Dismiss Notice
Subscribe to BeerAdvocate magazine and get 12 issues / year of fresh beer content delivered to your door each month.

Already subscribe? to manage your subscription.

Slimy Pebble Pils - North Country Brewing

Not Rated.
Slimy Pebble PilsSlimy Pebble Pils

Educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
80
good

15 Reviews
THE BROS
-
no score

(Send Samples)
Reviews: 15
Hads: 55
rAvg: 3.35
pDev: 14.93%
Wants: 2
Gots: 9 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
North Country Brewing visit their website
Pennsylvania, United States

Style | ABV
German Pilsener |  5.00% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes & Commercial Description:
Beer added by: WVbeergeek on 12-24-2013

No notes at this time.
Beer: Reviews & Ratings
Sort by:  Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
first ← prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | nextlast
Reviews: 15 | Hads: 55
Reviews by tone77:
Photo of tone77
3.36/5  rDev +0.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3.25

A big thanks to the legendary woodychandler for this beer. Poured from a 12 oz. can. Has a rich golden color with a 1/2 inch head. Smell is of grains, some mild malts. Taste is light, grains, malts, floral, a bit of an unusual aftertaste. Feels light in the mouth and overall is a mediocre beer. (295 characters)

More User Reviews:
Photo of woodychandler
3.5/5  rDev +4.5%

The CANQuest (TM) is up and running today! I have divested myself of so many bottles that it is silly, but now I am back where I belong.

From the CAN: "1% of all sales helps fight stupidity."; "A true Pilsner beer"; "You [CAN] only embrace freedom if you take responsibility. S[CAN] Your C[AN]!"; "Enjoy responsibly & Please recycle".

I got a little spritz across the fingers on the Crack! which usually indicates good carbonation. It was a brimful craft CAN, for sure, and I found out that it is often by design to reduce head space (primary) and to make the CANsumer happy (secondary). I actually initiated an Inverted Glug, but I had to back off when the head became too much to CANtrol. The pseudo-cascade settled into two-plus fingers of dense, rocky, bone-white head with moderate retention. Color was Solid Gold (SRM = 5), baby, with NE-quality clarity! Of course, this was like a Siren call to the Unholy Trio of Croesus, Mammon and Midas, still coming off of their earlier high. I often wonder why, with all of their gelt, they feel the need to hit me up for some. I guess that is how they hang onto their riches. Nose left no question that it was a German-style Pils, since the malts were getting in the way of the grassy hops. It took me a while, but I realized that as a self-avowed hophead, I need not be CANstrained to APAs and AIPAs. Pilsners will also do the trick, but Czech Pils are the best, IMHO, because they focus on the hops, while German Pilsners allow the malts to lead the way. Mouthfeel was medium. I was pleasantly surprised by how upfront the grassy hops actually were in this one! This was not slimy at all. Granted, it was not as outright hoppy as a Czech Pils might be, but it was not heavy on the malt, either. Finish was semi-dry with the malts making a brief reappearance before allowing the hops to linger. 5% ABV puts it at the upper threshold for a session beer, but on a hot, humid Summer day, this could fill the cooler with CANs with no problem. (1,991 characters)

Photo of DWolf
3/5  rDev -10.4%

Photo of TimoP
3.75/5  rDev +11.9%

Photo of WVbeergeek
3.75/5  rDev +11.9%

Photo of mrosenfeld32
3.75/5  rDev +11.9%

Photo of tdm168
3.41/5  rDev +1.8%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 3.25

Photo of McMatt7
3.3/5  rDev -1.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Photo of Justinrkelly
5/5  rDev +49.3%

Photo of Brutaltruth
3.43/5  rDev +2.4%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3.5

Enjoyed from the can in a pint glass. This interesting pils pours a cloudy yellowish amber with a nice head of white foam that settles to a thick ring, spacious pool, and nice lacing. Nose of light grains, light caramel malts, and subtle hops, and a light touch of citrus. Flavors follow the nose with subtly sweet caramel and grains, followed by a subtle lemon peel and more grains on the background. Finish is subtly sweet with a herbal hop kick. Finish is moderately dry and subtly sweet. Decent session brew.

Cheers (526 characters)

Photo of beerthulhu
3.45/5  rDev +3%

-can. 1% of all sales helps fight stupidity.

(3.25) A: Pale lemon with a hint of orange, quick release of macro-effervesce. Soapy oatmeal colored head, has large voids, stands 2 inches in a pilsner glass that quickly dissipates to a washy covering. No lace here.

(3.20) S: Pilsner grains, hint of orange, light strength with some dried herbal hops.

(3.50) T: Dry grain flavor, light dried orange, dried herbal hops with a flash of malt sweetness. Finishes with a wet kiss of lemony hopping. Has a bit of funky grains/greenery and yeastiness after the swallow that lingers a bit.

(3.35) M: Slippery, slimy texture, or subliminal? Carbonation around the tongues edges but more laid back then crisp.

(3.45) O: Traditional german styled pilsner, decent flavor, though capping and mouthful could use some work, which is rather insignificant in retrospect. Most people have been spoiled by the amercian hop infused pilsners of late, this is more dry, with a good pilsner malt backing, with an slightly above average level of hops then an german counterpart, but trends more closer to tradition then being bastardized version. (1,129 characters)

Photo of bret717
3.75/5  rDev +11.9%

Photo of Brock915
2.81/5  rDev -16.1%
look: 3.75 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.75 | feel: 4 | overall: 3

Photo of IdrinkGas
3.25/5  rDev -3%

Photo of CountryRock2001
3.75/5  rDev +11.9%

Photo of gopens44
3/5  rDev -10.4%

Photo of PCATD
3.6/5  rDev +7.5%

Photo of DavoleBomb
2.05/5  rDev -38.8%
look: 2.75 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 1.75

Poured into a pilsner glass.

2.75 A: Clear deep yellow color. Big foamy white head requiring two pours. Retention is average and spotty lacing is left.

2.0 S: Grainy maltiness with a dusty woodiness. Nondescript fruitiness. Hmm. This isn't what I want in a pilsner. It isn't clean. There's a vegetal component that is DMS-like, but it's not quite corny.

2.0 T: The taste isn't any better. Lots of strange vegetal off-flavors. The base is again grainy with lemony fruitiness.

2.5 M: Even the mouthfeel is lacking. Medium body. Despite lots of carbonation, it seems flat on the tongue. Lacking in creaminess.

1.75 D: I hope the rest of the mixed 8-pack does better than this one. (701 characters)

Photo of crowsnest
3.75/5  rDev +11.9%

Photo of Octoberist
3.5/5  rDev +4.5%

Photo of Scott_Thomas
3.44/5  rDev +2.7%

Photo of JohnK17
3.25/5  rDev -3%

Photo of ItsBeer4Me
3.5/5  rDev +4.5%

Photo of still_thedragon
2.75/5  rDev -17.9%

Photo of IPAchris
3.5/5  rDev +4.5%

first ← prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | nextlast
Slimy Pebble Pils from North Country Brewing
80 out of 100 based on 15 ratings.