Collaboration Series: Mrs. Stoutfire | The Bruery

Collaboration Series: Mrs. StoutfireCollaboration Series: Mrs. Stoutfire
263 Ratings
Collaboration Series: Mrs. StoutfireCollaboration Series: Mrs. Stoutfire

Brewed by:
The Bruery
California, United States

Style: American Double / Imperial Stout

Alcohol by volume (ABV): 9.50%

Availability: Limited (brewed once)

Notes / Commercial Description:
For our first local collaboration beer of 2013, we teamed up with our good friends at Beachwood Brewing in Long Beach, CA. We've worked with these folks on a number of small batch brews, beer dinners and general shenanigans for many years and it was really exciting to sit down and work on a full scale project with them for the first time. What we ended up with is an imperial smoked stout, but of course it wasn't that simple. We smoked our own malt on the same smoker and with the same blend of three different woods that Beachwood uses for their award winning BBQ - apple, white oak and pecan. We then aged the beer on those same three types of wood. The resulting stout is hearty and wonderful, balancing the rich, meaty smokiness with the sweetness of the malt.

Added by ngeunit1 on 03-29-2013

This beer is retired; no longer brewed.

Bros Score:
User Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
first ← prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | nextlast
Ratings: 263 |  Reviews: 28
Photo of Sammy
4/5  rDev +3.1%

Photo of kylehay2004
4/5  rDev +3.1%

Photo of acurtis
3.75/5  rDev -3.4%

Photo of Texasfan549
4/5  rDev +3.1%

Photo of UCLABrewN84
3.99/5  rDev +2.8%
look: 3.75 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

On tap at The Bruery in Placentia, CA.

Pours an opaque black with a foamy dark khaki head that settles to an oily film on top of the beer. Small dots of lace form around the glass on the drink down. Smell is of dark roasted malt, smoked malt, and cocoa aromas. Taste is much the same with smoke and cocoa flavors on the finish. There is a mild amount of roasty bitterness on the palate with each sip. This beer has a lower level of carbonation with a slightly crisp and medium bodied mouthfeel. Overall, this is a good beer with a nice smoke presence.

 553 characters

Photo of GRG1313
4/5  rDev +3.1%

Photo of spycow
3.5/5  rDev -9.8%

Photo of kjkinsey
4/5  rDev +3.1%

Photo of nmann08
4/5  rDev +3.1%

Photo of kojevergas
3.02/5  rDev -22.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 2.75 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3

750ml thick brown glass bottle with colorful label art and branded pry-off cap acquired for $14.99 USD plus tax at a local beer store and served into a flared stem-snifter/tulip hybrid glass in me gaff in low altitude Los Feliz, Los Angeles, California. Reviewed live. Expectations are somewhat high; I'm not a big fan of either brewery but each has at least one rather good beer in this style.

Served cold - straight from me fridge - and allowed to warm over the course of consumption. Side-poured with standard vigor as no carbonation issues are anticipated.

A: Pours a two finger wide head of khaki-tan colour. Good creaminess and thickness. Nice frothiness. Good retention for the high ABV - about 7 minutes. Nice even lacing as the head recedes.

Body colour is an opaque jet black. No yeast particles are visible. No bubble show.

Overall, it's an appealing appearance for the style - but isn't unique or special. No overt flaws are evident.

Sm: Dark malts, chocolate malts. Has a definite malty sweetness. Caramel. I do pick up on the smoke in the sense that I detect light bacon and pork. It's not so evocative that I could pick up on the actual wood used; i.e. I don't get hickory, applewood, mesquite, etc. A largely pleasant aroma of mild to moderate strength. It's not the most approachable aroma, but I'm optimistic.

No yeast character or hops are detectable.

T: Dark malts, chocolate malt, light timid smoke. The smoke is about as shallow as smoke can possibly be; zero depth of flavour for the smoke in particular. Caramel. Build is pretty generic for the style; you have to bring far more to the table in terms of complexity and subtlety to really stand out in this style. Balance is okay. Why brew this? Feels like a cashgrab - and hey, it worked - they got my money. I don't get much in terms of wood; the aging might have been for nought. I wonder how long they actually "aged" it; couldn't have been any more than 3 months given the timetable between Beachwood beginning to roll out bottles and this coming out. I feel swindled. Its mediocrity grows as it warms; there's just so little going on here.

Flavour depth is below average for the style. Flavour intensity and duration are average.

No yeast character or hop character comes through. Some alcohol is noticeable.

Maybe the smoke just fell off with time? I look for oak, pecan, and apple wood, but I can only find slight traces - and then only when I actively search for them. I'm left to conclude that this beer just falls of with age.

That said, the pecan in particular does develop as the beer warms; it surfaces more and more.

Mf: Sticky, smooth, wet. Pretty good carbonation. Suits the flavour profile in a general sense, but doesn't feel custom-tailored to it. Good body and thickness.

Dr: A downable smoked imperial stout without much smoke. Misses the mark in terms of smoke, but it's a drinkable little beer. That said, it's rather forgettable; there's nothing about this that would make me return to it - especially at this unreasonably high a price point. Another overpriced beer of middling quality from The Bruery/Beachwood. I wouldn't recommend this to friends. I'll finish this bottle alone with effort. ABV is decently hidden.


High C

 3,258 characters

Photo of oline73
3.75/5  rDev -3.4%

Photo of SocalKicks
4/5  rDev +3.1%

Photo of largadeer
3.5/5  rDev -9.8%

Photo of zestar
4/5  rDev +3.1%

Photo of mothman
2.3/5  rDev -40.7%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Photo of jlindros
3.82/5  rDev -1.5%
look: 4.25 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Share with Rudzud.

Pours a darker mocha colored 1 finger fluffy rich head that fades fairly slowly, nice lacing pitch black thick beer.

Nose campfire smoke, smoked oak chips, a bit of smoldering log, faint dark choc and cocoa, a bit of roasted malt and burnt grains, a bit of caramel and vanilla, faint charred oak, almost seems cedar bit that may be the smoke, some earthy chewy hops, light booze.

Taste starts with more smoked malt, smoldering log and campfire like, with lots if a bitter roast, burnt grains and hint if burnt coffee. Charred oak chips, charred roast too, and a bit of bakers and very dark choc. Then plenty of earthy chewy spicy hops, quite a bit of bitterness actually astringent like bitterness, from both the spicy hops and roasty malts. Slightly acrid from all that. Hint of vanilla and cocoa and some alcohol flavor with warming booze. Finish is dry, very bitter with lots if earthy spicy chewy hops, little astringent, more acrid burnt roast and smoldering log smoke, and just a touch of creamy cocoa.

Mouth is fuller bod, weird slight over carbonated like, some warming booze and alcohol flavor even, very sticky mouth coating.

Overall meh. It's a decent beer, but not what I was expecting. The smoke is a little nagging bitter and meh, the roast gets a little burnt and acrid, little astringent bitterness, not enough chocolate, booze comes on a bit strong, just too much going on and seems a bit flawed for what it could have been.

 1,465 characters

Photo of nickfl
4.5/5  rDev +16%

Photo of billab914
3.75/5  rDev -3.4%

Photo of wethorseblanket
3.84/5  rDev -1%

Photo of nathanmiller
4.5/5  rDev +16%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4.5

Photo of XmnwildX12
4.25/5  rDev +9.5%
look: 4.25 | smell: 4.25 | taste: 4.25 | feel: 4.25 | overall: 4.25

Photo of mendvicdog
4/5  rDev +3.1%

Photo of duceswild
3.75/5  rDev -3.4%

Photo of drewone
4.25/5  rDev +9.5%

Photo of mdfb79
4.09/5  rDev +5.4%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4.25 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

From 05/30/13 notes. Got a few bottles of this in the RS this year; 75-ml bottle poured into my Bruery tulip.

a - Pours a deep brown, almost black color, with two fingers of dark tan head and moderate carbonation evident. Lots of retention and light lacing on the glass. Looks great.

s - Smells of smoked malts, roasted malts, milk chocolate, cedar, oak, vanilla, light dark fruits, light sweet chocolate, and sweet coffee. Awesome nose; very complex. Lots of smoked notes up front but unlike some other smoked porters and stouts, it doesn't dominate the nose, and allows a lot of other stuff to come through.

t - Tastes of roasted malts, smoke, sweet chocolate, sweet dark fruits, burnt malts, light wood. Taste is pretty good, but less complex than the nose, and doesn't have any vanilla. Smoke is a little heavier in the taste; good, but a step down from the nose for me.

m - Medium body and low to moderate carbonation. Smooth and creamy, was hoping for a tiny bit of a fuller bottle. Doesn't feel lik 9.5% ABV though.

o - Overall I thought this was a very good smoked stout. It looks and smells great; a very complex nose with just enough smoke. The taste is good but heavier on the smoke. Glad to have another bottle of this one, as my girlfriend and I drank the bottle no problem.

 1,292 characters

first ← prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | nextlast
Collaboration Series: Mrs. Stoutfire from The Bruery
Beer rating: 3.88 out of 5 with 263 ratings
  • About Us

    Founded in Boston in 1996, BeerAdvocate (BA) is your go-to resource for beer powered by an independent community of enthusiasts and professionals dedicated to supporting and promoting better beer.

    Learn More
  • Our Community

    Comprised of consumers and industry professionals, many of whom started as members of this site, our community is one of the oldest, largest, and most respected beer communities online.
  • Our Events

    Since 2003 we've hosted over 60 world-class beer festivals to bring awareness to independent brewers and educate attendees.
  • Our Magazine

    Support uncompromising beer advocacy and award-winning, independent journalism with a print subscription to BeerAdvocate magazine.