1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Saranac Adirondack Light Beer - Matt Brewing Company

Not Rated.
Saranac Adirondack Light BeerSaranac Adirondack Light Beer

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
74
okay

28 Ratings
THE BROS
89
very good

(view ratings)
Ratings: 28
Reviews: 25
rAvg: 3.07
pDev: 17.26%
Wants: 0
Gots: 0 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Matt Brewing Company visit their website
New York, United States

Style | ABV
Light Lager |  ABV ?

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
This beer is retired; no longer brewed.

No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: brewdlyhooked13 on 07-06-2002)
View: Beers (88) |  Events
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50  | next › last »
Ratings: 28 | Reviews: 25 | Display Reviews Only:
Reviews by Scoats:
Photo of Scoats
Scoats

Pennsylvania

3.33/5  rDev +8.5%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

I don't know if I'd ever buy this but it came with the 12 pack. If I wanted a light beer though, I couldn't think of one better. It tasted a lot like Pabst Blue Ribbon, and I mean that as a compliment. Good lawn mower beer.

At 130 calories, this and Sam Adams Light aren't really that light.

Serving type: bottle

04-22-2003 05:11:24 | More by Scoats
More User Reviews:
Photo of Cooker_stp
Cooker_stp

New York

3.5/5  rDev +14%

08-18-2013 00:10:10 | More by Cooker_stp
Photo of generallee
generallee

New York

3/5  rDev -2.3%

01-11-2013 17:59:36 | More by generallee
Photo of rab53
rab53

Washington

3/5  rDev -2.3%

12-02-2011 04:07:42 | More by rab53
Photo of TastyTaste
TastyTaste

Minnesota

2.5/5  rDev -18.6%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Medium gold color, with a very small white head. Not a lot going on in the smell department, mostly a sweet corn and malt scent. Pretty bland beer. Too little malt, hardly a trace of hops. It's better than macros, but even for a light beer it is boring. Average beer, at best.

Serving type: bottle

02-07-2004 22:20:11 | More by TastyTaste
Photo of Beastdog75
Beastdog75

New Jersey

2.6/5  rDev -15.3%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3.5

(Saranac "12 Beers" Sampler, 2002 edition)

I thought that Saranac's holiday sampler packs usually showcased some of their more creative and flavorful beers, which is why I was a little taken back that they threw this in there. Anything to get people to try their light, eh? Turns out this is one of the better lights that I've had, and although it doesn't stand up to Sam Adams Light it certainly holds its own against the macro-brewed lights.

Saranac Light pours a light/pale straw color with a showcase of highly active carbonation. Very thin layer of foam bubbles forms and dissipates quickly. The smell is near non-existant, although the mildest of grains and fruitiness are slightly detectable. The mouthfeel is thin and fizzy. The standard light beer wateriness is present in the flavor, but there are some light malty/grainy notes here to save the day, with even a little bit of breadiness. Very light hop twang in the finish. Flavor is quite clean, and lacks many of the foul off-flavors that so many macro-lites have. Aftertaste is clean, and the finish lacks any alcoholic warmth.

I still wouldn't by this one on its own, but it does stand out flavorwise in an oversaturated light beer market. Kudos to Saranac for making a pretty decent light beer.

Serving type: bottle

11-04-2003 05:20:38 | More by Beastdog75
Photo of edchicma
edchicma

Massachusetts

3.13/5  rDev +2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Tried this just for the heck of it...hadn't had a light beer in some time. This one seemed a tad better than others I remember. Head was ok, but dissipated quickly. Color was a nice light gold color. Faint malt aroma, with a medium mouthfeel. It caught in the throat a bit, though...not as crisp and smooth as I would have liked. Overall, not bad for a light beer.

Serving type: bottle

09-25-2003 23:18:08 | More by edchicma
Photo of garymuchow
garymuchow

Minnesota

3.4/5  rDev +10.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Light refreshing slightly sweet mix of malt and hops to aroma. Fairly standard for style. Good looking, but again standard for style. Steady white head. Low flavor without being too watery. Mostly malt taste with slight lingering. Refreshing quality, but not too crisp. Softens and becomes fluffy as warms. Fine for what it's designed to be. Certainly better than most macros of style. Becomes unpleasantly bitter as warms.

Serving type: bottle

05-25-2003 21:03:55 | More by garymuchow
Photo of RBorsato
RBorsato

Virginia

3.4/5  rDev +10.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Pale gold color with a low white ringed head and good carbonation. No "cooked-corn" aroma with light graininess - I am sure this is an all-malt brew. Crisp and dry with a low level of sweetness. Light bodied but fuller than most lights ... not suprised based on calories.

I guess I preferred Sam Adams Light to this one but overall not bad.

Per label: 130 cal, 9 g carbs, 1.7 g protein, 0.0 fat

Available in the 2002 Saranac Holiday Pack.

Serving type: bottle

05-20-2003 12:20:47 | More by RBorsato
Photo of feloniousmonk
feloniousmonk

Minnesota

2.38/5  rDev -22.5%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

Appearance: clear, honey gold color, kind of pretty and appealing, head is a treat for the eye, too, bubbly, snow white, leaving a little lace, slowly simmering.
After that, it's all downhill. Nose is nothing, though I searched and searched, my nostril aflared...nothing bad, anyway...
As for taste; a tiny hop drizzle appears for 1/1,000,000th of 1 second that fades away...body doesn't exist...in fact, it stands as the very hallmark of negligibility!
There are small specs of flavor here and there, very small, and not enough to merit the term "flavorful" as it appears on the label.
I don't understand the existence of this type of beer, though the majority of Americans seem to take them to their collective bosom. It's even more mysterious when a small brewery or a craft brewer farts one of these things out.

Serving type: bottle

05-18-2003 18:51:18 | More by feloniousmonk
Photo of NeroFiddled
NeroFiddled

Pennsylvania

3.43/5  rDev +11.7%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Wow! I was really surprised by how good this was for being a "light" beer. Then I read the label - "130 calories". Many of the standard macros are only 140 or just above, so I find it hard to consider this truly a light beer. However, it's good! It pours a crystal clear golden body that's topped by a foamy bright-white head. It has great head retention and keeps a thin surface covering throughout the glass, and it even leaves some spotty lace! The aroma expresses a grainy maltiness. It's a touch wort-like with no hops to be found, but it's clean and welcoming. I certainly prefer its overt maltiness to the vapid alcohol aroma of some of the heavily-attenuated mass-produced lights. The body is also surprisingly full for the style, falling clearly into the medium range; and the fine carbonation leaves it crisp in the mouth. Very nice! The flavor, like the aroma, concentrates on grainy malt without hop flavor, but does offer a gently backing bitterness. It finishes clean and smooth with a short-lingering note of residual malt that dissolves to reveal a moderate dryness. Really well done with the exception of it's full 130 calories.

Serving type: bottle

02-08-2003 20:10:12 | More by NeroFiddled
Photo of RonfromJersey
RonfromJersey

New Jersey

2.73/5  rDev -11.1%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Bright yellow-gold body, with some steady bubbling, topped by a large foamy white head. Some hay in the nose, but very little aroma. Beer hits the tongue with an opening splash of malt, but slides away quickly, before more details are detectable. Mouthfeel is surprisingly full. Beer goes does easy. Very easy, Maybe too easy. Probably the second best light beer available in my market, after Sam Adams. Could have a use as a quick quencher/lawnmower beer in the heat of the summer, but really not something most craft beer fans are likely to embrace. Here's hoping they leave it out of next year's 12 pack.

Serving type: bottle

01-31-2003 21:30:11 | More by RonfromJersey
Photo of CharlesRiver
CharlesRiver

Connecticut

3/5  rDev -2.3%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

This is my second beer from the mixed twelve pack. Looks almost exactly like there Pilsner but the head doesn't last as long. The smell is very similar as well. This one seems much more carbonated than the last. Not much in terms of flavor. I can pick up a slight hint of hops in the end but that is about it. In the class that it is in, this one stands a bit taller. It definitely has more flavor than anything from A-B.

Serving type: bottle

01-08-2003 16:43:07 | More by CharlesRiver
Photo of Suds
Suds

Pennsylvania

2.7/5  rDev -12.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

I probably never would have tried this beer if it were not included in the holiday sampler. As suspected, it's not worth trying on its own.
The appearance is a slightly dark yellow-straw color, topped with a respectable white head. To be honest, it's a decent-looking beer. The aroma is almost non-existent, as is the taste....maybe a slight graininess and a very mildly sweet finish. Although this is arguably better than most light beers, it's still a waste of time.

Serving type: bottle

12-18-2002 17:03:28 | More by Suds
Photo of BeerBuilder
BeerBuilder

Minnesota

3/5  rDev -2.3%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Clear, brilliant straw color, with a white head. The aroma is light in malt, with a bit of grain. The flavor has a malt sweetness, as well as a grain flavor. The grain gives this beer a bit of a bite, and a flavor almost like sour apples. From this point the beer flows to a slight hop bitterness. It is light in body, smooth, and easy drinking. This brew has a decent flavor for an American Light Lager.

Serving type: bottle

12-17-2002 06:35:51 | More by BeerBuilder
Photo of shirfan
shirfan

New York

2.53/5  rDev -17.6%
look: 2 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

This infidel was the first to die in the Christmas Sampler, to get it out of the way...

Pours golden yellow and clear, head doesn't even make an attempt.

Mouthfeel is the only redeeming feature of this creation... it's fairly bubbly and interesting, but there's very little to back it up. A thin, canadian-tasting macro lager. On the dry side. No off flavors or grossly detectable adjuncts, but it's very plainly aimed at big 3 swillers and I wouldn't drink this again unless it was both free AND the only thing available.

Serving type: bottle

12-16-2002 18:20:22 | More by shirfan
Photo of frank4sail
frank4sail

New Jersey

2.65/5  rDev -13.7%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Fresh slightly sweet nose. No real head or retention with a carbonated clear (filtered) liik. Sour malt taste. The finish is slightly sweet. The sout taste just does not go away. Light to medium mouth. Lots and lots of carbonation (bigger bubbles force carbonation). there is taste there for a light beer... just not very good taste. And I would not really consider this a light beer at 130 calories.

Serving type: bottle

12-12-2002 12:23:00 | More by frank4sail
Photo of Kwak
Kwak

New Jersey

1.63/5  rDev -46.9%
look: 2 | smell: 1 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

Not good only drank this one because it cam in a twelve-pack sampler.

It poured yellow not much head gone in a flash bad aroma.

The taste was nothing special like a saranac watered down. It also had a little metalic taste to it ?

Serving type: bottle

12-08-2002 23:25:33 | More by Kwak
Photo of ElGuapo
ElGuapo

New Jersey

2.88/5  rDev -6.2%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

well, it's a light beer, so what can i really say. as a light, it is not to bad at all. i think only sam adam's is better. it has no real aroma and not too much flavor. it is not skunky like other lights, and it is nice and smooth. i will never get it again, but if you want a light beer, it is a good choice.

Serving type: bottle

12-08-2002 20:34:51 | More by ElGuapo
Photo of aaronh
aaronh

Pennsylvania

3.5/5  rDev +14%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4.5

This is a very good light beer. Pours with a decent head that shows moderate retention (longer than most macros). The color is a pale golden amber. The beer looks very inviting. A mild aroma of hops is blended with a hint of malt in the aroma. This light beer actually has some flavor, with a hint of malt sweetness coupled with some vegetal overtones. The mouthfeel is solid, which is more than many lagers can say, much less light beers. Of course, being a light beer with lower ABV that has a pleasing flavor profile, this beer is very drinkable. Which is good, because as it warms, it is less appealing. I could actually consider buying this beer to appease my macro buddies, because the left over beer would be consumed when I was in the mood for something lighter.

Serving type: bottle

11-24-2002 12:07:52 | More by aaronh
Photo of Jason
Jason

Massachusetts

3.98/5  rDev +29.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Presentation: 12 oz brown long neck bottle with no freshness date. 130 calories, 9.0 carbohydrates and 1.7 grams of protein on the side of the label.

Appearance: Bright robe of golden yellow, big bubbles rise to the top and hold the white lace together for the most part.

Smell: Clean aroma of powdery husky grain, dry with a faintness of hops as well.

Taste: Light bodied with an ample crispness, nice grainy bite with some hop bitterness in there as well. Powdery husk hits in the middle and a dolup of wheat also. Maltiness is mellow but has hints of a light doughy almost cracker- like character. Touch of residual sweetness upfront but the brew dries up in the end.

Notes: Not as light as some other light beers out there being it has 130 calories, but it is certainly a tasty one. I would assume this is an introduction to a product that they will be putting into six-packs and cases rather than just one bottle in a 12-pack.

Serving type: bottle

11-21-2002 17:42:50 | More by Jason
Photo of Brent
Brent

Kentucky

3.05/5  rDev -0.7%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

I will go on record as saying that light beers are the spawn of the devil and consequently I have to overcome a tremendous prejudice in rating any light. But, this was in the mix-pack, so I gave it a go. A pleasant and drinkable light. Fairly sweet at the front, with the flavor becoming more grainy at the finish, along the lines of a macro light, Miller Light coming to mind. Could have benefited from a bit more hops, but the level was acceptable. Mouthfeel was more substantial than average and helped the beer a good deal. One of the better light beers so far.

Serving type: bottle

11-17-2002 22:21:54 | More by Brent
Photo of Bighuge
Bighuge

Minnesota

3.45/5  rDev +12.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Clear straw color. Thin and airy white head. Not much retention. Minimal lacing. Aroma contains slight grainy notes and also some subtle aromatic hop tones. The taste is pretty clean and not as bland as most light beers. Grainy and dry. Just a sligh spattering of bitter hop notes. Closer to light in body than medium. Not over carbonated. Like this one just a bit better than Sam Adam's Light. Probably my favorite light beer, although I usually only have about 10 lights a year.

Serving type: bottle

11-14-2002 19:13:33 | More by Bighuge
Photo of ADR
ADR

Pennsylvania

2.85/5  rDev -7.2%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Clear yellow, head is white and frighteningly uniform in bubble-sizes -- like a loaf of Wonder Bread. Just the barest whiff of malt to the smell. Malt is thin, has a slight sense of walnut (straying toward peanut shells). The finish is slightly unsettling and macro-like in hop assertion. OK job on getting a little more flavor in the malt profile. I haven't tried too many "boutique" Lights yet, and this is not motivating me to bang on any doors but this brew isn't too bad.

Serving type: bottle

11-13-2002 10:26:16 | More by ADR
Photo of beerluvr
beerluvr

Ontario (Canada)

2.68/5  rDev -12.7%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

This pours with a fairly quick dissapating white head, over light golden liquid...not super carbonated (a plus, I guess). Nose is light grainy notes, very light malt presence & some corn/rice adjunct aromas. Taste is crisp, snappy and a bit of tanginess as well. Hops are way, way in the background. Finishes a bit sour...not the worst "lite"-style beer I've had, but alright for what it is.

Serving type: bottle

11-10-2002 11:56:51 | More by beerluvr
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50  | next › last »
Saranac Adirondack Light Beer from Matt Brewing Company
74 out of 100 based on 28 ratings.