Smuttynose Portsmouth Lager | Smuttynose Brewing Company

Smuttynose Portsmouth LagerSmuttynose Portsmouth Lager
Liked This Beer
3.65 w/ 251 ratings
Smuttynose Portsmouth LagerSmuttynose Portsmouth Lager

Brewed by:
Smuttynose Brewing Company
New Hampshire, United States

Style: Vienna Lager

Alcohol by volume (ABV): 4.50%

Availability: Year-round

Notes / Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

Added by BeerAdvocate on 10-26-2001

This beer is retired; no longer brewed.

User Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Recent | High | Low | Top Raters | Alström Bros
first ← prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | nextlast
Ratings: 251 |  Reviews: 225
Photo of chrispoint
2.5/5  rDev -31.5%

Photo of JAHMUR
2.5/5  rDev -31.5%

Photo of wiseguy142
2.59/5  rDev -29%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

I'm not a huge fan of this beer. It tastes like one of the first lemony-home brews I made where it got contaminated. I expect lagers to be significantly sweeter and drier but this had a harsh aftertaste of hops not fitting for the style, a murky yellow color, and just isn't fun to drink.

 288 characters

Photo of loren01
2.61/5  rDev -28.5%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

A: Pours clear orangish color, small white head, slight head retention
S: Metallic smell was a big turn off. The only other thing I noticed were a good amount of hoppiness
T: Bitter hoppiness mixed with the same metallic taste
M: Overcarbonated and hard to go down
D: Harsh tasting beer, couldn't get past the metallic taste, would like to try this again cause I doubt thats what they are going for with this beer.

 418 characters

Photo of quasimoto
2.7/5  rDev -26%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 3

A musty, grainy, dry toasty and slightly vinous aroma starts off this beer. As I swirl it the malty sweetness comes out and some diacytel. Malty sweet flavor, some cooked corn, and the dry graininess comes back in the end. The taste as I get it is first diacytel, malty sweet in the middle and finishes with the grainy flavor. The mouthfeel is smooth with not a lot of carbonation, and some slickness in the middle of the tongue from the diacytel. Overall a drinkable beer, but lagers are hard to do.

 500 characters

Photo of riversider76
2.79/5  rDev -23.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Pours golden. Head quickly vanishes. Average lacing. Smell was a bit matalic and hoppy. Mouthfeel was carbionated. Taste was a bit bitter from start to finish. I would have liked a more balance taste. This beer is not awful, but I was expecting more.

 250 characters

Photo of Seanibus
2.84/5  rDev -22.2%
look: 2 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Not the best of Smuttynose, which normally does top notch work.

Pours a hazy amber with hardly any head. What head there is collapses immediately and leaves almost no lacing. Although it isn't flat, it looks flat and uninspired. This is not even remotely an attractive beer, hardly what one would expect from a well-made lager.

The aroma starts with a blast of sour apricot, then, as the head collapses, becomes negligible. As it warms, there is a little hint of grain that comes out. Again, disappointing.

The flavor is better, but odd. It has a slightly sour fruitiness, with apricot and grape. There is considerable malt sweetness with little or no hop character. There is little in the way of finish, but the flavor eventually develops an unpleasant sourness on the back of the tongue.

Mouthfeel is light, with a slightly resiny character that unfortunately accentuates the sour aftertaste.

The more I drink this beer, the less I like it.

 947 characters

Photo of TAMU99
2.9/5  rDev -20.5%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Average lager beer. Nothing too impressive.
Appearance - golden, clear
Smell - beery, hops/malt nothing too spectacular
Taste - same. I was eating spicy food so maybe overpowered
Mouthfeel - lightly carbonated, clear
Drinkability - ok, not well balanced.

Not recommended

 279 characters

Photo of fitzy84
2.9/5  rDev -20.5%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

On tap at the Moan and Dove. The drink had a reddish, clear amber appearance with a thin head. The smells were of a good hoppy balance but nothing too spectacular, just average. Although there was a sweetness to the drink that I would attribute to the hops, I felt the drink had no real specific taste dimension. Good medium body with a decent carbonation. Overall, it was pretty average.

 388 characters

Photo of Stopper
2.96/5  rDev -18.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Starts with a very modest beige head topping a bright, clear orange. The head fades quickly to just a thin sheet of tiny bubbles across the top. The aroma is of a surprisingly full and very slightly sweet maltiness. A first sip reveals a body that is fuller than I would have expected as well. Most of the initial flavor is of light malt and little hops, but enough to be decently balanced. The finish is not overly dry and a slight hop bitterness remains, with very little hop flavor.

Overall, this is a bit maltier than I expected it to be, but not impressively so. And not overly impressively anything else either. It's a decent refresher and, in my opinion, something you can drink without feeling guilty about not thinking too hard about what you're tasting.

 766 characters

Photo of droomyster
2.97/5  rDev -18.6%
look: 4.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Pours a slightly hazy gold with a small white head. Aroma is disappointing: extremely subdued sour apples and caramel. Taste is also a let down: grainy malts with distant notes of caramel and grassy hops on the finish. Its flavors need to be serious amped up. There is nothing offensive about it but neither is it exciting. Definitely drinkable but I hope that Smuttynose (of whom I'm generally a huge fan) reworks this beer in the future.

 439 characters

Photo of NEhophead
2.98/5  rDev -18.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

12 oz brown bottle.

Thin, creamy white head that quickly fades leading to very little lacing. A copper color that looks a bit watered down.

A caramel sweetness combined with some lemon aromas. Not much here in terms of smell.

A metallic flavor combined with a very strange sweetness. The end of the sip holds an unpleasant bitterness. There seem to be some floral hints also, but they never really come to the forefront.

I found this lager to be a bit grainy and coarse. It doesn't quite sit well on the palate IMO.

Since the flavors are not overpowering, it's not a problem drinking...just not a pleasure. I'm glad that there were only three of these in the mixed pack. This is one to pass on.

 711 characters

Photo of bpfrush
3/5  rDev -17.8%

Photo of Brent
3/5  rDev -17.8%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Fairly sweet, with a somewhat grainy background. Holds it own against European imports, but does not really excel beyond them.

127 characters

Photo of kegerator
3/5  rDev -17.8%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

I didn't enjoy this one too much as it was abit boring.
poured a budweiser yellow with a a decent head that left slight lace.
smell was not there. it was very hard to pick up but i did smell a breadiness to this one with some citrusy noted, very slight citrusy notes.
tast was bland heavier then swill but tasted about the same. kind of reminded me of PBR in some ways.
nothing to write home about

 401 characters

Photo of ejimhof
3/5  rDev -17.8%

Photo of MrHurmateeowish
3/5  rDev -17.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Golden clear body with almost no head. Scent is hoppy but not overwealmingly so, with some yeast and malt. Flavor is slightly malty and slightly hoppy. Watery body. Very little carbonation. Bottle says best by October of 06, and this one's clearly past its prime... too bad... I'll have to try one that's a bit fresher.

 319 characters

Photo of rab53
3/5  rDev -17.8%

Photo of brheuer
3/5  rDev -17.8%

Photo of auntfloyd
3.01/5  rDev -17.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Served from a chilled 12oz bottle into a US pint glass. I bought this beer mostly because I am a fan of other Smuttynose brews, not so much because I'm a fan of the style. Pours a nice light amber color, which looks more golden when held to the light. The nose is slightly malty, but very subdued, and not a strong component to this beer.

The flavor is faintly sweet - fruity and malty, with a light hops aftertaste. Not too strong on any level, but very drinkable. This is a very easy drinking beer; not too carbonated, and not too strong. It's not a "wow" lager, but definitely something you can have when you want something lighter, especially in the summer time. Also a good bet for your non-BA friends who are put off by the taste of more flavorful craft lagers. Overall, not too bad, but not too outstanding either. A decent beer, but I might not buy it again.

 869 characters

Photo of Franchise
3.03/5  rDev -17%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

This beer pours a golden color and leaves a very thins white lace that disappears quickly. As I smell this beer I get some grassy wheat essence, along with some grape fruitness. This beer hits the palate with a bland tartness that really leaves you wanting for the malty sweetness to balance it out. The beer continues to give you that grapefruit, tarty smacking feeling but has nothing to balance it out with so the flavor is dominant.

 436 characters

Photo of LucaBrasi
3.05/5  rDev -16.4%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Pours a dull yellow with a very small head, which will disappear relatively quickly. I really couldn’t pick up much of a smell.... so I really can’t describe it. The taste was clean and clear with a hop finish. Mouthfeel was also smooth and lightly carbonated. This beer wasn’t super flavorful but is decent and goes down good. Out door thirst quenching beer.

 362 characters

Photo of oloughlinrj
3.06/5  rDev -16.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

12 oz bottle.

Pours yellow with decent head.

Not much to smell here, maybe slightly malty.

Pretty malty, but with a decent hop finish that lingers for a while. I'm not really finding a lot of strong flavors here.

Light carbonation and very smooth, it goes down easily.

Overall, I'm kind of underwhelmed by this lager. After the Smuttynose Robust Porter (which is excellent), I was expecting something more. It's a decent lager and goes down smoothly, but it just seems like a slightly above average beer from a brewery that you expect to produce much better products.
It's worth a try, but I won't be getting it again.

 634 characters

Photo of wheelinshirt
3.1/5  rDev -15.1%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Picked this one up from Abe's as part of a mixed six pack. 12 oz brown long neck bottle poured into a pilsner glass.

Practically exploded out of the bottle when I started pouring. Filled up the entire glass with head. Had to set it down and wait for the head to fall. This one sports some pretty good head retention, so it took a while. Big fluffy white head that leaves lots of lacing, but it was annoying having to wait more than five minutes to be able to pour and begin drinking a beer.

Smell is fairly non-descript, some malt, not a lot of hops, taste is similar. Nothing offensive in there, just nothing too noteworthy. It doesn't seem to be as refreshing as I like a good lager to be. This might have been better if I had been drinking it with a nice veggie burger and curly fries like the negra modelo that I enjoyed so much.

Mouthfeel was lacking in carbonation. Not completely flat, but it must have lost a lot of bubbles on that stunt it pulled during the pour. I would have this again if it was given to me, but I don't think I would buy this again.

 1,064 characters

Photo of AltBock
3.1/5  rDev -15.1%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

12 oz bottle with a plain and simple yellow and blue label with a picture of a white wall covered with hundreds of colorful buoys. To the right of the picture is where they keep the US Government warning and to the left is where they keep their clearly notched best before date of January of 2008. I'm just in the nick of time.

When poured into a simple mug, This Lager is a golden yellowish amber with an initial half an inch head of white foam. This head of foam quickly transformed itself into a small white bubbly skim and a spot or two of lace around the glass. It had a faint, but crispy aroma of toasted malts, a few blades of grass, a dab of juicy fruits, and then the aroma ended with floral hops. It had an average Lager crispy taste of toasted malts, a pinch of citrus fruits, and ended with what appeared to be a mix of floral hops and citrus hops. The mouthfeel was on the light side with medium carbonation and a faint aftertaste toasted malts and floral hops. Basically, I found this to be nothing more than an average not over the top affordable Lager from a great craft brewery. I couldn't see why not why this wouldn't make a nice summer session beer.

 1,170 characters

first ← prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | nextlast
Smuttynose Portsmouth Lager from Smuttynose Brewing Company
Beer rating: 43.4% out of 100 with 251 ratings
  • About Us

    Founded in Boston in 1996, BeerAdvocate (BA) is your go-to resource for beer powered by an independent community of enthusiasts and professionals dedicated to supporting and promoting better beer.

    Learn More
  • Our Community

    Comprised of consumers and industry professionals, many of whom started as members of this site, our community is one of the oldest, largest, and most respected beer communities online.
  • Our Events

    Since 2003 we've hosted over 60 world-class beer festivals to bring awareness to independent brewers and educate attendees.
  • Our Magazine

    Support uncompromising beer advocacy and award-winning, independent journalism with a print subscription to BeerAdvocate magazine.