Even Keel | Ballast Point Brewing Company

1.36/5  rDev -64.3%

2/5  rDev -47.5%

2/5  rDev -47.5%

2/5  rDev -47.5%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

2.25/5  rDev -40.9%

2.73/5  rDev -28.3%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

on draft, pint glass at the Cloverleaf, Caldwell, NJ. on sight, nice golden hue. not much hops in the nose. slightly bitter on the tongue, but not strong. finishes ever so slightly bitter, not much backbite. could use more hops during the finishing stage of the boil or during dry hopped, as well as a little more boil hops. good smooth mouthfeel. just needs more hops, would be a good IPA.

 390 characters

2.74/5  rDev -28.1%
look: 3.25 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

2.75/5  rDev -27.8%

2.75/5  rDev -27.8%

2.75/5  rDev -27.8%

2.76/5  rDev -27.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.75 | overall: 2.75

05/30/12 On tap at Rattle n Hum, NYC. Not sure where we're going with this brew. As an Un-hoppy guy this was not what I had in mind, or for that matter what was Ballast Point was thinking?

Tons-O-Hops but only 3.8% ABV? One would think this would alienate fledgling crafties due to unfamiliar sensations on the tongue with 'less than' sensations on the buzz. My advise...save the vats for something more decisive.

 415 characters

2.81/5  rDev -26.2%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.75 | overall: 2.75

2.85/5  rDev -25.2%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.75 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.75

Not a fan of session IPAs, but in this case I understand the need for them now. Much more malt base then I expected, but still just had an off taste. Not bad just kinda blah.

 174 characters

2.85/5  rDev -25.2%
look: 2.75 | smell: 2.75 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.75 | overall: 2.75

A decent session, I expected a little more from bp...

53 characters

2.9/5  rDev -23.9%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Still looking for a session beer that I can drink.

50 characters

2.97/5  rDev -22%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Reviewed at Stone Brewery. Billed as a "mild IPA" by the server.

C: Gold, poured with a very thick head (the short pour isn't BP's fault). There were flecks of hops in the head.

S: honeysuckle

M: slick and oily.

T: Lacks sweetness to balance the hops. Very hoppy, but initially I don't think the beer can stand up to it. Spicy hop flavor. I was expecting more citrus. By the end of the beer, I had gotten used to hop/malt imbalance and the last few sips were refreshing. I'm still a bit up in the air about this approach to the style.

 538 characters

2.97/5  rDev -22%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.75 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

3/5  rDev -21.3%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

3/5  rDev -21.3%

3/5  rDev -21.3%

3/5  rDev -21.3%

3/5  rDev -21.3%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

3/5  rDev -21.3%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

3/5  rDev -21.3%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

3/5  rDev -21.3%