Dismiss Notice
Subscribe to BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99! (Limited time offer, US delivery only)

Guinness 250th Anniversary Stout | Guinness Ltd.

Your Rating: None

Want it   Got it 
Guinness 250th Anniversary StoutGuinness 250th Anniversary Stout
570 Ratings
Guinness 250th Anniversary StoutGuinness 250th Anniversary Stout

Brewed by:
Guinness Ltd.

Style: Irish Dry Stout

Alcohol by volume (ABV): 5.00%

Availability: Limited (brewed once)

Notes / Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

Added by naterock on 04-13-2009

This beer is retired; no longer brewed.

Bros Score:
View: Beers | Events
User Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
Ratings: 570 |  Reviews: 402
Photo of RblWthACoz
3.71/5  rDev +4.8%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Pours a very dark brown that does show some light when held directly to it. Nice tan head. Nose is malty and coffee, but barely much there really. Flavor is prety nice and hearty. Thicker malts, but not too much so that it breaches that lighter character profile for the style. Minimal roasted tones. I have to say the carbonation is way too full at the start IMO. But overall this is a nice drinker. Happy Anniversary Guinness. Here's to the next 8,750 years on your lease.

 474 characters

Photo of lordofthewiens
3.25/5  rDev -8.2%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

I'm not a big fan of Guinness, but thought this was worth a try. The beer was a very dark brown, almost black, color with a thick tan head. It had a nice aroma of cocoa and roasted malt. Unfortunately, the aroma did not transfer into the taste. A very meek chocolate and coffee taste. On the watery side. I don't think I'll buy another 6 pack.

 343 characters

Photo of wmthorne
4.03/5  rDev +13.8%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Poured very similar to a Guinness extra stout from a bottle. Nice light brown head. Light carbonation. A little smoother than the extra stout from a bottle.

Had this on tap at the flying saucer. Had been looking forward to it since I heard about it's release. Caveat that I am a big stout fan and love Guinness.

All this being said I prefer the regular Draught Guinness but enjoyed this edition.

 399 characters

Photo of Clydesdale
3.64/5  rDev +2.8%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4.5

A: A dense, dark brown color with some chestnut hints. The head is quite large, foamy, and fluffy, with a light tan color. Retention is very nice, with attractive lacing.

S: Some light toasted/roasted malt. A bit of leafy hops. Faint vanilla, even fainter chocolate/lactic notes.

T: Pretty solid dose of roasted malts, with a toasty sweetness. Hops are leafy and herbal, with moderate bitterness. Mild coffee and semisweet chocolate, along with a hint of vanilla.

M: A fairly full-bodied, dry mouthfeel. Carbonation is light and slightly tingly.

D: A pretty nice offering. Mild and drinkable yet firm and unquestionably a stout. Not anything world-beating, as you might expect from Guinness, but a solid limited release here.

 732 characters

Photo of Redrover
3.73/5  rDev +5.4%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

I was excited to see this one on tap at JC Wooloughans in Las Vegas.

Served in a 20 oz imperial pint, the beer is jet black with a creamy beige priests collar. Decent lacing.

The aroma is of roasted malts a bit of coffee and a hint of molasses.

The beer is served too cold and I'm thinking its dampening the flavor and aroma.

The beer leads with roasty malts, a hint of smoke and a trace of black bread.

The beer has a nice dry finish and some latent bitterness. The taste improves as it warms.

The mouth is more carbonated and less creamy than a regular Guinness

It's an easy drinker that may be a bit harder to session due to the carbonation.

 652 characters

Photo of thryn
3.35/5  rDev -5.4%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3.5

It's the gimmick Guinness! Woohoo!

I am not one of those people who hates on regular Guinness. It's one of my go-to beers in certain situations. So I was interested to try this.

This dark brown beer pours nearly opaque into a pint glass. Head is a good two fingers, cream-colored and fluffy. No widget, so it pours more like the Extra Stout, but it's got a bit more carbonation to it. Head drops as it's consumed, but stays at a few millimeters. Minimal lacing.

Nose is very roasty and slightly chocolatey. I actually think it smells very nice, if a bit lacking in depth.

Hm. It is roasty at first, but there's not a lot of lingering flavor past that. I'm getting a bit of chocolate and dried dark fruit. A slightly bitter finish. They were going for more "refreshment and zing," but they got more "meh."

Mouthfeel is way too thin. I disagree with the "Guinness Draught is watery" faction, but this beer is a bit watery.

It's decently drinkable. I mean, it isn't bad ... if i had more body I'd probably get it again. As is? Eh, not so much.

 1,047 characters

Photo of OtherShoe2
2.53/5  rDev -28.5%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Pours a dark brown with a fluffy head with good retention and no lace. You can easily see through this when held to the light. Tons of bubbles in this one.

Faint scents, and what you get is kind of a boiled barley mixed with watery coffee scent. Eh.

This is stout, right? Could've fooled me. Take a Guinness Draught and mix it with a Michelob Dry (remember that crap?). Watered down, dry, thin flavors. Some dark roasted malt, maybe some coffee, but what is missing is that creaminess that you look for in the Guinness. Has a bitter, almost mineral/metallic finish.

Mouthfeel is thin and fizzy.

Drinkability? I've been on the wagon because of a health issue and this is the first beer I've had in little while. I poured out the remaining third of the pint glass. Glad I only bought a single. I always try to be constructive, and justify any critical comments, but when it comes right down to it, this is just a really shitty marketing ploy gone bad. This is terrible beer. Not horribly undrinkable, but not even worthy of its mediocre predecessors. This is a limited edition (6 months?) so grab one if you are compelled to do so, but for God's sake do not buy multiple bottles of this swill. If this is what they do to celebrate 250 years, I'd hate to see what these clowns do for Mother's Day (hey Ma -- here's a punch in the mouth!).

 1,340 characters

Photo of twiggamortis420
3.24/5  rDev -8.5%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Pours a nearly black color with a few brown tints around the edges. Has a nice, fluffy tan head that provides good retention and even better lacing.

Pretty much smells like Guinness draught (faint) with a bit more roasty malts and the sauer german malt that is used in small proportions. Smells very much like an old wooden irish pub that does not see an overabundance of cleaning.

Taste is pretty similar as the nose description above...more carbonation and a bit more malty heft than draught. Perhaps a touch more bitter, especially on the finish as well. For a 250 anniversary beer it does not seem to stray from the norm very much, it would have been nice to see them do something interesting. It is an ok beer, the price tag was a bit ridiculous at 9.00 a sixer. I wont buy it again, but wont have much problem finishing the rest of 'em.

 844 characters

Photo of drunkboxer1
3.52/5  rDev -0.6%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Had on tap in a imperial pint glass. Color was black with deep red around the edges and when held up to the light. White head dissipated real quick like. Smelled roasty and faintly like chocolate. It's fairly highly carbonated, and theres a pretty strong hop bitterness to it. As it warms you taste a lot more chocolate flavor. I don't think this is as good of a beer as their foreign stout, or their extra stout. Its probably better than the regular draft, but I don't think its as drinkable.

 493 characters

Photo of mjw06
3.28/5  rDev -7.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

brown almost black, two finger sized foamy and soft head that dissipates fairly quickly.

smells like a guinness draught, overall the smell is just kinda weak. some roasted barley in there that isnt all that strong in the nose, and then after that nothing.

where is the taste? stout? hmm... more on the taste when we get to the drinkability part.

the mouthfeel is an interesting one. although this isnt a nitro carbonation, it still carries some characteristics of it. the carbonation seems non-existent, and then shows itself to be what it is with a sharper, fizzier finish.

what to say about this?? guinness 250 is like a cross between draught and extra stout. everything from the color of its head, to the taste, and its mouthfeel. it is disappointing to say the least. i tried to keep my expectations low, but still it didnt match them. i hoped for a stout that would be memorable, very complex, and one that would stand out to commemorate 250 years. this isnt it. 250 isnt bad, however its not great either. and i dont know where its supposed to be taking me. i found myself mad that i even ordered this, wishing i would have just got one of the others. they could have went a lot of places with this, and though a cross between draught and extra may sound great, theres nothing commemorating about it.

 1,312 characters

Photo of Liverpool08
3.56/5  rDev +0.6%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Different yet the same. The pour looks the same yet the head is very carbonated and dissapears quickly. Its not the smooth creamy, delicious head you get with a tradional Guinness draft.
The smell is average, toasty. The taste is at first very carbonated yet still smoooth. Still has the toasty nutty flavor of the brand. Doesn't coat the mouth as the normal brew does. Yet VERY drinkible, probably more so than the original.
For any Guinness drinker a must try, at least once.

 477 characters

Photo of jokelahoma
3.51/5  rDev -0.8%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Poured into an imperial pint at Old Chicago in Olathe, KS.

Pours a nice opaque black, deeper in color than regular Guinness. Not nitro charged, apparently, so the head behaves like a regular beer, and falls fairly rapidly.

Aroma varies from "normal" Guinness as well. Smells more chocolate than roasty. Aroma is a tad lighter than expected. Overall not bad.

Taste is surprising, in that it isn't as roasty as Guinness, yet at the same time it's more assertive. Dark chocolate flavors dominate, rather than roasted barley. Little of that Guinness "tang" sourness. I like it more than regular Guinness, to be honest.

Mouthfeel is where this falls on its face. Overcarbonated, which both lightens the mouthfeel and gives it a prickly "bite". Hate to say I miss the nitro and the creaminess it provides, but I do.

Overall, this is a good stout that would be better on nitro, or at least less carbonated. Good flavor, just a bit too much "bite". Worth trying, though.

 967 characters

Photo of MrHurmateeowish
4.15/5  rDev +17.2%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3

12oz bottle obtained at the local Hannaford. Pours a nearly opaque dark brown to black body with slight ruby-red highlights and nearly an inch of slowly-dissipating light tan head. Smells toasty with strong notes of caramel and toffee. Tastes initially sweet with toasty rich caramel playing a big role, but finishes dry. Medium-bodied with ample carbonation. This was definitely better than expected - downright good. Solid flavors, no perceivable flaws, leaps and bounds better than Guinness Draught and at least as good as Guinness Extra Stout if not even a bit better in some ways. The only thing that will stop me from getting this beer as often as I can is the price (9.99$/sixer) is a little steep for what it is. It's a solid dry stout though.

 751 characters

Photo of thequeen711
4.3/5  rDev +21.5%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

I, too, will be very disappointed when this brew goes away!!! This delicious, malty, roasty, creamy and smooth brew is a step above the traditional Guinness we get in the states. Same Guinness goodness, but, a creamier, smoother drink. I compared side by side, Guinness Extra Stout and the 250. Extra Stout seemed watery compared to 250, the nitro infused head on the ES lasted far longer than the 250, but, my concern was the flavour and drinkibility of the 250. It will be hard to go back to Guinness, but, since 250 is a limited release, I'll stock up now!

 559 characters

Photo of nlmartin
2.08/5  rDev -41.2%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 1.5

The beer was served in an Imperial Pint glass. This review is based of drinking 2 bottles of 250th Anniversary.

Appearance: The beer pours a dark brown coloration. When exposed to light the beer looks like a glass of coke. The head is thick with ok retention. Specs of lacing remain behind on my glass.

Smell: The beers initial aroma is very very super light roasted malt. Something vaguely identifiable as fruity aroma is kicking around my glass. An earthyness finishes the aroma.

Taste: The beers flavor leads with a caramel sweetened light roasted coffee flavor. I am not sure what I expected but this isnt it.

Mouthfeel / Drinkability: The beer has a light body. The carbonation is a bit much. It was a chore to consume 2 of these for a review. I am hoping I can give the other 4 bottles away.

 803 characters

Photo of omnigrits
4.52/5  rDev +27.7%
look: 4 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 5

I'm going to be very sad when this beer goes away, and I'll go out on a limb by saying that after the promotion has run its course I'll find it very difficult to go back to nitro-Guinness. I've never quite understood the rationale for putting nitrous on a beer rather than CO2, which is the gas that yeast makes when it ferments the liquid that we all love. It ruined Boddington's for me.

This beer looks very much like regular Guinness but with a slightly darker head, and obviously no cascading. The aroma is the most wonderful mix of roasted malt, chocolate and coffee - just what you'd expect really. The taste is much the same, with that added dry stout finish that can make your mouth pucker if you're not ready for it. Mouthfeel is a little on the thin side compared to some of the craft stouts I like to drink, but the drinkability of this beer is second to none.

Guinness really need to add this (or something like it) to their full-time portfolio after the 250 promotion is over and done with.

 1,005 characters

Photo of drcarver
3.31/5  rDev -6.5%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

A - Deep brown. Not nearly as dark as their regular stout. Heavy in carbonation with a large off-white head.

S - The smell is sweet with matls, but not overwhelmingly so. Nothing really distinguishable.

T - Slight bitterness. No chocolate or coffee flavors, just dark malts. Finished quite dry.

M - Carbonation is lively. An astringent feel covers the tongue.

D - Easy to drink. The CO2 is less drinkable than nitrogen, but that can't be helped.

 449 characters

Photo of NJpadreFan
3.85/5  rDev +8.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Guinness- 250th Anniversary Stout

Deep dark black with a moderate size tan head. Quick dissapation and no lacing.
S- Light roasted malts with a creamy coffe bean, chocolate, and vanilla nose.
T- Nice roasted malt and chocolate with a creamy vanilla coffee body. Creamy light caramel and a slight dose of molasses.
M- Very smooth very creamy. A nice dry body with a sweet creamy finish.

Overall- Quite good and quaffable. This could be enjoyed all night!

 455 characters

Photo of beertunes
3.34/5  rDev -5.6%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

Served in a "Guinness" glass. Served on co2, not nitro. Poured a solid black with about 3/4 inch of medium tan head that left less lacing than I expected.

A rich, roasted aroma greeted me. A more fulfilling scent than I expected. The full, roasted, toasted flavors came through on the tongue, much richer and fuller than I expected.

Easy and smooth to drink, much like "regular" Guinness, this beer had an enjoyable body and level of drinkability that outpaces the standard Guinness. You should try this beer while available, and hopefully the suits will make this a yearly offering.

 585 characters

Photo of bigbelcher
3.95/5  rDev +11.6%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

The color is just as black as regular Guinness. Head is about the same color also. Thick and creamy. Aroma was coffee like. The flavor and body are where the differences come in. I found it to be not quite as roasty with much more body than the regular Guinness. Same carbonaton levels as regular as it was served on nitro also. Flavor was that of choclate and roasted peanuts. A decent beer but not too different from the regular to make it anything out of the ordinary.

 471 characters

Photo of BEERchitect
4.21/5  rDev +18.9%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

This beer seemed to just show up on a few taps around town with no flare, marketing, or promotion. Glad it did, it's a marked improvement over the standard Guinness.

First off, the beer has a more beer-like appearance without the cascading effect of the the nitro-tap. A sturdy white foam sit proudly on the beer and laces well on the way down in true Guinness fashion. Still as dark brown and dense looking as ever.

Faint aromas give a light impression of toasted grains, delicat maltiness, and with a slight yeasty twang.

Flavors on the other hand do deliver a bit more sweetness than the original Guinness and take the shape of caramel, barley malt, and light esters of grapes and plumbs. Still quite reserved in flavor and aroma, this beer has a noticable depth that is similar to the Extra Stout.

Somewhere between moderate and full, the mouthfeel seems heavy up front (probably because of the low carbonation and added sweetness). The beer fades nicely into a powdery and lightly ashy texture that is reminescent of Guinness Draught.

Ultimately, I find that the beer might be a good blend of Guinness Draught and Guinness Extra Stout. Still it's a good beer that I'll happily drink again.

 1,201 characters

Photo of sbe1
3.18/5  rDev -10.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

A not offensive attempt at something a little different from Guinness. Glad I tried it but wouldn't seek it out again.

Appearance: Blackish with a decent head, a perfectly decent looking stout. Does not require the two-stage pour of a proper Guinness.

Smell: A little chocolate, some roasted malt, a hint of yeastyness. Not bad.

Taste: A little caramel, some roasted malt, not bad, but not great either. Nothing really standing out in the end.

Mouthfeel: a fizzy carbonation, surprisingly medium bodied, not heavy and rich like standard Guinness.

Drinkability: Good, could be a serviceable replacement for standard Guinness, but why would you do that? Still a decent session beer.

 685 characters

Photo of Gosox8787
3.45/5  rDev -2.5%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

I often credit Guinness Draught as "the beer" that got me into different beers. When I heard that Guinness was releasing an Anniversary Stout, I knew I had to try it. While in the package store today, I saw this and picked up a six-pack.

Now onto the beer itself. I poured from the bottle in a nice cold glass. Appearance is opaque black with a two finger head that has good retention and sticks nicely to the side of the glass. The aroma is dark chocolate all the way, with nice hints of fruity esters. A nice new dimension. The flavor really surprised me at first. Fruity esters were the first thing I picked up. Almost reminded me of a Belgian Ale from the taste. On the back end, the flavor of the roasted malts present themselves in notes of chocolate, coffee, and a nice smoke. The roasted malts and fruity flavors don't blend as nicely as I would hope, and as a result, the fruity esters are not as fulfilling as usual. The mouthfeel is also strange, considering this is an Irish Dry Stout. It is light, watery and not at all creamy. The carbonation gives it a nice little bite, but still completely unlike the Draught. Drinkability is much lower than the Draught as the fruity flavors can be a bit overwhelming and this also seems a bit more boozy than the Draught.

Overall, an interesting beer completely different than what I expected. It was rather enjoyable, but I still prefer the Draught. Actually reminded me more of the new Smuttynose Star Island Single than Guinness Draught. The interesting flavor combination is certainly worth the visit for Guinness fans.

 1,578 characters

Photo of John_M
3.53/5  rDev -0.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

On tap at Max's the other day.

Like regular Guinness draft, this beer pours a dark black brown color with pretty good head retentition, but minimal lacing. On the nose I get some dry roasty aroma, with some licorise. The flavors on the palate replicate the nose, except this beer is a bit sweeter and has a somewhat fuller mouthfeel. I assume this is from the slightly elevated abv. The mouthfeel is medium bodied, but is otherwise a bit thin. Drinkability is OK, though this beer really isn't interesting enough for me to drink more then one.

This is an OK beer, but one that is so similar to regular Guinness, I'm not sure I see the point. Can't say I'm hugely impressed.

 675 characters

Photo of timmah427
2.98/5  rDev -15.8%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 1 | overall: 3

A - Dark, dark brown. Almost black. Nice fluffly, thick, off-white head that settles down a bit pretty quickly but remains throughout.

S - Smells like a run-of-the-mill dry stout. Not a ton of aroma, but the BP does show through. Roasty, with maybe a hint of chocolate.

T - Tastes almost EXACTLY like Guinness Draught. Maybe a tad bit more chocolate, but it still tastes pretty much like water that gets some bitterness from roasted barley. Not a huge fan, but it's a tiny bit more flavorful than the Draught.

M/D - WAYYY too much carbonation. It was like somebody dropped an Alka-Seltzer in my beer. This was a huge turn-off for me. I guess it was drinkable enough.

I was really disappointed in this beer. Everything was just very under-whelming. Guinness really played it safe with this beer. I would have thought it was okay, but the over-carbonation ruined it for me. I tried to give the rest of these to my roommates, but even they wouldn't drink them after trying mine. Not recommended.

 997 characters

Guinness 250th Anniversary Stout from Guinness Ltd.
Beer rating: 3.54 out of 5 with 570 ratings
  • About Us

    Founded in Boston in 1996, BeerAdvocate (BA) is your go-to resource for beer powered by an independent community of enthusiasts and professionals dedicated to supporting and promoting better beer.

    Learn More
  • Our Community

    Comprised of consumers and industry professionals, many of whom started as members of this site, our community is one of the oldest, largest, and most respected beer communities online.
  • Our Events

    Since 2003 we've hosted over 60 world-class beer festivals to bring awareness to independent brewers and educate attendees.
  • Our Magazine

    Support uncompromising beer advocacy and award-winning, independent journalism with a print subscription to BeerAdvocate magazine.