BrewDog Paradox Jura

BrewDog Paradox JuraBrewDog Paradox Jura
Write a Review
Beer Geek Stats: | Print Shelf Talker
Stout - American Imperial
4.23 | pDev: 10.64%
Scotland, United Kingdom
Retired (no longer brewed)
BrewDog Paradox JuraBrewDog Paradox Jura
Reviews: 29 | Ratings: 172 | Log in to view all ratings and sort
Reviews by Jugs_McGhee:
Photo of Jugs_McGhee
Jugs_McGhee from Louisiana

3.82/5  rDev -9.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.75

11.2 fl oz brown glass bottle with appealing label and pry-off pressure cap served into an Avery stem-tulip in me gaff in low altitude Austin, Texas. Reviewed live. Expectations are above average; I'm generally skeptical of Brewdog (the gimmick masters), but I did quite like Tokyo* so I'm optimistic. "Batch 186. Best before 08/06/22." Reviewed as a barrel aged imperial stout.

Served cold - at fridge temp - and allowed to warm over the course of consumption. Side-poured with standard vigor as no carbonation issues are anticipated.

A: No bubble show forms as it's poured.

Pours a one finger wide head of good khaki-tan colour. It retains for about 2 minutes - which is damned impressive considering its formidable 15% ABV. Good thickness, creaminess, and frothiness. Nice supple soft complexion. Has a good even consistency. Even, consistent lacing sticks to the sides of the glass.

Body colour is a predictable opaque solid black. Appears adequately carbonated. Looks clean; there're no floating yeast particles or hop sediment.

Overall, it looks pretty good considering its ABV, but isn't unique or special for a beer in this style. I've certainly seen better, but I'm really looking forward to this.

Sm: Has a powerful, strong aroma of whisky (and accompanying subtle spiciness), bourbon (and accompanying light, toasted oak along with a kiss of vanilla), dark malts, chocolate malts, peat (which I always love in an imperial stout), and hints of cream and chocolate. The highlight here is the way in which the barrel notes - both bourbon and whisky - cooperate to accentuate the nuances of the base beer. I'm shocked this isn't boozy, and surprisingly, the barrel notes don't overwhelm the base. It seems like it's maybe 10-11.5% at most. The peat is lovely.

It's rare whisky's trademark spiciness comes through as much as it does here; I usually prefer bourbon barrel aged beers to whisk(e)y barrel aged beers for that very reason, but this is evocative and appealing.

I can't wait to try this.

No yeast character, overt alcohol, or off-notes are detectable.

Mf/T: It's got some pleasant alcohol warmth, but is never hot, gushed, or boozy. It's also got a subtle coarseness and dryness I'd attribute to the peat, but is still smooth and wet enough to stay drinkable. Besides, that slight drag on the palate reminds one to sip. Still, it might be better a bit more silky; the roughness does limit drinkability. Well carbonated.

Not oily, harsh, or astringent (which can't be tough to do given the inclusion of peat).

The taste largely delivers on the promise of the aroma; we're treated to the base beer up front with its dark malt and chocolate malt foundation, as well as a pat of cream - then the barrel notes hit on the midpoint, delivering notes of peat, whiskey spice, subtle bourbon and vanilla, and oak barrel (though it lacks the toastiness I anticipated based on the aroma, to its detriment). It's certainly rich, and is on the sweeter decadent side, but it's a tasty beer to be sure.

Flavour profile is well-balanced overall. It has a very cohesive build, but isn't quite gestalt: the amplitude could be better and the barrel could be more seamlessly integrated. I'm not sure the base beer brings as much to the table as the barrel notes do. Still, it's got a good depth of flavour. Above average flavour duration. Average flavour intensity. Good complexity and subtlety. The barrel notes (specifically the peat) help lend it nuance.

It could really use some roasted barley character, and more of a toasty oak undertone would be lovely. I guess my biggest nitpick is that it could be much more expressive and evocative; it's slightly reticent as-is.

No yeast character, hop profile, off-notes, or overt boozy alcohol is detectable. And boy is that impressive; this does not drink at all like it's 15%.

As it warms, I'm picking up on some faint grape (particularly on the finish), light raisin, molasses, plum, prune, and fruit-filled chocolates. Maybe even a kiss of dessert wine in there too. Also, some burnt sugars. What I'm definitely not finding is the smoke mentioned by many other reviewers; I think they may be confusing smoke with peat, but I only find the latter.

I can almost find a wisp of a rum-like sugarcane liqueur, but just when I think I've found it, it disappears.

Dr: For its ABV, it's very drinkable, but it's still a sipper. I'm enjoying it more and more as it comes to temperature, and I'll finish this bottle with ease. That said, I couldn't justify paying $13.00ish USD for it a second time. It's a damn fine imperial stout, but there are other cheaper beers in the style which bring much more to the table in terms of complexity, intricacy, and subtlety. This is a tough style to stand out in, but I think overall Brewdog has done a commendable job. I'm glad I got to try this once. Certainly one of Brewdog's better offerings, and well worth picking up just one time.

Low B+

Apr 13, 2014
More User Reviews:
Photo of kirkfrailey
kirkfrailey from Michigan

4.75/5  rDev +12.3%

Aug 02, 2013
Photo of bmurray10
bmurray10 from Texas

3.98/5  rDev -5.9%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 4

May 19, 2015
Photo of Bartos
Bartos from Florida

4/5  rDev -5.4%

Feb 22, 2014
Photo of bcm75
bcm75 from Illinois

4.25/5  rDev +0.5%

Sep 25, 2014
Photo of REVZEB
REVZEB from Illinois

4.5/5  rDev +6.4%

Jun 24, 2014
Photo of Lucoli
Lucoli from New York

4.34/5  rDev +2.6%
look: 4 | smell: 4.25 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 4.5

Sep 07, 2015
Photo of KJ2013
KJ2013 from Pennsylvania

4.5/5  rDev +6.4%

Oct 26, 2014
Photo of Fabiand
Fabiand from Texas

4.5/5  rDev +6.4%

Jun 04, 2014
Photo of Kmat10
Kmat10 from Canada (AB)

4.5/5  rDev +6.4%

Sep 18, 2013
Photo of MLaVioletteJr
MLaVioletteJr from Massachusetts

4.75/5  rDev +12.3%

Oct 11, 2014
Photo of jbaakko
jbaakko from California

4.5/5  rDev +6.4%

Jul 04, 2013
Photo of Sweffin
Sweffin from Wisconsin

4.26/5  rDev +0.7%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.25 | feel: 4.75 | overall: 4.25

Jan 03, 2016
Photo of LumpkinBrews
LumpkinBrews from Colorado

4/5  rDev -5.4%

Oct 16, 2013
Photo of Stum-pub
Stum-pub from Connecticut

4.25/5  rDev +0.5%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.25

Jan 06, 2015
Photo of GumDropButtons
GumDropButtons from Texas

5/5  rDev +18.2%

Sep 08, 2013
Photo of Sir_Goatman
Sir_Goatman from Oregon

5/5  rDev +18.2%

Jun 13, 2014
Photo of hops202
hops202 from District of Columbia

3.92/5  rDev -7.3%
look: 3.75 | smell: 4.25 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 4

Bottle poured into a snifter. Best by 8-6-2022.

Pours a dark brown with hints of red and burgundy with very little to no carbonation. Strong whiskey followed by peat in the aroma - smells great. Taste is whiskey, vanilla and spice from the barrel and hints of chocolate malt, however not as good as the aroma. Certainly a sipper. Probably could have used a few more years in the cellar.

Apr 24, 2014
Photo of Scottie_A25
Scottie_A25 from California

4.5/5  rDev +6.4%

Jan 02, 2014
Photo of dtomes
dtomes from New York

4/5  rDev -5.4%

Dec 07, 2014
Photo of jaemeno3
jaemeno3 from New Jersey

4.25/5  rDev +0.5%
look: 4.25 | smell: 4.25 | taste: 4.25 | feel: 4.25 | overall: 4.25

Jan 10, 2015
Photo of epyon396
epyon396 from Pennsylvania

4.14/5  rDev -2.1%
look: 4 | smell: 4.25 | taste: 4.25 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 4

May 17, 2014
Photo of Zekenyce
Zekenyce from New Jersey

4.35/5  rDev +2.8%

Nov 30, 2014
Photo of BrickOneal
BrickOneal from South Carolina

4/5  rDev -5.4%

Feb 10, 2014
Photo of Minnesota_beer_guy
Minnesota_beer_guy from Minnesota

4.5/5  rDev +6.4%

Apr 30, 2014
BrewDog Paradox Jura from BrewDog
Beer rating: 94 out of 100 with 172 ratings