Madame Rose Belgian Style Wild Ale | Goose Island Beer Co.

Your Rating: None
Want it   Got it 
Madame Rose Belgian Style Wild AleMadame Rose Belgian Style Wild Ale
BA SCORE
4.16/5
Exceptional
1,329 Ratings
Madame Rose Belgian Style Wild AleMadame Rose Belgian Style Wild Ale
BEER INFO

Brewed by:
Goose Island Beer Co.
Illinois, United States
gooseisland.com

Style: Flanders Oud Bruin

Alcohol by volume (ABV): 7.10%

Availability: Rotating

Notes / Commercial Description:
Brown Ale aged in French oak Cabernet Sauvignon barrels with the addition of Michigan cherries and heavily inoculated with Brettanomyces.

Added by botham on 08-19-2009

BEER STATS
Ranking:
#1,480
Reviews:
253
Ratings:
1,329
pDev:
10.1%
Bros Score:
0
 
 
Wants:
294
Gots:
473
Trade:
39
HISTOGRAM
 
User Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
Ratings: 1,329 |  Reviews: 253
Photo of vrbulldog22
4/5  rDev -3.8%

Photo of Dirty25
4.5/5  rDev +8.2%

Photo of DubbelTrubbel
3.84/5  rDev -7.7%
look: 4 | smell: 4.25 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4.25 | overall: 3.75

Bottle into goblet-style wine glass. 2012 vintage.

A- Rich mahogany brown, one finger of tannish head dissipates quickly

S- funky yeast, wine, sour cherries, then some oak. Hint of malt. As it warmed, it was like Bourbon county with wine- noticeable oak.

T- Sour cherries against a brown ale- a little charred malt at the end. Then some weird funk. Leans toward high bitterness.

M- Really nice mouthfeel, very easy, smooth feeling.

O- For me the best part of this is the smell- quite good. I think the taste needs the most work- It doesn't stand up the smell in complexity. I would not buy again at the $18 a bottle price.

 627 characters

Photo of westcoastbeerlvr
3.5/5  rDev -15.9%

Photo of LambicKing
4.25/5  rDev +2.2%

Photo of Hanzo
4.25/5  rDev +2.2%

Photo of cmoody91
4.25/5  rDev +2.2%

Photo of Morey
4.25/5  rDev +2.2%

Photo of Bilco
4.25/5  rDev +2.2%

Photo of vanillacokaine
3.5/5  rDev -15.9%

Photo of Tony412
4.25/5  rDev +2.2%

Photo of nickhiller
4.25/5  rDev +2.2%

Photo of NateMac13
4.5/5  rDev +8.2%

Photo of MordorMongo
3.8/5  rDev -8.7%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Start of a year of at least a review a day. 2012 Vintage. Decided to start with some GI, why not?

A - Ruddy brown, minimal head and lacing, pretty standard oud bruin look honestly.

S - Some vinous barrel, slight cherry (not as much as past vintage), vinegar notes, very slight funk hiding in there somewhere.

T - Not as much cherry as last batch, definite lactic sour dominant, not as much funk as I would like, vinegar more evident in finish. Woody notes throughout but overall just a bit dull, not near as crisp, fruity and funky as last one.

M - Medium, some carb in there, more than what appears visibly.

O - For the pricepoint and GI rep I would expect more but hard to say this is a let down. A very solid oud bruin, would love some bigger cherry influence and more FUNK, but I won't say no to another one so cannot complain much.

Definitely preferred last batch to this one....but perhaps my memory is just playing tricks on me. Cheers!

 949 characters

Photo of Beerandraiderfan
4.02/5  rDev -3.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4

Poured out a ruddy kind of appearance that you expect from a flanders oud bruin, equal parts amber and light brown. It would seem like a flanders red versus a flanders oud bruin would be a better beer to showcase the cherries, but nonetheless, here we are. Thin head, no lacing or retention really.

Aroma, fits the bill, minimal vinegar feel, the cherry is there, but at over 2 years old, this one is probably a little less on the fruit mouthfeel and higher on the sourness because of it.

I thought it was pretty good, but the brown malt made me keep wondering if this would be better suited for a red. I guess my natural preference is for a flanders red moreso than a brown, so that's probably all it is. The wood presence is there, but not heavy on the palate. For my money, I think this is far superior to Rodenbach. The wine barrel intrusion is minimal, but complimentary and tannic. That with the brett give kind of a chalky, grittyness that sticks to the teeth, pretty enjoyable at a little over the two year point. Not overly acidic, its kind of a more bretty then lactic sourness.

This is one of the more rare beer reviews from beerandraiderfan, as this review is being written immediately after consuming said beer this New Year's Eve, 2012. What can I say, everyone of drinking age isn't drinking anymore. In the end, its a pretty good and enjoyable beer. How many more will I continue to get a hold of? I dunno, there's one or two still in the cellar, it costs a little to get it shipped here, and its about the same price as Oude Tart, so prolly not much, but it doesn't mean this isn't a quality beverage here. . . man.

 1,638 characters

Photo of bralston345
4.25/5  rDev +2.2%

Photo of chefduff2
3.5/5  rDev -15.9%

Photo of wtfdic
4/5  rDev -3.8%

Photo of DukeX13
4/5  rDev -3.8%

Photo of aminobutyricacid
3.5/5  rDev -15.9%

Photo of RelentlessLefty
5/5  rDev +20.2%

Photo of Gobzilla
4/5  rDev -3.8%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

A: poured a pale brown in color with slight ruby highlights and almost no head which barely left any lacing sticking to the glass.

S: not as funky on the brett as the description suggest however there was a good presence of cherry fruit, signs of vinegar, a little vinous wine barrel character and citrus notes.

T: cherry fruit was a little more pronounced on the palate but not too loud alongside good vinous wine barrel accents, mild bretty funkiness, brown sugar sweetness followed with a bit of citrus twang, slight vinegar flavor and a touch of vanilla.

M; the brew was light to medium in body with a low amount of carbonation which had a fruity, vinegary, citrusy, vinous barrel, semi sweet and tart finish.

O: I thought it was just an average oud flanders but was still good and worth the try.

 804 characters

Photo of Honus1
4.75/5  rDev +14.2%

Photo of pigc
3.97/5  rDev -4.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

2012 bottled 7/31/12 poured into tulip.

A - Dark brown with slight reddish tones with a one finger head that fades quickly. Medium amount of carbonation bubbles.

S - Tart cherries, lactic acid, slight barnyard funk and acidic vinegar.

T - Starts out with a mildly tart cherry followed by a bit of funky brett. Not picking out too much more on this other than some slighty acidic tannins.

M - Light and lively with decent carbonation.

O - Slightly one dimentional, although I do enjoy the tart cherry flavor. Madame Rose is a relatively tame sour. Worth trying this once but the $17 pricetag is a bit steep for what you get here.

 633 characters

Madame Rose Belgian Style Wild Ale from Goose Island Beer Co.
Beer rating: 4.16 out of 5 with 1,329 ratings
  • About Us

    Founded in 1996, BeerAdvocate (BA) is your go-to resource for beer powered by an independent community of enthusiasts and professionals dedicated to supporting and promoting better beer.

    Learn More
  • Our Community

    Comprised of consumers and industry professionals, many of whom started as members of this site, our community is one of the oldest, largest, and most respected beer communities online.
  • Our Events

    Since 2003 we've hosted over 60 world-class beer festivals to bring awareness to independent brewers and educate attendees.
  • Our Magazine

    Support uncompromising beer advocacy and award-winning, independent journalism with a print subscription to BeerAdvocate magazine.