T.E.A. (Traditional English Ale) | Hog's Back Brewery

Your Rating: None
Want it   Got it 
T.E.A. (Traditional English Ale)T.E.A. (Traditional English Ale)
82 Ratings
T.E.A. (Traditional English Ale)T.E.A. (Traditional English Ale)

Brewed by:
Hog's Back Brewery
England, United Kingdom

Style: English Pale Ale

Alcohol by volume (ABV): 4.20%

Availability: Year-round

Notes / Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

Added by proc on 08-10-2002

Bros Score:
User Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
first ← prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | nextlast
Ratings: 82 |  Reviews: 46
Reviews by Ralphus:
Photo of Ralphus
2.81/5  rDev -17.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Purchased from the LCBO, best before data still 11 months off. It seemed odd that the label had the phrase 'bottle conditioned' all over it, and the phrase 'pour slowly' after I had poured the first half of my beer. It was clear, even after a fairly vigorous pour. But the 2nd half did show evidence of some yeast particles, a dark sediment was brought to the surface and became a mixture.

The smell is a little bit like sweet DMS. Not my thing at all. The appearance improves things though with a color that is a pleasing a light mahogony with a small white cap.

Taste is light, malty with an earthy slightly bitter finish that just lingers on the palate for an extremely long time. Not pleasant but not terrible either. Very little fruit flavour or anything to add interest can be found unfortunately.

Mouthfeel is good.. very smooth due to the lack of carbonation. Drinkability is average for the style but i won't be finishing mine.

 940 characters

More User Reviews:
Photo of Billolick
3.3/5  rDev -3.5%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Mid sized bottle, with freshness dating. The bottle was brought back from England by my parents, so I cant guarantee the best handling, untill it got into my hands. Anyway, this one poured a dull light brown, with uninspiring white head, very low carbonation. Light bodied, light amount of flavor. Pretty dull stuff. Disappointing is the operative word. I'm sure this stuff is lovely on cask in a quant Brit pub, what I got out of the bottle was so so at best.

 460 characters

Photo of JohnnyBarman
3.55/5  rDev +3.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

This one squeaked into the LCBO in downtown Waterloo. With CAMRA, "bottle conditioned" and a pig on the bottle, I figured I was in for a treat.

Poured slowly into a nonic glass. Not much detectable sediment (nowhere near as much as Coopers, for example), but it's there. Copper-amber in colour, with a thin ring of head. Fairly typical for the style.

The nose is mild, with tea leaves and malt leading the pack.

I'm beginning to see why the beer is called "T.E.A.", because that's the dominant flavour here. A bit of toffee, some malts, but mostly tea leaves. Very smooth, however, so it would be great for a session.

Thin carbonation, slightly oily. Not the greatest.

Though it claims to be the "Champion Beer of Britain, I'm not sure what all the fuss is about. It's a pretty standard EPA, really. Not terribly complex, but smooth and easy to drink. Given the low ABV, it would actually pretty good for a session drinker.

 931 characters

Photo of jazzyjeff13
3.48/5  rDev +1.8%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 3.5

A 500ml bottle with a BB of Sept 2017. Purchased a while back from Waitrose (I think). As the name clearly implies, this beer is created to be a traditional English ale.

A: Poured into a tulip pint glass. A deep coppery-marmalade hue with fine sediment and good carbonation. Produces a decent head of creamy off-white foam that lasts for a minute or two before subsiding to a patchy surface layer.

S: Aroma of caramel malt with hints of grain, barley sugar, ale yeast, leafy hops and mild earthiness. OK but unexciting.

T: Tastes of grainy malt with notes of barley sugar, light caramel, a twinge of treacle, ale yeast, mild hay and leafy hops. Slightly sweet. A subtle bitterness upon swallowing.

M: Mouthfeel is smooth and tingly, with good body. Aftertaste of grain, ale yeast and mild, leafy bitterness.

O: A traditional English ale - pretty decent but I can see that this wouldn't be everyone's cup of tea. Looks good, while the aroma and flavour are a well-crafted blend of grainy malt and subtle English hops. Nice body. This has lovely balance, though perhaps veering towards sweetness. However, the understated hop character gives it a lack of charisma. Pleasant but forgettable.

 1,193 characters

Photo of Beer_Rabbit66
3.63/5  rDev +6.1%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 3.75

Photo of racer2k
3.3/5  rDev -3.5%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Poured bottle in to a pint glass

A: a nice reddish-brown beer with virtually no head or lacing. Beer is somewhat cloudy in the glass with good carbonation.

S: Mild hops, sweet malt and a bit spicy with some earthy overtones.

T: A mild ale that is flavorful but not overpowering. There is a good balance of forward European hops and back end sweet malt flavor.

M: Creamy moderately carbonated mouth feel with a tangy sticky feel to the beer.

D: Very drinkable session beer and one that stands out in the rather vanilla flavored British beer offerings.

 558 characters

Photo of mintjellie
3.2/5  rDev -6.4%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Pours a clear copper, with the lions share of sediment remaining at the bottom of the bottle. It's head is thin and poorly retentive. There's no lace to speak of. I left a little bit of beer in the bottle just in case I felt like rousing it up, and I'm glad I did. This doesn't have a whole lot of character to it, but drinking it hazy does improve it a little bit. I'm probably doing it wrong, but I like what I like.

It isn't very aromatic. It has a light biscuit aroma with faint earthy and floral notes. Mild toasty bread flavour with a leafy, tea-like finish. It has a very simple flavour to it, but that flavour starts to pop a bit as it gets closer to room temperature. It feels very light and smooth, with very low carbonation. In fact, it's almost flat. Thats not a complaint. I think mouthfeel is the best thing this beer has going for it. It's a decent and easy drinking pale ale, and I think it's nice to be able to try a bottle conditioned example. I just don't think it's an exceptionally good beer.

 1,015 characters

Photo of Sammy
3.12/5  rDev -8.8%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

A slight brown colour to it. No lasting head. A tad of hop aroma, and an understated bitter taste. Very understated taste overall, and a tad light mouthfeel. Drinkable, but not very. Little carbonation, its somewhat cask like. Bit I would not go out of the way to have this on cask.

 282 characters

Photo of CanuckRover
3.19/5  rDev -6.7%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Agressive pour, little head. Looks like a cask ale, that's promising.

Not much at all on the nose, some slightly metallic malt.

... Not much in the flavour either. Light caramel malt. Agree with the commentator below, a tea character... iced tea. Very subtle bitterness at the back of the mouth.

Nice bottle conditioned mouthfeel, but doesn't have the flavour to back it up, so it just comes across as thin.

Frankly, I can't say it's that much better than your average Canadian macro-ale. Rather disappointing.

 516 characters

Photo of sfprint
2.95/5  rDev -13.7%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

A: amber/crimson but transparent, weak soda carbonation, and basically no head.
S: mixed fruits, fruit leather, but very weak. Fruity malt and a bit sour
T: Mild, a hair bitter, like a weak amber ale.
M: Pretty light, pretty much no carbonation.
O: A fairly ordinary English ale. Boring but fine.

 298 characters

Photo of Momon
3.54/5  rDev +3.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Photo of jbonapar
3.5/5  rDev +2.3%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Pours a honey gold with a thick, but small head. Minimal smell, no really overpowering or dominant smell.

Taste is light and bitter, slight malt with a hop-tartness. Slight apple and fruits. Mouthfeel is warm, slightly malty.

A nice beer, refreshing, not overpowering and certainly not unique. But, easy to drink and would recommend on a nice summer evening.

 362 characters

Photo of beer_bottle
3.68/5  rDev +7.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 3.75

Photo of Reinheitsgebot71
3.1/5  rDev -9.4%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

The highly carbonated amber body is capped by a disappointingly off white small head with low retention.

High effervescent brings ester scents of apple and wet leaves straight to the nose. Hoppy resinous note is backed by the smell of dandelion greens.

Very bitter up front in an unpleasing harsh alkaline way not helped slight note of what best reminds me of chlorine. The harsh hop flavours begin to subside as the beer warms with some flowery notes coming into effect. Biscuit malt balances out the hop power further down the line as well.

The mouth feel is light and biting from the carbonation.

Overall this beer was a bit of a letdown.

 647 characters

Photo of Wiscodrinker
3.25/5  rDev -5%

Photo of georgeanthorpe
3.11/5  rDev -9.1%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.25

Photo of DrBier
3.25/5  rDev -5%

Photo of BlackHaddock
4/5  rDev +17%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Brown 500ml bottle conditioned beer, best before late March 2009, drank mid-March 2008.

Poured once, in a single pour, into a straight sided pint sleeve glass.

A lovely terracotta colour, on top sat a light biege head which thinned very quickly. The body was clear with very little carbonisation, hardly a bubble rising up through the beer at all.

Sweetish aroma, toffee and malted biscuits come to mind.

The taste is very moreish, very drinkable. Very simular flavours to the aroma in fact.

Well balanced beer and easy to drink. A long way from watery, but this isn't a heavy viscous beer either, just a good one.

 619 characters

Photo of Drummermean
3.5/5  rDev +2.3%

Photo of vinicole
3.75/5  rDev +9.6%

Photo of DirkNachbar
4/5  rDev +17%

Photo of Birdy69
4.44/5  rDev +29.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4.5

Perfect balance of hops and malt. One of the tastiest easiest drink out there. And from my most local brewery so it's a keeper for me

133 characters

Photo of Habanero58
3.5/5  rDev +2.3%

Photo of uno99
3.16/5  rDev -7.6%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 2 | overall: 4

A: Well the attractive bottle sure seduced me when I was in the liquor store, and there was also only one left on the self so that sealed the deal there. pours an intresting toffee colour. quite murkey thanks to the secondary fermentation.

S: being so strapped for cash lately I havent had a beer in a few weeks (unless you count macros) so I was quite giddy when I first took a whiff of this. However, as I came to my "sences" I realized this is pretty average. I do like the hop charecter, but again is pretty par for the course.

T: First thing I notice is the dissapointing mouthfeel - I think it really lets this beers flavour fall flat. let it roll to the back of your mouth however, and you do get a nice and classic hop pang.

M: Thin and watery. This is a beer that would clearly be better on tap or cask.

D: Nothing "wrong" with this beer - it might even be a good session ale if there isnt much choice at your local. However, there is no reason IMO to choose this over a St. Peters, or a Sam Smiths at your liquor store.

 1,033 characters

Photo of BKLRIBS
3.5/5  rDev +2.3%

first ← prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | nextlast
T.E.A. (Traditional English Ale) from Hog's Back Brewery
Beer rating: 3.42 out of 5 with 82 ratings