Redhook 8-4-1 Expedition | Redhook Ale Brewery

86 Reviews
no score
Send samples
Redhook 8-4-1 ExpeditionRedhook 8-4-1 Expedition

Brewed by:
Redhook Ale Brewery
New Hampshire, United States

Style: American Strong Ale

Alcohol by volume (ABV): 9.50%

Availability: Rotating

Notes / Commercial Description:
An American-Style Strong Brown Ale developed by eight Redhook brewers working in four teams of two to create one beer. The ale reflects a compilation of each team’s individual receipes that were then carefully blended into one distinct beer. 8-4-1 Expedition Ale offers complexy flavor notes, delivering malty sweetness, medium bitterness with hints of smoked flavors and oak chips balanced by the addition of honey, brown sugar and candi sugar.

55 IBU

Added by henrysunset on 02-09-2010

For Trade:
View: Beers | Events
User Reviews
Sort by:  Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
Reviews: 86 | Ratings: 105
Photo of ppoitras
4.18/5  rDev +14.8%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4.5

22oz bottle purchased at Yankee Spirits, Sturbridge, MA.

Poured into an imperial pint glass, formed a 1" beige head over the clear copper brew. Pillowy head recedes gradually, with sticky lacing. Aroma is sweet with strong oak and alcohol notes. Taste also starts sweet, then fruity quick in the middle, the rounds out with bitterness, oak and alcohol through the close. Mouthfeel is smooth and small-bubbled, and drinkability is great. Very happy with this strong ale from Redhook.

 484 characters

Photo of Zorro
3.98/5  rDev +9.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

A dark amber colored beer that could honestly be called brown. This is the color of an old penny with a thick but short tan colored head.

Smell is sweet with a strong vanilla and patent malt aroma. Oak and what smells like date sugar that is probably the honey. There is a little citrus here and lots of wood, mostly is smells on vanilla and coffee.

Starts out sweet with a strong wood and vanilla flavor. Strong oak flavor and a scorched sugar and caramel flavor, tastes a bit like Crème brûlée. Very slightly sweet and over all a well-balanced ale the hop bitterness is just right.

Mouthfeel is thick and creamy.

Drinkability is where this beer really shines, an excellent sipping beer, tasty but not intrusive. It is quite warm now and you still can't tell this is any stronger than an English pale ale. One damn fine beer.

 833 characters

Photo of bgildea
4.08/5  rDev +12.1%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4

A: Nice dark brown/amber color. Thick white/slightly tannish head that sticks around for a long time. Leaves a good amount of lacing as well.

S: Slight amount of fruits with some slight malts smell.

T: Sweet flavor hits your right away with a slight amount of hops that linger for awhile.

M: Decent amount of thickness to the beer. Really good mouthfeel, better than I expected.

D: It's definitely drinkable. The overall taste is good, so I'd recommend this to any ale lover.

Overall: Overall the beer was enjoyable. The flavors worked well, and the mouthfeel really made my day. It's definitely worth a taste if you spot it in your beer store.

 650 characters

Photo of metter98
3.65/5  rDev +0.3%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

A: The beer poured relatively deep amber in color with a thin head. A light amount of carbonation leaves persistent lacing patterns.
S: There are aromas of piney hops and caramel malts in the nose along with some hints of cherries and oak.
T: The caramel malts and brown sugar flavors lend some sweetness in the overall taste; there are also notes of cherries, honey and oak.
M: It feels medium-bodied on the palate with some dryness.
D: This is a beer that definitely needs to be sipped. There's no way that I could have more than one of these in a sitting.

 558 characters

Photo of whoneeds8
2.99/5  rDev -17.9%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Bottling date March 8, 2010.

Poured into a pint glass a transparent dark amber with a one finger off white froathy head. Good retentiona and great lacing all the way down. No apparent scent to my really bad nose. I mean I'm getting nothing out of this nose. The taste is rather benign. It has typical brown ale flavor but the promise of an oak flavor is very abscent. There is a good amount of brown sugar flavor that might be too strong. Not enough of anything else to really distinct this as anything but a really strong brown ale. There is a slight alcohol burn to the mouthfeel. Over all, this "limited" is just that . . . one and done.

 641 characters

Photo of mentor
3.68/5  rDev +1.1%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Pours a single finger of dark tan head over a mostly clear dull brown liquid. Smells of ethyl alcohol, brown malt, brown sugar, light chocolate, english fuggle-like hop grassiness, and some pear esters. Alcohol is clean and burns the nostrils a bit. Definitely the most prominent flavor.

Tastes green apple estery, dry chocolate, aromatic and slightly minty hops, blackberry (if from hops, then they used northern brewer). Nice balance between the malt sweet, alcohol sting hop grassiness, and zippy carbonation. Needs time for the alcohol edge to tame out and some of the hop grassy bitter to smooth. Bummer that the hop flavor will likely disappear by then. Md thick body and acrid strong carbonation. Quite the double brown ale, IMO.

 737 characters

Photo of aristeros
4.2/5  rDev +15.4%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Poured into a tulip. Pours a ruby brown, rubies and garnets dance in the glass in the light. There's a finger of white head, light lacing but little retention. Looks like a brown ale, described on the bottle as an 'imperial brown ale.'

Biscuity malts and an astringent, lightly citrus, but almost medicinal hop presence. Light walnuts in there. When it sip, it actually reminds me of an imperial stout--something in the smokiness and heavier body--and the descriptor seems valid! Pretty big beer.

First off, it's got a moderate to heavy body, somewhere between a heavier brown and a stout. You get a good balance between biscuit and honey malts and a nice, smoky flavor throughout. Sharpness from the hops contrasts nicely. Excellent balance to this brew.

Warming alcohol presence creeps in halfway through the glass. The carbonation may be a trifle too much, but I can understand the choice.

A lot of thought and experimentation went into this brew, and it was something different. Went well with grilled cheese sandwiches. I'm going to get a bottle for a friend who's a big fan of smoked porters.

 1,103 characters

Photo of clickpush
4.18/5  rDev +14.8%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Got this bottle on a whim from BevMo (Van Ness, SF)

Pour: Hardy pour to tulip glass. Bright red & clear body shows a 2.5 finger off-white head. Some sticky webbing upon descent and constant cap of lacing throughout entire beer.

Nose: Piny hops. Biscuity malt. Spicy yeast. Graham crackers, tree bark, soil minerality.

Mouth: Everything is here: hop, malt, yeast, barrel. Full bodied, bittering hops, malt (again biscuits, oats), and tons of woody notes. Warm lingering roasty finish with the addition of some alcohol burn. Mouthfeel is good but falls a little short of holding up to the complexity of the flavor. Still, an impressive beer.

Side note: do NOT eat yogurt covered pretzels with this beer.

 705 characters

Photo of Japerrault
3.83/5  rDev +5.2%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

A: Nice brown ale with a thick creamy white head. Nice lacing.

S: Aromas were light. Some caramel, toffey and fruity aromas mostly. Also, brown sugar noticed.

T: Light sweetness hit first, light chocolate, and piney hops, subtle barrel flavors also noticed. Bitterness lingers in the end.

M: Lighter than I expected. Medium body with decent carbonation. Alcohol warmth noticed.

D: Relatively smooth. High alcohol and some bitterness makes this more of a sipper.

 466 characters

Photo of cichief
3.06/5  rDev -15.9%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Poured from a 22 oz bottle.

A- Poured a nice brown, with a decent tan head.

S- Malty, with little hops presence.

T- Toasted malt, no noted hops, somewhat sweet for the style.

M- Smooth, well carbonated, not overly carbonated, but nothing special,

D- Decent brown ale, not a refreshing beer, but falls in the style.

 319 characters

Photo of cgmees
3.43/5  rDev -5.8%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Billed as an imperial brown ale, brewed with brown sugar and cherry wood smoked malts.

Appearance was a rich dark brown color, hint of cloudiness. Huge foamy brown colored head.

The aroma is a little underwhelming, with a big brown sugar presence, along with some caramel, a little smoke, and a bit of alcohol.

Taste had a mild earthiness, some chocolate and smoke.

OK Drink ability. Was not as impressed as I hoped to be from this one.

 444 characters

Photo of Bung
3.58/5  rDev -1.6%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

22 oz. Surprisingly lighter brown pour, a good finger of off white head. Recedes to a thin layer.

Aroma is kind of malty, toffee and brown sugar. Some old tea, acidic juice.

Taste is a bit bitter, more of a burnt bitter than hop bitterness. Some malt, caramel, brown sugar, burnt brown sugar. Quite a bit of tea and burnt brown sugar. Some woody oak, pine hops, but more leather and a bit of acridness, cranberry?

Mouthfeel is pretty lively, lighter medium body. Only warming after a bit. Drinkability is fairly good from this, if you can get over some of the burnt sugar characteristics.

Not quite sure what to make of this one really. Not bad, but well....not sure.

 671 characters

Photo of Wetpaperbag
4/5  rDev +9.9%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

A- A dark reddish amber color with a slight set of lacing and minimal head.

S- Smell of dark fruits, honey, and breads. Lots of sweetness and fruityness coming though this beer.

T- The honey is a very predominate taste in this beer. The dark fruits and oak undertones are tasty and add an excellent complexity to the beer.

M- Feel is good, and average for any beer, just solid not too thick or thin with a good amount of carbination.

D- Easy to drink for sure, very tasty all around.

 488 characters

Photo of honeybrewer
3.28/5  rDev -9.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

22 oz bottle poured into a pilsner glass.

Medium brown in color, amber when held to the light. Super thick off-white creamy head that takes a minute or so to fade down to half an inch or so, which hangs around all the way to the bottom of the glass.

Earthy, malty smell with a bit of hops. Also a bit of mustiness, like over-ripe fruit, not at all unpleasant.

Good malty flavored brew. Little bit of earthiness, also getting a dash of citrus hops I believe. Kind of leaves a slightly unpleasant bitterness on my tounge and in the back of my throat.

Despite the enormous head this beer has only moderate to low carbonation, yet still retains a good mouthfeel, which thickens even more as it warms a little.

Overall this is an enjoyable but not excellent brew, if somewhat overpriced.

 787 characters

Photo of Mora2000
3.88/5  rDev +6.6%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

The beer pours a clear brown color with a large khaki head. The aroma is honey, oak and caramel malt. Overall, the aroma is not that impressive and could be a little stronger and more up front. The flavor is heavy on the oak with some chocolate and toasted malts. The oak is a little overwhelming and could be toned down a bit, but it is still pretty good. Medium mouthfeel and medium carbonation.

 397 characters

Photo of TMoney2591
3.49/5  rDev -4.1%
look: 5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Served in a Dogfish Head snifter.

Is there any style so vaguley named and defined as "American Strong Ale"? I would say no. Still, compared to other such brews, I'd have to say that this guy is one of the best-looking I've seen. After the initial pour, I left the snifter in the kitchen momentarily to let it settle and to prepare the living room table for the impending meal (frozen/microwaveable fettuccine). Upon my return, I found Shania Twain on my counter. I literally said, "Nice!" I did. Sitting there was a dark uncut garnet topped by a solid finger of gypsum. It was the strong ale equivalent of the Guinness look. Now, while I've been typing this, that "Birth of Venus" seafoam has settled away, but I cannot deny the perfection that I bore witness to (and, besides, this new look isn't all that bad either). Gotta tell ya, expectations are running quite high. And, of course, the smell punches these expectations in the gut. "How dare you expect good things?" Optimism be damned, indeed: A weak line of leather, dark malts, alcohol, and that new paint smell (I've always described it as some variety of cranberries or an as-yet-unidentified cran-X blend, but am not sure why). It isn't necessarily wholly bad, but assuredly a knock to the system. Now I don't know what to expect, which could actually be a positive here: If my expectations aren't set on either side of the spectrum, a Heisenbergian situation, it's statistically improbable that they will be unmet or even met altogether. The perfect tasting storm. Sadly, though, the taste follows the nose a bit too closely. That brushed suede returns, not realizing how out-of-style it is; the cran-X has transmogrified into a figgy appletini; and the dark malts have become more wheaty than anything. Some mild coffee notes drift around as though smoking were still allowed at some Starbucks somewhere. All-in-all, an average performance on the tongue. At least I can't say that it was entirely disagreeable. Though I can see all sorts o' bubbly goodness throughout the glass, the carbonation is pretty low, or at least undistinguished. As such, the body is able to let itself go; unfortunately, because of the ho-hum flavors, this heftiness is perceived as just plain fat, teased by those cruel schoolyard punks. Honestly, I can't see myself really going after this brew again, but I also can't see myself turning people away from it in stores. It's a Calipari point guard in the eyes of ultra-loyal collegiate fans.

 2,483 characters

Photo of riored4v
3.9/5  rDev +7.1%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Reviewed on 5/12/10

Poured into a snifter. Ruby/brown, hazy body with an off-white head that poured about 1 finger thick and faded quick.

Smell was toffee and caramel. Mild citrus aroma. Hints of roast and chocolate. Some subtle hints of dark fruit. malty and sweet.

Taste was chocolatey and smokey with some good roast. Mild earthiness with a faint bitterness in finish that is on the citrus side. Mild piney hop presence as well. Good maltiness with a mild sweetness. Slightly boozey. Hints of a bready, toffeeness along with some oak and dark fruits.

Mouthfeel had a medium body with a medium/high carbonation. Faint stickiness.

Drinkability was decent. Some slight boozey/hotness limits the drinkability.

 713 characters

Photo of GhostMilk
4.35/5  rDev +19.5%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4.5

Wow, after reading a few reviews and then actually tasting the beer for myself I was surprised this one hasn't been more well received. I suppose the smoke and wood flavors could be amped up slightly... but as is, I completely enjoyed the subtle complexities of this finely crafted beer.

The ABV is hidden very well, and though there is sweetness it is not at all cloying. The flavor of burnt sugar matches beautifully with the cherry-wood smoked malts, and the aging in oak barrels adds additional balance to the sweetness of honey and brown sugar.

Definitely the best beer I've ever tasted from Redhook.

 607 characters

Photo of BretSikkink
3.63/5  rDev -0.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Dark brown color, carbonation looks to be holding the head up nicely. Good lacing as well. Nose holds some oak and vanillin notes amongst the more general sweetness. A little more pop from the nose would be nice.

The flavor is similarly leading towards the woody side, with a lot of sweetness from the vanilla and even a honey note. Decent flavor but a bit simple and lightweight. I want this body beefed up. To be a big-time brown ale, throw some toasted malt in until this one fills out. As is, not a bad sipper and interesting in its own way.

 547 characters

Photo of silver0rlead
3.59/5  rDev -1.4%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Pours a dark mahogany color with a frothy tan head that retains well, and leaves pretty lacing. The aroma is a little underwhelming, with a big brown sugar presence, along with some caramel, a little smoke, toasted bread, fig and plum and a bit of alcohol. The flavor is similar to the aroma with a big brown sugar presence, along with some molasses and caramel, a little rum, some light smoke, mineraly bitterness, raisin and date, and alcohol. The mouthfeel is lighter than expected and drinakbility is pretty good considering the ABV. A decent but unremarkable offering from Redhook, they need to amp up the hops and the smoke and this would really be something.

 665 characters

Photo of emmasdad
3.35/5  rDev -8%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Being billed as an imperial brown ale, brewed with honey and cherry wood smoked malts, had me intrigued. Upon pouring this one into my Duvel tulip, I noticed the rich dark brown color, nearly opaque, barely touched by orange at the edges. Huge foamy ecru colored head rests atop the beer. Aromas of oak, honey, brown sugar and milk chocolate. Taking a sip, this one becomes a huge letdown--some kind of Robitussin cherry cough syrup thing going on here, along with a little sweetness. Another letdown from the Red Hook limited series.

 534 characters

Photo of Gosox8787
3.57/5  rDev -1.9%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Presentation: Poured into a snifter glass from a bomber bottle in two parts. This is labelled as an "Imperial Brown Ale."

Appearance: Ruby red to brown in color with almost no head after the pour. No retention either. Seems rather flat overall.

Aroma: Sweet brown sugar and a little tart cherry. A little medicinal note peaking through in the background.

Taste: Toasty, smoky malt notes stand out a lot more here. The sweetness from the malt and the brown sugar are the strongest notes present. Oak notes really stand out too and provide a nice background. The honey used in te brew provides some sweetness and a little medicinal flavoring. Aftertaste is smokey.

Mouthfeel: Medium bodied with a dry finish. A little oily at times as well.

Drinkability: Somewhat smooth and easy to drink. The ABV is noticable and makes it presence known. Hard to have more than one of these, but it was no problem finishing the bottle.

Overall, an interesting concept for a beer but it doesn't translate perfectly. I can't really put my finger on the flavor profile this is going for. The sweetness in a highlight, but the oak and honey seem a bit like overkill. Worth a try in my opinion though.

 1,187 characters

Photo of KeefD
3.55/5  rDev -2.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

Finally getting around to entering some reviews from notes into BA.

This is the 3rd beer I've had with "Expedition" in the name. It's probably the worst of the three...

Clear reddish-brown color with no head or lacing. Like cola, but lighter.

Aroma is dry, lightly yeasty, hoppy up front, light, and hard to get any malt qualities for an imperial brown.

Taste reminds me of Arrogant Bastard, only lighter. Good hop flavor, but not overly bitter. Underneath the grapefruit hops are some cracker/biscuit malts, but not getting much flavor from the darker malts that give it's color. And where is the oak?

Average carbonation, medium body, a bit to dry and bitter for an imperial brown. Needs malt/sweet balance.

Alcohol well-hidden, easy to drink despite the high ABV. Just not delicious.

 793 characters

Photo of dman1969
3.81/5  rDev +4.7%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

Poured from a 220z bottle into a glass.

A-poured a dark red/amber color with a frothy tan head that disapated fairly fast.

S-light oak, light malt, sweet with slight hops but not much.

T-the brown sugar and honey blend nicely for a light sweetness with minimal oak coming through on the tounge.

M-I thought it was a little on the thin side for what I was expecting.

D-it is an easy drinking beer that doesn't really show the abv it reports to have. Nothing I would seek out, but wouldn' turn one away either.

 514 characters

Photo of lordofthewiens
3.45/5  rDev -5.2%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

In a snifter this beer was a cherry amber color with a small tan head. A fair amount of lace. It had a sweet, honey aroma, some fruit, and a spicey/peppery aroma. Sweet honey taste, cherry, piney hops. But (and sometimes there's always a but) the mouthfeel was entirely too sharp and medicinal, like drinking Robitussin. Not likely to try this again.

 350 characters

Redhook 8-4-1 Expedition from Redhook Ale Brewery
3.64 out of 5 based on 105 ratings.
  • About Us

    Your go-to website for beer (since 1996), publishers of BeerAdvocate magazine (since 2006) and hosts of world-class beer events (since 2003). Respect Beer.
  • BeerAdvocate Microbrew Invitational

    Join us June 2-3, 2017 in Boston, Mass. for beer, cider, mead, kombucha and sake from over 70 small producers.

    Learn More
  • Subscribe to BeerAdvocate Magazine

    Support uncompromising beer advocacy and award-winning, independent journalism with a print subscription to BeerAdvocate magazine.