Bad Elmer's Porter | Upland Brewing Company

Your Rating: None
Want it   Got it 
Bad Elmer's PorterBad Elmer's Porter
329 Ratings
Bad Elmer's PorterBad Elmer's Porter

Brewed by:
Upland Brewing Company
Indiana, United States

Style: American Porter

Alcohol by volume (ABV): 5.00%

Availability: Year-round

Notes / Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

Added by zerk on 05-26-2002

Bros Score:
User Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Recent | High | Low | Top Raters | Alström Bros
first ← prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | nextlast
Ratings: 329 |  Reviews: 145
Photo of brewdlyhooked13
1.82/5  rDev -49%
look: 4 | smell: 2 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 1

Appearance - pours opaque black into a Belgian glass. Three fingers of light mocha foam shoot up quickly. Strings of lace stick to the sides as the head slowly melts down.

Aroma - a little. Some grain, some funk.

Taste - some base toasty grain here but the bottle has started to turn I think. There is a light sour bite here that I think doesn't belong. It's not overly nasty, just diminishes most of the beer's good flavor. There is no sweetness to the malt, and the sourness is covering any hop factor. I could finish this, but I'd rather not.

Mouthfeel - very bubbly, medium body.

Drinkability - I'll have to try and hunt down a fresher sample. This one is only 11 months old and should be fine, but caveat emptor on the room temp bottle storage, I think these need cold storage.

 786 characters

Photo of chugalug06
1.94/5  rDev -45.7%
look: 3 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

A - Nice straw colored head with moderate lacing. Brew holds a nice black color with purple and brown hues. Rather basic looking brew.

S - Super homebrew esque funk... Very weird scent. Not much of anything other than chocolate funk. Smells almost like a Coca-Cola...

T - Taste is better than scent, just not by a lot... Taste is buttery chocolate with side of soy sauce. The flavor in this one struggles.

M - Overly carbonated with dry and distinct funk. Light bodied and underwhelming. Horribly out of balance.

O - Brew is smooth, but missing a lot!!! There's not to talk about with this one. I wouldn't go out of my way to find this one again. Thanks for the extra in a good trade!

 688 characters

Photo of jacothom
2/5  rDev -44%

Photo of cnally
2.22/5  rDev -37.8%
look: 4 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

This beer sure looks better than it tastes. Such a dark brown, with little visibility through the glass. A lot of head develops, looking like a root beer float. A whiff of it and it all goes downhill. There is rusty well water and sourness all over the smell. Tropical fruits & banana are hidden in the background. When you drink it, there is an immediate tangy flavor, and really smoky. Also, there is a little bit of bitterness that resembles the bitterness of an olive. This fades into a despicable aftertaste that makes me feel that I have licked a used ashtray. Lots of fizz and punch on the mouthfeel. Not enough malt for how dark it is. The aftertaste is so distracting, there is no reason I would ever have another.

 723 characters

Photo of drseamus
2.49/5  rDev -30.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

This beer was bottled in February '06.

A: I poured this beer into a 16oz tulip glass and the head was so large it took several minutes to get it all in there. The body of the beer is dark brown and when held the to light there are ruby highlights. The head is very frothy, massive, mocha colored, and lasts FOREVER. It shouldn't be this much trouble to pour a beer.

S: The aroma isn't great. There is a bit of roasted malt in there. I can't exactly place it up but it reminds me of soap.

T: The flavor has a ton of roasted malt in there but has a slightly sour taste. There is some chocolate in there as well but it leaves a fairly bad aftertaste.

M: This is a medium bodied beer and it fits the style nicely.

D: The sour taste really turns me off so I have to give this a pretty low score.

 806 characters

Photo of Kaveman
2.5/5  rDev -30%

Photo of PhineasMcClintock
2.5/5  rDev -30%

Photo of bertram
2.5/5  rDev -30%

Photo of ATLbeerDog
2.71/5  rDev -24.1%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Pours a beautiful coca-cola color with a small ½ finger caramel colored head that very quickly dissipates. Smells of raisins and dark fruits with a hint of brunt malts. First sip is those same dark fruits plus deep roasted malts, and an unwelcomed metallic presence. Very lightly bodied and lacking in carbonation. So far my least favorite brew from Upland. I am disappointed with this one

 390 characters

Photo of DaveHack
2.75/5  rDev -23%

Photo of IndianapolisDrinker
2.75/5  rDev -23%

Photo of StoutIrish
2.75/5  rDev -23%

Photo of PorterLambic
2.75/5  rDev -23%
look: 1 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

When I first started to crack the cap, so much gas rushed out, I had to stop opening the bottle, no easy feat there. Repeated this open/close procedure several times before I could even remove the cap. Bottled on date of 11/05, poured 4/06.

Poured a full Imperial pint glass of tan foam. After several minutes it became 1" of very dark brown beer. Repeated this annoying procedure over and over. After 20 minutes I actually had 12 ounces of beer in the glass. No lace at all.
Smell is heavily roasted malts, coffee, nuts, soy and smoke.
Taste is burnt malts, coffee, soy, hop bitterness w/o flavor, caramel (after further warming) and some alcohol.
Tingly on the tongue, very heavily carbonated. Aftertaste of coffee grounds and wet lettuce. Medium bodied. This beer is all over the place. I hope it's a bad bottle if only because I've got 5 more to drink.

OK. I've had 3 more of these bottles now. The "glass o' foam" is a certainty with every bottle. Thinking ahead, I used a trumpet-shaped pilsner glass this time. Foam to the rim and nothing else for several minutes. Only took about 10 minutes to pour it all this time.
The taste, mouthfeel & aftertaste are improved this time over previous quaffings and I have adjusted my ratings to reflect that. The wet lettuce in the aftertaste is much less noticeable since the first bottle. Perhaps this brew should have a "best AFTER" date instead of best before as I think it is actually improving with age.

If they can get a handle on this explosion of foam, I could actually recommend this beer to some degree but not as things stand now.

 1,618 characters

Photo of weatherdog
2.77/5  rDev -22.4%
look: 4.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

On tap at the Bloomington brewpub. Served in a 16oz. shaker pint.

Pour is stand porter pour, deep nearly pitch black with a khaki colored head. Medium long retention with a healthy amount of lacing.

Aroma is very muted and light. Some mild coffee but overall seemingly watery.

Taste starts off with a little astringent roasted grain taste, then some dark fruit plumish esters finish off the taste. Mouthfeel is very thin and watery, nearly no body and a medium high carb level does not help it's cause. No glaring off flavors but it's just an average at best porter, just too watery tasting.

 594 characters

Photo of fretlessman71
2.78/5  rDev -22.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2.5

Pertinent preliminary comments: Much thanks to my friend Bruno_78 for sending this one along.

AROMA: Pretty high roasted malt content, a bit of fruit (plum?) and a fair amount of chocolate. Yep, it’s a porter, all right.

APPEARANCE: Jet black with only the faintest of mahogany coming through the edges when held to light. Beige head doesn’t get too big, but cap lasts. Light to moderate lacing.

FLAVOR: Very similar to the aroma; heavy on the roasted malt almost to the point of being too bitter. Mild to moderate acidity; not much chocolate. Almost getting cigarette smoke here. Hmmm… Carbonation okay; a little too “fizzy” on the palate. Finish is pretty dry, hops are coming through here, of all places. Picking up on some diacetyl – just got a mouthful of butter. Hmmm, indeed…

MOUTHFEEL: Decent; a little fizzy but well-weighted.

DRINKABILITY: Okay – I think I’d be bored of this one after one beer, though.

OVERALL IMPRESSION: This beer is alright… if you’re a really big fan of the burnt character of black patent malt, you might really be able to appreciate it. Not really my thing, though. Maybe this one needs a little less time in primary and a smaller chocolate malt/black patent malt ratio.

 1,234 characters

Photo of Rdc67
2.91/5  rDev -18.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Photo of ncvbc
2.91/5  rDev -18.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

A foamer with a head that keeps rising, lots of carbonation. Aside from that, very dark brown with ruby edges. Head finally settles after a few minutes and leaves spotty lacing down the glass. Smell is somewhat metallic and bitter chocolate. Smokey, charred scents. Kind of don't want to smell it too much. Taste brings some good chocolate up front and a healthy dose of caramel. Some toffee, coffee, and a nice bready malt in the background and again a little bitter with dryness. Mouthfeel is a tad distracting with carbonation. Wants to be creamy smooth but can't. Not a favorite but nothing horrible by any means. Just a little off for me.

Thanks to lightindarkness for this treat in the Ugly Duckling BIF...

 714 characters

Photo of KnappStout
2.92/5  rDev -18.2%
look: 3.25 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.75 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Photo of magictacosinus
2.94/5  rDev -17.6%
look: 3 | smell: 2.75 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Second offering from Upland that I'm giving a try. Had for breakfast with cornbread, ham, and other stuff we eat out here in the Midwest on a daily basis when visiting. Poured into a tulip glass from a 12oz bottle. Bottling date is listed as "April/2013." A bit old, but whatever.

Pours a brownish tinged blackened color with a head that resembles a mocha of sorts, bubbles and all. Lacing is actually pretty decent on this one, in spite of the fact that head retention is not at all. A ring struggles to stay around, and somehow it does. Bubbles are pretty non-present, but it's still got a strong color that makes it somewhat appealing. Looks thinned in nature. Not very different from your average run-of-the-mill American porters all of the country.

The flavors are mainly of roasted coffee notes, slight brown sugar, and... Not much else, to be exact. Some slight robust toasted maltiness creeps in, but it's really the coffee espresso bean flavors that fight for recognition here. Otherwise, there's a bit of graininess, maybe some bitterness from the light hops at hand, but it's not complex - only assertive on what it intends to be.

The flavor ends up being a one-note flavor of ground, fresh coffee extract, combined with toasted malts and light grains that provide a smidgen of bitterness and simultaneously some sweetness. I wish there was more beyond the coffee, but there really isn't - biscuits, light chocolate, faded caramel and citrus. I'm looking too much into this thing. It doesn't help that it's slightly watery as a cold (albeit refreshing) glass of coffee. However, it did pair well with the hearty, greasy food to avoid any discomfort from consuming it.

A very average porter that doesn't try to take any risks, but doesn't bring anything new to the table as a result. I could enjoy this on an evening sometime, but there are far, far better standard porters at the same price available that provide a hearty but super flavorful experience in the process. If more of Upland's beers are of this quality, call me excited enough to crave their highly acclaimed sour fruit beers more than ever before.

 2,126 characters

Photo of cetherid
2.98/5  rDev -16.5%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

poured into a pint glass


very dark porter. pretty much black with a nice thick foamy tan head.


mainly roasted malts. not much else to the smell. trying to smell for chocolate or coffee but not really getting that.


a smokey/roasted type of flavor. like some roasted coffee beans...almost a burnt taste to it. a little tartness and a slight hop presence.


barely medium bodied. a little light for me, although it has a little creaminess feeling to it. low carbonation. would probably be better on tap


about 1 is all I could take. doubt I'd buy this again. if I'm ever at Upland taproom, i MAY try it on draft if available just to compare.

 661 characters

Photo of TheDM
2.98/5  rDev -16.5%
look: 5 | smell: 2 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 3

This brew poured a medium head of fine to large sized light brown bubbles that left a fair lacing and an opaque black colored body. It has a mild malt aroma and a medium strength coffee flavor with a slightly fizzy start and a bitter finish. The best thing about this beer is its color.

 286 characters

Photo of hotstuff
2.99/5  rDev -16.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

This beer poured a small tan head that did not last long and it contained fine-medium sized bubbles. The lacing was decent and the nose was that of chocolate. The hue of this beer was black.It had a decent smooth coffee taste to it with some bitterness observed.

 262 characters

Photo of TerryB
3/5  rDev -16%

Photo of speedvagen
3/5  rDev -16%

Photo of murf1087
3/5  rDev -16%

first ← prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | nextlast
Bad Elmer's Porter from Upland Brewing Company
Beer rating: 3.57 out of 5 with 329 ratings
  • About Us

    Founded in 1996, BeerAdvocate (BA) is your go-to resource for beer powered by an independent community of enthusiasts and professionals dedicated to supporting and promoting better beer.

    Learn More
  • Our Community

    Comprised of consumers and industry professionals, many of whom started as members of this site, our community is one of the oldest, largest, and most respected beer communities online.
  • Our Events

    Since 2003 we've hosted over 60 world-class beer festivals to bring awareness to independent brewers and educate attendees.
  • Our Magazine

    Support uncompromising beer advocacy and award-winning, independent journalism with a print subscription to BeerAdvocate magazine.