Bad Monkey Chimp Chiller Ale | Bad Monkey Brewing Company

Bad Monkey Chimp Chiller AleBad Monkey Chimp Chiller Ale
43 Ratings
Bad Monkey Chimp Chiller AleBad Monkey Chimp Chiller Ale

Brewed by:
Bad Monkey Brewing Company
Georgia, United States

Style: American Blonde Ale

Alcohol by volume (ABV): not listed

Availability: Year-round

Notes / Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

Added by santoslhalper on 07-24-2006

This beer is retired; no longer brewed.

Bros Score:
View: Beers | Events
User Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
first ← prev | 1-25 | 26-50  | nextlast
Ratings: 43 |  Reviews: 40
Photo of Knapp85
1.8/5  rDev -28.3%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Basically this beer is absolutely nothing special at all. The beer is yellow and rather bland. Dull look white head and not much aroma. The beer itself is just not impressive to say the least. I can't believe it's as expensive as it is. The only flashy thing about this beer is the label. Total bummer of a beer.

 312 characters

Photo of woodychandler
2.56/5  rDev +2%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Butt Monkey?!? WTF?!? Chimp Chiller? Wha? Also, my bottle indicated that it was made by the "Golden Beverage Co. Wilkes-Barre, PA". Okay, whose butt did this monkey fly out of?

It began by pouring out with a thick, bone-white head that quickly reduced to a light cover of wisps on the surface of the beer. Color was a really pale yellow with NE-quality clarity. The nose had a slight mustiness and a lightly malty aspect. It smelled like most mass-produced beers, setting me up for disappointment. The mouthfeel was really thin, bordering on watery. It had a light malty flavor on the tongue, but I was underimpressed. The finish had a slight bite to it, but overall, it reminded me of some sort of ethereal beer that was just too light and fluffy to remain earthbound. As a cream ale, I am still reaching for a Genny.

 821 characters

Photo of Slatetank
3.6/5  rDev +43.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

I picked this up at Queen six pack in Lancaster. Poured cold from the 12oz brown bottle into a Nonic

A - Pale golden w/ a quickly dissipating white head that leaves no lace to speak of. The clarity is good and there are plenty of streaming bubbles rising to the top of the glass

S - Slightly sweet in the scent dept. This ale hints at cereal w/ a slightly sweet corn accent in the aroma

M - A sweet, light and refreshing crisp feel w/ decent carbonation and mild malt texture w/ a relatively clean finish

T- Sweet extra light malt flavor w/ slight creaminess similar to a pale wheat ale. There is a gentle touch of adjunct in the ale as it warms, but mostly a refreshing light ale is what I get out of this. Subtle toasted malt w/ a honey-like tinge it begs for easy summer drinkin'

D - This is a fine light ale, much better than an industrial lager or macro IMO. I find this to be perfect for a warm summer day on the deck chillaxin'. It is a nice alternative to BMC and makes a nice lawnmower ale, but I am not averse to light bodied ales

 1,045 characters

Photo of stakem
2.91/5  rDev +15.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Poured a transparent straw yellow color with 1 finger head that dissolved into a thin layer. Has a little bit of lacing. Nearly constantly bubbling from the carbination. Initially had a yeasty smell upon opening and pouring but that passes on to a smell that reminds me of lemons. Taste is a bit watered down as compared to the other cream ales I have had. I think I can taste a tiny bit of trace malts, but that might be because I am fighting to get a taste out of this beer. The aftertaste is almost buttery and mouthfeel is quite light.

 539 characters

Photo of WVbeergeek
2.8/5  rDev +11.6%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Appears : Light copper golden ale leaves bright white head behind, wow leaves a bright white head and thick white lacing.

Aroma: Wow, thick grainy sweetness leaves behind hop aromatics with ginger tones.

Taste: leaves behind caramel thickness that tastes oh so good that is coated with sugar coated sweetness.

Mouthfeel: Sugary medium bodied so nice not even carbonation:

Drinakbility: Very smooth butt monkey of a sorts.

 433 characters

Photo of jwc215
2.26/5  rDev -10%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 3

Pours straw yellow with a thin white head that becomes a patch that covers most of the top.

The smell is of tonic water with a touch of grain - some "beer-like" quality, but not much.

The taste ia of some sweetness with just a hint of bland, washed-out hops. "Wet cardboard" in the very abrupt finish. Fizzy carbonation covers up any potential for flavor that might be there.

Drinkable as far as light and fizzy, bland "beer" goes I suppose. Personally, I think that this is not worth a monkey's butt.

 504 characters

Photo of tone77
3.22/5  rDev +28.3%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Poured from a brown 12 oz. bottle. Has a golden color with a small head. Smell is of malts, a good bit sweet on the nose. Taste is not sweet, rather light and mild, a bit of malts, not a whole lot of flavor. Feels light in the mouth and has good drinkability. Overall this is a mediocre brew.

 292 characters

Photo of Gavage
1.73/5  rDev -31.1%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 1

Appearance: clear yellow in color with no head, only a spotty surface foam. Numerous fast rising carbonation bubbles are visible. No lacing.

Smell: grass and corn and barely detectable by the nose. Basically no aroma.

Taste: thin malt levels, corn, honey, green grapes, grass, and no bitterness. Just an unpleasant mess here.

Mouthfeel: lightly crisp to start, dry and smooth at the finish. Light in body, thin in flavor. Clean aftertaste.

Drinkability: we’ll leave the Butt Monkey jokes out here – this beer is just not worth having. Pass this by if you see it on the shelves in your store.

 606 characters

Photo of Stinkypuss
2.78/5  rDev +10.8%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Now labled as "Bad Monkey" after some backlash I suppose.

A. 12 oz bottle into a clean pint glass. Soapy head on a clear piss yellow body. Head recedes to a trace. No lacing.

S. Husky cream smell with perhaps a hint of hops. Smells and looks similar to a macro.

T. Pale malts are the predominant feature of this brew. Some light adjuncts are there but barely noticable. No discernable hop flavor, and very little bitterness to help balance the malt sweetnes. On par for the style, but very average.

M. Light and well carbonated. Sweet aftertaste doesn't linger too much.

D. Overall, a decent example of the style, but doesn't really leave much of an impression. Too sweet to really have more than one, unless you absolutely love cream ales.

 745 characters

Photo of Suds
2.95/5  rDev +17.5%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Courtesy of a friend, I recently had the chance to try this brew. It pours a very pale color with a slight yellow color and is completely clear. Unremarkable head. The aroma is slightly grainy, with a bit of grass behind it. It’s initially pretty unimpressive. The taste is better than expected, though. It’s a got a grain flavor, with a very slight touch of malt. There’s certainly not a lot to this beer, but it’s better than the usual macro. It’s smooth and clean, with a light body. This would never be a ‘go-to’ beer for me, but it’s not as disappointing as the first glimpse indicated.

 599 characters

Photo of DavoleBomb
1.27/5  rDev -49.4%
look: 1.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 1 | feel: 1 | overall: 1

Poured into a pint glass. I think this is the beer I am drinking. It says on the label, "BadMonkey, Chimp Chiller Ale, brewed and bottled by Golden Beverage Company, Wilkes Barre."

1.5 A: Shitty piss yellow color with a shitty white head.

2.0 S: Floral and citrus hops dominate the nose. There's also a healthy bit of pine in there as well. Lots of fruitiness with pineapple up front and hints of mango in the background.

1.0 T: Holy fuck this is bad. Seems like there is about 2% barley in this bitch. Tastes like adjuncts and nothing. This has me craving an Old German right now.

1.0 M: Super light body. Undercarbonated. Basically nothing is done right here.

1.0 D: Just about every other shitty beer out there is better than this one.

 743 characters

Photo of tpd975
3.02/5  rDev +20.3%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

A: Pours a light golden yellow hue with a medium white head. No lace.

S: Big on corn with hints of green grass.

T: Tons of corn with some very light hops. Honey sweetness in the finish.

M: Light in body with good carbonation.

D: It's drinkable, but not the most tasty.

 272 characters

Photo of dsa7783
3.37/5  rDev +34.3%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

Single bottle copped from Gary's in Madison...
I don't know what the brewery is trying to pull off with the monkey logo sticker...
Pours an ultra-light, see-through golden hue with a minimal head and very minor lacing...
Smell: Faint, nondescript, unassertive pale aroma...
Taste: Crisp, refreshing, light-bodied flavor... Easily drinkable, yet still lacking in the flavor department...
Loose, watered-down mouthfeel...
Not too sure about this one...

 450 characters

Photo of PittBeerGirl
3.55/5  rDev +41.4%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4.5

after reading some of these reviews I was somewhat afraid to try this beer. Actually-its not bad. The appearance and smell are average-almost what you'd expect a typical run of the mill American lager or maybe a sub-par ale to smell and look like. It yellow with no head retention and nothing particular stands out in the smell. Its would the average person would say smells like "beer" maybe with a hint of sweet.

I was pleasantly suprised by the taste,mouthfeel and drinkability. The taste is very smooth and creamy. Its sweet but still yeasty. The aftertaste is very sweet and creamy. The mouthfeel is above average. Carbonation is very low but its very smooth. This is a very drinkable beer. Completely unoffensive and nothing bitter.

 741 characters

Photo of brewdlyhooked13
2.59/5  rDev +3.2%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2

Appearance - pours a pretty clear light golden into a pilsner glass. A half inch of foam, creamy and tight, and with good retention. Fades down slowly, leaving a solid wake of lace covering everything.

Aroma - corny, slightly sweet. It's okay for the style.

Taste - macroish grain flavor, slightly sweet as in the nose. No hop presence, just a fading of the grain on the swallow.

Mouthfeel - thin and watery, plenty crisp; good form per the style.

Drinkability - goes down easy enough, but I wouldn't make a habit of these. Thanks to beachbum for the bottle.

 562 characters

Photo of goblue3509
2.21/5  rDev -12%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Pours a very faint yellow color with a small head which gives way to some lacing. The aroma is of some citrus and sweet florals but the smell is very faint and almost not there. The taste is of sweet flavors, some fruit taste and no really hop presence, some adjunct bite at the end. The mouthfeel is light bodied and stingy. Drinkability wise it not offensive but nothing pleasurable to keep you coming back.

 409 characters

Photo of BeerSox
3.1/5  rDev +23.5%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

12oz bottle into pint glass

Crystal clear straw hue with a very thin fizzy white head.

Barely any aroma, just a little grain.

Very plain flavor, somewhat sweet, with some bready grain and just a touch of leafy hops. Light bodied, high carbonation.

A pretty bland beer, and actually very inoffensive. Very drinkable, if this is the type of beer you're looking for.

 368 characters

Photo of SixpointJMH
2.43/5  rDev -3.2%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

Pours a run of the mill looking crisp light gold colour with a head that leaves no markings on the glass.

The aroma is faintly sweet with some grain in the mix. Some grassy notes and possibly some corn as well.

The flavour is actually not bad at first sip, but each successive sip brings out the flaws in this one. Corn flavours become much more apparent here with the grass notes and grainy feel taking a definite back seat. Very much scatter shot. Mouthfeel is light bodied and just very bland.

This one is just not enjoyable. A bad marketing idea coupled with a beer that's equally ill-conceived. Don't bother.

 622 characters

Photo of ommegangpbr
1.93/5  rDev -23.1%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 1.5

I taste corn, cheap corn. The feel on the palate is flat. Looks pale and cheap with no head. Tastes pale and cheap, with no oomph. Upon the first sip I was already thinking drain pour. Stale candy comes to mind.
If you happen to enjoy the taste of Budweiser, then by all means do pick this up as there is a striking resemblance in profile.

 356 characters

Photo of jcdiflorio
2.03/5  rDev -19.1%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Pours with a white head dissapates quickly.Not alot of carbination.
light golden color very clear.Slight malt smell kind of a straw smell no hop presence.Not much taste. I don't think i'll drink this again. I bought this cause Iliked the bottle which can be hit or miss.

 272 characters

Photo of santoslhalper
2.98/5  rDev +18.7%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2 | overall: 4

Appearence: Pours a dull, clear yellow with a thin, foamy white head.

Smell: Very malty, with hardly any hop presence. Buttery (uh-oh), with a little but of earthy, floral aromas.

Taste and Mouthfeel: Light and refreshing, yet offering very little to the palate. Just a tiny bit of hop bitterness, and a very watered down mouthfeel. Goes down real easy, and it is thirst quenching. Almost tastes like a light lager...

Drinakbility and Overall: I think they might have wanted to brew a pale ale with this one, but I feel it's a cream ale all the way? Tried it yet? What do you think? Although this beer is far from anything special, it would be a good lawnmower beer on a hot day.

 689 characters

Photo of EStreet20
1.58/5  rDev -37.1%
look: 2 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 1.5

Yes I fell victim to the hilarious looking bottle and grabbed a single. Plus it's brewed in Wilkes-Barre, right near my Alma Mater so I'll give it a whirl.

A - Completely transparent pale yellow. Tiny head of white fizz that disappears. Basically has the look of a macro lager.

S - Smell is of funky adjunct lager.

T - Tastes like a corn loaded, adjunct filled mess.

M - Extremely thin and watery.

D - No way.

This brew is simply awful. This is one of the few times I've bought a beer with no idea what it was. Oh well, the monkey picture is funny.

D -

 573 characters

Photo of letsgopens
3.93/5  rDev +56.6%
look: 2 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4

I had a difficult time finding this one on the site after picking it up on a whim from my local six pack shop. Never saw it before so I was intrigued. Apparently it's now called 'Bad Monkey' rather than 'Butt Monkey'. Very odd; the bottle looks exactly the same as the old one except the 'Butt' was replaced with 'Bad'. Guess I'll have to update that pick. Also I noticed that it's now brewed by the Golden Beverages Co. in Wilkes Barre, PA. In any case...

This illusive bugger pours a very clear, rather drab yellow with some sparse rising bubbles. The head was almost as illusive as beer because by the time I found it on the site the head was nowhere to be found. Egg-shell white and airy with little or no lace remaining.

Husky grain in the nose with some buttered cornbread and faint but floral hops. After the skepticism I felt post pour I'm feeling a little better considering the aroma was a pleasant surprise.

Sweet and malty up front with some very pleasant buttery biscuit notes. Mild but pronounced, spicy hops as well. I'm liking this one. A great representation of a cream ale IMO. From my college days I still have a fond recollection of Genesee Cream Ale and, dare I say, I prefer this selection over it.

The mouthfeel is fluffy upfront with a very fine textured carbonation that fades to distinct creamy feel. Really compliments the beer's mild but pleasing character.

I'd say the drinkabilty is high, even for the style. The fact that there's no standout flaws that some beers of the style display (i.e. - metallic or boozy) that hinder me from drinking several without it wearing on my palate, bodes well for this brew. Ignore the style and the tacky label; if you're in the mood for something easy drinking and well balanced, give this one a go.

 1,774 characters

Photo of drxandy
3.21/5  rDev +27.9%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

enjoyed from bottle, my friend richard's parents brought him some from PA. He poured one to a glass and it had a regular golden bmc shade.

smells of malt, adjunct slight hop bitterness, clean and biscuity

taste is of sweet malt, slight adjuncty corn, nice medium carbonation, biscuity toffee, hops come in after the sweetness and give a nice slight bitterness. clean and refreshing, would be a great summer beer.

mouthfeel is slightly creamy, good medium carbonation

not bad for a cheaper beer

 497 characters

Photo of DerekP
2.72/5  rDev +8.4%
look: 2 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

About 4 years ago in a bar my girlfriend (now my wife) and I frequented often, the bartender offered a new beer from the cooler. If my recollection serves me correctly, it was humorously called Butt Monkey. The brew with the ridiculous name was made in the state of Pennsylvania so I was inclined to give it a go. Long story short, it tasted pretty much like your average adjunct lager, but maybe a tad bit more interesting.

Maybe the brewery realized that no one was interested in drinking a beer that didn't even have enough respect for itself to bear a name that avoided references to one's back end. Seeing the brew for the first time since that night four years ago just a few weeks prior to this writing at the distributor I work at on weekends, the brewery has evidently gone the safer route with the name of Bad Monkey.

It appears tarnished gold with a head that disappeared in less than a minute's time. It smells like an eviscerated pilsner: wet malts, mild grassy hops and nothing more.

In the mouth it unenthusiastically delivers a slightly tangy hops note upfront with an extremely mild malt bill. The presence of caramel malts is just barely in the room. A glimse of the fruity ale characteristic comes through in the feel and finish (probably the best feature to this beer).

Somewhere I heard or read that Bad Monkey is in the area of 6% ABV, but the grains required to make that a positive attribute clearly did not make the cut. What I mean to say is, this a concoction that's had 100% fermentables added to the recipe to both thin out the final product and raise the alcohol content.

 1,605 characters

first ← prev | 1-25 | 26-50  | nextlast
Bad Monkey Chimp Chiller Ale from Bad Monkey Brewing Company
Beer rating: 2.51 out of 5 with 43 ratings
  • About Us

    Founded in Boston in 1996, BeerAdvocate (BA) is your go-to resource for beer powered by an independent community of enthusiasts and professionals dedicated to supporting and promoting better beer.

    Learn More
  • Our Community

    Comprised of consumers and industry professionals, many of whom started as members of this site, our community is one of the oldest, largest, and most respected beer communities online.
  • Our Events

    Since 2003 we've hosted over 60 world-class beer festivals to bring awareness to independent brewers and educate attendees.
  • Our Magazine

    Support uncompromising beer advocacy and award-winning, independent journalism with a print subscription to BeerAdvocate magazine.