Lammin Kataja Olut - Lammin Sahti Oy
Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
Ratings: 113 | Reviews: 98 | Display Reviews Only:
3.45/5 rDev +5.5%
The beer (can I call it that) poured into the chalice (unsure what glass to use as well) a hazy brownish golden with zero head. The bottle had a barely audible hiss when opened, but the carbonation level was almost none.
The aroma was earthy much like a farmhouse ale. Coupled with that earthy presence was a low caramel maltiness and a light almost Belgian yeast spice.
The flavor was sour, but not over the top with a light grain flavor and a low caramel flavor. The sourness was acidic in nature and worked well in the grand scheme of things, but the beverage was still one dimensional. Some slight fruit flavors were present, but no spice and hardly any grain other than the low caramel.
The finish was dry and slightly grainy, but only very slightly. A light sour impression lasted into the aftertaste. The body was medium and it was flat. Sahti kinda grows on you, but at $5 a pop, this one probably won't be revisited. It would be nice to try an example with some carbonation.
11.2 ounce bottle. Thanks MABZ!!!
07-21-2005 23:39:24 | More by GCBrewingCo
4.5/5 rDev +37.6%
Lammin's Kataja Olut is malty sweet and tart with clear notes of juniper, but not too much.
It pours a golden amber with very little head (which is expected for the style). In the nose it's delicately fruity, with notes that are hard to define (tart berry, citrus), and a bit earthy/musty. It's medium-full bodied, dextrinous, and quite smooth across the palate with a very mild caress on the tongue. The maltiness is sweet and somewhat caramelish; off-set by some hard to describe juniper branch flavors (spruce tips?, musty leather) and delicate fruitiness (tart red berries, lemon). There's no noticeable bitterness, but it's tart edge balances it well enough.
Since Sahti is a live product, it will change quickly. Fresh examples are sweet and not tart at all, but bottles that have been around for a while can become quite sour. This is a very good example of the style.
06-22-2005 11:11:04 | More by NeroFiddled
3.75/5 rDev +14.7%
Kudos for having such a cute stubby bottle. With a bright red bottlecap to match the label, no less.
Pours a light ruby into my tulip with absolutely no head. A little bit of bubbles towards the end to indicate that it is carbonated. But barely.
The aroma smells like some of my favorite diacetyl beers without the nutiness. A bit of sour fruit, earthiness.
Yum. Diacetyl rush with a light crisp fruity trip into a sour berry end. Not enough to pucker, but enough to leave this earthy lingering taste on the palate that seems to coat it entirely. I don't know if it is actually supposed to taste like this, nor have I had other sahti to compare, but it tastes pretty good for an almost flat beer.
The mouthfeel is odd. While it isn't entirely flat, it's much more lightly carbonated than I'm used to. And it somehow manages to coat the tongue. Hmmm, who would have thought about body from such a clear beer. And while it is a pretty good beer, the price is too prohibitive to make this a habit. 5 clams for the bottle. Ouch!
05-25-2005 00:16:03 | More by twilight
1.38/5 rDev -57.8%
Barely releases any pssht with the popping of the cap. Carbonation is non-existant. Pours out to a slightly hazy dark caramel, unable to form a head with no lacing. The aroma is predominately of malt with an emphasis on caramel, butterscotch, and sickly toffee. Mouthfeel is sickly syrupy and flat with a medium-dense body, leaving a gross coating in the mouth. The taste is sweet and malty, but not in a good way...more of an "August Schell" or "Berghoff" way. Diacetyl is predominant. No real bitterness to speak of. Kinda doughy and metallic. Other reviews mention sourness and juniper. I get none of either.
Well, pretty boring to me. I have no interest in ever drinking this again. It tastes like an English IPA without the hops. Hard to finish. No redeeming qualities. A complete waste of $4.49.
05-15-2005 20:45:39 | More by Mitchster
2.5/5 rDev -23.5%
Short 330 mL bottle with red label and a viking style helmet on the front.
Appearance: Poured a light amber color, somewhat remenescent of fruit tea which would will be a recurring theme in this review. Absolutely NO head at all.
Smell: Not a very strong smell, but somewhat of a fuit odor.
Taste: What first struck me about this beer is the flatness. Perhaps this was just this bottle, but there was absolutely no foam or carbonation to speak of. The flavor reminded me of weak fruit tea.
Moutfeel: No carbonation, flat mouthfeel.
Drinkability: Definitely not worth the money I spent on the bottle, around $5 if I remember right. The beer was OK overall but not something I will seek out againl.
04-17-2005 19:57:04 | More by OatherS
2.9/5 rDev -11.3%
Had a bottle at CAH...$9.75...ouch.
Poured into a tumbler. No head. Cloudy brown. Smell was weak. I was expecting a little juniper hit in the nose, but nothing was present. Taste was pleasingly sweet, but with the lack of any juniper bite. It's as if they brewed this for export thinking that non-Finns wouldn't be able to handle anything over-the-top or complex. Damn marketing firm. Mouthfeel was dominated by the sweetness with some surprising carbonation (because bubbles were tough to spot.) Of course, if you like somewhat sweet beers this is an easy to imbibe. Fell way short of expectations and certainly not worth the premium price that I paid for it. Had to order a draft Goudenband to recover my taste buds.
04-08-2005 11:50:46 | More by pentathlete
2.88/5 rDev -11.9%
Wow what a disappointment. I was expecting the Juniper to jump out and kick my taste buds in the ...
Did not happen, what I did get was a sour tasting, somewhat malty brew with little carbonation and no real head to speak of. Was it awful? No. Was it a unique taste experience? Hardly. Too bland and characterless. I would have preferred a lambic or gueze to this one, Again, not bad but nothing worth seking out.
03-27-2005 01:19:46 | More by Citadel82
3.53/5 rDev +8%
Came to me hightly recommended - "the ale brewed with juniper branches". It is my first sahti and surely not my last.
The Olut poured with no head and left a thin rim of white-crisp bubbles, a pale swirl on the surface, and a sticky lace. The color was that of a thick, rich cider. Notably, there was a continuous up flow of very tiny carbonation power houses. The nose was so subtle and difficult to place - tart, slightly sweet with a soft juniper finish. The crisp base tone tartness met with a strong carbonation which rose up the tongue's underside then carried the bass and mid tones high up in the palate and finished by sweeping it crisp and clean.
This was a different and interesting brew. I find it curious that my sample bottle was characterized by such a big carbonation when other reviewers longed for such. I was pleased with this refreshing selection.
03-13-2005 17:39:40 | More by yoko
3.85/5 rDev +17.7%
11.2oz dark brown bottle. No freshness date.
It's difficult to compare the looks of a non-filtered Sahti to any typical farmhouse ale, so that said, it's hard to grade it poorly in comparison.
It pours a hazy orange-hued dull amber color with a minimal bubbly beige head that leaves thin sliding lace in its wake.
It smells somewhat like fresh cut birch, with a faint smell wet hay and distant smoked meat.
The thin malt body is sharp-edged and a bit harsh, but it provides an interesting backbone for the bitterness of the woody tasting juniper branch. A light lemony tartness lasts throughout, as does a Gueze-like apple cider vinegar taste. The 7.0% abv is well disguised.
This fragile brew has a short shelf life, so be sure to get it as fresh as possible
03-12-2005 15:51:46 | More by BeerResearcher
4/5 rDev +22.3%
11.2 oz bottle obtained from John's Grocery (Iowa City) in Feb 2005 and consumed a couple evenings later. No freshness date, which is a concern because Sahti is suppose to be served fresh (well, that's what the BA article says). Hard poured to get almost a thin layer of white head over a cloudy apple cider colored liquid. Smells piney with mild cherry sour, raspberry, and rhubarb. Tastes sour with notable piney flavors at first. Fruity flavors appear momentarily including apples (like hard cider), raspberry, and strawberries. It's quite dry, which makes it a bit difficult for me to pick out additional fruits, although there clearly are more than I listed above. The end, during the swallow has a chalky kind of bark flavor that persists well into the aftertaste, which also includes tart grapefruit. This is sour, but not as sour at the Lammin Sahti I had a couple nights ago. It also doesn't have as much depth in scent and flavor. Carbonation is very mild and, with it's counterpart, it does share a late burst of of fine bubbles that form on the flat of my tongue and tear it apart with an acrid ummph. Overall, it leaves me with an impression of a dry and barky hard cider. Medium mouthfeel. Fairly drinkable, I could certainly handle another (which I couldn't of the Lammin Sahti the other night). I highly recommend trying this bevereage one evening in preparation for the Lammin Sahti the next evening. This was a challenging beverage. I'm glad I had the opportunity to try it and would eagerly have another in the future.
03-07-2005 05:43:42 | More by mentor
4.3/5 rDev +31.5%
Open mind. Pour.
Moderately hazy, coppery-gold in hue with a peachy highlight; the color is quite attractive. There wasnt any animation and the head didnt form properly (in the sense the head didnt form like beers typically do, maybe this is appropriate for a Sahti?). There was a tight cap of bubbles that formed a collar around the edge of the class. No subsequent lacing. There is something unique about the appearance. Im interested. The nose is sharp and very raw; dare I say it is lambic-like. Upfront is a blast of menthol herbalness, like organic Vics Vapor Rub, odd yet interesting. There is acidity like a Gueuze. The juniper is most noticeable. Brine. There are lightly musty too. Vinegar. Orange yogurt. JuicyFruit candy. I am surprised at the raw complexity in this beer; I kept on smelling it only to detect more aromas. The potency is moderate but it is plenty articulate, I will not lie, Im not sure what this beer is saying. It is more intriguing than inviting. It is drinking time. If you like Gueuze seek this beer out. I am very impressed with the palate. It is tart and puckering, the acidity is refreshing and energizing. There is a very unique taste, like orange and berry yogurt upfront. In the middle I found some piney qualities, they are dissimilar to the piney taste of hops, this is completely different. Herbal. Raw. Woody. Leather. Lemon zest. It is even weakly nutty. Tart at the finish, dry with a slight bit of alcohol warmth and some bready/nutty characteristics. The juniper is heavy in the finish, it lingers into the aftertaste, that JuicyFruit sensation reemerges. The aftertaste is long and fairly sweet with a nutty twang. The alcohol is hidden in the palate but it does hit the brain and stomach, my belly warmed quickly (the acidity might have something to do with that too). This beer is a funky son of a bitch and you know what? I really like it! Hell yeah! I had no idea what to expect but I am quite impressed. Medium in body, the carbonation is low but at no point does that negate any aspect of the mouthfeel, if fact the mouthfeel seems very sturdy. Nice! Id say this beer would be great with funky blue cheese. This beer has that oddly compelling vibe to it, it is like Gose in that sense. The palate is wacky yet so damn refreshing and agreeable. I would not recommend this beer to anybody but a hardcore beer nerd and mostly likely somebody who really digs Belgian funk/acidity. Who knew Finland rocked like this! I will have to buy more the next time I see this beer. I purchased this bottle in Iowa City, IA.
I am now a Sahti fan.
02-24-2005 03:17:13 | More by bditty187
3.33/5 rDev +1.8%
Presentation: 11.2 oz brown stubby with no freshness date, says on the label Ale brewed with natural flavor (Juniper Branches).
Appearance: Very little carbonation, not much of a lace at all. Clear copper color, the beer was poured with care to leave the sediment in the bottle.
Smell: Musty lemons, faint hard-boiled egg and a steely aroma. Canned mandarin oranges?
Taste & Mouth Feel: Wow canned mandarin oranges on the palate. Carbonation is next to nothing with a moderate body. Pretty damn tart from the get go, mildly lambic-like. Walnut skins. Musty nearly chalky with a drying tartness, lemony with a sharpness of the juniper riding it back.
Drinkability & Notes: Weird I sort of like the flavor, it has grown on me after several sips. If the carbonation had a nice sharp spike of crispness to it Id probably love it.
02-14-2005 02:35:43 | More by Jason
3.6/5 rDev +10.1%
I'm told that this is a variation on their regular Sahti (and that term is clearly printed on the label). No more information is available on their website, as this isn't even listed there.
Pours a murk-laden toasted golden with an intial eggy bubble or two. All carbonation is gone after a few moments.
Ripe with raspberry yogurt, lemon juice, and brine-cured cheese on the nose. A backing caramel-nut bread provides foundation.
Begins doughy, but is immediately slashed with a pink lemonade sweettartness. A bit nutty at the turn, then ceded wholly to lemon, but more tea-like now. Juniper branches lends a rotting berry sourness. Traces of cilantro leafiness. It rides out like a piece of leather cured in oak, pickling brine and lemon-juice-spiked tea. Medium bodied, feeling brawnier with it's lack of carbonation.
My only reference point would be to compare this to an Oud Bruin/Witbier cross.
I wasn't sure what to expect, and I'm not sure what I actually got.
Subjectively, it is certainly interesting, but objectively nearly impossible to score due to lack of experience.
01-10-2005 08:15:45 | More by cokes
Lammin Kataja Olut from Lammin Sahti Oy
76 out of 100 based on 113 ratings.