Hardcore IPA | BrewDog

Your Rating: None
Want it   Got it 
Hardcore IPAHardcore IPA
Very Good
1,509 Ratings
Hardcore IPAHardcore IPA

Brewed by:
Scotland, United Kingdom

Style: American Double / Imperial IPA

Alcohol by volume (ABV): 9.20%

Availability: Year-round

Notes / Commercial Description:
This Imperial India Pale Ale rocks…hardcore! But don’t take our word for it...this little bottle has a grandiloquent story to tell.

2,204 malted Maris Otter grains gave all they had to offer the world to provide the robustly delicate toffee malt canvas for the ensuing epic. 4 Hop Cones willingly sacrificed themselves to ensure your mouth feels punished and puckering for more. 9,900,000,000 yeast cells frantically fermented their little hearts out as the sugars became alcohol in the depths of our fermentation tanks.

2 humans and 1 canine companion were relatively happy with the results.

150 IBU

Added by BeerAdvocate on 03-10-2008

Bros Score:
User Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
first ← prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | nextlast
Ratings: 1,509 |  Reviews: 556
Photo of Tetrault67
1/5  rDev -74.6%

Photo of TheManiacalOne
1.4/5  rDev -64.5%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 1 | feel: 2 | overall: 1

Poured from a 22.4oz bottle into an imperial pint glass.

A: The beer is a light gold color, with a short white head that fades quickly and leaves a thin lace on the glass.

S: The aroma is of fruity citrus, light caramelized malts, some honey, alcohol and different scent of hops.

T: The taste starts with a medicine-like alcohol bite that over-powers everything else. There are sweet flavors of caramel, honey and citrus that try to poke their way through. The malt character is thin and the hops presence is subdued, providing very little balance. The after-taste is slightly bitter and a lot like cough syrup.

M: Crisp but not smooth at all, light-to-medium body, medium carbonation, finish is slightly sticky.

D: Not tasty or flavorful, does not go down easily, not too filling, strong kick, not a good representation of style, I just flat out did not like this beer at all and would not recommend it.

 910 characters

Photo of BigMike
1.59/5  rDev -59.6%
look: 3 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 1.5

Poured into a tulip glass. Batch #207

Pours a hazy light orange color. Even with a hard pour and several hard swirls in the glass i couldn't get any head to form.

Smells a bit like sour butterscotch. A touch of floral and light caramel malts but nothing too pleasant.

Wow. This beer tastes awful. Medicine like bitter sweetness. Tastes like caramel flavor cough syrup.

Not a lot of carbonation. Pretty thick and heavy. Each swallow is torture.

Drinkability = DRAIN POUR This beer is horrendous. I knew nothing about this beer when i saw it. I saw DIPA at 9% for $4.99 and was happy. After smelling and tasting. I was UNhappy. I would not recomend this to my worst enemy.

 679 characters

Photo of BeerSox
1.73/5  rDev -56.1%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 1.5

660ml bottle into nonic. Batch 002. Best before 7/7/09.

Dark and hazy golden hue with a one finger off white head that quickly settles to a bubbly partially covered cap.

The aroma is faint and citrusy, but also very tart and sour. It doesn't seem like there is anything wrong with the beer, just how it is.

Very buttery flavors - an oddly high amount of diacetyl. The hops add some bitterness, but are also sour as well. Soapy, used in Ding's review, sums it up pretty good.

Not a very good DIPA at all. Tastes like it was brewed with movie theater butter (which is made using diacetyl). I wish I knew the actual date it was brewed rather than a best before date.

 670 characters

Photo of NonicPanic
1.75/5  rDev -55.6%

Photo of Heminoolo
1.75/5  rDev -55.6%

Photo of PhillyStyle
1.93/5  rDev -51%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 1.5

Poured from a 660ml capped bottle. Bottle was marked best before 7/7/09 batch 002 (Not really sure if it is a limted release or not as the bottle did not indicate, but since another reviewer had similiar marking, I will review it here):

A: Poured an amber color, which was unexpected. With this style of beer I am used to something a little darker and more red. This makes me wonder as to the quality of the beer. No head noted at all. It was a typical pour from me so that I could get a decent head, but I poured two and got nothing. Very disappointing.

S: The aroma was fairly good, but somewhat faint for a DIPA. Most noteably, barley and hops. Nothing to really rave about.

T: The taste was heavy on the barley with the hops clearly taking a back seat.

M/D: This is the big problem with the beer, the lack of carbonation along with the fact that it felt like I was drinking syrup was not appealing at all. It also left a very bitter long aftertaste that was not appealing either. This one really put me off on trying the other beers by the brewer. It would be best to avoid.

 1,084 characters

Photo of Crosling
1.94/5  rDev -50.8%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 1

Nose is absolutely full of diacetyl, with some mild hop accents (peach, nectarine, but that's a stretch), it's hard to get pass the diacetyl. Flavor is extremely dull, mostly loaded with diacetyl. Sorry, but this is an awful beer. Plain and simple.

 248 characters

Photo of deepsouth
2/5  rDev -49.2%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 1

this beer pours a relatively flat looking golden color with a huge four finger rocky head that sticks around a good bit. great head, subpar looking liquid.

this beer smells a bit earthy and funky. i pick up more malty sweetness than i do hoppiness. odd.

this beer doesn't taste that great. hop bitterness and a bit dry, but not much else. what a strange brew.

the mouthfeel is flat, but thicker than i expected. pretty decent, but hard to get around the taste.

man, this is damn near a drain pour and i never do that. i'm going to try to drink this because i think it set me back nearly $15, but that's the only reason. i'm sharing it with my wife and she thinks it's pretty disgusting as well.

 698 characters

Photo of Techichi
2/5  rDev -49.2%

Photo of Sinewave
2/5  rDev -49.2%

Photo of ThePeskyDingo
2.01/5  rDev -49%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 1.5

poured with a 1 finger white head that dissipated somewhat quickly. Golden orange color with a small amount of carbonation.

Smells a bit like bread dough actually... light hop smells in the background.

Tastes kind of like the smell, which is dissapointing. I get a doughey taste from it, and not many hops, althought they are there. I will say i cant really taste the alcohol though for 9%.

The mouthfeel isnt bad. I get a dry feeling from it and a clean finish. Too bad it doesnt help the average taste.

I'de say the drinkability is sort of low. I just cant get over the doughey taste that this beer has. Just one for a review, and thats all i can handle.

Ok, editing this: After finishing this beer, the drinkability is really bad... reminded me too much of the dough in the bakery I used to work in, and I found myself choking it down. Not anything near what an imperial IPA should taste like.

I'de rather drink my michelobe golden light ANY DAY.

 956 characters

Photo of CwrwAmByth
2.07/5  rDev -47.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 1 | feel: 3 | overall: 1

Not even going to bother going into detail with this one. The hops are disgustingly strong, esecially when cold.
IPAs have always been the drink for a hot summers day for me, this one is impossible to drink more than 330ml of.

Will not buy again.

 250 characters

Photo of Patrick999
2.09/5  rDev -47%
look: 1.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Poured into my Sam Adams glass. Really light, hardly any foam. This beer looks lifeless.

Aroma is that of a fairly bland barleywine - some nail polish remover, a little tropical fruit, mostly passionfruit.

Wow. This is shockingly bad for a DIPA, in my opinion. Alcohol and some apricot, malt bill entirely lacking. There is a lot of bitterness, mostly provided by a very uninteresting hop profile, and alcohol.

Feel is very limp - it's way undercarbonated and thin for the style.

Even taking into consideration that this particular bottle is a couple months past its prime, it's still shockingly bad. Other past-prime IPAs don't go to crap like this, leading me to believe that this was never very good in the first place. I really don't want to drink the rest of this. BrewDog continues to be really hit or miss for me.

This is a weird beer, and not to my liking.

 870 characters

Photo of BeanBone
2.16/5  rDev -45.2%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

Appearance: A thoroughly hazy golden-orange capped by a slow-to-form finger of off-white head that leaves good lacing.

Aroma: Mild citrusy and herbal hops over a caramel malt base. Missing the punch you'd expect from a "Hardcore IPA."

Taste: Where in the hell are the hops? According to the bottle, this bottle will still be fresh for over six months, so I'm sure this isn't a freshness issue. Some grassy and herbal bitterness builds up as time goes on and it warms, but it never really gets much "hoppiness" going. With the hops not making much of an impression, the plain caramel malt body makes up the bulk of the flavor profile. Plenty of butteryness and unmasked alcohol throughout, making a boring profile into something unpleasant. The aftertaste is bitter and boozy.

Mouthfeel: Medium bodied with smooth carbonation and some slight burn from the alcohol.

Drinkability: Rather poor due to the flavor profile and alcohol content.

Verdict: Hardcore IPA is a thoroughly confusing beer; I was ready for something different, but I've never had to search for hops in an IPA. Even if you take style off the table and try to rate this beer in a style-vacuum, it's still not a very pleasing beer. When you take into account that this bottle cost me over seven dollars, this really becomes a hot mess.

 1,304 characters

Photo of barleywinefiend
2.18/5  rDev -44.7%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Poured a pale golden color with small white head.Nose, what nose? I smelled grain. Taste is grainy, lightly boozy, bland with no hops. A dull mouthfeel, low in carbonation and thick. Expected more. Not a well crafted IIPA and I would consider this a C IPA at best but not IIPA at all.

 284 characters

Photo of morimech
2.24/5  rDev -43.1%
look: 2 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Batch #002. I have not seen a yellow Imperial IPA before. Practically no head formed but some lacing is left on the glass during consumption.

Has a soapy aroma. Some malt and grapefruit is detected.

Tastes like a poorly done homebrew IPA. The hops that are present are more for bittering but lacks any flavor dynamic. Overly sweet malt base makes this one poorly crafted ale. Alcohol taste lingers in the aftertaste.

Almost completely flat carbonation really hurts this already hurting ale.

Had a difficult time drinking the entire bottle. I only endured because of the expence of said bottle. This is one beer to avoid.

 626 characters

Photo of masterofsparks
2.25/5  rDev -42.9%

Photo of ajzy
2.25/5  rDev -42.9%

Photo of jmmy3
2.25/5  rDev -42.9%

Photo of gregmoscetti
2.36/5  rDev -40.1%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

tastes like a boozy sierra nevada. Brewdog will never get all that much love out here for an IPA. It was irresponsible even buying it, knowing that the hops were probably poorly cared for in transport, and knowing that this is southern california and we drink Pliny all day. All and all, this beer isnt crap but its by no means good. Im sure to a scotsman its hoppy and delicious. to a so cal local its a heaping pint of lame sauce

 431 characters

Photo of RonfromJersey
2.36/5  rDev -40.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Yellow-orange body, more yellow where the glass is thinner, more orange in the bowl, very hazy, scattered carbonation streams. Good sticky snow white froth and lacing.

Mild orange aroma, with a muted background of other citrus. Expected more at first pop.

Toffee sweet base coats the tongue. Juicy fruit -oranges and other citrus. Very mild hop bitter nip at the swallow. Fruit soaked in alcohol finish, though its a tingle not a burn.

Slighty sloppy mouthfeel. Decent drinkability, though the alcohol is dicouraging while the hop profile does not add enough desire.

Disappointing. The only thing "double" about this ipa is the alcohol.

Maybe in Scotland this can pass for a DIPA/IIPA, but not in the US. Way too much hype, including the name and bottle copy, for what is here. Not a good first impression from a brewery that may be trying too hard for buzz.

 864 characters

Photo of Zimbo
2.46/5  rDev -37.6%
look: 5 | smell: 4 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 1.5

Taste. Hmm, pure TCP to me. Not just bitter, not even just warped but full blown psychotic and twisted. Doesn't mean it was enjoyable to drink. It wasn't. More of a beer as a dare. Like an entire pine tree shoved down your throat.
Will need to try this again.

 259 characters

Photo of Blitzstyle
2.48/5  rDev -37.1%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

Poured into a pint glass from a 22.4oz bottle. Little to no head on a aggressive pour. Beer does lace well. Very golden in color, different from most dipa's.

Sour citrus smell, almost like rotten grapefruit. And a sweet malt scent.

Sour grapefruit dominates the taste, backed up by some sweet maltiness. Some pine notes emerge after it warms to near rooom temp, but still the sourness is there. Checked the bottle its far from its experation date. Not the biggest hop bomb out there thats for sure.

Was hard for me to get past the sourness of the grapefruit. Would pass on this in the future!

 595 characters

Photo of ChadQuest
2.49/5  rDev -36.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

large 3 finger head, the body is an amber color, darker then what i personally desire in an IPA, but i can't knock it for being what it is.
nose is a bit resiny with an orange sugar candy aroma too, like those brachs orange slices. Alcohol is easily detected here too, and is somewhat solvent like.
I guess Scotland is on the East Coast now, this is not very hoppy and i am still 4 months within the best-by window. Flavors are not bad per say, but i did reach for this wanting an IPA, a "Hardcore" one at that. The non-hardcore flavors include Candied Pears that are slightly fruity but more sugary, some piney notes, and a mist of citrus to make things obligatory. Besides the Sugar coated light fruits there is some caramel thrown against this canvas.

If this was called an English Strong ale, maybe i would approach it better, but i wanted an IPA. Mission Failed.

 870 characters

first ← prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | nextlast
Hardcore IPA from BrewDog
Beer rating: 3.94 out of 5 with 1,509 ratings