1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Saranac Rauchbier - Matt Brewing Company

Not Rated.
Saranac RauchbierSaranac Rauchbier

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
76
okay

69 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 69
Reviews: 59
rAvg: 3.29
pDev: 14.29%
Wants: 2
Gots: 0 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Matt Brewing Company visit their website
New York, United States

Style | ABV
Rauchbier |  5.60% ABV

Availability: Winter

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: Estarrio on 10-19-2006)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 69 | Reviews: 59 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of buzzy
3.25/5  rDev -1.2%

buzzy, Feb 23, 2014
Photo of jaydoc
3.5/5  rDev +6.4%

jaydoc, Jan 05, 2014
Photo of dgherm
3.25/5  rDev -1.2%

dgherm, Jul 29, 2013
Photo of herrburgess
3/5  rDev -8.8%

herrburgess, May 27, 2013
Photo of Slatetank
3.25/5  rDev -1.2%

Slatetank, May 21, 2013
Photo of cliff1066
3.5/5  rDev +6.4%

cliff1066, Dec 11, 2012
Photo of chrispoint
2.5/5  rDev -24%

chrispoint, Feb 18, 2012
Photo of Beertracker
3/5  rDev -8.8%

Beertracker, Dec 15, 2011
Photo of rab53
3/5  rDev -8.8%

rab53, Dec 02, 2011
Photo of tclapper
4/5  rDev +21.6%

tclapper, Nov 17, 2011
Photo of mikesgroove
3.28/5  rDev -0.3%

a decent pour for the style as it settles in and gives off a nice two finger head tha slips down the sides of the glass effortlessly.aroma was smoked to high heaven, but rather one sided, some touches of a cough syrup like smell coming off it as it warmed, not sure what that was, but hints of grain buried underneath as well. The flavor was surprisingly good though. Rich notes here of peat and malted grains, nice roasted touches and a very nice and well balanced grain bill. Definitely a very nice flavor and it took me off guard, the feel was a bit thin and one sided, but still not terrible.

mikesgroove, Jul 02, 2011
Photo of THECPJ
2.55/5  rDev -22.5%

Reviewed from notes

Appearance: dark golden yellow with ½ finger white head

Smell: smokey malts, hint of spices

Taste: malts, smoke-but not overpowering, slight sweetness

Mouthfeel: mild carbonation, medium body

Drinkability: the smokiness is not really my thing, just can't get into it.

Cheers!
The CPJ

THECPJ, Mar 04, 2011
Photo of ClockworkOrange
3.05/5  rDev -7.3%

A 12 ounce bottle from a mixed pack. Poured into a standard shaker glass. This rauch appears a clear medium chestnut color with a finger of fizzy ecru foam. The head vanishes in less than a minute. Smells and tastes of very mild smoke, maybe I use the Schlenkerla rauch's as a standard, but this is barely kissed with smoke. Notes of spicy/sweet caramelized malts are also present. Rather thin and watery as well with just about adequate carbonation. Take it or leave it.

ClockworkOrange, May 16, 2009
Photo of connecticutpoet
3.98/5  rDev +21%

On the pour, this was a deep yellow, clear beer with a half finger of white head topping it off in my pint glass.

Aroma was of very slightly smoky malt, with almost a hint of sweetness. Some medium-bodied malts were evident. No hops noticeable, but were not necessary.

Taste was slightly smoky, not overpowering but making itself known. Aftertaste was a little smoky, but also had some bitterness. Nice medium malt body. Well balanced.

Mouthfeel was well rounded, good body, not thin.

Good drinkability. Too bad this isn't one of their regulars. This is one of their better ones.

connecticutpoet, May 13, 2009
Photo of MmmIPA
3.4/5  rDev +3.3%

I havnt had a Saranac in a while and I found this one at the beer store.It may be a bit old.

Twelve ounces of amber/orange body and no ead what so ever.Not much carbonation bubbles either.Caramel malts and thats pretty much it in the nose.I taste some malts and smoke.The smoke is at the end of the sip and its nice.Its not offensive to me,its delicate.Its a bit watery but that doesnt take any points from the overall score.This is tasty as are all of the Saranac beers Ive tried so far.They do a good job.Smooth body and carbonation is tingly.

MmmIPA, Oct 01, 2007
Photo of hero27
2.6/5  rDev -21%

12 oz bottle.

Light amber color. Head is modest and doesn't leave much behind for lacing.
Toasted malt aroma...where's the smoke??
Flavor is buttery caramel malt with some spicy hops. Almost adjunct-like.. For the style, this really does not have much smoke flavor at all. If you're looking for a hearty, flavorful rauchbier, this is not it.
Slightly oily mouthfeel, medium-bodied. Slick but easy enough to drink.

Overall take on it...this is a rauchbier for people that don't like rauchbiers.

hero27, Jun 29, 2007
Photo of garcia2a
3.3/5  rDev +0.3%

For the style, I like the rauchbiers to have that smokey sausage tase, this beer, while nice, did not have that smokey body that I like. I wouls consider this more of a leichtrauchbier.

This poured amber and clear with a bit of head. The nose had a faint tinge of smoke and spice. The tase was thin with a thin aftertase.

A good primer for those wanting to try this style

garcia2a, Jun 13, 2007
Photo of Redwood21
3.28/5  rDev -0.3%

The appearance is decent, a nice amber color with a decent head.

The smell is not very strong nor smokey but isnt bad.

The taste is a toss up, i actually really liek this beer, but looking at the style, i had to go back to the guidelines to be sure i wasnt crazy. there is no smoke in this beer. im a fan of scotch many of which have a smokey flavor in them....none here. that said i think it does taste really good with a malty character with a more full feel.

medium in body a nice full feeling to it, pretty pleasant.

i really enjoyed this beer. if they had just called it a malty beer or a "beer" its got some good flavor and is good

Redwood21, Apr 18, 2007
Photo of auxiliary
3.63/5  rDev +10.3%

appearance - Deep yellow color, not much head or lace that stuck around.

smell - Malts, grass, smoked smell.

taste: Not much smoke or burnt taste that I thought it would be. Malt taste to it, not sweet. On the smokey side but not overpowering.

mouthfeel - Medium body, low carbination here.

drinkability - The last of the winter pack we had. Not a bad drink at all. Don't let the word smoked on the label through you off.

auxiliary, Apr 15, 2007
Photo of BuckeyeNation
3.38/5  rDev +2.7%

Brilliant tangerine with almost Champagne-like carbonation zipping up to a whipped creamy, taupe colored head. Most rauchbiers are some variety of orange it seems. Delicate, attractive squiggles of lace are beginning to decorate the top few inches of the glass, making this one of the better looking MBC beers that I can remember.

Smoked beer should smell smoky, should it not? I can appreciate no more than a faint whiff of smoked malt. If it doesn't deliver much more rauchiness on the palate, Saranac Rauchbier will be no more successful than any other beer from this brewery. Although it doesn't smell bad per se, I can't see giving an average score to a nose that is so far removed from what it ought to be.

Perhaps the brewery doesn't have enough respect for its clientele to provide them with an honest to goodness rauchbier. This is, by far, the least smoky version that has ever entered my glass. I think it most resembles a sweeter than usual English pale ale, despite the fact that German hops (Hallertau) are is use. It's only on the finish that one tastes a glimmer of smoked malt.

Maybe it's the fact that it's a surprisingly hefty lager, but I think the base beer is one of MBC's best (of a fairly lackluster lineup). That's why I've decided to grant an above average flavor score to such a wimpy rauchbier. A few more tendrils of smoke appear on the horizon as it warms. Triple the amount would give it a chance to be the brewery's best beer.

As alluded to, there's nothing at all wrong with the mouthfeel. It's on the full side for a lager and has that characteristic polished gem smoothness that I love. They've even gotten the carbonation right: spunky, yet far from buzzy.

Saranac Rauchbier is oh so close to good beer. If I could send a smoke signal message to the brewers, it would go something like this: *add* *more* *smoke* *to* *Rauchbier* *please*. It's too bad more American craft brewers don't take a shot at this style.

BuckeyeNation, Apr 09, 2007
Photo of billybob
2.48/5  rDev -24.6%

pours a quarter inch off white head that fades quickly to a ring on the glass with a orange amber color. smelled a little musty or like over ripe fruit. taste was stale bread maltyness with a touch of toffee and very slight smoke taste. mouthfeel was ok. would not buy this beer again. not a fan of smoked beers in general.

billybob, Apr 01, 2007
Photo of happygnome
3.38/5  rDev +2.7%

a: pours a golden-orange color with about a half inch of head that dissapears fast leaving a little lacing
s: the first thing that comes to mind is sweet aroma followed by a kind of grassy aroma
t: better than the aroma, the grassy aroma does not come out in the tastebut it is sweeter than most smoked beers and the smoked flavor is really not very strong
m: medium bodied beer with adequite carbonation

overall this is an ok beer i did enjoy it but there are a lot of things that could be improved

happygnome, Mar 31, 2007
Photo of sethmeister
3.23/5  rDev -1.8%

12oz bottle into mug at cellar temp. This bottle came in the saranac winter 12 pack.

Pours clear golden amber with 2+ fingers of fluffy offwhite head and ascending bubble streams. Some lacing evident.

There's a very (and I mean very) slight smoky scent on top of typical malty lager scent.

Malty flavor with a bit of smokiness. A little sweet with a hint of caramel. I actually do get a slight impression of bacon towards the finish and this lingers. Drank half the glass before I noticed it.

Medium to light bodied mouthfeel. A little watery.

My first Rauchbier and I guess I would have expected a bolder smoked flavor and scent. This is very drinkable, and I enjoyed it but I wouldn't search it out on purpose.

Kudos to Saranac for trying some less common styles and giving them to us in a 12 pack with one beer per style so we can sample.

sethmeister, Mar 05, 2007
Photo of dherling
2.48/5  rDev -24.6%

Poured out an orange golden honey brown with a thin quickly dissapearing off white head. The nose is mostly munich malt, biscuity in a way, with some toffee sweetness and a bit of hickory. The taste is more like a dark lager than a rauchbier. Has some maltyness to it, and a bit of well, malt. Nothing else here. No smoke, no rauch, no fun. Has a medium body and slightly carbonated mouthfeel. Fairly drinkable, but a terrible example of the style.

dherling, Mar 02, 2007
Photo of ski271
4.1/5  rDev +24.6%

Clear, Medium amber/orange with a small, creamy, off-white, slowly-diminishing head. Smell is of lightly smoky malts supported by some light citrus from the hops, some very light earthy yeast, and caramel. Taste is more of the same except with more piney hops than the citrus in the nose. It has a medium body, dry texture and soft carbonation. This is very good for a rauchbier, because it lets the smoke aroma and flavor stand out without being overpowering or fake-tasting like so many other rauchbiers I’ve tasted. Very easy drinking and enjoyable.

ski271, Feb 09, 2007
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Saranac Rauchbier from Matt Brewing Company
76 out of 100 based on 69 ratings.