Oaked Butt Head Bock | Tommyknocker Brewery

138 Ratings
Read the review
Oaked Butt Head BockOaked Butt Head Bock

Brewed by:
Tommyknocker Brewery
Colorado, United States

Style: Doppelbock

Alcohol by volume (ABV): 8.10%

Availability: Rotating

Notes / Commercial Description:
Gold Medal winning Butt Head Bock brewed with heavy toasted Hungarian Oak. Deep earth and wood notes make this specialty a substantially enjoyable brew for the connoisseur.

Added by humanawho on 11-07-2008

For Trade:
User Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Recent | High | Low | Top Raters | Alström Bros
first ← prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | nextlast
Ratings: 138 |  Reviews: 80
Photo of pjk49202
1.15/5  rDev -67%
look: 3.5 | smell: 1 | taste: 1 | feel: 1 | overall: 1

Absolutely the worst beer I have ever tasted.
On tap in a tulip glass at the brewery in Idaho Springs.
First of all they use fake oak flavor. So the oak is just a fake, artifical taste. The taste of this beer is soooo overwhelmed by the fake oak flavoring it's just terrible. The regular butthead is very good. But, the oaked Butthead is the worst beer I have every had in my life.

 382 characters

Photo of Rhettroactive
1.66/5  rDev -52.4%
look: 2.5 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 1.5

From 12oz bottle to Bruges hybrid glass on 8/16/11
*From notes

A: Used fast food greasy-amber. A decent pour yields a .75 finger head and zero lacing.

S: You know you're in for trouble when the nose reeks of medicinal Robotussin. It's amazing....ly bad.

T: Like sawdust off the much-treadded floor of your local Home Depot. Acidic and utterly disgusting. None of the enjoyable characteristics of a doppelbock reveal themselves here. Instead, it's borderline micro-pig piss.

M: Underwhelming. It's like drinking cold, liquid butter.

O: Tommyknocker's Oaked Butt Head tastes like it got shat out of one. This is a massive dissapointment not only for the Doppelbock style, but for beer in general.


 712 characters

Photo of Fatty_Mccracken
1.74/5  rDev -50.1%
look: 3.25 | smell: 2.25 | taste: 1 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Photo of Hellpop65
1.75/5  rDev -49.9%

Photo of rowew
1.83/5  rDev -47.6%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 1

Presentation: 12 oz longneck. Oaked in big letters on the front, bottling date notched on the label.

Appearance: Reddish brown, small head with little retention.

Smell: Smells a bit like a vanilla extract, all vanilla, a bit of alcohol. Just a hint of the wood in there somewhere, and not much beer.

Taste: Cloying sweetness, dominate flavors are way too much vanilla.

Overall impression: This one is over the top with the oak flavor, and it doesn't come across as real - instead it tastes like someone added vanilla extract to a beer. None of the beer flavor comes across. Glad there were only 4 of these and not 6.

 621 characters

Photo of DBIII
2/5  rDev -42.7%

Photo of WVbeergeek
2.13/5  rDev -39%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Hopefully this brew has some agin' potential, because it's pretty rough pretty much pure oak and whiskey soaked malt character a tad sour with a strong unrelenting vanilla oak and charred barrel note. It's almost like extract vanilla and oak chip aged thang going on. Appears a bright ruby amber hue with a large tan khaki head dwindles rather quickly leaving behind even fine bubbled lacing clinging to my glass. Aroma has more oak barrel whiskey edged effects going on, charred wood and vanilla phenols grabbing my nose air with a touch of burning sensation from the alcohol content. Flavor is pretty effin' cloying sugary sweet caramel with burnt oak barrel notes and again vanilla extract like toothace candy sweetness going on. Mouthfeel is again cloying I don't really even want to finish it. Body is syrupy with a low almost flat carbonation level that makes the beer feel heavier than it actually is. Drinkability is pretty sorry, not one I'm grabbing for again, why do I do it. Tommyknocker as usual ends in pretty much complete disappointment, this one is no different.

 1,079 characters

Photo of Vonhinx
2.5/5  rDev -28.4%

Photo of ChainGangGuy
2.58/5  rDev -26.1%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Appearance: Pours out a clear, deeply-hued, mahogany body with a thinnish, whitish head.

Smell: Sweet-scented nose with some notable alcoholic wafts and piercing notes of vanilla and green raisins. Personally, it's not too terribly appealing.

Taste: Sweet maltiness, with some light caramel, but more than a fair share of sticky sugariness and marked by some traces of smoke. Garnished with a few green raisins. Lessened hints of brown sugar and vanilla. All in all, it's a bit boozy throughout. Not too much in the way of hop character or bitterness. Finishes warming, semi-dry and with a lingering mixture of vanilla and smoke.

Mouthfeel: Medium-bodied. Medium-low carbonation. There's a slight, smooth stickiness to the mouthfeel.

Drinkability: I didn't particularly care for the standard-issue Butt Head Bock, but had hoped a bit of oak would really make it come alive for me, though, sadly, this didn't happen. Fair enough for an oak-aged American-made doppelbock. Let's just leave it at that.

 1,002 characters

Photo of biglite351
2.68/5  rDev -23.2%
look: 2 | smell: 4 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

A - odd cloudy orange brown. Tight white head that vanished rather quickly.

S - sweet lager smell. Rather nice bock scent.

T - has a weird vegetable - fruit juice taste. Not bad, but not something that I would look for in a brew. I don't get the oak.

M - thin with a mild tingle on front sides of tongue.

D - not my bag.

 324 characters

Photo of CrazyMacHarris99
2.7/5  rDev -22.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

Pours a red copper color with a quick white foam head. The smell is slightly smokey with a hint of vanilla, oak, slight malty sweetness and a bit of alcohol. The taste is more smokey with some peat and malt, a bit of oak and vanilla and a healthy dose of alcohol. There is definitely a bitter note missing that would help this one. Its way to sweet and cloying and the alcohol is taking over. The mouthfeel seems one dimensional for all that is going on here and the drinkability is very low because of the over malty, alcoholic with little oak.

 545 characters

Photo of sulldaddy
2.71/5  rDev -22.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 3.5

Im pouring a cellar temp bottle into a snifter.
The beer pours a slightly hazy mahogany color withsome ruby highlights. Even with a fairly agressive pour only minimal fizzy beige head foams up and fades to an edge layer quickly.
Aroma is a little caramel and some faint bourbon notes, no real hop presence and not very strong scents either. A little underwhelming IMO.
Firs sip reveals a lighter than expected body with fine tingly carbonation. Flavor is sweet malt and some brown sugar, maybe some vanilla, but overall pretty mild flavor too. ABV is not present so if it is 8.1% it is well hidden. The beer is less than I expected and a bit of a downer. Was hoping for a little more umph from a beer on this cold snowy evening. I wouldnt buy this again, and would advise others who like barrel aged stuff to avoid.

 816 characters

Photo of Floydster
2.73/5  rDev -21.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Glass from Falling Rock on 4/26/09, reviewed from my notepad, color is a mix between red and brown, thin off white head, aroma consists of pepper, wood, vanilla, and smokiness, flavor starts off sweet with different malts, finishes dry with oak and smokey accents, flavor gets metallic after a while, medium bodied, not much carbonation, could not drink a whole lot of this, chewy and thick for my palate, also a hint of saltiness which did not sit well with me, never had heard of this brewery before and after trying the Fort Collins equivalent of this beer, I was hopeful to find a better interpretation of a barrel aged bock, while this was, it still was not my favorite, might be worth trying

 697 characters

Photo of BradLikesBrew
2.75/5  rDev -21.2%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

a: Dark copper with a thin off-white head.

s: Oak, way to much oak. Some smoky notes, maybe it's charred oak.

t: Caramel, vanilla and oak. Lots of oak. Nod depth, the flavor is more shiner bock than doppelbock.

m: Thin for the style. Short finish. The feel is more oktoberfest than doppelbock.

d: I have never heard of an oak-aged doppelbock and now I know why: if the Doppelbock is any good, it doesn't need oak.

The oak completely overwhelms this beer. It does not taste like a Doppelbock. With that in mind, it is still a decent beer, but this seems more like Tommyknocker jumping on the oak-aged bandwagon than a well executed craft beer.

 648 characters

Photo of Minkybut
2.77/5  rDev -20.6%
look: 2 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.75 | feel: 2.75 | overall: 2.75

I poured this pitiful beer into my tumbler at 40 degrees. The beer was cloudy and flat looking right off the bat. Absolutely no head at all. It even smelled aged which I did not knock off points for. Don't really know if just got a out of date beer or what, but I'm a first impression guy so its goodby to this one nope not buying again.

 337 characters

Photo of Haybeerman
2.81/5  rDev -19.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

A: Brown copper color. Poured a half finger light tan head that dissipated. Inconsistent, broken lacing.

S: Oak, more oak. Smoky flavor may be from oak. Malts are in there, but masked.

T: Caramel, vanilla and, of course lots of oak. Lacks the malt backbone I expected.

M: Light body; frankly, it was thin. Balanced carbonation. Very abbreviated finish.

D: Not high on my list; a few too many shortcomings. The regular Butt Head is better.

 442 characters

Photo of homebrewhawk
2.83/5  rDev -18.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

12oz bottle served in a shaker pint. Poured a hazy dark copper with a sparse heat that quickly dissipated. Syrupy aroma with some burnt sugar and vanilla from the oak. Medium bodied, not a lot of carbonation. Lots of oak in the flavor that pretty much obscures the base beer. Either that or the base beer is very bland. I didn't get much of the deep malt flavor that I expect from a bock. This tasted just like oak and not much more. Glad I only bought a single.

 462 characters

Photo of Domingo
2.92/5  rDev -16.3%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 2.5

I really like the normal Butt Head as it's one of the better bock offerings in the US. However this is a bit of a bust.
The carbonation is pretty flat (like most oaked beers) and is reddish copper. Lacing and carbonation after 30 seconds is nonexistant.
The taste is super sweet up front, but then a wave of burnt wood almost like a rauchbier kicks in. I'm also getting a little bit of normal vanilla-like oak in there, but that oversweet burnt wood is killing me. Reminds me of baked beans. The malty flavors from Butt Head are "hiding in plain sight" but everything else is completely killing them.
Drinking this was generally just difficult.
Tommyknocker is better than many of their ratings suggest, but this was pretty bad.

Hopefully this bottle was just a dud. If so, I'll update this accordingly.

EDIT: Bottle #2's slightly better. I did have drinkability at a 2. I bumped it up to a 2.5 as the burnt wood flavor wasn't as strong. It was however replaced by more vanilla.

 981 characters

Photo of Riverwarrior
2.98/5  rDev -14.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

S = Very slight hints of bourbon with vanilla way in the background.

T = A bourbon flavor is upfront, but it quickly fades to blandness. The middle and finish seems to be void of other flavors. The finish is basically a thin bourbon flavor. No alcohol detected.

MF = Medium body with low carbonation. Smooth and semi-dry.

Overall, I'm a bit disappointed in this one. No complexity at all. Worth trying, but I'll not go out of my way for another. I personally like the regular "Butthead" offering over this one.

 513 characters

Photo of jpalarchio
3/5  rDev -14%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Pours a light orange/red, very transparent, with almost no head.

Smell isn't anything exciting and the taste doesn't do much for me. There's something in the taste that I really can't pick out. Whatever it is, it's distinct; not necessarily good though.

Perhaps part of my disappointment is that this was right next to the Tommyknocker Imperial Nut Brown Ale which I have enjoyed previously. In a rush, I thought this was an oaked version of the same. Once I got the bottles home, that's when I realized it was a bock.

 520 characters

Photo of JGooden
3/5  rDev -14%

Photo of jduprey007
3/5  rDev -14%

Photo of oline73
3/5  rDev -14%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Photo of JohnK17
3/5  rDev -14%

Photo of schuyhigh
3/5  rDev -14%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Surprisingly struck me with a cooked swine aroma and taste upon first impression. Has a nice amber orange color. Smell, as previously mentioned, comes off as a bit of a "porkish" scent. Taste has a hint of pork too with big aged oak impressions. A little spicy, a little malty and a lot interesting. Don't know that I would recommend this beer, but worth trying.

 362 characters

first ← prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | nextlast
Oaked Butt Head Bock from Tommyknocker Brewery
3.49 out of 5 based on 138 ratings.
  • About Us

    Founded in Boston in 1996, BeerAdvocate (BA) is your go-to resource for beer powered by an independent community of enthusiasts and professionals dedicated to supporting and promoting better beer.

    Learn More
  • Our Community

    Comprised of consumers and industry professionals, many of whom started as members of this site, our community is one of the oldest, largest, and most respected beer communities online.
  • Our Events

    Since 2003 we've hosted over 60 world-class beer festivals to bring awareness to independent brewers and educate attendees.
  • Our Magazine

    Support uncompromising beer advocacy and award-winning, independent journalism with a print subscription to BeerAdvocate magazine.