseudo-pilsners of the world, Suprema tastes and drinks very much like the lot of Latin American light lagers, settling on the lesser end of the spectrum.

The bottle gave a Dec 2010 bottling date, and I could imagine it perhaps being skunked with its green glass - I did, as usual, grab a single from the back of the row, out of direct light. Only, it wasn't quite all skunk that plagued its aroma and flavor. My best guess is that this is brewed with some funky hard water - heavy metals, cruddy lead pipes, and/or some low-quality or staling ingredients.

Basically, it pours with a beautiful, tight, white cottony head, leaving some pretty crystal lace, all atop a crystal clear, sickly yellow-gold hue - fairly standard. But as it's pouring out of the bottle you can smell the acrid stench of chemical/mineral/vegetable sizzling your nose hairs, eyes close to watering. Not as much carries over into the taste, which comes off like watered-down cream corn, lightly musty-funky, with a 1/4 tsp of malty sweetness on the end. I really can't tell if it's hops or ridiculous tannins or what - it feels fairly smooth but pretty fizzy-bitey, bitter, and dry, with a tiny residual film left on the tongue.

Could have been skunked, and I hate to leave it at that, considering its likely better fresh on-tap or mmm from a can. But such experiences like mine here hold weight as well.

03-20-2011 16:04:01 | More by Bouleboubier
Photo of chinchill
chinchill

South Carolina

3.33/5  rDev +9.2%

330ml green bottle {"No Returnable"} served in pint glass.

A - Clear; pale gold color with a white head that rather quickly dissipates to a thin partial coat. Does leave lacing, however. Medium/light carbonation.

S - a bit fruity and wine-like

Tastes better than indicated by aroma. Still some white wine resemblance, but both hops and malt in the mix. Nice finish.

M - light, crisp and smooth, but unremarkable.

D - good, east to drink, thirst-quenching beverage.

Serving type: bottle

02-26-2011 23:00:40 | More by chinchill
Photo of g00dness
g00dness

California

4.15/5  rDev +36.1%

I had this one at a Salvadorean restaurant. I picked it out because it was the drink of choice for the rowdy spanish-speaking table actross the room, figuring if they could take down 4 beers each, I'd at least like to try one.

It poured an extremely welcoming semi-clear golden barley color into the glass with a thick creamy head.

Nose was lemony hops with a beery undertone.

Taste was dry and balanced - a great use of the light-bodied hops. The yeast was still a mild (and positive) presense making me think they didn't microfilter it out. A friend of mine was trying to explain to me how that made most american-style lagers taste bad, and I didnt believe him, but now I might have some evidence to back him up.

Mouthfeel was outstandingly good for such a dry beer. Just all smooth and creamy.

Drinkability of this beer when you're having a plate of pupusas is really off the charts. I only gave it a 4.5 because I think it might be less charming away from food.

All in all, I may never try another Salvadorean beer, since this one is so good. (or to my palate - i think my review is going to come in over the mean)

11-10-2010 16:49:34 | More by g00dness
Photo of armock
armock

New York

3.25/5  rDev +6.6%

A - Poured a goldencolor with a white head that leaves lacing behind

S - Is of sweet grainy malt very light hops

T - Follows the nose sweet grainy malt finishes nice and clean

M - This beer has a light body with medium carbonation to it

D - This is one of the better Central American beers out there it has a pretty decent taste thats pretty enjoyable its worth a try sometime

10-31-2010 16:52:27 | More by armock
Photo of Pardishcreel
Pardishcreel

California

3.25/5  rDev +6.6%

A pale gold color with a small head that forms, the dissipates a little quicker than average.

Smell: very clean, fruity kinda like a dry white wine rather pleasing.

A stronger pilsner surprising from the look I almost expected water. Not a bad taste if you drink it normally but hold it on the tongue and it quickly becomes rougher. very grainy almost no spices.

Its drinkability is high due to the fact that not to much is going on with this beer.

08-16-2010 03:35:01 | More by Pardishcreel
Photo of glamphetamine
glamphetamine

Virginia

1.7/5  rDev -44.3%

A - A pale, anemic yellow. Standard straw color. Third-of-a-finger head that goes all Judge Crater on us the instant it sees air.

S - Like a dive bar bathroom that was just mopped with Natural Ice.

T - A bit of corn, cheap malt, and just a faint echo of hops. Like, imagine hops had shouted in an empty room just before you walked in. It's like that.

M - Gross. Prickly, bubbly, and fizzy. Very light. Imagine brushing your tongue and rinsing it off with seltzer water. No, wait, you brushed your cheeks, too. That would still feel better than this brew.

D - I could chug this as a session beer after I ran out of good stuff, but I'd burp like hell and probably be upset with myself. It's overpriced, both in terns of money and the energy I spent carrying the sixer to the car. I know this may sound harsh, but this was an immense disappointment. Avoid!

03-06-2010 05:06:22 | More by glamphetamine
Photo of ericj551
ericj551

Alberta (Canada)

3.63/5  rDev +19%

Sumprema pours a crystal clear pale yellow with a thin head. The aroma is sweet and grainy with a slight but not unpleasant bit of sulfur. The flavor is just a bit sweet with a crisp and clean after taste. There is just a bit of bitterness. There is nothing special about this beer, but as far as the style goes I'm not sure you could do it better.

02-26-2010 03:10:25 | More by ericj551
Photo of HalfFull
HalfFull

California

3.53/5  rDev +15.7%

Poured into a pint glass from a green 12 oz. bottle. Pours a medium straw in color and offers a thick soapy white head. Strong retention and lacing for a usually slick style.

Interesting blend on the nose. Grainy malts and some sweet light corn mix with notes of a Euro. Pils, and it's not such a bad combo. actually.

Flavor is smooth and moderate in body. Not too sweet, yet finishes with a clean lightly sweet lemongrass flavor. Richer and fuller in body in the first two thirds of the palate, in fact quite pilsner like up front. Moderate feel overall and good drinkability given that the beer offers enough texture to balance the adjunts.

02-02-2010 02:30:38 | More by HalfFull
Photo of Gavage
Gavage

New Jersey

3.13/5  rDev +2.6%

Appearance: pours a crystal clear light yellow color with a one finger head that breaks apart immediately.

Smell: light malt, grass, and hint of bitterness is detectable.

Taste: slightly grainy malt presence with grass, hint of lemon zest, and a mild bitterness. Well balanced but mild in flavor.

Mouthfeel: light-medium in body. Crisp throughout. Clean aftertaste.

Drinkability: for the style this one is not half bad. Very easy to quaff and mildly refreshing. Worth a try.

12-24-2009 21:55:44 | More by Gavage
Photo of FloppyDog
FloppyDog

North Carolina

3.65/5  rDev +19.7%

Pours a light straw yellow with a 1 inch head of white foam. Surprisingly good head retention for the style.

Aroma is of light malt, faint earthy hops, and a bit of faint DMS, but not nearly as much as I was expecting.

Taste is surprisingly sweet, slightly like apple juice, but in a good way. This is surprisingly different from most adjunct lagers, and I like that about it.

Mouth feel is prickly from the carbonation. Very light-bodied and drinkable.

Overall, one of the best mass-produced adjunct lagers I've tasted.

09-22-2009 02:25:22 | More by FloppyDog
Photo of OStrungT
OStrungT

California

3.38/5  rDev +10.8%

This beer pours a pale straw yellow color, with a thin, but fluffy white head. The head fades slowly, leaving a surprisingly decent lace.

This beer smells mildly of grain. A very slight citrusy aroma is also present. That is about it for aroma.

The flavor is quite similar, with the addition of some grassy hop flavor. It is as mild as the other flavors. Not much to it, but not terrible either.

This beer is highly carbonated. It leaves a slight grainy aftertaste.

This beer would make a decent session beer. It is mild, and low in alcohol. I wouldnt want to drink it though since it is almost flavorless.

Overall: Decent beer for what it is. Not great, but not bad either.

05-05-2009 23:30:13 | More by OStrungT
Photo of Clydesdale
Clydesdale

District of Columbia

3.48/5  rDev +14.1%

A: A clear yellow-gold with some large carbonation bubbles. A fairly large, fluffy white head with nice retention and some solid lacing.

S: Light graininess. Some slight lemon/citric tang, along with a faint grassy hop aroma.

T: Again, some light grain malt. A nice lemony twang that provides a bit of character. Hops are grassy and herbal, providing light bitterness.

M: Lightish body, with subdued carbonation. I'd prefer it were a little more active in terms of carbonation, as it would give this beer a more refreshing nature.

D: This tastes pretty good, although it's a bit too flat and dull on the palate to be considered anything better than pretty good. More than I was expecting, to be sure.

03-08-2009 01:55:45 | More by Clydesdale
Photo of matty
matty

Pennsylvania

3.38/5  rDev +10.8%

Yellow colored beer with an impressive head that leaves lacing all the way down the glass.Aroma is a bit bitter.Taste is corn with a slight tweek of citrus.Overall refreshing and smooth.If you are a macro fan it's worth a try.I personally would purchase again!!

02-02-2009 18:19:53 | More by matty
Photo of illidurit
illidurit

California

2.45/5  rDev -19.7%

Poured into a pint glass. A firm pour produces a light gold body with a dense froth atop. Retention and lacing are well above average for a cheap lager. Aroma is grainy with a touch of lemony tartness and the customary adjunct corn syrup note. Flavor is the same but it's actually worse to taste the lemon/corn syrup/grain profile than to smell it. Almost immediately becomes tiresome and is rather reminiscent of lemon lime soda. Body has a little more heft than the run of the mill adjunct lager. Clean aftertaste, nice level of carbonation.

11-30-2008 07:14:20 | More by illidurit
Photo of Drew966
Drew966

Florida

2.9/5  rDev -4.9%

Suprema pours a golden yellow with a white head from a green twelve ounce bottle. The aroma is grainy and mildly sweet. The flavor has some hops in it with a grain backing and on the sweet side. There really isn't any reason to recommend this beer. It's inoffensive in any case.

04-13-2008 00:07:46 | More by Drew966
Photo of RblWthACoz
RblWthACoz

Pennsylvania

3.2/5  rDev +4.9%

Pours a clear and very straw color with a bright white head that falls down and leaves a pretty thick lacing. The nose is very minor with an almost bitter tone to it. Minor roasted edge. Flavor is sweet. A little bit too much and a tad unbalanced it seems. There also seems to be a bit of an apple tone here as well. A bit thin overall. Feel is decent. Lower carbonation with an okay liquid body. This is drinkable, sure. Doesn't really carry enough punch to make it memorable enough to go back to. But still nice enough to try.

02-09-2008 10:39:03 | More by RblWthACoz
Photo of plaid75
plaid75

New York

3.25/5  rDev +6.6%

Poured a medium straw hue with a one and a half finger foamy white head. There was good retention and lacing,

The smell featured a light grainy malt with a touch of lemony hops.

The taste consisted of a sweet and musty grain with some flowery hop. A bit of green apple appeared toward the finish.

The mouthfeel was light and relatively clean.

Overall a decent Latin American beer. Certainly better than most.

08-11-2007 18:33:26 | More by plaid75
Photo of BEERchitect
BEERchitect

Kentucky

3.25/5  rDev +6.6%

This beer tends to impress me with a clean flavored, light bodied character. Opens up with a lemon-zest aroma, backed up with funky notes that hinge on skunkiness and earthiness. The flavors are less deterant, with a focus on fresh lemon grass and orange rinds, a mild malt / grain sweetness balances out the citrus. A mild grassy hop bitterness and flavor dominate late, and tend to cleans the palate. The feel is overcarbonated, which mutes the flavors considerably and lightens a lot into the finish. Certainly a refreshing south-of-the-boarder type brew, but hardly quality drinking.

04-21-2007 17:48:57 | More by BEERchitect
Suprema from Cerveceria La Constancia S.A. / BevCo Ltd
72 out of 100 based on 62 ratings.