Bohemian Pilsner | Matilda Bay Brewing Co.

Bohemian PilsnerBohemian Pilsner
BA SCORE
3.23/5
36 Ratings
Bohemian PilsnerBohemian Pilsner
BEER INFO

Brewed by:
Matilda Bay Brewing Co.
Australia
matildabay.com.au

Style: Czech Pilsener

Alcohol by volume (ABV): 4.70%

Availability: Year-round

Notes / Commercial Description:
Bohemian Pilsner has a light, golden colour and a distinctive hop character with spicy and peppery notes. Importantly, its bitter finish is balanced across the palate with a clean mid-palate and full malty flavour.

35 IBU

Added by rastaman on 06-24-2004

BEER STATS
Ranking:
#40,977
Reviews:
25
Ratings:
36
pDev:
18.89%
Bros Score:
0
 
 
Wants:
0
Gots:
1
Trade:
0
HISTOGRAM
 
User Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
first ← prev | 1-25 | 26-50  | nextlast
Ratings: 36 |  Reviews: 25
Photo of timmsimpson
2.7/5  rDev -16.4%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.25 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Photo of SmashPants
2.94/5  rDev -9%
look: 3.25 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.75 | overall: 2.75

Format: a 345mL dark brown bottle with a decent Matilda Bay craft-ish label.

Appearance: pours out a mid-golden colour with a finger of white head that drops to a thin cap. Limited lacing.

Aroma: grass hops with biscuit malts and some citrus. Something awkward and vegetal in the back, but all told reasonable.

Taste: more of the vegetal note comes through here than the malts or the citrus. Not offensive, but not particularly brilliant.

Aftertaste: the flavours linger reasonably quickly, with the citrus making a bit of a come-back.

Mouth feel: a light-to-moderate body with a moderate carbonation. Lacks feel.

Overall: this is not one of Matilda Bay Brewing's best efforts. It is a pretty ordinary and to be honest pretty boring pilsner. Add a laughable price of AU$70 a case, and this one is a no-go.

 811 characters

Photo of admiral
3/5  rDev -7.1%

Photo of Stuckey_Stuckey
4/5  rDev +23.8%

Photo of dmorgan310
3.5/5  rDev +8.4%

Photo of Mosant
3/5  rDev -7.1%

Photo of csmartin6
2.75/5  rDev -14.9%

Photo of XsoldoutX
3/5  rDev -7.1%

Photo of adityashekhar
3.25/5  rDev +0.6%

Photo of soju6
3/5  rDev -7.1%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

A: Pours a golden color with a moderate head that fades to bits of lacing.

S: Aroma of mild hops with a bit of malt sweetness and fresh grain.

T: Taste of citrus, some malt sweetness and fresh grain. Taste has a nice bit of hops, mild malty sweetness with some grain and hint of fruit. Nice bitterness and a clean finish.

F: Fairly moderate body, crisp smooth and refreshing.

O: Nice take on the style. Better than I expected.

 434 characters

Photo of pin
2/5  rDev -38.1%

Photo of magpieken
3.25/5  rDev +0.6%

Photo of hopnerd
3.25/5  rDev +0.6%

Photo of dansmcd
3.25/5  rDev +0.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

A - Two fingers of fluffy white head cap a clear light amber body. Decent streaky lacing follows.

S - Typical pils aroma of light grainy malt and crackers with a slight fruitiness and honey.

T - Clean and mild. Lemon, grain and the faintest peach are all I can decipher really.

M - Thin body with moderate carbonation. Quite smooth.

O - Sessionable and inoffensive.

 369 characters

Photo of mazstar
1.53/5  rDev -52.6%
look: 2 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 1.5

I've had Bohemian Pilsner before on tap and I recall it had a typically hoppy and floral pilsner taste and smell - this time around I think the Fosters crew had siphoned Victoria Bitter into the bottles.

Everything about this beer smacked of VB leading me to write to them alerting them to double check if in fact the right beer is going in to he bottles.

There was zero floral or hops and the taste was a lifeless malt with just a touch of bitterness - nothing resembled a European pilsner here. I expected much more from Matilda Bay even if it is part of a large macro brewer. Felt exactly like a heavy full bodied lager without any taste or discernible positives.

Absolute rubbish - stay away.

 702 characters

Photo of Stew41
2.1/5  rDev -35%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

Never been convinced on this one although did show better tonight. Pale larger nose, feels a little stale. Palate is essentially boring but has some body and weight with some ok hop character but not appealing in any sense. Finishes a little disjointed although reasonably bitter.

 280 characters

Photo of CrazyDavros
3.03/5  rDev -6.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Pours amber with a large, fading head.
Nose shows soft spicy and floral hops with bready malt underneath.
Flavours focus on the malt with more sweet bready characters and a bit of caramel. Could use some bitterness.
Carbonation is a bit full on.
Pretty decent and to style, apart from the unchallenged malty sweetness.

 318 characters

Photo of ADZA
3.03/5  rDev -6.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

A mate came over with a sixer of these and i havnt had it in a while but i do like the new label just hope the beer is improved aswell and it pours a crystal clear pale straw hue with beautiful carbonation that leaves behind a frothy two finger head with heaps of clingy lacing,the smell is feint noble hops and grains,the mouthfeel is very average and light bodied and has tastes of noble grassy herbal hops,pale malts,grains and a lemon tinge finish and overall its pretty average and i remember it being better and im glad i didnt buy it cheers.

 548 characters

Photo of Macca
2.95/5  rDev -8.7%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

This pours a crystal clear dark orange colour with an ok white head.

The nose is all grain. Maybe with a little sweetness in there. No sign of the hops.

Same, same on the palate. A touch metallic.

A bit thin in the mouth.

A very average boring pils.

 253 characters

Photo of doktorhops
3.07/5  rDev -5%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Time for a Pilsner face-off! Two decent Australian (and one Kiwi!) Pilsner's battle head to head for my admiration, who will win? Let's see! First cab off the rank is Matilda Bay Bohemian Pilsner.

Poured from a 345ml bottle into a 500ml Stein glass.

A: Clear gold body with a bone white head that began at 1.5cm and dropped to a 0.5cm covering... standard stuff really (although the head from a real Czech Pilsner would retain much better).

S: Cut grass hops power through some light crystal malts with a herbaceous hint of what's to come. Not bad at all.

T: The crystal malts are quite feathery and take a back seat to the citrus/cut grass hops. There is a spicy and bitter back note which leaves you high and dry (literally dry!) in expecting something else. Nothing extraordinary here.

M: Standard carbonation for a Pilsner - slightly creamy and medium bodied.

D: Yeah it's not bad on a hot day but today is not that day for me (it's all rainy and miserable outside, a great day for a Pilsner face-off). I'm not getting anything unique out of this brew, even though Matilda Bay are quite known for their beer capers this is not one of them.

Food match: I'm gonna go out on a limb and say Czech food (check!).

 1,218 characters

Photo of lacqueredmouse
3.1/5  rDev -4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Pours a very light bodied, and rather light coloured gold, with almost minimal head. Even with a pretty vigorous pour, it seltzers up, and the dissipates to the thinnest of rings, leaving some tiny bubbles around the edge. Decent lacing from what's left, however, leaving tiny-patterns sudsing around the glass, and the body looks pleasantly thick. Head is a clear disappointment, but otherwise decent enough.

Nose is fresh with lemony zest and a slight creaminess that almost makes me think of Belgian yeast. Then it sinks a bit, leaving some old grain characters and a faint whiff of musty organics. Eh. OK, but not great.

Taste misses the mark even more. Thin entry with a lick of metallic hops, before the big musty grain note comes through on the back, leaving a green but rather unsavoury finish. Feel is extremely thin. I don't know where the body I espied in the appearance went, but it doesn't lend anything to the very light palate. Eh.

Eh. I seem to have said "eh" a lot in this review, and that seems to be the critical point. It's not bad, but it really lacks interest, even enough to make me enthusiastic about my next sip.

 1,140 characters

Photo of WHROO
3.72/5  rDev +15.2%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

A good pilsner & one of the more traditional bittery ones at that.
Cloudy Amber with a 1 finger head, good head retention & lacing was a fraction above average.
Aroma was not too evident, got some bitter citrusy hops & a little fruit malty sweetness.
The taste is what a strong pilsner is all about - malty fruit sweetness at first, then the strong hoppy bitterness that lingered to finish. We had a drinker amongst us that loves her beer but not bitterness & she was blown away by the level of bitter than turned her off...i liked it but!
It was alive enough in mouthfeel, nice & clean - i love the contrast between the initial sweetness then the hop bitterness, would probably have liked a little more malty fruity sweetness across the top & middle tongue section.
Twas quite enjoyable!!!

 790 characters

Photo of Cs1987
4.12/5  rDev +27.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4.5

Apperance - Amberish-gold, 2 fingers of head which reduced.

Smell - Great bitter fruit smells, quite strong for an Australian pilsener.

Taste - Plenty of Saaz hops gives this beer fruitiness and a good bitterness level.

Mouthfeel - Great texture and carbonation.

Drinkability - Would make a great session drink.

Overall - Arguably the best popular Australian pilsener.

 373 characters

Photo of foles
4.2/5  rDev +30%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4.5

I havent had what I call a real characteristic pils for a long time. The smell is slightly lemony with a musty edge. Not too bad, the taste reminds me of the experience I had with a little brew in Stuttgart - Stuttgarter Brau. It goes through a flavour transition as it is consumed, slightly bitter up front, then a lemony jest and a flowery light, fresh, crisp finish. Lovely. The only drawback is probablt that the characteristic could be a little more pronounced, but I shouldnt complain...

I've found my favourite pils of the moment. Just a tad expensive despite being a local beer here in Perth (originally although the brewing has shifted I am led to believe)

I'm going to invest in a carton of these.

 709 characters

Photo of brendan13
3/5  rDev -7.1%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

A - Golden coloured beer poured with a couple of centimetres of white head into a pint glass. A bit of lacing is left behind.
S - Grainy, light herbal hop notes, a touch of honey.
T - Very much like the smell.
M - Medium bodied, fairly high carbonation.
D - Drinkable for sure but pretty much just like any "premium lager" in other words pretty boring.

 352 characters

first ← prev | 1-25 | 26-50  | nextlast
Bohemian Pilsner from Matilda Bay Brewing Co.
Beer rating: 3.23 out of 5 with 36 ratings
  • About Us

    Founded in Boston in 1996, BeerAdvocate (BA) is your go-to resource for beer powered by an independent community of enthusiasts and professionals dedicated to supporting and promoting better beer.

    Learn More
  • Our Community

    Comprised of consumers and industry professionals, many of whom started as members of this site, our community is one of the oldest, largest, and most respected beer communities online.
  • Our Events

    Since 2003 we've hosted over 60 world-class beer festivals to bring awareness to independent brewers and educate attendees.
  • Our Magazine

    Support uncompromising beer advocacy and award-winning, independent journalism with a print subscription to BeerAdvocate magazine.