1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Wheat Wacker - Black Diamond Brewing Co.

Not Rated.
Wheat WackerWheat Wacker

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
80
good

37 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 37
Reviews: 16
rAvg: 3.48
pDev: 11.49%
Wants: 0
Gots: 2 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Black Diamond Brewing Co. visit their website
California, United States

Style | ABV
American Dark Wheat Ale |  7.00% ABV

Availability: Summer

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: GRG1313 on 07-07-2011)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Recent | Likes | High | Low | Top Raters
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50  | next › last »
Ratings: 37 | Reviews: 16 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of BabaBeer
3.5/5  rDev +0.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Photo of PorterLambic
3.34/5  rDev -4%
look: 3.25 | smell: 2.75 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Pours a slightly hazy, golden orange color with a decently sized, off-white head. Retention is pretty good and the lacing is solid and sticky. For a dark wheat it doesn't seem any darker than any other wheat.
Smell is a bit weak, with sweet grainy note, a bit of tartness/sour citrus, wheat and malt.
Taste is grassy, malt, light citrus, wheat and a not unsubstantial alcohol warmth. Balance is pretty good.
Medium bodied, reasonably smooth and with a solid warming aspect. Effervescence is restrained. It drinks like an Imperial wheat - which I've never heard of - and in that mindset this is a really good beer. As a standard wheat, it's ok. Either way, the nose is a bit off so don't take a deep whiff before you sip and it'll be good.

Photo of innominat
3/5  rDev -13.8%

Photo of GClarkage
4/5  rDev +14.9%

Photo of HamdenHector
3.29/5  rDev -5.5%
look: 4 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3.25

A: somewhat cloudy; honey colored; 2 finger white head that receded slowly and had nice lacing;

S: an interesting combination of wheat and grassy, piney hops:

T: exactly as advertised; a hoppy wheat beer; that profile stayed consistent from start to finish;

M: light to medium bodied; slightly over carbonated;

O: I had low expectations and while this isn't a beer I would seek out, I was pleasantly surprised;

Photo of wrightst
3.75/5  rDev +7.8%

Photo of MeganPhillips
3.25/5  rDev -6.6%

Photo of JAFoley
3.04/5  rDev -12.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 2.75 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3.25

A - Pale clear yellow body with three fingers of white head. Very good retention but no lacing.

S - citrus and pine

T - Mildly citrus hops and citrus from the Belgian yeast.

M - Medium/light body and moderate carbonation. Somewhat sticky

O - Kind of a one note beer and drinks kinda like soda. Not bad and very drinkable, but won't be picking this up again.

Photo of TheManiacalOne
3.55/5  rDev +2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Poured from a 22oz bottle into a US tumbler pint glass.

A: The beer is a deep gold color, with a large off-white head that fades slowly and leaves a spotty lace on the glass.

S: The aroma contains floral hops, wheat, caramelized malts and some citrus.

T: The taste starts out with a mildly tart citrus flavor. Then a bit of caramel sweetness comes in. Next there’s a strong hops bitterness for the style and some wheat breadiness although there isn’t much balance. The after-taste is slightly bready and slightly hoppy.

M: Crisp and a little smooth, medium body, medium carbonation, finish is slightly sticky.

O: A little tasty, goes down ok, not too filling, good kick, decent representation of style, it’s an ok beer worth drinking for a while.

Photo of jaxray8
4/5  rDev +14.9%

Photo of GraduatedCashew
3.5/5  rDev +0.6%

Photo of Smurf2055
3.75/5  rDev +7.8%

Photo of Rick778
3/5  rDev -13.8%

Photo of Boone757
3.5/5  rDev +0.6%

Photo of johntfox
3.5/5  rDev +0.6%

Photo of DrunkinYogi
3.5/5  rDev +0.6%

Photo of GeckoPunk
3.46/5  rDev -0.6%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

A - Drank straight from the bomber. Cannot perform a full review on looks.

S - The smell was much better directly after the beer was opened than 15 minutes afterwards. Simcoe/Citra hops. Citrousy. Very faint Belgian yeast.

T - Completely agree with the grassy reviews. Slight, but certainly not predominant Belgian funk. Citrousy orange/lemon. Barely bready. Not a fan of the thin wheat malt taste. I find it a little insufficient for this beer.

M - Well carbonated. Quite bubbly. Lingering bitterness. Not all that great, but can't complain too much about the mouthfeel.

O - At $2.99 a bomber, it's a "good price for a good beer". Not a spectacular beer, but well worth the investment. Personally, I would still spend the extra $1 for my fall-back SNPA as a replacement for this... Worth a try, but it won't become a regular in my lineup.

Photo of jgammoniv
4/5  rDev +14.9%

Photo of xomin80
3.75/5  rDev +7.8%

Photo of Talisker
3.25/5  rDev -6.6%

Photo of lordofthewiens
3.5/5  rDev +0.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

In a pint glass this beer was gold in color. It had a fairly good-sized white head that dissipated quickly, leaving a scant amount of lace.

Grassy, outdoors aroma. Some peppery spice.

Clove taste, some citrus. A bit of Belgian funkiness.

A lot going on in this beer. Not sure how well it succeeded.

Photo of JAHMUR
2.5/5  rDev -28.2%

Photo of astebelton
4/5  rDev +14.9%

Photo of lacqueredmouse
2.35/5  rDev -32.5%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

This was billed as a Wheat IPA at Collins Pub in Seattle. On-tap.

Light golden hue (I don't know who classified this as a dark wheat), with a fine white head. Some patchy lace, forming fine, but insubstantial patterns on the glass. Very light body. Looks quite insipid.

Nose is weak, with a faintly foul orange character like fermented bin juice. Seedy, weedy grain gives a vegetative apology. Grassy, reedy and pointless.

Taste is light and peppery, but ultimately without merit. No wheat body or sweetness, and no fragrance or flavour from the hops. It tastes thin and struck with booze, even though it's relatively weak. A light lemon character comes through pretending to be crisp drinkability. Meh. Meh meh meh. Feel appallingly light.

I don't like this at all. It has a bitterness to it, but nothing else from the IPA style. It has a wheat thinness, but none of the good wheat beer characters. It's like an amalgam of everything that could go wrong in either style, creating a synergy of badness. Very poor indeed.

Photo of mschind
3.6/5  rDev +3.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

A- Poured from a bomber producing a fluffy, off white three finger head that quickly faded to a foamy cap. Decent lacing on the way down. Color is a hazy medium gold, dark for a wheat beer.

S- Lots going on here. There's a Belgian yeast at work giving it a fruity and spicy aroma with some grassy hops.

T- The fruity esters (peach/apricot) dominate up front along with light malt sweetness. The finish is peppery with mild hop bitterness.

M- Medium body with high carbonation.

O- An interesting combination of flavors and styles. A bit too strong to be a seesion beer. It paired well with some jalapno salami and dark pretzels. Not something I would seek out by itself.

« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50  | next › last »
Wheat Wacker from Black Diamond Brewing Co.
80 out of 100 based on 37 ratings.