Red Rack Ale | Woodstock Inn Brewery

Your Rating: None
Want it   Got it 
Red Rack AleRed Rack Ale
200 Ratings
Red Rack AleRed Rack Ale

Brewed by:
Woodstock Inn Brewery
New Hampshire, United States

Style: Extra Special / Strong Bitter (ESB)

Alcohol by volume (ABV): 5.50%

Availability: Year-round

Notes / Commercial Description:
Amber in color with slight caramel sweetness. Medium hop bitterness. Malty up front with a nice hop/ malt balance.

23.3 IBU

Added by UnionMade on 07-07-2002

Bros Score:
User Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Recent | High | Low | Top Raters | Alström Bros
first ← prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | nextlast
Ratings: 200 |  Reviews: 99
Photo of drinksandeats
2.19/5  rDev -35.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

From a 12 oz. bottle purchased in the Whites.

Appearance: Ruddy, slightly opaque. Strong head and good lacing.

Smell: Weak caramel maltiness. Some fruit aroma, a bit of hops, and not much else. Flat.

Taste: Slightly sweet, with an off banana taste present. Mild hops insufficient to overshadow the off fruitiness. Not good.

Mouthfeel: Starts out rich and smooth with a good body, and ends with a slightly unpleasant dryness.

Drinkability: Nothing to write home about. There's not much good beer flavor, even once you strip away the banana esters.

 551 characters

Photo of q33jeff
2.33/5  rDev -31.7%
look: 1.75 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 1.75 | overall: 2.25

LOOK: Yellow-ish Orange, clear, small head
AROMA: Slight Cranberry, White Bread
TASTE: Just like the Pemi Pale Ale….Ash or Char, with someCreamyness. Maybe it's a little Pine.
FEEL:A bit flat

Another below average beer from beer of the month.

 269 characters

Photo of NittanyBeerFan
2.41/5  rDev -29.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Poured into a nonic pint glass.

Coppery amber in color. Head is light and airy, not much retention, nor is there much lacing. Just about none, to be exact.

The aroma is fruity, a sign of some good English yeast, with a little bit of diacetyl coming out as the beer warms. The flavor is mildly bitter, and again fruity. However, as this beer reaches cellar temp, the nose and flavor are there-abouts of a tub of move theater popcorn butter. Holy crap. This is the second Woodstock Inn beer that I have had, and they were both diacetyl bombs. Needless to say, they have to get their processes under control to fix this. Otherwise, it is a fairly solid beer. Drink this cold(er) if you have it. It's a shame I didn't.

 716 characters

Photo of ygtbsm94
2.5/5  rDev -26.7%

Photo of DonFrap
2.5/5  rDev -26.7%

Photo of jpd7374
2.5/5  rDev -26.7%

Photo of Kyrgyzbrewer
2.5/5  rDev -26.7%

Photo of Karibourgeois
2.58/5  rDev -24.3%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Photo of BeerNinja007
2.58/5  rDev -24.3%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Got this in a variety 12-pack on sale for $10 at Beverage King in West Lebanon, NH. Best by date of Aug 2010 stamped on the label. Poured into a chilled pint glass.

Clear reddish-copper brew with a thin off-white head. Nose is a thick syrupy sweetness and dark fruits, like a mix of maraschino cherries and caramel. Taste is not as sweet. Dry, muddy, indistinguishable hops and malt. Fizzy carbonation with a soapy finish. Nothing interesting going on, pretty bland and unremarkable. Saving grace is that there's nothing particularly offensive. Meh.

 550 characters

Photo of Mora2000
2.64/5  rDev -22.6%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Thanks to Cavie for sharing this bottle. This is my first beer from this company.

The beer pours an amber color with a white head. The aroma is heavy on the butter with some sugar notes. The combination makes the beer smell like circus peanuts. Unfortunately, the flavor is not much better. There is a little bit of grass, sugar and toffee, but once again there is a lot of butter in the flavor. Medium mouthfeel and medium carbonation.

 437 characters

Photo of vapodge
2.65/5  rDev -22.3%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2

12 oz. bottle poured into a pint glass

A - clear red; thin, dissipating head; no lacing

S - scotchy malts; diacetyls

T - same as nose, with a fair bit of sweetness thrown in; super buttery

M - thin, but nice acidic aftertaste tries its hardest to counteract that butter

D - not for me -- butterscotch bomb; still, it's easy-drinking, but I can't handle that much diacetyl

 376 characters

Photo of micahgoldfus
2.7/5  rDev -20.8%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

Poured a brownish-red color that looked better up against the light. Had a thin, fizzy head that faded fairly quickly. The smell was dominated by hops: a little floral, but mostly a strong, spicy, tangy hop smell. There was also plenty of a sweet, caramel maltiness in there too. It was an interesting mix. The taste combined these two flavors as well: one one hand, there were bready, buttery, tasted malts that ended with a touch of caramel. On the other hand, there was dry, bitter hop flavor. But to me, unlike the smell, the taste did not work out. The mixture sounds nice, and should have produced a beer that I enjoyed. But the taste was just a little off to me, and the bitterness and sweetness seemed contrary to one another, as opposed to complimentary. I think that the flavors were a bit too strong, and the beer could have benefitted from some more subtle tastes. I ended up finishing the beer, but I didn't really want to.

 936 characters

Photo of billybob
2.72/5  rDev -20.2%
look: 2 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

pours a medium copper color quarter inch off white head that quickly fades to beer and a light wispy lace. smells of sweet malt and slight metalic note. taste about the same. mouthfeel light, carbonation held well even with a strong pour. average at best not worth the price. keep looking.

 289 characters

Photo of MAUEX_MFA
2.75/5  rDev -19.4%

Photo of Nelli769
2.75/5  rDev -19.4%

Photo of TheBirdSanc
2.75/5  rDev -19.4%

Photo of jschwamb
2.75/5  rDev -19.4%
look: 2.75 | smell: 2.75 | taste: 2.75 | feel: 2.75 | overall: 2.75

Photo of RIKIM
2.75/5  rDev -19.4%

Photo of evergreen_machine
2.75/5  rDev -19.4%

Photo of changeup45
2.83/5  rDev -17%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Medium-bodied amber color with a medium head and just a little bit of lace. Rich, malty flavor with some spices mixed in there. Slightly bitter in the finish and aftertaste. Malty aroma too with malts overall dominating this one. All around pretty average.

 256 characters

Photo of B967ierhunter177
2.87/5  rDev -15.8%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

This beer pours a clear amber with a thin head and no lace. The aroma is nutty with caramel and fruity notes and a hint of bread. The flavor leads with caramel followed through by grapefruit and bread crust. It's a bit more bitter than most ESBs but still good. The mouthfeel is light-medium. Woodstock Red Rack Ale is a decent brew, crisp, and refreshing. Recommended.

 369 characters

Photo of charlesw
2.88/5  rDev -15.5%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

Poured a light amber - very clear! Huge head dominated by big bubbles but with a nice, tight, creamy cover that translates over time to a very nice covering lace.
It smells like Ringwood yeast. No doubt about it. Dang!
And it tastes, well, like Ringwood. It's all buttery and creamy and really lightly malty and then there's the lightly bitter finish to it... Gently fades on that bitter note - nothing really bad to say there. Still, it tastes like an ESB to me and definitely not a red - there's just not enough maltiness to it, not really enough body, and the bitter tones aren't quite hoppy - they're just bitter, if you know what I mean.
I mean, heck, I bet it would be great on cask or something like that, but, again, NOT as an amber - more as an Old-Thumper wanna-be.

 778 characters

Photo of BMMillsy
2.88/5  rDev -15.5%
look: 4.25 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.75 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.75

Beer of the month club. Pours a pretty red color with small quickly receding head. Sweet fruit aroma with lots of malt and a bit of a buttery tone. Flavor is malty sweet up front, followed by buttery floral taste, and ends with some bitter hops, though these are pretty toned down. A little metallic flavor takes away from things. Easy drinking with plenty of carbonation. Ok beer, but nothing I would seek out.

 411 characters

Photo of ekardz
2.91/5  rDev -14.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

12 oz bottle from Awesome Beer Clubs into sam adams glass:

A-Reddish amber, clear lots of carbonation, very alive and inviting, little to no head.

S-some scent of grapes, sweet, herbal/piney hops, some fruity aromas.

T-well built, taste some grape characters. Red ale, killians like, definitely embodies the style.

M-light/smooth, good amount of carbonation.

D-wasn't sure if I would enjoy this, but I was pleasantly surprised. A perfect beer after a long day of work before drinking some of the heavier higher grav stuff.

 527 characters

Photo of wyllder
2.93/5  rDev -14.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

First off: Thanks to edchicma for the chance to sample this.

Pours a clear, coppery amber with a 1/4 inch head that recedes to nothing and leaves no lacing.

Nose is a mild, roasted caramel malt smell.

Intro to the palate is tangy & highly carbonated. The tanginess recedes for the midsip and you get a light roasted caramel flavor that comes through. Just the faintest burnt caramel aftertaste.

Mouthfeel is slightly oily.

Drinkability gets marked below average because I found this beer to be terribly boring. Halfway through the bottle I gave up on finding anything interesting and was already thinking ahead to what I would try next.

Overall, a rather boring and uninteresting beer.


 712 characters

first ← prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | nextlast
Red Rack Ale from Woodstock Inn Brewery
Beer rating: 3.41 out of 5 with 200 ratings