Dismiss Notice
Curious about recent updates to the site and app? Check the Announcements forum for updates.
Dismiss Notice
Love Belgian Beer?

Join us Sep 17 in Portland, Maine for Return of the Belgian Beer Fest, featuring hundreds of authentic Belgian beers and Belgian-inspired offerings.

Tickets + more: beeradvocate.com/belgian

Yuengling Light Lager | Yuengling Brewery

241 Reviews
no score
Send samples
Yuengling Light LagerYuengling Light Lager

Brewed by:
Yuengling Brewery
Pennsylvania, United States | website

Style: Light Lager

Alcohol by volume (ABV): 3.20%

Availability: Year-round

Notes / Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

Added by BeerAdvocate on 05-22-2002

For Trade:
View: Beers | Events
User Reviews
Sort by:  Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
Reviews: 241 | Ratings: 1,027
Photo of Theheroguy
2.91/5  rDev +1.4%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.75 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.75

Generally underwhelming

This beer is inoffensive unlike most light beers. However I never really have the desire to take another sip. It isn't much better than most light beers taste wise. It has a nice body and nice smell . I just can't recommend this beer as much as I love the yuengling family. Drink a regular yuengling they aren't super high on calories.

 360 characters

Photo of Timothy223ktktm99
2.68/5  rDev -6.6%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

this beer is not available in state, but has a popular name, so snagged it up on vacation.

not remediable. because well it is not especially good and not especially bad. very light. even for a logger. it is not quite bud light thin, but still very thin, and for the ABV, well i guess its good if your trying to take it easy, but for the money, your better off drinking cheaper light beers

 389 characters

Photo of RonaldTheriot
3/5  rDev +4.5%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Yuengling Light Lager has a thick, spongy, quickly-dissipating, white head and clear, fairly bubbly, caramel appearance, with no lacing left behind. The aroma is typical for light beer, with its faint sweetness and grain. Taste is stereotypical light beer- watery sweetness, grain, and essentially no hop bitterness, but Yuengling Light Lager has an overriding paper note, which is not a positive attribute. Mouthfeel is very light and watery, and it finishes crisp, refreshing, and quite drinkable. This beer would go well with boiled crabs, steamed vegetables, potato salad, and corn bread with butter, but on its own, it’s not much. I guess it’s okay, though. It is at least worth trying, once.


 706 characters

Photo of DeFaz
2.85/5  rDev -0.7%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Actually a bit better in my opinion than their regular lager, this light lager has more flavor than most light beers but offers nothing particularly special. It has flavors of bread, grain, malt, and just a touch of hops, and it is somewhat more bitter than most run of the mill light beers. Where I live this sells for $5.99/6 pack (bottles) and is actually a bit less than Coors Light and some other light beers. While not particularly good, this light beer is very drinkable and a somewhat better choice than other cheap beer options. Also, with its low ABV, it makes for a decent session beer for someone with a low budget.

 627 characters

Photo of jjamadorphd
3.18/5  rDev +10.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.25

I had no choice but to try this light beer at the last party I was at (who the heck only stocks light beer in the cooler?) Anyway, it wasn't half bad. The beer had a great golden look with a white, frothy head. What surprised me was the bold, crisp flavor the beer had, even though it felt a bit watery. Overall, it was one of the better lights I have had.

 356 characters

Photo of pmorey
3.05/5  rDev +6.3%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

If you go to an enforced "no glass" beach, your options are very limited so this is what I ended up with. Can't judge appearance out of a can but aroma was ok. First drink was actually a pleasant surprise at the front of the mouth, with decent balanced taste, though very heavily carbonated. As it went back though, it was as if it turned to water. No lasting flavor and no aftertaste. To be expected I guess at this ABV.

I later decided to pour one after I got home. Very nice deep golden amber color and decent head.

This is definitely not the best beer I have ever had, but for a light, it is not bad at all. Serves its purpose and I would drink again.

 657 characters

Photo of thecheapies
2.5/5  rDev -12.9%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 3 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

Bright gold, or maybe a shade darker. Not your usual Yuengling color. Head? No head. I'm staring at a transparent surface with some tiny bubbles along the rim.

Corn and barley malts with some carryover sweetness that isn't supposed to be there. Not even getting any hops. Smells like grain water.

More corn presence, like the nose. Only the malts, but they're just lightly toasted pale grains. Very light earthy bitterness that is a by-product of the hops. Not crisp. Sweet-ish, but no DMS or other sulfurous notes. Wouldn't call it clean, however.

Medium in body, impressive for a light lager, but where's the carbonation? I thought this would be super-fizzy. Gases must've escaped, as this beer's near-flat.

It's alright, I guess. I'll drink it from time-to-time. You don't have to.

 788 characters

Photo of cottonkoozie
2.19/5  rDev -23.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

Appearance - Nice color for a light macro. Almost the same color as clover honey. Decent head but dissipates very quickly. However it looks pretty much like you would expect a regular yuengling to look if you added water to it.

Smell - Like any other light macro, not much smell. Slightly better than something like bud light but still not much there, just some grain smell.

Taste - Like Yuengling lager, but with water added. Not very pleasant, just too watered down feeling. The grains are there, no real hops or malts, pretty much what you expect in a light adjunct macro.

Mouthfeel - pretty much just average, no really much else to say about it.

I'm pretty sure that all they did was water down regular yuengling lager until it was below 100 carbs, (99 according to the bottle), and then bottle it as a light beer. Really glad this beer was given to me because I wouldn't buy it. If you are a fan of traditional Yuengling Lager then go with that, and if you are trying to watch you calories, drink less or make cuts somewhere else.

 1,040 characters

Photo of kylehay2004
2.83/5  rDev -1.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

A: Clear, amber with a white head, about a single finger head

S: Bready and grainy smell, little else.

T: Sweet and caramel notes. Smooth. Basically I imagine this as a watered down tradition yuengling lager.

M: Moderate carbonation and Medium body. One very nice difference from the traditional yuengling lager is that this one doesn't have a bad aftertaste. That is definitely a plus.

O: basically a watered down traditional yuengling without that sour lingering aftertaste. Still would take the full flavored version over this one though.

 545 characters

Photo of StonedTrippin
2.28/5  rDev -20.6%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

take all the bad features of the normal yuengling, its gross stale malt flavor, its way over the top carbonation, and its skunky aftertaste, then water it all down, and this is what you get. it pours clear and bubbly, minimal head. the aroma is pretty bad, metallc and off on the malt, no hops at all. the flavor is just a dumbed down regular yuengling, with a little less body. carbonation is also brutally ovedone, feels like a pepsi in my mouth, but tastes far worse. this had me on the verge of throwing up in my mouth, no joke. i can find some redeeming factor in any beer, which is hard in this case, but guess if you want to drink all day and not catch a buzz, this it your go. not something ill hopefully ever drink again.

 730 characters

Photo of buschbeer
2.51/5  rDev -12.5%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

12oz can
Served in a pint glass

A - It has a nice amber color to it. Each pour gives me a generous head that quickly dissipates.

S - I get grain and grass.

T - There is almost a complete lack of taste. If I have to think this hard as to what I am tasting I will just call it tasteless. Very Coors Light-like.

M - Damn near water. The carbonation lets me know that it's not.

O - It looks great for a light beer. That's about it. It's as close to water as I've come across since having a Coors Light.

 503 characters

Photo of BucBasil
3.41/5  rDev +18.8%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Drank from the 24 oz can.

Smell is extremely light. Almost no aroma coming off of this. Just some crackery malt and grain. Some grass.

Taste is very light also with a sweet, almost citrusy character to it. Lemony tea and then an almost peach note, then some grass and crackers. Weird and unexpected. Tastes somewhat summery actually and really not bad at all. very light but not in taste, rather in character.

This was a pleasant surprise. Yuengling is always pretty solid and this one might edge out the original in the summer.

 532 characters

Photo of DavoleBomb
1.99/5  rDev -30.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 1.5

Poured into a perfect pint from a 24 oz. can.

3.5 A: Clear medium orange color. Two fingers of frothy off-white head. Retention is pretty good and a decent amount of lacing is left. I just had the regular Yuengling out of a can and it didn't retain the head at all. How peculiar.

2.0 S: Like the regular, just weak as hell. Also not picking up any caramel. Just a light toastiness and some graininess. Weak.

2.0 T: Tastes like nothing with a light toastiness and graininess. Weak.

2.0 M: Light body. A bit too much carbonation. Not even crisp, just fluffy water. Weak.

1.5 D: Weak.

 586 characters

Photo of SpeedwayJim
3.2/5  rDev +11.5%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

From capra12. 12oz. bottle into a Heady Topper pint glass.

1 finger white head with minimal retention. Beer is dark, clear goldenrod. Spotty lace with little retention. Average for the style.

Some wheat and rice notes. Not much else. Simple and pretty subdued.

Opens sweet. Some rice notes with hint of a malt backbone. A slightly odd tartness towards the end. Finishes clean and crisp. Slightly sweet aftertaste. Not much going on here but par for the style.

Light bodied with good carbonation. Clean and crisp in the mouth and finishes crisp, quenching. Little aftertaste. What you'd expect. Pretty refreshing.

Overall, this is one of the better beers in its style. Nicely drinkable. Great with food. But overall, there's not much going on here. Decent.

 763 characters

Photo of smakawhat
2.91/5  rDev +1.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 2.5

Poured from the bottle into a nonic pint glass.

A real nice amber brown and clear body, giving a fairly good white head but it seems to fall at a good clip to nothing.

Nose is strange. Kind of acrid and sour. Some faint toasted malts lingering in the background, faint sweetness behind this sourness.

Taste is fairly neutral. In the mid palate there's really nothing going on. Upon the aftertaste there's some sweet malt and bread, and a little toasty grain but kind of small. Pretty light bodied but that's to be expected feels actually pretty decent in the palate without any major faults.

Overall it's fairly inoffensive but it sure smelled unappealing on first open. I suppose you could do worse, can't say I am really drawn to this though, what's the point of drinking a beer that has next to nothing for taste?

 820 characters

Photo of bluejacket74
3.05/5  rDev +6.3%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

12 ounce bottle. Served in a pint glass, the beer pours a clear light amber color with a half inch off-white head. The head didn't stay around for too long, and there's a small amount of lacing. Aroma is sweet malt and corn, not much to this brew at all. It's not a bad aroma, but not great either. Taste is the same as the aroma, it's all sweet malt and corn. Mouthfeel/body is light/medium, it's smooth, a bit slick and goes down easy enough. I'd have to say for the style of beer this is, it's average. I've certainly had a lot worse. It's not offensive at all, and for the most part I think it's more enjoyable than most light beers I've had in the past. Not that I would make a point to seek this out, but it's really not bad. Single bought from Blacklick Wine and Spirits for $1.09.

 788 characters

Photo of VncentLIFE
2.4/5  rDev -16.4%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 3 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Ah Light Lager. This thing has no flavor that I really could find. I did all the swirling and stuff, but I got very little. Light toasted corn and no bitterness at all. The pale straw body and no head didnt really help either.

Well I cant say I totally hated this thing, but there wasnt much to hate. It was drinkable (like water or coke).

 341 characters

Photo of brewcore
3.03/5  rDev +5.6%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Poured from a bottle into a pint glass. Grading for the style.

A: Dark gold, almost copper in color. Yields a one finger, creamy, white head. Some but not much lacing.

S: Bready malts. A little bit of sweet adjunct funk.

T: Malts. Primarily bready with an earthy finish. Not much from hops here. More flavor than most light lagers.

M: Relatively light and watery but with more body than most light lagers with moderate carbonation.

O: Not a bad beer for a light lager. I like it better than the offerings from the big three but it still is not something I will be stocking in the fridge any time soon.

 606 characters

Photo of thagr81us
3.1/5  rDev +8%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Served from bottle into a shaker. Poured a golden caramel color with a half finger white head that subsided to a minimal amount quickly. There was no lacing evident throughout the glass. The aroma was comprised of sweet malt, nutty, and floral. The flavor was of sweet malt, nutty, floral, and water. It had a light feel on the palate with medium-high carbonation. Overall this was a fairly average brew. While there wasn't a whole lot going on here, it really wasn't bad either. Just wish this one would have been a little more complex. Would make a good gateway beer for the regular frat boy out there.

 604 characters

Photo of WoodBrew
3.05/5  rDev +6.3%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

I tried the Yuengling Light Lager during a visit to Ohio. The beer poured a light oak color with a nice creamy white head,then lay to a light lace around the top of the glass. The smell and taste were mostly malt with slight balance hop. The mouthfeel was light in body and carbonated. Overall I think it is very drinkable, a nice light beer.

 342 characters

Photo of giblet
2.75/5  rDev -4.2%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

first off let me say that i am not a lover of light beer. this is one of the best light beers i have had. pours nice head with good carbonation from a can. nice malt smell. refreshing and somewhat tasty. not much on hops though. good beer for everyday.

suckem up and movem out.


 286 characters

Photo of devinoconnor
3.48/5  rDev +21.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Only thing about Beer Advocate I don't like... the snobs. Any even remotely "mainstream" lighter beer is immediately deemed poor. Granted, this isn't the world's best brew, but it's not poor. In fact, it's one of the better light beers America produces.

Pours a light brown with little head. Smells of malt and yeast, no hops or citrus notes. Taste is earthy, soil-like similar to its regular counterpart.

Overall, a good light beer.

 437 characters

Photo of BeerKangaroo
2.68/5  rDev -6.6%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Into a pint glass:

A: light golden amber colored body that didn't have any head whatsoever

S: very faint caramel and graininess

T: light sweetness but didn't last

M: light and crisp; sessionable; slight wet grassiness and grain in the aftertaste and finish

O: decent for the style, does the trick what Yuengling was trying to do, probably only have again if I'm trying to lose weight

 388 characters

Photo of projectflam86
3.43/5  rDev +19.5%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

12oz can poured into a tulip. Reviewed with the style in mind.

A- Pours a light golden amber color with a thick white foam head that doesn't stick around for very long but does leave a few rings of lace.

S- Some faint caramel malt and grain scents. Not a whole lot going on in the nose.

T- A nice light sweetness initially with a touch of grassy hops and grain in the finish. Toasted bread and caramel malt round out the flavor. Very nice flavor considering the style.

M- Light and crisp with good carbonation.

O- Overall a very drinkable light lager. Easily one of the best that I have had thus far.

 606 characters

Photo of shealoftus14
1.75/5  rDev -39%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 2

Prefer the normal yuengling lager, this light beer had no taste really. I dont like any light beers but I would prefer one of the big 3 over this one. The aroma was alright the appearance was a light bright color but the taste wasn't that good. Didn't apprecaite the aftertaste either. I believe I can get the same quality of this beer at a lower price as well.

 361 characters

Yuengling Light Lager from Yuengling Brewery
68 out of 100 based on 241 ratings.
  • About Us

    Your go-to website for beer (since 1996), publishers of BeerAdvocate magazine (since 2006) and hosts of world-class beer events (since 2003). Respect Beer.
  • Return of the Belgian Beer Fest

    BeerAdvocate Brings its All-Belgian Fest to Portland, Maine on September 17, 2016. Tickets are on sale now.

    Learn More
  • Get the Mag

    Become a BeerAdvocate magazine print subscriber today.