1906 Reserva Especial | Hijos De Rivera, S.A.

1906 Reserva Especial1906 Reserva Especial
BA SCORE
17.9%
Liked This Beer
3.24 w/ 134 ratings
1906 Reserva Especial1906 Reserva Especial
BEER INFO

Brewed by:
Hijos De Rivera, S.A.
Spain
estrellagalicia.com

Style: Vienna Lager

Alcohol by volume (ABV): 6.50%

Availability: Year-round

Notes / Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

Added by tesguino on 10-12-2005

BEER STATS
Ranking:
#42,281
Reviews:
47
Ratings:
134
Liked:
24
Avg:
3.24/5
pDev:
18.21%
Alströms:
0
 
 
Wants:
7
Gots:
44
Trade:
0
View: Beers | Events
User Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
first ← prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | nextlast
Ratings: 134 |  Reviews: 47
Photo of atrocity
1.75/5  rDev -46%

Photo of mulder1010
1.9/5  rDev -41.4%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 1.5

330 ML poured into a Sam Adams Perfect Pint glass

A-- Poured a dark golden straw yellow. Medium to high carbonation by appearance, lots of bubbles. Bright cloud white head that was one finger. Decent head retention and some soapy like lacing on the sides of the glass. Do not think this is a bock at all.

S-- Heavy corn presence right off the bat. Very big chemical smell. A little bit floral and sweet as well. Very much not a bock.

T-- Sweet and almost syrupy. A little bit of a floral taste but otherwise it tastes like a run of the mill offering that is a bit more pimped out.

M-- Very little bitterness and ABV is noticeable in the mouth. A little bit creamy and more on the medium side of carbonation. Very sweet and perfume like. Does have a bit of a heavy finish. Sounds like a lager to me

D-- Basically a suped up lager that is not that great or worthy of having with good tapas. Skip and find something more interesting to have than this.

Not going to fail it even though as a bock it would get an F. As a lager or a pilsner it is barely passable

 1,064 characters

Photo of JEdmund
1.94/5  rDev -40.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 1.5

Picked this up at a Spanish import shop in Guatemala City.

Appearance
Light orange, though a bit more color than most macro lagers; clear; nice, frothy white head; minimal carbonation; head dissipates quickly

Aroma
Faint yeast and malt, a hint of hops; mostly sulphury and uninviting (possible oxidation?)

Taste & Mouth Feel
Skunky and sour malt bitterness; immediately reminds me of malt liquor; leaves a metallic and salty aftertaste that hangs around too long; creamy texture and more substantial than your typical macro—light-to-medium body; fine level of carbonation

Overall
This is not enjoyable to me; in fact, I don't even want to finish it. It has more flavor than most macros, but unfortunately that flavor is not good. It falls short of the pilsener style in every way except its color. Its texture is probably its best attribute, but overall it's not good. I wouldn't drink this again nor would I recommend it.

 928 characters

Photo of hopsolutely
1.96/5  rDev -39.5%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

Definitely not an impressive lager, and I can't fathom what might qualify it to be classified as a bock?!

Colour is a pleasant amber and carbonation is decent. However the smell is unpleasant "canned Euro lager" and the taste is downright acerbic, with a sweet finish that doesn't balance well at all with the harsh flavour.

I was drawn to the can by its honesty on the label ingredients, actually listing corn. They also make reference to hops and I think that's pretty misleading. Definitely not a beer I'd recommend or purchase again.

 540 characters

Photo of gerardoluna
2/5  rDev -38.3%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

[Eyes] Clear orange color; clean and transparent... minimal carbonation, head is poor and dissipates quickly.

[Aroma] yeast and malt, a little touch of hops in deep

[Mouth] Freshhhh Malt bitterness, leaves a metallic aftertaste, creamy, light body gentle carbonation.

 269 characters

Photo of Purified
2.08/5  rDev -35.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 1.75 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.25

Photo of ironmark666
2.1/5  rDev -35.2%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.25 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Photo of MartinCalvino
2.25/5  rDev -30.6%

Photo of EmperorBevis
2.26/5  rDev -30.2%
look: 3.25 | smell: 2.75 | taste: 1.75 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 2.75

Bottled
I'm not sure how many times I can do anything to get my phone to the point of the day when it stops being on my iPhone

pours a bronzed body with splattered white head
Corn syrup aroma
Slight aesthete flavour

 219 characters

Photo of kojevergas
2.37/5  rDev -26.9%
look: 2 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Bottle served into an Estrella Levante stemgoblet in Ibiza, Spain. Reviewed from notes.

A: Pours a one finger head of decent thickness, no cream, and poor retention. Colour is a nontransparent gold.

Sm: Light malt. That's it.

T: Malt-ridden body. Some subtle hops, but poorly built overall. Not complex nor bold.

Mf: Light and smooth. Doesn't fully complement the flavour.

Dr: Hides its ABV very well. Far too malty - classic Spanish beer fallacy. Decently priced.

 474 characters

Photo of FLima
2.38/5  rDev -26.5%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Malty beer with some caramel notes. Copper appereance with persistence foam (three fingers initially then keeps a denoted ring). Hops are timid, loosing ground for the alcohol. Aftertaste a little bitter with some sweetness.
Nothing especial, not worth it a second shot.

 271 characters

Photo of BretSikkink
2.41/5  rDev -25.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Sad to say this is my first review since moving to Mexico. I clearly would not have bothered if I'd read reviews first, but I was at the supermarket and I saw something I'd never seen.

Color is just fine, a little translucent for a bock but I'm throwing that style out the window right now. Orange with a brownish tint. Head is pretty massive at first, tons of big bubbles, but it settles down into a craggy, creamy delight.

Way downhill from there. Nose is thin and skunky. If a good lager nose is clean, this is dirty. Sharp metallic note. Flavor follow suit, skunky with a tainted medicinal quality. Like bad aspirin. Malt is toasted but comes off strangely with the herbal stink lingering to it.

Body is thin but passable for many lager styles, carbonation is way up fortunately, producing that nice head and a little relief on the palate from the otherwise very bad flavor. Trust the other reviews and avoid if possible. I'm sad that I bought a sixer, although it was mercifully cheap.

 996 characters

Photo of Toynk
2.44/5  rDev -24.7%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.25 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Photo of CrazyDavros
2.48/5  rDev -23.5%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

Pours dark amber with a large, quickly fading head.
Nose shows caramel, grapes, sweet port notes. Pretty faint though.
Flavours initially include sweet caramel and bready malt but then industrial notes show through which ruin it.
Carbonation could be higher.

 258 characters

Photo of ZxWx
2.49/5  rDev -23.1%
look: 1.75 | smell: 2 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.25

Photo of alexandrefdiniz
2.5/5  rDev -22.8%

Photo of Phyl21ca
2.58/5  rDev -20.4%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.75

Bottle: Poured a bright amber color ale with a medium size foamy head with good retention. Aroma of light grainy notes with light diacetyl notes is more or less pleasant. Taste is also grainy with some diacetyl notes and a thin finish. Body is about average with good carbonation. I was not a big fan of the malt bill used in this beer.

 336 characters

Photo of spoony
2.6/5  rDev -19.8%
look: 3.25 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Photo of ygtbsm94
2.71/5  rDev -16.4%
look: 3.25 | smell: 2.25 | taste: 2.75 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 2.75

Aroma of skunkiness, burnt caramel, toasted malt, grains. Taste slight sweet malt, caramel, mild grassy bitterness.

115 characters

Photo of AlexLMS
2.71/5  rDev -16.4%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

This beer is not a German Pilsener as the corn presence is clearly stated in the label.

1906 is a very clear beer with a deep golden color, large and slightly off-white creamy head that can be persistent. When it fades it leaves a very nice lacing.
The nose is quite agreeable with sweet malt notes. Its tastes confirm the aroma with sweet malts and some fruits.
Smooth mouthfeel, moderate carbonation, a light body and a deceptive medium alcoholic strength. The finish is sweet and reasonably long.

Overall: a nice and interesting adjunct lager. The negative part was the lack of a little more bitterness to balance the sweet malts.

 641 characters

Photo of LeonSammartino
2.73/5  rDev -15.7%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Had it from a bottle into a glass. Not a bad beer, poured darker than I would have thought, but style felt that I tastes fruity overtone, amongst all the except toasted malts.

Only very slight bitter aftertaste than ran away quickly.

Probably wouldn't go out of my way to drink it again, but if someone served it up, I wouldn't refuse it either.

 349 characters

Photo of chinchill
2.74/5  rDev -15.4%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

33cl bottle dated BB March 2012, so a bit past recommended date. Served in a lager glass.

A: Pours a dark golden amber. Very clear with rising carbonation bubbles varying in size. Eggshell head has decent retention and leaves soapy looking lacing on the sides of the glass.

S: Mainly smells like corn/adjunct lager, but with a more pronounced aroma. A little bit floral as well, with hints of white bread and bread dough.
T: Sweet up front; mildly bitter finish and aftertaste. Only a hint of darker malt in here, and not too much flavor from the lighter malts either. Higher ABV evident after a little warming. A little bit of a floral and herbal taste.
M: medium carbonation and near medium body.
O: tastes and feels more like a slightly strong lager. Drinkable and modestly refreshing.

 793 characters

Photo of DruC4
2.75/5  rDev -15.1%

Photo of Momon
2.75/5  rDev -15.1%
look: 2.75 | smell: 2.75 | taste: 2.75 | feel: 2.75 | overall: 2.75

Photo of Blumstein
2.75/5  rDev -15.1%

first ← prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | nextlast
1906 Reserva Especial from Hijos De Rivera, S.A.
Beer rating: 17.9% out of 100 with 134 ratings
  • About Us

    Founded in Boston in 1996, BeerAdvocate (BA) is your go-to resource for beer powered by an independent community of enthusiasts and professionals dedicated to supporting and promoting better beer.

    Learn More
  • Our Community

    Comprised of consumers and industry professionals, many of whom started as members of this site, our community is one of the oldest, largest, and most respected beer communities online.
  • Our Events

    Since 2003 we've hosted over 60 world-class beer festivals to bring awareness to independent brewers and educate attendees.
  • Our Magazine

    Support uncompromising beer advocacy and award-winning, independent journalism with a print subscription to BeerAdvocate magazine.