The Unforgiven Amber Ale - Rush River Brewing Company

Not Rated.
The Unforgiven Amber AleThe Unforgiven Amber Ale

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
84
good

150 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 150
Reviews: 74
rAvg: 3.71
pDev: 13.48%
Wants: 4
Gots: 15 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Rush River Brewing Company visit their website
Wisconsin, United States

Style | ABV
American Amber / Red Ale |  5.80% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: feloniousmonk on 07-14-2004)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Recent | Likes | High | Low | Top Raters
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 150 | Reviews: 74 | Display Reviews Only:
Reviews by mwilbur:
Photo of mwilbur
3.28/5  rDev -11.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Review from 8/19/12.
Poured on-tap into shaker pint.
A: Pours a golden orange hue with a thin white head.
S: Spicy hops abound. Hint of citrus.
T: Spicy (and a hint of citrus) hops. Some malt, but could be better balanced. Funny aftertaste.
M: Smooth and oily feel with a slightly bitter finish.
D: A solid and refreshing brew. Nice for drinking outside on the patio with a meal.

More User Reviews:
Photo of deebo
3.95/5  rDev +6.5%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

A-Poured into a pint glass, this beer gives about 2 fingers of large bubbled slightly off white head. The head hangs around for about half the drink with some lacing noted. A very slight haze. A light amber/orange color.

S-A hoppier aroma (clean citrus and grassy) than most amber ales. Also has a nice malty (sweet and slightly grainy) aroma.

T-Similar to the aroma. Malt and hops upfront and in the middle, ends a bit astringent and mouth drying but definitely not overpowering.

M-Crisp carbonation, balances the hops and malt very nicely. Medium bodied-quite nice for an amber, a touch creamy.

O-A bit heavy on the hops but quite nice complexity and an easy to drink brew. I can't ask for much more than that. A nicely crafted brew. First beer in about a week, so anything might taste great right now!

Photo of NilocRellim
3.45/5  rDev -7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

This ale was poured out of a bottle into a pint glass. Golden amber in colour with good clarity. Hoppy, fruity smell with citrus notes to the nose. Upon first taste, the ale was hoppy upfront with a bitter malt finish and mellow malt aftertaste.

Would I buy this beer again? Probably.

Photo of bpfrush
3.75/5  rDev +1.1%

Photo of ADR
3.75/5  rDev +1.1%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

On tap at The Happy Gnome, St. Paul, MN...

Sort of dark peach-colored brown color, translucent. Flat head dies fairly quickly, in less than 30 seconds or so. Laces in incomplete dripping rings. Aroma of lemon peel, slightly soapy in overall impression. Mouthfeel is lighter, the carbonation on this one was less than medium as well. Not a bad caramelized flavor, especially to start, almost like cinnamon rolls, with a decent bittering that makes this beer a drinkable entry and gives it good neutral balance. Some hops linger into the aftertaste. Flattish presentation, something that happens from time to time with Rush River kegs detracts a bit here.

Photo of brow1901
4.03/5  rDev +8.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4.5

A- Pours and amber yellow color with a thin white head on top. The head disappears to nothing quickly, and leaves no lacing as it goes.

S- The smell that stands out to me is the lager yeast character. Less fruity esters it seems, though it does say ale on the label. The hops smell spicy and citrus.

T- Real light, mostly just hops that stand out. Tastes like typical bitter hops that are found in a lager, (maybe it is ale yeast with saaz or hallerteu hops).

M- Real light, which is apporiate. The carbonation levels are a bit low and the finish is too slick for me.

D- Pretty drinkable for the style, I like the hops in this beer. Not the most complex but this style never is.

Photo of sgttibbs
3.5/5  rDev -5.7%

Photo of rhoadsrage
4.5/5  rDev +21.3%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4.5

(Served in an American pint glass) bottled 2wk June
A- This beer has a slightly hazy slightly dense apricot brown body with a snow globe of little bits swirling around with tiny bubbles. There is a sticky antique white head that last for most of the beer.
S- The soft sweet but very aromatic caramel malt and honey malt gives way to a soft green pine aroma that grows with each sip.
T- This beer has a slightly sweet caramel malt with some dry honey malt notes underneath. There is a soft slightly sweet biscuit note then a soft pine hint in the finish.
M- This beer has a medium mouthfeel with a creamy texture.
D- This beer has a nice full rich caramel flavor but its not sweet or sugary with a nice support of green hops underneath. If there were light classes of beers I would say this is a great light barleywine.

Photo of cokes
2.63/5  rDev -29.1%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Silty, sediment-laden pumpkin amber with a tight sticky pale khaki head.
The nose exudes plenty of wrought iron metallics and buttered dinner rolls, with a backing of hop-driven tropical fruit punch.
Into the mouth, it's all buttered bread, microwave popcorn, and heavy duty diacetyl. It's a shame, because under this oppressive curtain and burnt butter is a seemingly lovely, lightly nutty and toasty amber ale with a solid, if slightly metallic and astringent, citric and tropical hoppiness.
The mouthfeel is medium full and notably pasty with low CO2.
I've had similar problems with diacetyl in their Small Axe (and to a far lesser extent, Bubblejack IPA). Either they are wildly inconsistant, or I am particularly sensitive about their yeast. Regardless, I think I'm done with them.

Photo of dirtylou
4.33/5  rDev +16.7%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

12oz single, filler in a mixed six pack

appearance: poured into an imperial pint glass, a rather copper body with a fluffy beige cap and decent retention...nice

smell: i was rather surprised to find out that this beer has quite a nice hop profile, sharp citrus and bubblegum combined with a nice grassy malt core...i like what i smell

taste: this is a nice amber ale, i'd definitely drink it on tap if that were an option. I love the hop profile - juicy citrus and bubblegum, tangerine, peach....grassy caramel malts...lovely

mouthfeel: smooth and crisp

drinkability: high

Photo of tempest
4/5  rDev +7.8%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

On-tap at the Blue Nile.

I'd always ignored this beer when I visited the Nile. I mean, next to Furious and Bender, who needed it? Well it turns out this beer kind of kicks ass. It's a hoppy amber, like Troeg's Hopback Amber for anyone that's tried it.

It looks like a typical amber with a dark orange body and white head. The aroma is big on citrus hops and the taste matches. All the while, there's a nice balancing, biscuity malt presence that separates this beer from a pale ale.

Overall, there's a lot of nice hop and malt flavors going on in what makes for a very drinkable and tasty beer. Worth a try.

Photo of Fr0stb1te
3/5  rDev -19.1%

Photo of Giesch
3.4/5  rDev -8.4%

Photo of morimech
3.95/5  rDev +6.5%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

Pours a cloudy orange color with a thin head that quickly disappears. It is an unfiltered beer so some particulate matter is floating about the beer. Just a little lacing left on the glass surface.

Has a nice citrus hop aroma. Not much else to comment on.

This beer comes alive where it counts most, the taste. Starts off with a citric bite but quickly the malt mellows the flavor out.

Has a lighte body with a bit of a harsh carbonation that bites the tongue.

Highly drinkable with a lighter body and low ABV. A very good Amber Ale.

Photo of Ek0nomik
3.28/5  rDev -11.6%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Poured In: Pint Glass
Drank At: Haymarket Grill (Eau Claire, WI)

This is the second Rush River that I have had on tap, and both times they have come out quite clear. The bottle I have had was definitely cloudy so you could see how it wasn't filtered. Perhaps the sediment is settling at the bottom of the keg.

Appearance: Amber.

Smell: Very strong malt and bread aroma.

Taste: A sweet malt caramel flavor. I noticed a lot of people claiming quite noticeable hop flavor and scent, but I didn't detect these.

Mouthfeel: Medium body.

Drinkability: It was a good brew, and worth trying. I wouldn't pick it up again though. I'd stick to their Bubblejack IPA.

Photo of raygaymadness
2.73/5  rDev -26.4%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2.5

This beer does not follow a traditional amber.
Pros. Nice up front taste..malty but not overpowering.
Cons. It has a tingling hop aftertaste that is almost unnatural for a amber beer. Maybe a good start to drinking craft beers but it has nothing that makes you go wow.. this is tasty. That being said rush river does have some nice beers but a little more grain and less hops would make this beer more apealing.

Photo of Kunstman
3.75/5  rDev +1.1%

Photo of deanis30
3.75/5  rDev +1.1%

Photo of tourdot
2.75/5  rDev -25.9%

Photo of MoyaHoya
2.5/5  rDev -32.6%

Photo of troyvar
3.75/5  rDev +1.1%

Photo of BeerFMAndy
3.45/5  rDev -7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

12 oz bottle poured into a Sierra Nevada imperial pint.
Mar. Wk3 notched on the label, no info.

A - More golden orange than amber, it's lighter in hue than I expected it to be. A low off-white head leaves good lace clinging to the glass in coiled rings.

S - A mellow hop combination of dirty earth and citrus lies in wait, waiting to strike. Yeasty undertones and caramel malt provide the base.

T - I expected the hops to strike like a snake and inject their bitter venom into my throat. Instead what I get is a good combination of citrus and earth that's balanced heavily by caramel malt.

M - Hardly biting bitter, this timid serpent of an amber is medium-bodied and balanced with a smooth mouthfeel.

O - Where they land around average with an amber ale, well-balanced nonetheless, they gain serious points for having a coiled snake on the label of "The Unforgiven" Whether or not they intended to allude to the Metallica song from the "Black Album" featuring the same coiled snake matters not to me as I listened to it with the beer regardless.

Photo of Wiscodrinker
3.32/5  rDev -10.5%

Photo of SF_Posse
2.6/5  rDev -29.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Dissapointed with this beer. It looks great on the poor.

Photo of Bighorn
2.5/5  rDev -32.6%

« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
The Unforgiven Amber Ale from Rush River Brewing Company
84 out of 100 based on 150 ratings.