Dismiss Notice
Save $5 when you subscribe to 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine by selecting auto-renew.

Subscribe now →
Dismiss Notice
Join Our Email List →

And we'll send you the latest updates and offers from BeerAdvocate, because knowing is half the battle.
Dismiss Notice

Pre-order your Respect Beer "Hipster" Hoodie today!

Plus: Free shipping (US only) on orders of $25 or more until 12/18/15. Just select "Free Shipping" at checkout.

Shop now →

yet another IPA critique

Discussion in 'Homebrewing' started by dooleyra, Jul 11, 2012.

  1. kjyost

    kjyost Champion (775) Manitoba (Canada) May 4, 2008 Verified

    Make sure you add that honey after krausen has dropped. Save yourself some of the aromatics that will be scrubbed by boiling & a strong fermentation. Beyond that, looks like and IPA. That and I wish you guys had one for Walker and not that tool La Russa.
  2. Pahn

    Pahn Champion (840) New York Dec 2, 2009 Verified

    i don't know if this comment still bothers people, but it looks like too much crystal malt to me. i'd drop down to 5% ._.

    hops look great, very similar to what i do (though my last IPA sucked).
  3. what made it suck?
  4. Pahn

    Pahn Champion (840) New York Dec 2, 2009 Verified

    it's hard to say. we don't like the yeast we used, fermentation temperature wasn't well controlled, i think it had hop sludge remnants in it, didn't get the hops we wanted, overly complicated grain bill that probably made things worse, all sorts of failure. just a terrible beer.

    edit: we've made simpler IPAs with similar hop schedules to yours and had them come out well though.
  5. CBlack85

    CBlack85 Advocate (555) South Carolina Jul 12, 2009 Verified

    I would agree that (for my tastes) there is too much crystal malt. Of course, that is a matter of taste. I personally have all but stopped using crystal in my IPA's & APA's