1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Hale's Mongoose IPA - Hale's Ales Brewery & Pub

Not Rated.
Hale's Mongoose IPAHale's Mongoose IPA

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
82
good

196 Ratings
THE BROS
90
outstanding

(view ratings)
Ratings: 196
Reviews: 126
rAvg: 3.62
pDev: 14.64%
Wants: 6
Gots: 7 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Hale's Ales Brewery & Pub visit their website
Washington, United States

Style | ABV
American IPA |  6.00% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: BeerAdvocate on 12-13-2002)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Raters | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Hale's Mongoose IPA Alström Bros
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 196 | Reviews: 126 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of Renfield
Renfield

Kansas

1.78/5  rDev -50.8%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

A - Cloudy brownish orange. Minimal head.

S - Stale hops smell, a hint of citrus, light caramel malt notes.

T - Grapefruit pith and a strong metallic note. Occasionally a glimpse of round maltiness. A pronounced lingering, stale cardboardy flavor. Oxidized?

M - Thinninsh and flat. Carb level barely noticeable.

D - Poor drinkability. One sip certainly doesn't entice you to the next.

I'd have been pissed if I'd brewed this beer and certainly wouldn't have shared it with friends.

Serving type: bottle

09-04-2008 23:46:30 | More by Renfield
Photo of nige4958
nige4958

California

1.85/5  rDev -48.9%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 1

I love Hales, I don't know what happened here. Possible bad bottle. I've got 5 others I'll evaluate after this one. This is complete shit. I smell no hops, flavour is very bitter & istringent. This beer is way, way too dry. Disgusting, really. Must be a bad bottle.

Serving type: bottle

05-04-2006 01:26:40 | More by nige4958
Photo of jdhilt
jdhilt

New Hampshire

1.9/5  rDev -47.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 1.5

Pours with a three finger cream head that goes slowly leaving some lace. Cloudy amber color. Light carbonation and medium bodied. Hoppy nose. Starts hoppy, midway there is a hint of sweetness but it doesn't last leaving a hoppy bitter aftertaste. $1.39 for a 12oz bottle from Exclusively Washington Seattle, Wa. Don't even try looking for this place, it is a gift shop that wives are forced to check out.

Serving type: bottle

07-26-2006 02:17:31 | More by jdhilt
Photo of YOOJ
YOOJ

Louisiana

2.05/5  rDev -43.4%
look: 3 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

Look is nothing to write home about.

Smell is awful, sort of a cheap lager smell. It reminds me of the smell of a brew people use to play beer pong.

Not to imply that I play beer pong. Or that I am damn good at it.

Anyway, the taste is sour and bland, no hop flavor.

This is my first beer from Hale's, and they seem to have a good reputation, so this could be a bad batch or a very old bottle. But this Hales IPA was AWFUL.

(purchased at John's Market in Portland)

Serving type: bottle

12-17-2009 06:38:50 | More by YOOJ
Photo of PDXHops
PDXHops

South Carolina

2.1/5  rDev -42%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

12 oz bottle, poured into a small snifter.

Hazy caramel body with a finger or so of off-white head. OK retention and lacing.

Smells very bland. Some caramel maltiness and that's just about it.

Flavor profile just doesn't do it for me. A strong syrupy maltiness akin to malt extract is the dominant flavor. There's some citrusy hops, but the bitterness isn't sufficient to cut the malt. Alcohol is noticeable and there's a bit of a medicinal aftertaste. Medium body, moderate carbonation.

Overall impression: Subpar IPA. No freshness date on the bottle- wonder if it was an old one? I bought it in a store with good turnover. Will update my review if I have a different experience

Serving type: bottle

07-14-2009 19:18:12 | More by PDXHops
Photo of csmiley
csmiley

Ohio

2.23/5  rDev -38.4%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

A - Color is deep copper and cloudy. Minimal head with minimal lacing. The head that I could get did stick around for a while.

S - Citrus hops are out front but get quickly backed up by caramel. Bread aromas are rather strong as well.

T - Citrus hits the palate first but goes away quickly. Pine seems to step in behind. Then there is a sudden drop in hop flavor altogether. Pretty strong caramel flavors get matched up with bread dough.

M - Medium bodied and not even close to the amount of carbonation that I would expect.

D - Drinkability is low. This is an IPA that does not have any redeeming qualities that would warrant me buying more. Too many characteristics were just not that impressive.

Serving type: bottle

03-19-2008 03:12:41 | More by csmiley
Photo of ccrida
ccrida

Oregon

2.42/5  rDev -33.1%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

Poured from a 22 oz bomber into a nonic pint, the Mongoose IPA is a hazy brunt orange with modest egg shell head that quickly recedes to thin skim and leaves slight lace.

The aroma is mainly malty, but there is a definite citrus hop backbone, although it's pretty slight for a NW IPA.

The taste is not as malty as the aroma, lots of citrus flavor, really more lemon then grapefruit like most of the hop-bomb NW IPAs. Almost like a pale with lemon juice squeezed in. The malt is reminiscent of gingerbread, and there is a nice hop bitterness on the finish.

The mouthfeel is a bit thick and pushes cloying. The malt here is too much and not refreshing or tempered enough by the hops.

This wasn't too good IMHO. Not enough aroma or flavoring hops, or at least ones that I like. I'm pretty sure I'll never bother with this again.

Serving type: bottle

06-15-2007 01:25:53 | More by ccrida
Photo of Nachos4two
Nachos4two

Illinois

2.5/5  rDev -30.9%

04-11-2013 17:34:58 | More by Nachos4two
Photo of bef126
bef126

Texas

2.5/5  rDev -30.9%

10-01-2013 02:58:27 | More by bef126
Photo of pinotboy007
pinotboy007

Virginia

2.55/5  rDev -29.6%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

A - Dirty water brown with a light soapy head that vanishes almost instantly. No lacing. There are some floaties. Reminds me a tiny bit of a cask drawn ale.

S - Caramel, malt, and hops with a touch of peat.

T - Some bitter hops that go down a bit "hot" on the finish. There's a touch of single malt flavor to this, too.

M - Its weakest component; watery with only a hint of creaminess and carbonation.

D - Average only in the sense that this ale would probably be quite refreshing in the summer heat. Tried it with some smoked ribs tonight (a mistake). Oh, well.

Serving type: bottle

11-10-2008 23:38:37 | More by pinotboy007
Photo of DoubleJ
DoubleJ

California

2.58/5  rDev -28.7%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 1 | overall: 2

I don't recall if my home state receives Hale's, but I grabbed one of these while I was in 'zona. On to the beer:

There was a little colony of yeast on the bottom of the bottle, so I poured about 10-11 ounces of the 12 ounce bottle into my shaker pint glass. Hardly any head forms on top this hazy, one could argue cloudy, glass of iced tea amber color. Some hop cones in the nose, reminiscent of grapefruit peel. Not a terriby intense aroma. Bits of cough drop sweetness hinted.

The taste is alright here. The texture, meanwhile, is to be frowned upon. It's like drinking water. It's unacceptably thin for a 6% ABV beer, and carbonation is next to nothing. Grapefruit skins are tasted at first. Faint note of caramel, and a light sour grapefruit note. Like a classic early 90s Pacific Northwest IPA, some hops, a little yeast, and not overly bitter.

This could be a pretty good IPA, but there's no texture to this beer. Because of that, I would not make this an everyday beer, and I don't feel the urge of making a second purchase of this.

Serving type: bottle

03-21-2009 05:49:56 | More by DoubleJ
Photo of BAS
BAS

Washington

2.68/5  rDev -26%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Poured with vigor into a footed highball glass from a 22oz bottle.

A: Cloudy wheat-orange with a nice white head, average lacing, average retention.
S: Dull for an IPA. Medium kick. Medium hops, citrus and floral notes present.
T: Medium hops (for an IPA), slightly watery, slightly tart on the edge of grapefruit. Minor citrus and floral flavors. Not a strong IPA, and not very complex, but drinkable.
M: Medium carbonation. A little on the dry side. Tart citrus oils tend to stick around for a while.

Overall a drinkable, simple IPA. Very much an average brew.

Serving type: bottle

10-28-2012 20:58:13 | More by BAS
Photo of Tiriansdoor
Tiriansdoor


2.75/5  rDev -24%

04-16-2012 06:03:09 | More by Tiriansdoor
Photo of Dansting
Dansting

Kansas

2.8/5  rDev -22.7%
look: 4.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Bomber bottle. Poured a slightly cloudy copper color with a light white head. Nice lacing. Aroma is hoppy but kind of off. Not a normal IPA hoppy aroma. Mouthfeel is nice. Flavor is very bitter and not much else. Heavy in grapefruit, but none of the floral hoppiness of the good IPAs. I was excited that this was available in Kansas, but this really let me down.

Serving type: bottle

08-07-2008 02:16:33 | More by Dansting
Photo of Spikester
Spikester

Oregon

2.88/5  rDev -20.4%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Poured cloudy amber with a good two inch head from an agressive pour. Good hoppy pine aroma. Very low on the IPA register. Good drinkable beer much closer to an APA in taste profile. Or, an IPA light. Good session brew. From a bottle. Served about 55 deg. F. Unsure of age might be an issue in low hop flavor.

Serving type: bottle

07-15-2011 07:04:39 | More by Spikester
Photo of jkdrummer
jkdrummer

Washington

2.88/5  rDev -20.4%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 3

A: Little head, no lacing, cloudy amber blah

S: Not much to write about -- smells like old hops, sweetness detectable.

T: Sweet like honey and malty little IPA characteristics detectable at all.

M: This and FLAT.

D: Would have been better with carb. For some reason this IPA was FLAT! Bad Quality Control maybe? Really disappointed in Hales -- they ain't what they used to be.

Not recommended.

Serving type: bottle

03-04-2008 00:14:14 | More by jkdrummer
Photo of Vancer
Vancer

Illinois

2.88/5  rDev -20.4%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Crystal clear amber orange pour, small white head that pooped out too quick. It is leaving some traces of a sticky white lace.

Subtle, and I mean subtle, notes of florals here, you really have to sniff hard to pull ‘em in. And whoo, the quaff is a small pop of hoppy florals, finishing with a harsh coating of rotting pine. Not exactly a world beater here.

Dry and crisp, a decent try and I’m glad I tried, but I won’t knock down any doors to get this again. They’re trying, it just falls short a tad.

Serving type: bottle

12-01-2006 21:31:02 | More by Vancer
Photo of desertbronze
desertbronze

Idaho

2.9/5  rDev -19.9%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 3

12 oz. twist-top bottle. Poured into a tulip glass.

Almost no head, even with an aggressive pour into the middle of the glass. What foam there was faded immediately. No lace left on the glass.

Amber colored beer - a little cloudy - typical of a dry hopped beer. Not much hop aroma - smells malty and faintly alcoholic. Malt flavor comes through first. Then the hop bitterness wakes up your taste buds, although the beer is not as bitter as I expect an IPA to be.

Good mouthfeel - not too heavy, but leaves some hop flavor to savor for a few minutes. Well balanced between malt and hops.

I could drink several of these on a hot day. It's an OK beer, but an IPA that costs around $9 for a sixer should have some hop aroma, IMO. If it's the only IPA in the beer case, I might go for it. If I have alternatives, I would go for those.

Serving type: bottle

05-10-2009 22:25:42 | More by desertbronze
Photo of SethB2
SethB2

California

2.93/5  rDev -19.1%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Poured out of a bottle into a pint glass.

Appearance and smell are both fairly typical of a west coast IPA. Some citris hops and a small amount of malty sweetness. Overall, very nice. The taste, well, I'm not sure about that. The first sip was very metallic and it went down super dry, leaving an aftertaste that wasn't all that pleasant. I let it warm a bit, thinking I might have served it a little cool. It helped, but the metal was still there. I have more in the fridge and will re-review if I got a bad bottle, but I don't think I did.

Serving type: bottle

04-02-2006 18:04:10 | More by SethB2
Photo of gdhawley
gdhawley

Minnesota

3/5  rDev -17.1%

11-16-2011 14:49:22 | More by gdhawley
Photo of johnnyboy76
johnnyboy76

Oregon

3/5  rDev -17.1%

02-01-2014 02:29:21 | More by johnnyboy76
Photo of gpawned
gpawned

Illinois

3/5  rDev -17.1%

09-30-2012 06:22:52 | More by gpawned
Photo of doughanson78
doughanson78

Washington

3/5  rDev -17.1%

11-15-2011 09:45:27 | More by doughanson78
Photo of rhinos00
rhinos00

Colorado

3/5  rDev -17.1%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 3

Received this as an extra from cannabanaceae. Poured from a 12 oz. bottle into a pint glass.

A- To tell you the truth, this is one of those beers where as soon as you start pouring you know it's not going to pretty. Pours a murky, burnt orange. Virtually no head to speak of.

S- Had to coax out the scent with a few swirls of the glass. I get some citrus hops and a little bit of malt, but not much else. Very faint.

T- The taste isn't half bad. Actually it's a huge improvement when compared to everything else about this beer. Up front there a decent presence of hops that give off a slightly bitter, orange rind zest. There is a subtle sweetness due to the malt presence at the back end.

M- Horrid! Lacked any body whatsoever. I mind as well have been drinking seltzer water that had no carbonation. The beer completely fell apart at this stage.

D- Given the water-like mouthfeel, it went down pretty easy.

Overall, this beer failed on many levels. At least the taste was up to par. If I came across it, I would maybe buy one bottle just to make sure I didn't get a bad bottle the first time through.

Serving type: bottle

04-22-2009 02:19:39 | More by rhinos00
Photo of sharpski
sharpski

Oregon

3/5  rDev -17.1%

07-18-2014 03:45:10 | More by sharpski
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Hale's Mongoose IPA from Hale's Ales Brewery & Pub
82 out of 100 based on 196 ratings.