Orchard White | The Bruery

Your Rating: None
Want it   Got it 
Orchard WhiteOrchard White
Very Good
455 Ratings
Orchard WhiteOrchard White

Brewed by:
The Bruery
California, United States

Style: Witbier

Alcohol by volume (ABV): 5.70%

Availability: Year-round

Notes / Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

Added by DoubleJ on 05-01-2008

This beer is retired; no longer brewed.

Bros Score:
User Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Recent | High | Low | Top Raters | Alström Bros
first ← prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | nextlast
Ratings: 455 |  Reviews: 316
Photo of CGMLS3
1/5  rDev -74.3%

Photo of TrickkyGangsta
1.5/5  rDev -61.4%

2/5  rDev -48.6%

Photo of TheRealDBCooper
2.1/5  rDev -46%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 1

I greatly like most of what comes out of The Bruery, but after last night's tasting I wish they had retired this one instead of Black Orchard.


Color - This is about the only part of the experience that was pleasing.


Taste and smell - Somewhere between a band-aid and original flavor Listerine.
Carbonation - Lost half this bottle to the counter top with unpleasantness continuing into a prickly mouthfeel. Having never had this experience with any other Bruery beers I presume this is a one off for the batch.

Overall: There are a lot of great wits out there, but this is not one of them. If you are one of the subset of people who really like the band-aid taste I recommend this to you.

As a side note, I hate to start out my reviewing with a negative one, but this really shocked me with how bad it was last night. Fortunately I have several other Bruery beers in the fridge (including a Black Orchard) that I will be reviewing, all of which I've had and greatly enjoyed.

Edit: I had it on tap at The Bruery tasting room and the rating stands. I don't get the love on this one.

 1,101 characters

Photo of ktrillionaire
2.1/5  rDev -46%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 1.5

On-tap at Ale+Witch. The brew pours a translucent yellow-gold and is capped with a sparse white film atop. The nose smells very spicy, highly perfumed, and might even be considered nice, as long as it doesn't follow through to the taste: notes of lavender, jasmine, rose and chamomile are quite pungent and lend a huge flowery element to the brew. Uh-oh, 'pon my first sip: revulsion. This tastes like a beer aged on Glade air fresheners; no more need be said. I wonder, looking at the rating, just who exactly really thinks this brew is 'good'? The Bruery's reputation and pricepoints seem to be a factor here, as the beer is just not very good.

 646 characters

Photo of JLeege
2.26/5  rDev -41.9%
look: 2 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 1.5

Appearance- pours a clear gold with high carbonation. Light for a witbier, not cloudy at all. Big head, but receded quickly.

Smell- The aroma is there though. Reminiscent of your classic wit, the lavender actually really makes itself known as well. Fresh laundry.

Taste- Finding the taste pretty strange. Cider like, big red chewing gum, with some pollen? This is weird.

Mouthfeel- thin, way to much carbonation

Overall- not at all what I was expecting. I will finish this bottle, but don't expect to revisit this ever.

Edit: couldnt even get through half the bottle, scores adjusted accordingly.

 602 characters

Photo of DefenCorps
2.4/5  rDev -38.3%
look: 4 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

My introduction to The Bruery was in the parking lot of Captain Lawrence on a cold February morning a couple of years back, when spacecoyote brought a bunch of them to the Rosso release. This was among the beers he shared, and I finally got to revisit it. $3.99, bargain bin pickup.

A mildly hazy straw yellow with a HUGE, dense, white head that forms a thick collar leaving some lace, this looks appealing. The nose, OTOH, is rather unappealing. A very large floral component is present, with the lavender really strong. I also get sage and coriander, this is sharply spiced with some crystallized ginger as well. The combination of yeast, floral and spices is rather awful, it's mildly garbage juice-like. Strangely, I can't say I pick up any off-flavors, this almost seems like this is how it was designed.

The palate is significantly better. Opening with a moderate pale malt character, there's a blend of biscuit and sweetness, along with the lavender, coriander and ginger notes. Not as pungent as the nose would suggest (and given that I'm drinking this out of my Founders 10th anniversary tulip pint glass, one that doesn't concentrate the aromatics, that's saying something.) Drying and crisp on the finish, it does feel watery while retaining flavors of lavender and ginger. None of the characteristics I look for in a good wit - mild orange peel, coriander and yeast, well balanced - are present here. The oats do temper the crispness that the high level of carbonation would otherwise impart. This just isn't very good. While I could force myself to drink this bottle, I'm not, and I'm going to make it a point to grab a few bottles of the St. Bernardus Witbier next time I can. Not recommended at all.

 1,716 characters

Photo of BrewCrew2010
2.49/5  rDev -36%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2.5

A: Pours a golden straw yellow body with a white fizzy head; not long lasting with spotty lacing.

S: A very light and simple nose of grainy malts, lemon, and some spices.

T: Initial flavor is like a lemon, almost Sprite-like, flavor with some notes of wheat, spices, grassy & citrus hops, and a little sour funk. It reminded me of a dry white wine. Not what I think of when it comes to a witbier.

M: Light body; high carbonation; clean and crisp mouthfeel.

O: I'm hoping I had a bad bottle, because I was not overly impressed with this beer. I don't see myself trying this again.

 583 characters

Photo of beernads
2.5/5  rDev -35.7%

Photo of kojevergas
2.54/5  rDev -34.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2.5

750ml brown glass bottle with standard pressure cap served into a generic hefeweissbier glass in low altitude Los Angeles, California. Reviewed live.

A: Pours a four finger head of slight cream, decent thickness, and okay retention. Colour is a transparent lemon yellow. It's a bit bland looking for a witbier.

Sm: Dirty lemon peel, water, and barley. A moderately strong aroma.

T: Dirty lemon with some strange off-esters. It's a bit floral as well. I don't like the build, but it balances what it has. It's a bit simple, but luckily it avoids being watery. Foundation appears to be grassy straw. Lavender notes intrude where they oughtn't to.

Mf: Smooth and wet, suiting the flavours of the body.

Dr: Low ABV, decent quality, and sold at a fair price for the volume. I didn't find it particularly appealing (especially for the style), but I could certainly see how fans of the style might enjoy this one.

 916 characters

Photo of ElGallo
2.65/5  rDev -31.9%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

750 mL bottle purchased at Whole Foods in Reno. My first beer from The Bruery. Poured into a wine goblet because, well, that's all I had in my hotel room.

Pours with little head and some minor lacing, strong scent of citrus and lavender, which is very inviting. Unfortunately that's where the compliments end.

The lavender carries over into the taste, which I found downright nasty. This is a white ale, so I wasn't expecting too much, maybe some tartness and a little coriander or mild spice, but lavender dominates the profile, and it was difficult to drink.

I did my best to sip this one with the hope that it would balance out as it warmed, but no dice. I know there are some excellent offerings from The Bruery, but this one was a total letdown. I would not recommend this beer.

 786 characters

Photo of Geuzedad
2.66/5  rDev -31.6%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 4 | overall: 2.5

Poured this into a tulip. Poured a hazy yellow with a billowy white 3 finger head.

First thing I noticed was the smell of lavender. It was really hard to pick out the other smells as the lavender was right there.

Taste was....lavender...as in an old ladies perfume lavender. Again it was hard for me to pick out any other taste as I felt I was inside a perfume bottle.

Mouthfeel was sharp with heavy carbonation but again I could not get past all the lavender.

If you did not figure it out yet I am no fan of lavender. To me this beer was very overpowering and not enjoyable in the least. Thinking it was just me I shared a glass with Galengeueze who had pretty much the same reaction. I am a big fan of The Bruery but this one really missed the mark with me.

 764 characters

Photo of shoegueuze
2.68/5  rDev -31.1%

Photo of Mebuzzard
2.71/5  rDev -30.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

Saw this on tap at Vine Street pub in Denver and had to try it. $4.25 for a pint, not a bad deal, methinks.
Yet, this beer didn't impress me at all. Pours a very light golden, yellow hazy body with a rather large head. Head died down, which I thought was odd given the carbonation on this thing.
Smell is sweet corn and flowers. Some spice, but overall it's not good.
Taste is floral, coriander and corn. Something is wrong here. I've had a couple of beers from The Bruery and this one is the worst. Carbonation can't cover up the sweet, cream corn. Lavender is possibly in there, but hard to find.
I couldn't finish it. If I had a drain, down it would have went.

 664 characters

Photo of Georgiabeer
2.71/5  rDev -30.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Pale yellow with a meringue-like white head that keeps coming after a pour. Smells fruity with a bit of lemon and tangerine, but also with a touch of bandaid. The taste has more of the citrus flavor as well as a bit of light graininess. Unfortunately that same bandaid note overlays the rest of the flavors, and that is one of the few flavors I really dislike in a beer. I don't knowif that i a normal note or a contamination in this case, but regardless, this is not an ancient beer and was handled well, so I'm docking points here. Mouthfeel is quite effervescent and crisp- but maybe a touch too fizzy. Could be a good beer, but my experience was marred by the off-tastes.

 675 characters

Photo of olradetbalder
2.75/5  rDev -29.3%

Photo of IdrinkGas
2.75/5  rDev -29.3%

Photo of westcoastbeerlvr
2.75/5  rDev -29.3%

Photo of mwa423
2.79/5  rDev -28.3%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

A - Pours with tons of head (splitting the bottle among 5 filled 5 glasses with beer and head) The color is dead on and also the haze is perfect for the style. We could be talking a 5 if the head stuck a bit more and wasn't so excessive.

S - Has a bit of an alcohol/chemical smell with orange spice and some wheat.

T - The orange peel hits first but once that wears off there is some smells that remind of turkey broth and hints of alcohol which is quite strange for both the style and abv. I can't decide if this is a great example of a new experimental witbier but a relatively bad mistake of a beer.

+1 to the reviewer that said it tastes like his girl's bodywash. He got it dead on.

M/D - Mouthfeel is pretty rough with the hit in the mouth, but also that kills drinkability as well. I'll finish my glass, but it certainly goes down slow.

 848 characters

Photo of Jmoore50
2.81/5  rDev -27.8%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

Did not like this beer that much. I could still drink it, but not good.

The appearance was a sunshine yellow with a big mean frothy white head. The head had great tiny bubbles and left a thick lacing, thus the score.

The smell was of Belgian yeasts, lemon peel, earth, a bit of light flowery incense.

The taste was a mess, belgian yeast with citrus flavors, straw or grass and coriander. The mouthfeel was super super carbonated which raped the tongue with these mediocre flavors. Not a fan.

The mouthfeel, as mentioned above, was overly carbonated where you could tastes some things very strong, and others just a hint.

Had a hard time drinking this whole bottle. Not recommended.


 695 characters

Photo of Murchmac
2.82/5  rDev -27.5%
look: 4 | smell: 2 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

I dont know what to think about this brewery. They have carbonation issues. The first beer I had from them (autumn maple) was flat, this one was too carbonated. Im too upset to review this formally so gonna tell it how I see it....

The first pour was an entire pint of white foam, when it settled down, still a giant head that stays with it... kinda a cloudy golden hoegarden yellow, with no smell due to the immense amount of foam in this beer. Tastes ok. Not much of a taste, but better than a macro. Like packing peanuts, just kinda there....

I give up, no more buying of these beers, I bought this because it was 7 bucks for 750ml, but no more money from me... Now to watch the soup...

 692 characters

Photo of OttoBomb
2.84/5  rDev -27%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Poured from a large style capped 1 pt 9.4 fl oz (750ml) bottle into a Dogfish Head signature glass (February 25, 2010). No freshness date that I can find.

Eyes: Pours a pale golden color with a very fizzy white head. Lots of lively carbonation in the glass which pushes around some of the particulate in there. Similar in activity to sparkling wine. The bottle slowly spews foam after the first pour.

Nose: A lavender punch! I like the smell of lavender, but I can't say that the small of lavender is actually appetizing to me. There is also yeast, citrus, spice, and a bit bready too.

Tongue: Less lavender than the nose thankfully. Some coriander, yeast, and white pepper. Tastes somewhat soapy and sharp. Wet naps come to mind.

Mouth: Chock full of prickly carbonation, too much for me thanks. A bit sour and very sharp, which enhances the spicyness.

Libation: For a premium beer, I'm a bit underwhelmed. There is a whole lot going on here which probably would work in another combination. I'm not sure lavender leading the charge was the way to go. An interesting and complex beer, but maybe too complex for me.

I can't think of many times I've had foods that are made with lavender, and even fewer where lavender is the dominant characteristic. The spices are all good, and all add a good piece to the puzzle, but the mixture doesn't work with my palate.

 1,365 characters

Photo of cjgator3
2.85/5  rDev -26.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

750ml bottle

A- Capped 750ml bottle. Pours a pale golden yellow color with a fizzy white head.

S- The aroma is wheat and citrus, some tartness, spices and yeast. Well done.

T- The taste is light and a little tart with some bready wheat and citrus with a very dry yeasty finish. My only complaint is the high amount of carbonation that is so high I think it takes away from the taste leaving the aftertaste like a big gulp of club soda.

M- The mouthfeel is light bodied with a ton of prickly carbonation. Maybe a bit too much carbonation for my liking.

D- Overall, I was a little let down by this one. Not bad, but not something I would pick up again.

 656 characters

Photo of chaz01
2.86/5  rDev -26.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2.5

Poured from a 22 ounce bottle into a Belgium goblet.

A: Hazy yellow color with a creamy white head that sticks around awhile.

S: Aroma of lavender soap. It's very pretty and fragrant, but that's not what I would expect out of the beer.

T: Orange and lemony fruit flavors with lots of spices -- including lavender.

M: Creamy and well-carbonated. Dry finish.

D: I had to check the label as I wrote this, and sure enough, it does mention lavender on the bottle, although I'm picking it up much more than what I think was intended. I can't say that I've ever used lavender before to describe a beer, and although it makes it interesting to try once, it's not something I'd repeat.

 682 characters

Photo of msjacilynn
2.91/5  rDev -25.2%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

A: pours hazy pale yellow with very deep foamy white head. sediment at the bottom of the glass. just how I like my witbiers.

S: yeast, tart, citrus.

T: whoa. not what I expected. found the lemony-citrus punch way over the top with little to no malt balance. lavender was interesting but without the malt I couldn't really appreciate it. not sure if the bottle was bad, but this was just overwhelmingly tart.

M: tad creamy and well carbonated.

D: not out of this particular bottle. might revisit again if I have the opportunity but will not seek this out again.

 564 characters

first ← prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | nextlast
Orchard White from The Bruery
Beer rating: 3.89 out of 5 with 455 ratings