El Diablo Deluxe | Bullfrog Brewery

87 Ratings
no score
Send samples
El Diablo DeluxeEl Diablo Deluxe

Brewed by:
Bullfrog Brewery
Pennsylvania, United States

Style: American Wild Ale

Alcohol by volume (ABV): not listed

Availability: Limited (brewed once)

Notes / Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

Added by treyrab on 07-02-2010

This beer is retired; no longer brewed.

For Trade:
User Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
first ← prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | nextlast
Ratings: 87 |  Reviews: 55
Photo of Rochefort10nh
2/5  rDev -46.5%

Photo of olympuszymurgus
2.53/5  rDev -32.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Pours with a thick fluffly white head over a murky golden brown body. Smells like lemons and corn, grainy with a hint of earth.

Taste? meh. Pretty much underwhelmed with what feels like a saison with no "wild ale" sour or barnyard funk. Very mellow, very clean. Nothing memorable.

Not a purchase/trade I would make.

 319 characters

Photo of mothman
2.68/5  rDev -28.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Color is hazy bright golden orange. Pours a finger of white head with good retention and good lace.

Aroma: Very floraly and herbal. Floral hops. Some spice and brett shine through. Funky brett. Belgian yeast shows.

Taste: Complete brett bomb. It is harsh and over the top brett. Floral/herbal hop profile. Ends very weedy. Terrible. Not to much to say about the taste.

Mouthfeel: Dry and funky. Over the top funk. Medium bodied with a medium to high amount of carbonation.

Overall, this is a terrible beer. I cannot drink a lot of it. I am very shocked by how bretty this beer has gotten and has taken over so much of the flavor profile. I am not impressed.

 661 characters

Photo of westcoastbeerlvr
2.75/5  rDev -26.5%

Photo of t0rin0
2.75/5  rDev -26.5%

Photo of homebrew311
2.81/5  rDev -24.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3

A: pours a bright orange with a slight hazy, 2 finger frothy head

S: earthy tea like notes followed by a very musty smell, followed by a funky spice character. Not sure if this beer just isn't my style or if this has some extracurricular aromas going on, but the one thing I know is that is is not smelling great.

T: peppery up front with some citrus and a huge amount of barnyard funk and, a tiny twinge of tartness on the finish. I'm having trouble with funk in this one.

MF: high carbonation, light body

O: This Wild was a bit of a disappointment. The balance is off and the funk overwhelms the beer.

 607 characters

Photo of jh1982
3/5  rDev -19.8%

Photo of ygtbsm94
3/5  rDev -19.8%

Photo of Florida9
3.01/5  rDev -19.5%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

A: Cloudy. Very cloudy. Peachy yellow-orange in color. Forms a foamy off-white head with good retention and a little lacing.

S: Smell is dead on this one, and I don't mean non-existent. Literally smells like grandma's house. Musty, dusty, and old with a little orange and citrus trying to play through the mildew.

T: Much like the smell, the flavor must be past it's prime. Flavor is surprisingly light with notes of citrus, coriander and other culinary spices with a light bitterness. There is a little citric acidity, but it is faint.

M: Light and overcarbonated. Almost feels fuzzy on the tongue.

O: Not an overly interesting beer. Difficult to believe this is a Wild Ale, though maybe it's just not a very good one.

 727 characters

Photo of TMoney2591
3.12/5  rDev -16.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Served in a Dogfish Head shaped pint glass.

Big thanks to the Cantral PA group of the Gang Bang BIF for this bottle!

Bottle #323/467. Finally getting to try something from the once-vaunted Bullfrog Brewery. It pours a cloudy sunset golden straw topped by a healthy bit of very-light-cream-white foam. The nose comprises honeydew, pineapple core, farmhouse funk, and honey. The taste holds notes of cobwebs, musty grass, clove, light black pepper, dust, grapefruit rind, and coriander. The funk isn't really there, certainly not to the extent expected from the smell; instead, the spices seem to all be vying for power in some sort of flavor melee, all while the still-dying King Funk looks on from behind his slowly-closing eyes. Suffice it to say, things did not sit very well on my tongue at all. The body straddles the line between heavy light and light medium, with a moderate carbonation and a very dry finish. Overall, I can only assume this beer is a shadow of its former self, as I was never able to be acquainted with said former self. All I know is that it's not drinking very well right now.

 1,104 characters

Photo of Jmoore50
3.13/5  rDev -16.3%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

What a colossal disappointment this beer was for me. I have wanted to like Bullfrogs Sours, but the ones I have had are just good to mediocre. This one was offensive.

This beer is a great golden color that just brightens the room with its pour. Its cork didn't have any trouble coming off, but did not foam over. It has a great fluffy white head that pours two fingers with a medium pour. It also leaves a medium to thick lacing that reminds me of my grandmothers attic, webs of white everywhere. A great looking beer.

The smell is great as well, strong herbal notes with the Brett yeast helping that out. A nice lemon and sweet apple note with a great musty Brett character. Its also very herbal, with many notes of coriander and hay.

Wow, what a downward spiral this beer takes. It has a great taste upfront with some sweet apple notes and a fun spicy belgian yeast palate. Then towards the end there is a sharp taste that is incredibly offensive towards the point of making a funny face every swallow. It is like the Brett yeast is so concentrated in the end that it is pungent taste that is so distracting from the rest of the beer. I am finding it hard to describe the level of infected herbal tastes that the end of this beer has. Not good.

Its mouthfeel is incredibly carbonated and dry. Then after you swallow this beer the menacing, potent, and offensive herb flavor comes up. Its this flash that ruins it for an otherwise enjoyable beer. It has some nice sweet flavors with a great belgian yeast flavor, that ending train wreck ruins this beer for me. I could drink it fairly well, I was mainly trying to pinpoint the off flavor.

Sorry Bullfrog, this one was not for me. Jaspers is next in line for me and I still have high hopes for a brewery doing its best to give its drinkers a great American Wild Ale.


 1,830 characters

Photo of AlexFields
3.16/5  rDev -15.5%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Opened at TN whales tasting 3/16/2013. Thanks to Andy for sharing this.

Pours a bright almost neon orange with a huge bubbly off white head. Beautiful.

Smells very bretty, slightly tart, hints of orange and cardboard.

Taste is some brett but less than the nose, moderate amount of orange, touch of cardboard again, this is decent but far from great. Seems slightly oxidized.

Body is a little thin and a little undercarbed, not terrible but not good.

Decent beer, certainly drinkable, but pretty so-so. Was probably better fresh. Appearance is amazing though.


 571 characters

Photo of Photekut
3.25/5  rDev -13.1%

Photo of scottfrie
3.28/5  rDev -12.3%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Bottle 99 of 467 poured into Portsmouth snifter. Thanks goes to StormKing47 for this one.

A: The first pour was a clear dark golden but the next one clouded up into a hazy apricot color. The head was crazy frothy, billowing, and bright white, and it slowly faded into a fuzzy film leaving a few wisps of lacing down the glass.
S: Dominant scents of bubblegum yeast and tons of fruit. I smell banana, peach, and sweet tangerine with a few notes of lemon and straw.
T: This tastes more like a tripel than a wild. Since I assume El Diablo is the base beer and it’s a BSPA, I suppose I’m not too far off. It’s definitely not as fruity as the nose suggested, although there is a little bit more funky straw or hay. The finish is almost saison-esque with a herbal hop bitterness. Strange. There is no tartness and only a little bit of sour.
M: Once the ample bubbly carbonation died down I could really feel the medium body. Unfortunately it’s got a slick greasy feel to it. Not the greatest.
O: This one started off with potential based on the look and smell, but there is just something off about the taste and mouthfeel. This is too much like a tripel and not enough like a wild.

 1,188 characters

Photo of mjyoung
3.28/5  rDev -12.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Drank 6/25/11/ Split with the same damn people.

A: A very nice pour with an immense frothy head (full 3 fingers).

S: Strong notes of Brett dominate, but there's a hint of bubblegum and a wee bit of citrus. Not a lot going on and it's pretty simple.

T: Very mildly sour, but definitely nothing close to the smell. The body is unfortunately nondescript but there's a hint of that lovely Belgian yeast I like so much. The aftertaste is far too bitter, and does not finish cleanly at all.

M: Nice and airy, with a fair amount of carb. It leaves a cloying film that doesn't sit so well.

O: This beer came across as an odd mix between a sour and a Belgian trippel. Definitely a bit of a miss for me, simply because I don't appreciate the mix of styles.

 754 characters

Photo of kbutler1
3.36/5  rDev -10.2%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Bottle. Shared this one at Where the Wild Beers are. Pours a golden hued clear color with a slight white head. The aroma is straight Brett at this point with huge floral accents and some barnyard. Some citurs notes like lemon make their way through the florals though. Light mouthfeel with a good amount of carbonation. The taste is pretty much what I thought it would be after the nose. Slight sweetness upfront that then gets trampled by the Brett floral and barnyard flavors. Some lingering zestiness of lemon as well. Overall, not bad but not a favorite either.

 565 characters

Photo of Hojaminbag
3.43/5  rDev -8.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

El Diablo Deluxe has a cloudy body with hues of yellow, gold and orange. The off-white head is sticky looking, and does manage to leave lacing at regular intervals.

Tart and fruity, with peppery notes in the background and some light bread flavors.

Brett provides El Diablo Deluxe with a good bit of tartness that comes along with some apple and pear notes, but it also provides an intense musty flavor that is by far the dominant characteristic of the beer. Unlike the flavor, the fruit notes are very understated while the phenols are actually quite powerful, bringing herbal flavors and notes of pepper. This beer is insanely dry, and the combination of musty and phenolic flavors make it seem even more so.

A very light, highly carbonated body that leaves a lasting impression of both brett and dryness.

El Diablo Deluxe is a head-on offensive of dry, musty brett. If you really dig that sort of beer, then you will love this one. I would struggle to drink a bottle by myself.

 984 characters

Photo of womencantsail
3.44/5  rDev -8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3.5

Thanks to the late, great, jerz for sharing this one at our Sour Fest Eve tasting.

A: The pour is a very highly carbonated clear golden color with a massive white head that sticks around for quite some time.

S: Lots of different fruit notes in the nose: apples, pears, lemon peel, and oranges. The spices come through quite nicely as well, as does a bit of dry Brett and some earthy funk.

T: Unfortunately, the flavor does not live up to expectations. Just some miscellaneous spices, including nutmeg, coriander, and citrus zest. Lots of yeastiness with sweet apple and a hint of tartness at points.

M: The body is medium, I suppose, but the carbonation is far too aggressive to really enjoy what flavors are in this beer.

D: This one is just too foamy and it really detracts from the enjoyment. The flavor is not amazing to begin with, so this detraction does not help much.

 880 characters

Photo of thagr81us
3.48/5  rDev -7%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Big thanks goes out to the BA who sent me this one awhile back as a part of a get well package after my accident! Shared this one during the One Year Anniversary of My Wreck Tasting! Bottle #114 of 467! Served from bottle into a Crooked Stave ‘Crooked Line’ tulip. Poured yellow-orange with a two finger white head that subsided to a minimal amount quickly. Maintained excellent lacing throughout the glass. The aroma was comprised of sweet malt, earth, funk, sour, horseblanket, fruit, and citrus. The flavor was of sweet malt, funk, earth, earth funk, horseblanket, and fruit. It had a light feel on the palate with high carbonation. Overall this was a decent brew. I went into this one really expecting quite a bit, however I was a good bit let down. The funk aspect going on here really dominated every aspect of this beer. Usually this is a good thing, but there really wasn’t too much else going on to help balance this out. Also it was a little bit weak as well. Worth trying and glad that I did, but definitely not the highlight of the tasting.

 1,058 characters

Photo of seeswo
3.5/5  rDev -6.4%

Photo of a74gent
3.5/5  rDev -6.4%

Photo of JAHMUR
3.5/5  rDev -6.4%

Photo of imperialking
3.5/5  rDev -6.4%

Photo of aasher
3.53/5  rDev -5.6%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

This was shared by thagr81us at the Charlotte Tasting 2012. Thanks Calton!

This one pours a light bodied polished told in color with a slight white lacing around the glass. The nose is light. All I can pick up are light brett and hibiscus. The flavors are consist of a lot of brett, lavendar, hibiscus, and and funk. It is subtly sour. This beer drinks like a Belgian pale with loads of brett with floral components. It's ok. This beer could've peaked a couple years ago but we'd never know. It's impossible to tell how agressive this was or what it used to be. I'm glad I could try it.

 587 characters

Photo of crosamich
3.58/5  rDev -4.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

This one has some phenolic funk and I would agree with other posts I read just now before my own post in saying that this batch resembles a saison. A little more funky than I would like but as a Brett beer, it fits the style. I believe this was all Brett so expect this one to age out to more funk with time.

 308 characters

first ← prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | nextlast
El Diablo Deluxe from Bullfrog Brewery
3.74 out of 5 based on 87 ratings.
  • About Us

    Founded in Boston in 1996, BeerAdvocate (BA) is your go-to resource for beer powered by an independent community of enthusiasts and professionals dedicated to supporting and promoting better beer.

    Learn More
  • Our Community

    Comprised of consumers and industry professionals, many of whom started as members of this site, our community is one of the oldest, largest, and most respected beer communities online.
  • Our Events

    Since 2003 we've hosted over 60 world-class beer festivals to bring awareness to independent brewers and educate attendees.
  • Our Magazine

    Support uncompromising beer advocacy and award-winning, independent journalism with a print subscription to BeerAdvocate magazine.