Samuel Smith's Pure Brewed Lager Beer | Samuel Smith Old Brewery (Tadcaster)

very good
317 Reviews
Samuel Smith's Pure Brewed Lager BeerSamuel Smith's Pure Brewed Lager Beer

Brewed by:
Samuel Smith Old Brewery (Tadcaster)
England, United Kingdom

Style: Euro Pale Lager

Alcohol by volume (ABV): 5.00%

Availability: Year-round

Notes / Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

Added by BeerAdvocate on 08-10-2001

For Trade:
View: Beers | Events
User Reviews
Sort by:  Recent | High | Low | Top Raters | Alström Bros
first ← prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | nextlast
Reviews: 317 | Ratings: 580
Photo of RaulMondesi
2.3/5  rDev -39.5%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Four pack at my local Trader Joes in Tustin, CA.

Was looking forward to drinking session after session of Hottenroth all day - but apparently walking into The Bruery Provisions at 5:01 (they closed at 5:00 on Christmas Eve) was too late for them to sell Raul a few bottles. (The also sent me to a liquor store that didn't even sell any of their items, but that is besides the point.)

Anyway, so here Raul is with this swill instead. I was looking forward to pounding the entire 4-pack, but I could only get through 1. Is it me, or do all Euro Lagers/Pilsners either taste just decent, or like this nasty astringent, windex, skunk-like lager?

Raul was pumped on this, but he highly disagrees with it. Raul will use it to clean his windows instead. Peace!

 756 characters

Photo of ATLbeerDog
2.3/5  rDev -39.5%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

From a brown bottle - Pours a very light pale yellow with almost no head or carbonation. Smells of sweet malts with just a tad of light hops. First sip is sweet with very little hops coming through. Pretty much flavorless. Finishes slightly bitter. Well under carbonated. Not much happening here. Worth skipping this one!

 321 characters

Photo of crossovert
2.34/5  rDev -38.4%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

355ml bottle. "Pure Brewed" lol, is this budweiser or something?

It pours a clear gold with a foamy white head that dissipares with some decent lacing.

The smell is metallic and grainy. It has a doughy, crusty malt scent.

The flavor is rather poor in my opinion. It is super watery. The hops leave a vomity flavor and the malt is bland.

Try again boys, whew.

 363 characters

Photo of jujubeast6000
2.42/5  rDev -36.3%
look: 4 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Reviewed 5/13/2009 (Bottle):

Pours an extremely clear, extremely pale yellow colored body, with a huge frothy white head, lasting. Vegetably aroma, corn, straw. Malty. Some sweetness too, like something I can't place. Maybe sweet corn. Corny, vegetably taste, especially in the aftertaste. Sweet taste. Clean. Refreshing, but still a lager. Carbonated body.

 358 characters

Photo of scruffwhor
2.42/5  rDev -36.3%
look: 4 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Thanks for the 12oz bottle mom and dad. Pours a light, clear amber with a quick eggshell had that very quickly recedes. The aroma is a very musty toasted malt. The taste is pretty bready with some light floral hops. Very musty, adjuncty palate with maybe a littl citrus here and there.

 285 characters

Photo of NJpadreFan
2.45/5  rDev -35.5%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

Samuel Smith pure brewed lager beer

This sure isn't their oatmeal stout but lets give it a go shall we.

Appearance- light yellow/ straw with a big soapy white head that holds together well.
smell- a clean watery malt aroma.
Taste- light malt and water. not much body. There's not much here.
Mouthfeel- watery watery watery. A slight, ever so, bitter hopiness.

Overall, This is so watery it goes down quickly. maybe a good beer for drinking games or quenching your thirst after playing tennis but not a beer drinkers beer!

 533 characters

Photo of adamette
2.61/5  rDev -31.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Live review. Poured from the 355 ml dark brown bottle purchased at Save-On Tobacco & Beverage
in Mentor as a single for $2.25 a few days ago into my Samuel Smith pint glass. Foil wrap over the cap is green with gold leaves and hops represented in a nice pattern. Mark on neck of bottle: SC27I1 but I am not sure what that means. I like the label on this beer better than the "Organically Produced" version of Sam Smith lager which I just drank. It is more colorful and there is a nice image of a glass of the lager and the hops and barley plants presented in color as well.

A Initially generous white, fluffy head over a straw yellow, very translucent body. Classic lager look but nothing special. 3.5

S Less aromatic than the organically produced lager but the barley and hops are still able to be smelled. I am bored with this smell. 2.5

T Barley and hops are there dutifully but they have less depth and interest for me than the organically produced lager from Samuel Smith. The result is a rather boring lager. 2.5

M Somewhat thin but appropriate to the style. 3.0

D Lagers, in my opinion, are brewed to be very drinkable but this one is rather flat, lacks the interest of the organically produced lager and therefore its drinkability suffers for me. 2.5

Notes: Skeptical at first, this side by side comparison of organic vs. non organic showed me that organic can possibly really offer something. Interesting.

 1,420 characters

Photo of jackndan
2.68/5  rDev -29.5%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Sam Smith’s Lager: Eh, its an euro lager, well made with taste, but you can find a lot of beers just like this, and as good, from Poland, Slovakia and Czech Republic. Anyhow, it looks like a euro pilsner, and its pretty good, but I had as good for half the price. If its British, it had better be an ale is my new motto.

 326 characters

Photo of Frozensoul327
2.7/5  rDev -28.9%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

I really enjoy Samuel Smith brews, but this one I can do without. Pours out to your typical lager golden yellow, with medium carbonation and a short lived white head. Medium odor of hay and barley. Tastes a bit watered down with flavors of hops and stale malt. A touch of sweetness on the finish. Not one of my favorites, but possibly more akin to those who have a more developed palate. Go for the Oatmeal Stout for what I would call a good brew.

 447 characters

Photo of Shiloh
2.78/5  rDev -26.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2.5

This offering is light! Pours a very light golden colour with full head and limited carbonation. The body is light and aroma mildly grassy.
The taste is of a constant lingering ginger with a mild hoppy back.
Most impressive here is the mouthfeel, again due to the lightness of the product. Nagging sweet aftertaste.
Sorry Sammy, where it counts, ya ain't got it!!!

 367 characters

Photo of MMansfield
2.8/5  rDev -26.3%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Notes from Seaport Beer Fest 08/11/07

Appearance: Poured a clear gold colour with a fluffy bone white cap, good retention.

Aroma: Malt forward, a bit of sweetness and a bit of skunky grains. A bit of citrus as well.

Taste: Grainy malts, very little from the hops besides a slight bitter tang amongst a very bready finish.

Mouthfeel: Soft, medium carbonation. Drinkability is medium.

Final Statement: Definately the least exciting Sam Smiths I've had to date. There's definately better lagers out there.

 517 characters

Photo of Neehan
2.83/5  rDev -25.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

I love Samuel Smith beers, but unfortunately this does not live up to the (incredibly high) standards of this brewery. A nice appearance and mouthfeel but there seems to be a bit missing that prevents this beer from being the usual treat that Samuel Smith provides. Just seeing the name on the label makes me crave an Oatmeal Stout, so I plan on passing on this one in the future to move on to the other well crafted brews from this company.

 441 characters

Photo of Dogbrick
2.83/5  rDev -25.5%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Bottle from Winking Lizard. This beer pours a clear pale orange-gold color with a thin off-white head that dissipates quickly. Spotty lacing. The aroma is mildly hoppy with a bit of malt. Light-bodied with a light hops and malt flavor with touches of grass and fruit. The finish is lightly hopped and short. Overall this beer is rather subpar.

 343 characters

Photo of dsa7783
2.85/5  rDev -25%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

An average brew in all respects, sampled many selections from Samuel Smith that I really like, and this was probably the weakest... pours an apple-juice color with no froth and a slight carbonation present... not a very appealing appearance... smell was almost non-existent, very bland, as was the taste which was non-descript and slightly watery... mouthfeel and drinkability were also about average, just wanted to try this one because all of the other Samuel Smith brews were great, this one was a miss... Not recommended...

 527 characters

Photo of beerguy101
2.9/5  rDev -23.7%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Light straw color, medium head. A light bodied lager. Crisp and light mild flavor. Mild taste. Mouthfeel is round. Finish is smooth. Aftertaste is slightly bitter. Fairly well made, very standard tasting lager beer. Nothing particularly wrong with this beer, its very well made just not a lot of taste or flavor to it.

 318 characters

Photo of hotstuff
2.92/5  rDev -23.2%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

When poured this brew had a small white head with fine-small bubbles that quickly diminished. There was a lot of carbonation with this brew. The body was cloudy and pale yellow in hue. The aroma was malty and the lacing was fair on the sides of my glass. In my opinion, this brew had a bitter taste that lingered.

 313 characters

Photo of DogFood11
2.93/5  rDev -22.9%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Pale and highly filtered. Soft, tight head is easily managed and eventually falls to a sheer covering with minimal lace.

Sweet malts are readily available in this style and this is no exception. A light fruitiness adds to the mix and loads of dry hay.
Pale sweet malts of the euro style lager just don't do it for me. With that said this is one of the better ones in the style. Finishes pretty clean but lacks depth or complexity.

Notes: Although I'm a huge fan of Samuel Smith's this is the one offering I'll pass on.

 526 characters

Photo of pootz
3/5  rDev -21.1%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Bottle from IHB trade fest thanks Paul.

My first Sam Smith's lager...anticipation is maxed.

The pour reveals a liquid that can call itself a proper lager....straw-gold with a frothy white 3 finger cap..good lace.

Aroma is a tad sweeter than I like in a lager but there are ample bready notes and some dry hay.

Malty sweet with light stabs of target bittering, some floral essence here, light fruity notes???...clean finish.

A substantial beer but has too many tastes in it that should not be in a lager...although it is well made and satisfying

 549 characters

Photo of Scoats
3/5  rDev -21.1%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

This beer is amazingly average. Pleasant but not great. I guess I one never knows what to expect frrom a generic "lager" but I was expecting something more. More color, more flavor, more anything. So what is this beer? I imagine this is what Heineken would taste if it was unskunked and fresh. Not a bad beer but not worth the high price.

 338 characters

Photo of TheDM
3/5  rDev -21.1%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

This brew poured a small head of fine to medium sized white bubbles that left little lacing and a cloudy straw yellow carbonated body. It has a plesant malt-hop aroma. Ifelt it was a rather smooth brew with a mild hop flavor. Its a nice all-around brew, but nothing special to write home about.

 294 characters

Photo of Yesac
3.01/5  rDev -20.8%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

A - Very pale/clear yellow with a medium bright white head

S - Pale malt smell.

T - Yeasty and a slight malt taste.

M - Thin of course, lightly caffeinated.

D - This lager is easy to drink due to its lightness and thinness. It's got the typical watery taste that makes it easy to down a few.

 298 characters

Photo of VWBuggirl
3.01/5  rDev -20.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

This had a golden yellow color that is crystal clear, little foam and almost no lacing. As for the scent, there isn't much depth to it. Mainly maltiness. I agree with a previous reviewer that it is quite grainy, but in a non-skunked way.

This is a pretty standard euro pale lager, nothing special.

 299 characters

Photo of TMoney2591
3.02/5  rDev -20.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.75 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Served in a Lagunitas mason jar.

For whatever reason, I have Aerosmith's "I Don't Wanna Miss a Thing" stuck in my head right now... Anyway, this stuff pours a clear brass topped by a finger of off-white foam. The nose comprises lightly-buttered biscuit, very light grass, and a hint of honey. The taste holds notes of dried honey, light toffee, even lighter biscuit, and a vague sense of funky lemon peel. The body is a light medium, with a light moderate carbonation and a fluid feel. Overall, though I could possibly see this working well on cask (don't ask me why, I just get that impression here), it just didn't do it for me out of the bottle. This is quite the letdown.

 676 characters

Photo of deltatauhobbit
3.03/5  rDev -20.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Didn't find much difference between Samuel Smiths own Organic Lager and this Pure Brewed Lager.

Pours a clear, golden color with minimal head.

Smell is dominantly hops with very little malt.

Fairly smooth taste with some hop bitterness, has a little more malt than the Organic, still thin tasting though.

This beer still won't make me a lager fan.

 351 characters

Photo of radshoesbro
3.08/5  rDev -18.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

a - very typical of a lager. better head than average with alright lacing. i don't normally drink beers this light so i'm not super into tasting it.

s - doesn't smell like anything i like. cabbage comes to mind. very light hops..VERY light hops. no malts that i can smell.

t - okay, way better than i expected from the looks of it (but it's samuel smith's so i don't know why i wasn't psyched on drinking it). for a lager this is great. for something i'd normally drink i'm not so into it. i don't really taste the biscuit flavor everyone is talking about. it's a pretty average lager.

m - light bodied with an alright finish. the taste of it leaves your mouth after about 30 seconds though.

notes: i'm not so into this. it's better than most lagers, but i'm not so into this type of beer. personally wouldn't recommend it unless you're really really into lagers.

 876 characters

first ← prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | nextlast
Samuel Smith's Pure Brewed Lager Beer from Samuel Smith Old Brewery (Tadcaster)
3.8 out of 5 based on 580 ratings.
  • About Us

    Your go-to website for beer (since 1996), publishers of BeerAdvocate magazine (since 2006) and hosts of world-class beer events (since 2003). Respect Beer.
  • BeerAdvocate Microbrew Invitational

    Join us June 2-3, 2017 in Boston, Mass. for beer, cider, mead, kombucha and sake from over 70 small producers.

    Learn More
  • Subscribe to BeerAdvocate Magazine

    No fake news here. Get real beer content delivered to your doorstep every month.