1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Wheat Wacker - Black Diamond Brewing Co.

Not Rated.
Wheat WackerWheat Wacker

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
80
good

35 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 35
Reviews: 15
rAvg: 3.48
pDev: 11.78%
Wants: 0
Gots: 2 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Black Diamond Brewing Co. visit their website
California, United States

Style | ABV
American Dark Wheat Ale |  7.00% ABV

Availability: Summer

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: GRG1313 on 07-07-2011)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50  | next › last »
Ratings: 35 | Reviews: 15 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of innominat
3/5  rDev -13.8%

innominat, Aug 25, 2014
Photo of GClarkage
4/5  rDev +14.9%

GClarkage, Jul 07, 2014
Photo of HamdenHector
3.29/5  rDev -5.5%
look: 4 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3.25

A: somewhat cloudy; honey colored; 2 finger white head that receded slowly and had nice lacing;

S: an interesting combination of wheat and grassy, piney hops:

T: exactly as advertised; a hoppy wheat beer; that profile stayed consistent from start to finish;

M: light to medium bodied; slightly over carbonated;

O: I had low expectations and while this isn't a beer I would seek out, I was pleasantly surprised;

HamdenHector, Jul 02, 2014
Photo of wrightst
3.75/5  rDev +7.8%

wrightst, Jun 14, 2014
Photo of MeganPhillips
3.25/5  rDev -6.6%

MeganPhillips, Jan 11, 2014
Photo of JAFoley
3.04/5  rDev -12.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 2.75 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3.25

A - Pale clear yellow body with three fingers of white head. Very good retention but no lacing.

S - citrus and pine

T - Mildly citrus hops and citrus from the Belgian yeast.

M - Medium/light body and moderate carbonation. Somewhat sticky

O - Kind of a one note beer and drinks kinda like soda. Not bad and very drinkable, but won't be picking this up again.

JAFoley, Jan 05, 2014
Photo of TheManiacalOne
3.55/5  rDev +2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Poured from a 22oz bottle into a US tumbler pint glass.

A: The beer is a deep gold color, with a large off-white head that fades slowly and leaves a spotty lace on the glass.

S: The aroma contains floral hops, wheat, caramelized malts and some citrus.

T: The taste starts out with a mildly tart citrus flavor. Then a bit of caramel sweetness comes in. Next there’s a strong hops bitterness for the style and some wheat breadiness although there isn’t much balance. The after-taste is slightly bready and slightly hoppy.

M: Crisp and a little smooth, medium body, medium carbonation, finish is slightly sticky.

O: A little tasty, goes down ok, not too filling, good kick, decent representation of style, it’s an ok beer worth drinking for a while.

TheManiacalOne, Nov 14, 2013
Photo of jaxray8
4/5  rDev +14.9%

jaxray8, Oct 14, 2013
Photo of GraduatedCashew
3.5/5  rDev +0.6%

GraduatedCashew, Aug 29, 2013
Photo of Smurf2055
3.75/5  rDev +7.8%

Smurf2055, Aug 08, 2013
Photo of Rick778
3/5  rDev -13.8%

Rick778, Jun 03, 2013
Photo of Boone757
3.5/5  rDev +0.6%

Boone757, May 29, 2013
Photo of johntfox
3.5/5  rDev +0.6%

johntfox, May 21, 2013
Photo of DrunkinYogi
3.5/5  rDev +0.6%

DrunkinYogi, May 16, 2013
Photo of GeckoPunk
3.46/5  rDev -0.6%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

A - Drank straight from the bomber. Cannot perform a full review on looks.

S - The smell was much better directly after the beer was opened than 15 minutes afterwards. Simcoe/Citra hops. Citrousy. Very faint Belgian yeast.

T - Completely agree with the grassy reviews. Slight, but certainly not predominant Belgian funk. Citrousy orange/lemon. Barely bready. Not a fan of the thin wheat malt taste. I find it a little insufficient for this beer.

M - Well carbonated. Quite bubbly. Lingering bitterness. Not all that great, but can't complain too much about the mouthfeel.

O - At $2.99 a bomber, it's a "good price for a good beer". Not a spectacular beer, but well worth the investment. Personally, I would still spend the extra $1 for my fall-back SNPA as a replacement for this... Worth a try, but it won't become a regular in my lineup.

GeckoPunk, Apr 26, 2013
Photo of jgammoniv
4/5  rDev +14.9%

jgammoniv, Mar 19, 2013
Photo of xomin80
3.75/5  rDev +7.8%

xomin80, Jan 11, 2013
Photo of Talisker
3.25/5  rDev -6.6%

Talisker, Jan 01, 2013
Photo of lordofthewiens
3.5/5  rDev +0.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

In a pint glass this beer was gold in color. It had a fairly good-sized white head that dissipated quickly, leaving a scant amount of lace.

Grassy, outdoors aroma. Some peppery spice.

Clove taste, some citrus. A bit of Belgian funkiness.

A lot going on in this beer. Not sure how well it succeeded.

lordofthewiens, Sep 19, 2012
Photo of JAHMUR
2.5/5  rDev -28.2%

JAHMUR, Sep 11, 2012
Photo of astebelton
4/5  rDev +14.9%

astebelton, Aug 28, 2012
Photo of lacqueredmouse
2.35/5  rDev -32.5%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

This was billed as a Wheat IPA at Collins Pub in Seattle. On-tap.

Light golden hue (I don't know who classified this as a dark wheat), with a fine white head. Some patchy lace, forming fine, but insubstantial patterns on the glass. Very light body. Looks quite insipid.

Nose is weak, with a faintly foul orange character like fermented bin juice. Seedy, weedy grain gives a vegetative apology. Grassy, reedy and pointless.

Taste is light and peppery, but ultimately without merit. No wheat body or sweetness, and no fragrance or flavour from the hops. It tastes thin and struck with booze, even though it's relatively weak. A light lemon character comes through pretending to be crisp drinkability. Meh. Meh meh meh. Feel appallingly light.

I don't like this at all. It has a bitterness to it, but nothing else from the IPA style. It has a wheat thinness, but none of the good wheat beer characters. It's like an amalgam of everything that could go wrong in either style, creating a synergy of badness. Very poor indeed.

lacqueredmouse, Aug 05, 2012
Photo of mschind
3.6/5  rDev +3.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

A- Poured from a bomber producing a fluffy, off white three finger head that quickly faded to a foamy cap. Decent lacing on the way down. Color is a hazy medium gold, dark for a wheat beer.

S- Lots going on here. There's a Belgian yeast at work giving it a fruity and spicy aroma with some grassy hops.

T- The fruity esters (peach/apricot) dominate up front along with light malt sweetness. The finish is peppery with mild hop bitterness.

M- Medium body with high carbonation.

O- An interesting combination of flavors and styles. A bit too strong to be a seesion beer. It paired well with some jalapno salami and dark pretzels. Not something I would seek out by itself.

mschind, Aug 04, 2012
Photo of Docer
3.23/5  rDev -7.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Appearance: (3.5)

- Nice rather clear bright copper and straw yellow session-looking brew. Fluffy quick bright white head settled to a bubbly ring and thin layer over the brew. Solid.

Smell: (3.0)

- Kind of a roasted, caramel, wheat smacked madness with a touch of butter. Not so sure this is as it was meant to be. Certainly some diacetyl at play here. Which also doesn't usually occur if a bottle is even slightly old on the shelf, but rather pulled from the fermenter or bright tank too soon. Grassy and herbal hop notes, and a citrus finish.

Taste: (3.0)

- Nice wheat malts, and light caramel sweetness. Little bready with a tangy wheat roast. Nice resinous bittering hop, earthy, grassy, but overall a toss up. Some slight issues with this one. Not so much butter in the taste, but more astringent. Light citrus in the hop.

Mouth Feel: (4.0)

- This brew is well carbonated, and drinks well. It's a touch dry, and chewy. Medium body, slight creaminess, and is overall quite good as far as the feel goes.

Overall: (3.5)

- If this brew was as clean and perfected as it was meant to be, it may have some super high marks. The early boil hopping is nice, and the wheat bill is heavy and well played, but just some slight imperfections kind of drew this beer down a notch or two. I can see where it's going though.

Docer, Jun 11, 2012
Photo of kickerofelves
4/5  rDev +14.9%

kickerofelves, Jun 01, 2012
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50  | next › last »
Wheat Wacker from Black Diamond Brewing Co.
80 out of 100 based on 35 ratings.