Flying Monkeys Super Collider Double IPA | Flying Monkeys Craft Brewery

BA SCORE
81
good
64 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score
Send samples
Flying Monkeys Super Collider Double IPAFlying Monkeys Super Collider Double IPA
BEER INFO

Brewed by:
Flying Monkeys Craft Brewery
Ontario, Canada
theflyingmonkeys.ca

Style: American Double / Imperial IPA

Alcohol by volume (ABV): 12.40%

Availability: Limited (brewed once)

Notes / Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

Added by Viggo on 08-17-2011

This beer is retired; no longer brewed.

BEER STATS
Ratings:
64
Reviews:
35
Avg:
3.48
pDev:
14.94%
 
 
Wants:
2
Gots:
1
For Trade:
0
User Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
firstprev| 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | nextlast
Ratings: 64 |  Reviews: 35
Photo of hopsolutely
3.5/5  rDev +0.6%

Photo of daryk77
4/5  rDev +14.9%

Photo of Digimaika2
3.55/5  rDev +2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

A: Reddish amber colour with a respectable two-finger creamy head with a dirty beige hue. Decent retention as the blanket sticks around for a little while. Noticeable lacing.

S: Pine, candied fruit (fruitcake style), baked bread, molasses/caramel, grapefruit, and tropical qualities. Appealing but I find this a little subdued aroma wise with some digging required.

T: Earthy pine hops, which transitions to the malty bread-like qualities. A strange biting and slightly askew wave of grain follows this. Other qualities detected in the aroma are hard to pick up in the taste. Alcohol quite noticeable (albeit probably hard to hide at 12.4%). Decent overall taste but I feel that some flavours are missing, and that this could be balanced better.

M: Medium body with a moderate carbonation, which tastes about right for the style. Nice and oily with a slightly resiny texture.

D: Had high expectations for this given my excellent experiences with all other FMCB products, however, this unfortunately fell a bit short. Hopefully they can work out the kinks in this. Reminds me of a lesser functioning version of Vermonster.

 1,127 characters

Photo of joemcgrath27
3.3/5  rDev -5.2%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

big props to my BA in crime andrenaline for including this in his latest shipment
A - lightly hazy deep cedar brown, one finger of tan head retained at a thin covering
S - butterscotch, some herbal earthiness, along with a light boozy aroma, really not much on the nose
T - unique hop mix of perfume and oily resin, some caramel and woody hints, and hints of alcohol
M - medium body with low carbonation, maybe even a little flat, it has some bitterness but 100 IBU it is definitely not
O - definitely a unique dipa with that perfume and resin flavour mix, although it is nothing mind blowing it is always nice to try a pale that's on the fringes of the traditional style, worth a try

 684 characters

Photo of oldp0rt
3/5  rDev -13.8%

Photo of bigox420
4/5  rDev +14.9%

Photo of biegaman
3.23/5  rDev -7.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Super Collider is not exactly 'dark matter' nor does it have a head as expansive as the universe. In fact, it looks relatively flat, with a bit of toothpaste white trim that comes apart like stringed cheese. And despite a general murkiness, its brownish body cedes plenty of pecan-colored highlighting. A big contrast to the vibrant label.

To be brutally honest, my first sniff of Super Collider reminded me of some failed homebrewing experiments. The smell of wet, dead leaves and rank citrus is one that I recognize as hoppy, but not the most desirable brand of hoppy. The bouquet is a hot mess of sugary, not entirely fermented malts that smells a bit like cheap brandy with added hops.

For the time being, while the beer is cold and near full, I'm glad to have a front row seat on this train wreck. There's enough leafy Centennial hop bitterness and candied, acidic-sweet citrus to make it well worth drinking. I have a feeling, however, that that honeymoon will end once the alcohol starts to kick in. (Note: the beer ends up holding itself together alright, but it's just not that palatable. It tastes like something distilled from pine sol.)

Flavour specifics include some big honey and biscuit malt as well as some grassy, flowery hops. That description, however, does not indicate just how 'rough' and 'dirty' the beer drinks. Age will help nothing. This beer is like the towering, tattooed, long-bearded leader of a biker gang: rougher than a rose patch. Think Chino or San Quentin.

In the end, the urge to experiment proved more captivating than reason for this brewery. The people in Ontario wanted something bold with big cojones that could kick them in the butt - this is the beer that will leave them impressed… not favorably impressed mind you, but impressed. This failure with hops proves once and for all that it's not the tool that matters, but how you use it. This is a beer that some people might not drink on a bet.

 1,946 characters

Photo of jsnoek
4/5  rDev +14.9%

Photo of fostachild
2.95/5  rDev -15.2%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

clear dark red/brown colour. inch of bubbly/foamy off-white head - nice lacing.

smell is nice - hoppy, citrusy, with a bit of fruit, and caramel.

taste is pretty bad - pretty much just bitter and alcoholic - couldn't taste all that much else.

couldn't finish the glass i poured let alone the bottle. pretty big let down from a brewery that i usually enjoy.

 359 characters

Photo of RedAleMan
3.5/5  rDev +0.6%

Photo of mintjellie
3.53/5  rDev +1.4%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Deep red-brown colour, light beige head forms thin rings of lace. Citrus, floral, and pine aroma accompanied by a big whiff of booze. Light earthy scent hidden deep underneath everything else. Tangerine flavour is solid, but not over-the-top in the way I expect the citrus/tropical American hop profile to be in this style. Toast and caramel malt profile provides a flimsy backbone. Finish is bitter and lingering, but not challenging. I hoped and expected for a powerful and challenging bitterness, but this is pretty easy to handle in that respect. It's also quite boozy. It's not undrinkably so, but it's boozy enough to detract from it. In terms of mouthfeel, it does leave a nice oily, resiny feeling on the the roof of the mouth, but it could use a little more heft. I'm not saying that this DIPA should be barley wine malty, just that I would like it with a pinch more heft, and that a little more residual sugar might help it in that regard. It also might help balance the alcohol. Overall, I think this beer is a good start. Knowing the Flying Monkeys history of releasing works in progress, I'm sure this will be tweaked and come back even better next year. I await its return.

 1,187 characters

Photo of CAMRAhardliner
3.26/5  rDev -6.3%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Pours dark amber. The head is not enormous but lasts forever and leaves lots of lace patches on the glass. The aroma is malty and estery with a piney hop characteristic. Pineapple and diacetyl notes also show. The taste is hoppy while also sweetish and buttery like the nose. Alcohol heat is pretty prominent throughout for 10.5% (according to the LCBO). This is a pretty full bodied beer. The finish is bitter with lots of medicenal alcohol heat.

A DIPA with flavor flaws and a very immodest alcohol presence. I'd pass if offered agian.

 538 characters

Photo of jimctin
2/5  rDev -42.5%

Photo of MattPS
3.5/5  rDev +0.6%

Photo of Phyl21ca
3.95/5  rDev +13.5%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Bottle: Poured a deep copper color ale with a large foamy head with OK retention and light lacing. Aroma of citrus and piney hops with loads of resinous notes is quite powerful. Taste is also dominated by loads of citrus and floral notes with some solid notes of pines and resin. Malt backbone is quite solid with light caramelized notes. Body is quite full with good carbonation and no apparent alcohol. Well brewed and interesting though a bit stale and I think this would have been better had it been released sooner form the LCBO.

 534 characters

Photo of andrenaline
3.77/5  rDev +8.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Apparently it's the watered down version with ABV at 10.5% and not 12.6%.

A - Pours a dark caramel colour, finger of head with some retention and no real lacing.

S - Sweet citrus hops, floral notes, caramel and toffee, brown sugar and cedar.

T - Definitely a bitter beer with an odd resiny oil flavour that dominates the tongue. Caramel and butterscotch are more prominent than the hops, but the earthy citrus notes come through on the finish. ABV is reasonably well hidden offering up a hint of sweetness.

M - Medium bodied, smooth and a touch of dryness on the finish; the way it should be.

O - A unique DIPA and I'm glad the Ontario breweries are starting to dabble in the more adventurous ales. I'd imagine a fresher bottle might offer up some more hop flavours, but I certainly still enjoyed it. Not too sure why it's not getting much love on BA. I've had plenty worse DIPA's, and I would definitely grab another bottle.

 930 characters

Photo of allergictomacros
2.36/5  rDev -32.2%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

A - Hmm. Little sticky note on my bottle that says 10.5% - typo or weakened some? Anyway, pours a dark, clear red with a solid, quite stick head.

S - Nose is sweet, citrus/grapefruit, apple and caramel. A bit candy-like.

T - Sweet. A bit too much maybe, and bitter. A bit too much of that as well (160IBUs it says...) Fresh apple cider, booze, old white wine. I'm thinking a bit of oxidation here.

M - Heavy, boozy body with heaps of carbonation.

D - This is gonna be hard to finish. Strong and poorly balanced.

 515 characters

Photo of heebes
3.08/5  rDev -11.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Pours an auburn with tan foam head. Nose is caramel malts, brown sugar and booze. Taste is similar, rye wheat, sugar, malts, heavy booziness. Mouthfeel is medium heavy.
Overall, a let down from FM. No hop presence, terrible example of a IIPA. On the other hand, not a bad barleywine. Too bad they didn't predict the LCBOs tyical warehouse holdups and just label this a barleywine. Might of been a better reception

 414 characters

Photo of jimithebeerguy
2.9/5  rDev -16.7%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Man was I dissapointed in this beer...

I was sooo hoping that the magic of many of their other beers was incorporated in the the Super Collider Double IPA...

This beer tastes boozie....is strong...smells strong is went flat in my glass far too quickly. It wasnt the worst beer i have ever had but I think my expecatations were too high after the great impression Atomic IPA had on me.

It is not that this is a bad beer but I think for the $ 10.00 / bottle you can find much better beers to enjoy.

 502 characters

Photo of spinrsx
3.58/5  rDev +2.9%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

650ml Bottle

Appearance – Mostly clear copper colour with an average size fizzy beige coloured head. There is a low amount of carbonation visible and there is a fair amount of lacing. The head lasted for around 4 minutes before it was gone.

Smell - Malts, caramel, hops, booze

Taste & Mouth - The beer has an average amount of carbonation and I can taste malts, caramel, and some citrus notes. There isn't as much hop taste as I expected and I can really pick up on the booze. It ends with a malty sweet aftertaste with only a little bit of lingering hop bitterness.

Overall – As everyone else has said, I'm sure this would have been better fresh. It's basically a barley wine. For the 8.95 price tag I would have rather just had 4 bottles of their smashbomb IPA.

 771 characters

Photo of WeedKing4
3.81/5  rDev +9.5%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Pours a dark amber brown thats mostly clear. Tastes very malty up front with not a huge hop presence. This tastes closer to an american barleywine style then a double ipa. Quite drinkable for the high alc% in it. No high booze taste detected at all. Its not that bad overall either, but it would have been nice if this didn't sit in the LCBO warehouse for a couple months before being released. Its quite a shame for the state of beer we live in, for Ontario. They completely ruined the chance of this beer making a bigger name for its self.

 541 characters

Photo of MeisterBurger
3.16/5  rDev -9.2%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 3

Pours a reddish mahogany topped by a light foamy head. Retains well and laces okay.

Caramel and citrus dominate the subdued aroma along with some mildly off-putting notes that I can't quite pin down.

Tastes biscuity and malty with a warming piney bitterness in the finish. Bitterness lingers in the aftertaste and it's warming in the chest. Hops add bitterness more than flavour, but there's some citrusy notes and floralness (florality?--you know what I mean) to be found. It doesn't really have much character or depth or anything that makes me want to drink more than one.

Mouthfeel is light considering how malty this is. Thin. Not great.

This is kind of a clumsy attempt at the style for me. Not terrible, but somewhat inelegant and not what I look for in a DIPA.

 773 characters

Photo of bylerteck
3.03/5  rDev -12.9%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Bought a few of these and split one with friends earlier but settling down for a review solo. Bottled August 16.

A - Pours dark copper with a bit of haze and strong carbonation. One finger of light brown head. Head is creamy and fluffy. Some wall-ish lacing and a good retention of half a finger.

S - A good citrusy punch. A little boozy citrus and a caramelly malt note.

T - Boozy. Boozy pineappley citrus. Not all that much depth.

M - Full body, medium carbonation, a boozy and slightly bitter finish.

O/D - Too boozy. Obviously not that fresh, but still, the booze element could have been masked better. Not alot of balance or malt backbone, and the hop profile doesn't seem that strong. Too bad it took so damn long for this to get out, I feel like it would be better fresh.

 784 characters

Photo of mrnobody
3.44/5  rDev -1.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 4 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 3.5

650 ml bottle poured into a Duvel tulip.

A: Pours a clear dark amber/brown with a finger of beige head, not much retention, a little lacing.

S: Smells of citrus hops, booze, rotten fruit and yes, perhaps some floor cleaner.

T: Taste is malty, boozy, 160 IBU? Maybe the lcbo should have put a sticker marking that down too. This is definitely in barleywine territory. It's actually not bad but a DIPA it ain't.

M: Reasonably full bodied mouthfeel with a nice fine and subdued carbonation.

D: Actually, overall I don't mind this. The smell is terrible but for 10% ABV, it's pretty drinkable.

 598 characters

Photo of BBP
4/5  rDev +14.9%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Chestnut amber with decent head and retention as well as slight lacing.

Hops and malt meet harmony in the aroma as they join to form one aroma. It's well balanced but nothing seems intense our sharp enough to stand out.

unlike the description the flavor isn't such an explosion of hops. It seems more like a hoppy english barleywine. I suspect this is at it's prime when fresh but I can thank the LCBO for ruining that. Still very good but somewhat standard for a barleywine.

Medium full. Slight carbonation works well with the body. Slightly dry and moderately sticky in the finish.

Overall it's quite good, but I think the whole hoppiness talk about it was a bit of an exaggeration.

 688 characters

firstprev| 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | nextlast
Flying Monkeys Super Collider Double IPA from Flying Monkeys Craft Brewery
3.48 out of 5 based on 64 ratings.
  • About Us

    Founded in Boston in 1996, BeerAdvocate (BA) is your go-to resource for beer powered by an independent community of enthusiasts and professionals dedicated to supporting and promoting better beer.

    Learn More
  • Our Community

    Comprised of consumers and industry professionals, many of whom started as members of this site, our community is one of the oldest, largest, and most respected beer communities online.

    Learn More
  • Our Events

    Since 2003 we've hosted over 60 world-class beer festivals to bring awareness to independent brewers and educate attendees.

    Learn More
  • Our Magazine

    Support uncompromising beer advocacy and award-winning, independent journalism with a print subscription to BeerAdvocate magazine.

    Learn More