Rogue Farms Wet Hop Ale | Rogue Ales

BA SCORE
82
good
165 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score
Send samples
Rogue Farms Wet Hop AleRogue Farms Wet Hop Ale
BEER INFO

Brewed by:
Rogue Ales
Oregon, United States
rogue.com

Style: American Pale Ale (APA)

Alcohol by volume (ABV): 6.40%

Availability: Fall

Notes / Commercial Description:
Carawheat, Carafoam and Rogue Micro Barley Farm Daretm and Risktm Malts; Rogue Micro Hopyard Freedom, Revolution, Independent, Rebel, Alluvial and Liberty Hops; Pacman Yeast & Free Range Coastal Water.

15º PLATO
65 IBU
75 AA
14º Lovibond

Added by Docer on 09-19-2009

BEER STATS
Ratings:
165
Reviews:
104
Avg:
3.59
pDev:
12.26%
 
 
Wants:
8
Gots:
9
For Trade:
0
User Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
first ← prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | nextlast
Ratings: 165 |  Reviews: 104
Photo of dheldman
2/5  rDev -44.3%

Photo of changus
2.21/5  rDev -38.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

I'm really not impressed with this beer. Light, flavorless, smelled terrible and I just didn't want o finish it. Not a real fan of the wet hop beers, but this could have been more exciting. Looks good and dressed well in that fancy Rogue bottle. Just not worth it.

 264 characters

Photo of bitterthebetter
2.36/5  rDev -34.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

bought a 3.99 22 at local 7-11, figured why not. poured a hazy golden orange with crisp white head

resiny pine, slight citrus undertones, bready malt

resiny pine upfront then fades into lemon citrus then fading to bready malt, citrusy finish

resiny pine upfront, but gives way to dominating citrus and heavy malt, i wouldnt know it was a fresh hopped ale, very thin hop body, overshadowed by the bready malt, almost lagerish

a lame example of a fresh hop beer. looks great, smells good, but tastes like a boring pale ale. I would never guess this was a fresh hopped ale, very light and fading hop body and mouthfeel left me wondering what's the point, and then i remembered it's a rogue beer, I should have known better. don't buy this beer to expect a fresh hopped flavorful beer

 784 characters

Photo of RJLarse
2.44/5  rDev -32%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

On tap at the Flying Goat. Served in a pint glass.

Appearance is a rich copper color and hazy with a great foamy off white head.

Smell is faint with maybe a hint of malt.

Taste is malty but a bit off somehow. There is a stale bourbon flavor and a mild bitterness.

Mouthfee is OK. Medium body and clean.

Drinkable bit for the taste. I'll probably pass on having this again.

 377 characters

Photo of doubleipa
2.57/5  rDev -28.4%
look: 4 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Appearance: frothy, mostly diminished head, clear body, brown.
Aroma: Moderate malt, light bread, toasted, molasses, hops, (what hops), nothing there. Palate: medium, oily/creamy texture, very little carbonation.
Plenty of head, just no real hoppiness. My be moving towards "skunk" state.

 288 characters

Photo of Cresant
2.66/5  rDev -25.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Poured this 22 oz. brown bottle into a Samuel Adams glass. No date. There was some haze in the body. Copper/amber in color with a huge head of rich tan.

The smell was caramel-like. Typical Rogue yeast smell. Hints of sour dishrag. Bread crust. More on the malt side, rather than hops aromas.

The taste was also caramel-like. Low on the hops flavors too. Seemed a bit hollow, not well balanced. What happened to the hops? kind of bland.

The mouthfeel was rather light and less carbonated than expected.

 504 characters

Photo of HugePlume
2.74/5  rDev -23.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2.5

22oz bomber poured into a pint.

A- Nothing amazing here. Muted caramel color, almost a tan hue to it. Did pour with a surprising amount of head given its a pale at heart.

S- Misses the mark here. For a wet hop ale I was expecing to get kicked in the face with fresh hop aroma. Next to nil. This would be expected if I had sampled this late in the season but two months after bottling isn't enough time to completely wipe out the fresh hop. Very dissapointing as this is the raison d etre for these beers.

T- No fresh hop oils to tickle your pallet here either. Comes across unbalanced and a little too malty.

M- No problems with mouthfeel, good carbonation. Finishes very clean, typical Rogue style.

D- Its drinkable, but it misses the point. Im quite dissappointed. Rogue usually crafts a supreme brew and is one of my favorite breweries but this misses the mark, especially since this is one of my favorite styles.

 922 characters

Photo of chefduff2
2.75/5  rDev -23.4%

Photo of Bloodbuzz99
2.75/5  rDev -23.4%

Photo of keesimps
2.77/5  rDev -22.8%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Interesting beer and attempt but feel that it misses the mark... Flavor profile does not seem to come together for me. I like the hop notes and presence but they don't seem to fit with the excessively malty and darker characteristics of this beer than a traditional pale ale... I wish it were better, but I had to toss it down the sink.

 336 characters

Photo of DiabolikDUB
2.79/5  rDev -22.3%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Poured from Bottle into Imperial Pint glass.

Pours a clear orange-copper color with a couple fingers of off-white head that leaves a heavy layer atop the glass. The aroma is grapefruit, caramel malt and some alcohol. The flavor is grapefruit hoppiness upfront and quickly develops into a strong malt flavor and finishes sweet and slightly dry. Its medium bodied and softly carbonated. This beer needs more hops in the nose and a more consistent hop flavor especially since its fresh hopped. I'm more looking for hop bombs from Fresh Hop ales and this just wasn't that. This beer should certainly be considered an American Pale.

 628 characters

Photo of claspada
2.8/5  rDev -22%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Pours a white head with light lacing and average retention, an orange amber hue.
A light aroma with equal amounts of malts and hops.
Robust malty, nutty body, followed by a powerful hop presence that is piney, earthy and bitter.
Somewhat sticky and mouth coating, not in a good way however as this beer is fairly thin in malt backbone.
Goes down easy and is mildly flavorful but something is missing in my opinion.
Overall, not as good as the newer OREgasmic Ale from Rogue, I think they must have learned their mistakes and fixed them with this Harvest Ale. Seek out that beer over this one.

 592 characters

Photo of OWSLEY069
2.95/5  rDev -17.8%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Pours a hazy orange-ish to copper color with an off white head. In the aroma, fresh pine like hops. In the taste, quite watery and a dry fresh hop in the end. A smooth and light to medium bodied mouthfeel, with a small dry pine hop like aftertaste. Nice aroma, thin body, a nice hop in the end, but still lacking.

 313 characters

Photo of dirtbikejunkie
2.95/5  rDev -17.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

A: Poured a bright, almost clear orange. Very pronounced color. Only a light head with light lacing.

S: I could not distinguish anything in the smell except for light malt and hops. Nothing extraordinaire.

T: The taste followed the smell and nothing really good. Not bad, just not what I expected.

D: It was easy to drink. I can see my friends who are not craft beer drinkers enjoying this one more than me. I can't give it a great score for drinkability though because I simply had no desire for another.

OA: Not what I expected. At the price of this bottle I have no intention of buying another. I hoped for an interesting, flavorful beer but it was not so.

 664 characters

Photo of avocadoz
2.98/5  rDev -17%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

To my knowledge , this is the first wet hop beer I have had.

Smells of grapefruit and caramel; pours golden, slightly cloudy with little head.

Taste is relatively flat, not very hoppy. I was expecting more, but it's just not there. Very easy to drink though.

I would probably not buy this again, but will try more beers in this style to compare.

 349 characters

Photo of GRG1313
3/5  rDev -16.4%

Photo of C-Dog
3/5  rDev -16.4%

Photo of chugamugofsud
3/5  rDev -16.4%

Photo of nickfl
3/5  rDev -16.4%

Photo of gatornation
3.06/5  rDev -14.8%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

pours a hazy peach amber color with a decent head yellows and red colors mix in with a beige collar looks good..smell is bland of citrus ,tropical and floral smells nothing overwhelming or indicating of a wet hop..taste was a disappointment it just average not alot of wet freshness in this minimal hops and citrus are meet by doughy bread and dull malts..mouthfeel is light ans medium carbonation..this wet hop lakes big bold citrus hops and just nothing jumps out or grabs you in smell or taste i would say pass on this one as this time of year there are many harvest/wet hops that lap this one

 596 characters

Photo of BostonHops
3.08/5  rDev -14.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

650ml bottle served in a standard pint glass.

pours a slightly cloudy dull amber/copper color with a solid finger of beige head. middling retention; patchy lacing.

nose is subdued, definitely not as aromatic as i typically look for. notes of citrus hops... a bit biscuity. to be honest the 3.0/average rating here is a bit charitable. flavor mostly follows the nose: hoppy/earthy with some balancing malt characters. a touch of hops bitterness in the finish. it's decent - by no means a drainpour - just underwhelming.

medium bodied mouthfeel with average carbonation. goes down easy enough, but with more tasty beers out there i probably won't be gunning for this one again. again, it's fine but nothing special.

originally reviewed: 02-06-2011

 749 characters

Photo of Dawkfan
3.08/5  rDev -14.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

A- Pour is a hazed amber. Small off white head, retention is decent, modest lacing.

S- Aroma is very earthy and herbal. Fresh cut grass and perhaps a bit citrusy. Nice mix of sweet and bready malt.

T- The hops really don't come through until the end, fairly balanced. The malt flavor is mainly bready. Different tastes going on with the hops, it's grassy, earthy, peppery, piney & citrusy. There's almost a sweet sugary fruit taste in here as well. A decent hop bite that carries on the palate for awhile.

M- Body feels fairly full for an APA, carbonation is average. Dry finish.

D- It's alright, but not quite what I look for in an APA.

 641 characters

Photo of perrymarcus
3.08/5  rDev -14.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

650ml bottle served in a standard pint glass.

pours a slightly cloudy dull amber/copper color with a solid finger of beige head. middling retention; patchy lacing.

nose is subdued, definitely not as aromatic as i typically look for. notes of citrus hops... a bit biscuity. the 3.0/average rating here is a bit charitable.

flavor mostly follows the nose. hoppy/earthy with some balancing malt characters. a touch of hops bitterness in the finish. it's decent - by no means a drainpour - just a bit underwhelming.

medium bodied mouthfeel with average carbonation. goes down easy enough, but with more tasty beers out there i probably won't be gunning for this one again.

 672 characters

Photo of rfgetz
3.15/5  rDev -12.3%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Pours a hazy orangy amber, little head, little lacing. Smell is almost non existant, light malt and light hops. Taste is almost non existant, light malt and light hops... theres just not much going on with this beer, there is just a touch of a bitter bite and a faint faint touch of pine, but there is very little fresh hop charachter here. Body is slightly thicker than the bland scent and flavors would dictate. I actually recommended this to a friend who usually drinks macro, as i knew the taste wouldnt offend him.

 519 characters

Photo of ccrida
3.16/5  rDev -12%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 3

Bomber that I picked up at New Seasons 2 weeks ago, in have since kept it in the fridge, erroneously thinking this was a hoppy ale that needed kept as fresh as possible (what with the fist full of hops and the big red "Wet Hop Ale" proclamation on the label). Poured into my Samuel Smith's imperial pint, the wet hop ale is a chill hazed bronze with a large, creamy light sand head leaving light lace.

Smell is subtle hops, kind of bubblegum like, with hints of pine sap and limes. It's pretty good, but far to muted.

Taste is malty, spicy, bitter, pretty much like every other Rogue pale ale - this one being most notable for it's lack of hops. I realize wet hops are generally milder then dried, but this one is really subtle, mostly on the pine side. Good enough but not what I was expecting. The alcohol could probably be turned down a few notches, as it's the only really flavor that lingers on the long finish (along with some bitter hop spice), which I'm quickly tiring of.

Mouthfeel is very creamy, medium bodied.

Drinkability is ok for a basic, if maltier then most pale ale. Of course it's no bargain in Rogue bargain packaging, even with the ABV that is higher then most session ales. I don't see myself ever revisiting this. Overall, it's disappointing for a wet hop ale, in regards to there are not enough hops to showcase them. All the more so since I think these are Rogue's own hop varieties that I've never had.

 1,436 characters

first ← prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | nextlast
Rogue Farms Wet Hop Ale from Rogue Ales
3.59 out of 5 based on 165 ratings.
  • About Us

    Your go-to website for beer (since 1996), publishers of BeerAdvocate magazine (since 2006) and hosts of world-class beer events (since 2003). Respect Beer.
  • BeerAdvocate Microbrew Invitational

    Join us June 2-3, 2017 in Boston, Mass. for beer, cider, mead, kombucha and sake from over 70 small producers.

    Learn More
  • Subscribe to BeerAdvocate Magazine

    Support uncompromising beer advocacy and award-winning, independent journalism with a print subscription to BeerAdvocate magazine.

    Subscribe