Hop Warrior Imperial IPA | Rooster Fish Brewing Co.

34 Reviews
no score
Send samples
Hop Warrior Imperial IPAHop Warrior Imperial IPA

Brewed by:
Rooster Fish Brewing Co.
New York, United States

Style: American Double / Imperial IPA

Alcohol by volume (ABV): 8.00%

Availability: Year-round

Notes / Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

Added by jzeilinger on 01-06-2010

For Trade:
User Reviews
Sort by:  Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
first ← prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | nextlast
Reviews: 34 | Ratings: 83
Reviews by lovindahops:
Photo of lovindahops
3.88/5  rDev +18.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

poured from a sweet looking bomber I picked up at the Geneva Wegmans... oh yeah, into a tulip glass

A- a fine amber look that is reminsicent of a nugget nectar from sat night... yeah that is the comparison. The head is an onslaght of foam and later lacing. Sure it was an aggressive pour... but I do like this brew's locality and excitement generated by catching it

S- very strong malty backbone. Not much other than the that and some alcohol warming in the end... wait there is some caramel

T- pretty good. A bitter entrance followed by the anticipated sweetness. A pretty good DIPA characteristic. The alcohol even warms the palate as it exits

M- there is some good carbonation on the tongue. The brew is bubbley and full

D- this is a good DIPA. Sometimes, it's surreal to look at a brew that is not widespread and realize it's the style you are judging. I need to get down to the glen... and not for the race (but the brew)

 931 characters

More User Reviews:
Photo of oberon
3.63/5  rDev +10.7%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 3.5

Only the secong beer I have had from Roosterfish.Poured into an imperial pint glass a rich clear amber with a tigh,fluffy two finger white head that never really fades completely.Aromas are a bit light,faint citric hop along with sweetish fruity alcohol.Full lush mouthfeel,full but not coating,flavors are resiny upfront with some citric notes,its sort of sputters into a sweet somewhat alcoholic finish.This DIPA has some things going for it,the appearance and mouthfeel are great,it lacks in depth of flavor and aroma.

 521 characters

Photo of rwilde
4/5  rDev +22%

Photo of asabreed
3.68/5  rDev +12.2%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Bomber into a pint glass.

Appearance: A nice and full hazy and copper-colored amber, with lots of raindrop lacing around the top of the glass. It froths up good initially, but then the craters burst, leaving a quarter-finger semblance of head at the top of the body.

Smell: Big initial whiffs of citrus sourness. Lots of sourness. A lot of lemon and grapefruit. Though I like the intensity of it, it almost seems more like a Pale, as there aren't really a lot of discernible possibly sweeter fruit esters, and there's not much earthiness or sense of malt either.

Taste: Again, not overly sour, but mostly there's not enough of a rich malt backbone to keep this from sliding into a kind of puckering lemon-like sourness, that kind of cascades all the way through, taking away the earthiness and possible fruit esters, which seems to be there but have a tough time getting through. I don't dislike it by any means, but it I'm not sure the sourness will be a huge crowd pleaser to many.

Mouthfeel: One of the best things about this beer, which is medium-bodied but the carbonation's there, and does a nice job with holding everything together and is a good balance between spritzy and creamy.

Drinkability: Throughout the drinking of the bottle, I enjoyed the almost-combative sourness, and the carbonation held up to deliver with each sip. But I would've guessed, for some reason, that this was an Imperial Pale versus a DIPA. The sourness may turn folks off, but it's definitely a puckering summer treat in some respects also, if you're into that sort of thing.

 1,570 characters

Photo of JWhat
3.85/5  rDev +17.4%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 3.75

Not their best effort, but worth trying especially at their brew pub. Specials are usually available.

101 characters

Photo of Gmann
3.43/5  rDev +4.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Pours a murky golden amber color with a big fizzy head that slowly settled into a fluffy head.

The aroma is of a bready malt with some candied tropical fruit/apricot notes. The beer has that big malt candied sweet aroma. The hops don't smell all that fresh.

The taste is of a bready malt, some toffee, not nearly as sweet as the aroma. More noticable grassy notes from the hops. Some light citrus and apricot but more grassy than anything else.

Moderate to full feel. The beer is quite dry which helps balance the bigger malt bill. Tons of grassy bitterness but it doesn't linger and the beer is quite drinkable.

Definitely a maltier DIPA or the hops faded. Flavor is better than the aroma and the brew is quite balanced. Hop heads won't like this as it is more of an EIPA flavor.

 784 characters

Photo of akorsak
3.33/5  rDev +1.5%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

A bomber from Finger Lakes. The Roosterfish hefe impressed me so I'm taking another look.

A: The DIPA is darker, relatively speaking. More of a golden brown amber color. A thick white head, over two fingers, is fluffy, leaving plenty of lace behind.

S: The nose is big, well-hopped with a soapy finish. Syrupy citrus follows, creating a barleywine-esque big body.

T: Citrus, grains, citrus. Repeat. The hops start off, a quick blast before the grain kicks in. An odd flavor, right around mid sip and very vegetal, seems to be a remnant of the hoppiness. Caramel malts, otherwise, support the syrupy thick hops. A citrusy orange flavor appears near the finish. Accessible but the vegetal flavor weighs the beer down.

M: The mouthfeel starts off well, veering into barleywine territory without much prodding. As DIPAs go, it generally works. Roosterfish, despite a bad first encounter, may be back on the visit list next year...

 930 characters

Photo of TheSevenDuffs
2.78/5  rDev -15.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2.5

Poured in to Duvel tulip
Born on date of: 12-09

A - Poured a dark amber colour with half a finger of creamy white head.

S - An intense aroma of bitter piney hops and sweet caramel malts.

T - Bitter pine hops up front that are somewhat dull and in flavour while still providing bitterness. The hops really lack the punch that I have come to expect from a DIPA. The malt flavour dominates and it is somewhat unpleasant, although I can't put my finger on exactly what the taste is. Perhaps this is a freshness issue since this bottle is about 6 months old. Hope fade is very possible here.

M - Medium body, lightly carbonated.

D - A below average DIPA that does not impress at all. I would not buy this again.

 714 characters

Photo of jonB
3.08/5  rDev -6.1%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

The beer pours a very nice copper with a solid layer of foam that disappears a little too fast. A little bit sweet and pretty piney on the nose. The first sip is very sweet and gets evened out by the hops at the end. The bitterness gives it a good ending, but can still detect some alcohol. Average for the style.

 313 characters

Photo of logicalparadox
3.25/5  rDev -0.9%

It's imperial, but is it worthy of an emperor?

Sweet malt backbone, paired with hoppy payload. Acrid middle, some kind of medicinal or herbal bitter in there. Alcohol mingles with the bitter finish.

Not a huge fan but worth trying again.

 240 characters

Photo of tclapper
4/5  rDev +22%

Photo of metter98
3.4/5  rDev +3.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Cask at d.b.a., Brooklyn, NY

A: The beer is relatively clear copper in color and has no visible carbonation. It poured with delicate lacing covering the surface that eventually completely faded away.
S: There are light aromas of citrusy hops in the nose.
T: The taste is similar to the smell and is citrusy but there are also some notes of caramel malts in the flavors.
M: It feels medium-bodied and a bit smooth on the palate.
O: The beer doesn’t have a lot of aroma or complexity in the taste but it does have some warming from the alcohol.

 545 characters

Photo of kylemckinnis
3.75/5  rDev +14.3%

Photo of Tyrawlings
3/5  rDev -8.5%

Photo of dreichus
4.07/5  rDev +24.1%
look: 3.75 | smell: 4.25 | taste: 4 | feel: 4.25 | overall: 4

Photo of plaid75
3.53/5  rDev +7.6%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

On draft at the brewpub.

Poured a deep copper hue with a two finger foamy white head. There was very good lacing and retention.

The smell featured a subtle hop and full earthy malt.

The taste consisted of heavy caramel and a less than adequate hop spice.

The mouthfeel was toward the fuller side of the style.

Overall an unimpressive DIPA.

 349 characters

Photo of JamnesCameron
4/5  rDev +22%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Picked up a growler at World Wines and Liquors in Mentor, OH. Poured into a snifter. Pours a clear deep copper with a thin white head. Head drops leaving barely a wisp of foam.

Aromas of citrus and piney hops, good malty backdrop.

Flavors of a nice caramel and toffee malt base, with a huge punch of citrus (orange, tangerine) and pine (fresh tips) hop bitterness. The bitterness is not overdone, considering their calculated IBUs is around 120. Finish is medium, with pine and grapefruit lingering.

Mouthfeel is medium with sticky malt and a round mouth coating bitterness. Good level of carbonation.

Overall a very nice DIPA, not sure why the scores are so low. No love for the Roosterfish?

 696 characters

Photo of fmccormi
3.5/5  rDev +6.7%

Photo of garyloveman
3.5/5  rDev +6.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Photo of pathman
4/5  rDev +22%

Photo of throwback
4/5  rDev +22%

Photo of Drknight
3.5/5  rDev +6.7%

Photo of nh2032
4/5  rDev +22%

Photo of HotHands
2.92/5  rDev -11%
look: 4 | smell: 2 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 3

A - Pours a dark amber with a rocky off-white head.

S - not as much as I'd like from this style. Some caramel aromas but not nearly enough hop aroma.

T - caramel sweetness is somewhat balanced by a large amount of hop bitterness. The problem is that there are not enough aromatic hops and thus not much complexity. Also, it tastes like an imperial red because of the crystal malt - a bit like a worse Lagunitas Lucky 13.

M - good enough. A bit sticky.

Overall - misses the mark because of a lack of aroma or complexity.

 523 characters

Photo of electtodefer
4.25/5  rDev +29.6%

first ← prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | nextlast
Hop Warrior Imperial IPA from Rooster Fish Brewing Co.
3.28 out of 5 based on 83 ratings.
  • About Us

    Your go-to website for beer (since 1996), publishers of BeerAdvocate magazine (since 2006) and hosts of world-class beer events (since 2003). Respect Beer.
  • BeerAdvocate Microbrew Invitational

    Join us June 2-3, 2017 in Boston, Mass. for beer, cider, mead, kombucha and sake from over 70 small producers.

    Learn More
  • Subscribe to BeerAdvocate Magazine

    Support uncompromising beer advocacy and award-winning, independent journalism with a print subscription to BeerAdvocate magazine.