Narragansett Lager | Narragansett Brewing Co.

Log in or Sign up to start rating.
BA SCORE
78
okay
368 Reviews
Narragansett LagerNarragansett Lager
BEER INFO

Brewed by:
Narragansett Brewing Co.
Rhode Island, United States | website

Style: American Adjunct Lager

Alcohol by volume (ABV): 5.00%

Availability: Year-round

Notes / Commercial Description:
We brew our lager with six row malt, seedless hops, corn from Iowa, our lager strain (the same one the brewery has depended on since just after Prohibition), and the purest water from Lakes Ontario and Hemlock.

12 IBU

Added by Todd on 09-29-2003

BEER STATS
Reviews:
368
Ratings:
1,179
Avg:
3.42
pDev:
29.24%
 
 
Wants:
79
Gots:
307
For Trade:
1
View: Beers | Events
User Reviews
Sort by:  Recent | High | Low | Top Raters | Alström Bros
first ← prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | nextlast
Reviews: 368 | Ratings: 1,179
Photo of damndirtyape
3.63/5  rDev +6.1%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 3.75

16oz can served in a pilsner glass at the Oyster House, Philadelphia, PA.

Appearance: Clear gold with a thin white head. Some mild amount of lacing noted.

Smell: No aroma except for a bit of grain.

Taste: A simple clean lager with light bitterness. Clean flavor, not very crisp, but with a good malt backbone and some hops to counter the malt. The corn is just barely notable. It's not a strong flavor, but is just under it all.

Mouthfeel: Good carbonation, slick, and a bit sticky on the teeth.

Overall / Drinkability: A good simple easy to drink lager. Went well with crab cakes that had some spiciness to them, and I think this would be a great beer to have 2 cans with over a lot of seafood. Paired really well with seafood. I would have had another one if I had the time and a larger portion of seafood.

 833 characters

Photo of MUTINY
3.54/5  rDev +3.5%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 3.5

16oz can into a nonic.

I'll make a quick review of it. Pours a bright clear copper with minimal head. Lacing is better-than-expected, retention is poor. Smells heavily of grain, faint sweetness, no real detection of hops. Taste is not as sweet as the nose implies, big hits of the grain note along with more of a hop character than expected to offer counterpoint - although the two main flavor characteristics don't really integrate that well & the hop note is broad & undefined. Feel is solid, nicely dense & substantial with appropriate carb to balance. Altogether among the better AALs to have passed my lips.

 619 characters

Photo of TX-Badger
3.25/5  rDev -5%
look: 3.25 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3.25

Pours a clear yellow golden color with white head. Cereal grains and some light malts on the nose; follows onto the palate. Light bodied. Finishes with mostly cereal grains but pretty clean.

 190 characters

Photo of mynie
4.12/5  rDev +20.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.25 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.25

Wait... I've never reviewed Gansett? How did that happen?

I'll often order a pint of this near the end of a night of drinking and then offer it to my friends and have them guess what it is. They always--ALWAYS--say it's great, and they're always shocked once they find out what it is.

Appearance-wise, you know the drill: it's darker than Bud or Coors, but still pale and filtered. Decent head.

Smells of crisp malt with mild adjunct twang. And that's basically how it tastes: a bit grainier than Miller or Coors, but the malt profile is less sweet than those beers, and the hop finish is more pronounced. Among American Adjuncts, only the new (old) Schlitz has a firmer hop presence. The body is very thick, which really makes the beer.

It's not up in the top tier of the style, which consists of Gusto Schlitz, Ballantine, and Grain Belt. But it's easily near the top of the second tier, right alongside Champagne Velvet and High Life. Plenty of trendsters are too stupid to appreciate a well brewed andjuct and so this beer will never be revered--and thank god for that.

 1,086 characters

Photo of AfricanPete14
4.28/5  rDev +25.1%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 5 | overall: 4.5

This beer was the first I've had in a while that made me exclaim "wow" after I cracked this open and took a sip. This brew poured a good looking golden color with a 1 inch head. It tasted like a great full bodied lager with a solid grain/wheat taste with a light hoppy aftertaste. The smell reminded me of PBR with a strong smell of grain and hops. This tasted great and went down smooth. This beer had an absolutely perfect carbonation level.

 443 characters

Photo of Act25
3.05/5  rDev -10.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.75 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 2.75 | overall: 3

Hard to figure out A bros rated this 4th best adjunct lager... They're all swill.

A - Best part, because it laces. Clear pils gold. Not much retention.
S - Not much. Meager. Gets wif of lemonada in a corn field, with some buttered popcorn.
T- Follows the smell with more hops prickles and lemon.
F- As thin and as cottony as any other. Adjuncts' corn coats my mouth so not light and refreshing.

3.0 (Average) is my base line for American Lager and this is a great 3. But no better.

 486 characters

Photo of GimmeASchlitz
3.82/5  rDev +11.7%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.75

This is by far my favorite local adjunct beer. I almost consider it craft beer. Better than most crap out there and so refreshing. Local dives here carry them in both tall boys and drafts and I know it will be a great time when these bad boys start turning into rounds at the table.

Pours a nice golden straw color with a foamy head

Smells like a lager should. Slight hops and cereals

Tastes like a high class adjunct lager. Grains, little bit of sweet corn, and finishes with a clean hops taste that is there just to tell you that you're drinking a beer. Finishes crisp, clean, and refreshing.

Great beer to create memories to and enjoyed at any event. Basically standard fare at all my BBQs and house parties.

 715 characters

Photo of hophugger
3.14/5  rDev -8.2%
look: 3.25 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3

A decent lager suitable for the style. Lokk, aroma and head are all average. I felt that this one was a touch too sweet and seemed to be just a tad watery

 154 characters

Photo of teromous
3.65/5  rDev +6.7%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Appearance: Medium gold body with great clarity. Short head with good head retention. Not much lacing.

Aroma: I get a spicy hop aroma which is very nice. It's not strong but it is unmistakably there and it smells very nice. There is a touch of a cereal aroma.

Taste: Very low flavor profile. There is only a touch of sweet grain flavor but that is it. A touch of bitterness.

Mouthfeel: Light bodied and very drinkable. It leaves no presence on the palate at all.

Overall: I was very impressed by this beer. I thought it smelled fantastic and it was very easy to drink. There wasn't much flavor to the beer at all but the overall drinking experience was very nice. If I am in the mood to drink an American Adjunct Lager I would pick this beer up.

 749 characters

Photo of llerrafnad
3.28/5  rDev -4.1%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

From a can to a pint glass. Nothing really to say about this beer except that it's great to have a warm day or when you don't feel like spending more then $4 at a bar. A bar by me has a deal where there's 5 in a bucket and comes with buffalo wings for $20. Better than Budweiser etc....

Would drink again. Good stuff.

 318 characters

Photo of StringsAreWings
3.07/5  rDev -10.2%
look: 3 | smell: 2.75 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3

Being a fan of some of the beers 'Gansett has put out lately like their Lovecraft Reanimator Helles Lager I felt it was time to try the original. I had never had one before.

L: Like sparkling cider. Gold, completely transparent (as in crystal clear) with a nice show from the bubbles racing to the surface. Pours with a medium density 2 finger head that recedes quickly into a minor surface haze.

S: Almost no smell. Maybe a light scent of apple and malt.

T: Taste is actually not bad. Fairly mild. It's not great but I would put it up against any commercial beer (PBR, RRock, Coors etc) I have tried and it would probably win. A slight copper note and a light apple sweetness to it. I get why college kids blow through cases of this. Low cost and very drinkable when compared to it's price point competitors.

F: Pretty carbonated. A lot of tongue zing makes for a lively gulp. Not overdone though.

Overall I am glad I tried it. You could drink a few of these during a sports event for sure. Nothing to write home about but at literally a dollar per 12oz bottle it's pretty impressive that it isn't rougher. If you wanted to buy beer and didn't have the cash for a quality choice I might suggest this over other cheap beers.

 1,239 characters

Photo of q33jeff
1.83/5  rDev -46.5%
look: 2.25 | smell: 1.75 | taste: 2 | feel: 1.25 | overall: 1.75

**
12/29/2013
Aroma is barley and sour. Pale yellow orange. No head. Taste is Vegetables, grapefruit. Weak carbonation. Not good , but some character exists."
**

 161 characters

Photo of bigdeuce
2.9/5  rDev -15.2%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.25

The pour is that of a typical macro. Quick dissipating foamy head and a clear, bright body. Clean tasting with some grainy huskiness. Crisp and smooth. A bit of overly sweet backlash, which is most unpleasant. Can use a few more hops. Easy drinking. Nice lawnmower beer and is also less expensive than the big three but typical of the style.

 345 characters

Photo of MikeWard
2.99/5  rDev -12.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 2.75 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3.25

12 oz bottle into a half pint glass.

looks pretty decent. very pale yellow with white foamy head, which persists throughout leaving good lacing. highly carbonated.

Strong yeasty corny lager smell.

tingly on the tongue. very watery, little flavor.

thin on the mouth.

Overall, probably an okay representative of the style, good slammimg on a hot summer day

 359 characters

Photo of BoozySmurf
3.23/5  rDev -5.6%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 4.25 | overall: 3.5

So my gold standards for this style are High Life and PBR. This tastes a little less sweet (and less corny) than High Life, but is also a little less bitter than PBR. Appearance (clear gold) and nose (grassy) are similar to both. Mouthfeel is a bit creamier, fuller bodied than both and is pleasant. Finishes slightly sweet. Slightly above average overall.

 361 characters

Photo of edward_boumil
3.4/5  rDev -0.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

L Golden yellow, very bright and clear. Some head lingers, bubbles readily apparent.
S: Very sweet, clean honey malts, cereal grain, and a touch of floral hop
T: Fresh, sweet, and clean. Light sweetness, incredibly freshing
F: Pretty crisp, very light and effervescent, and smooth
O: Great lager, brings me back to earlier days in college. Been a while since I've had this, will be drinking it again more often in the future. Solid lager for sure.

 451 characters

Photo of ZBowden
4.13/5  rDev +20.8%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.25 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Pours crystal clear lemon honey with fine white head, smells of slight sulfur with corn and biscuity crackery malts, tastes of sweet crisp maltiness slowly taken over by notes of corn and subtle hops on the back end, mouthfeel is very light high carbonation lasting slightly sweet finish.

 288 characters

Photo of HamdenHector
3.26/5  rDev -4.7%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3.25

A: crystal clear; pale gold in color; 1 finger moussy white head that receded to a thin collar; very nice lacing;

S: corn first, then pilsner malt;

T: corn and pilsner malt; no hop character; no bitterness;

M: light bodied; light carbonation; very lightly dry finish;

O: almost no flavor; it matches the style guidelines to a certain extent, but in my opinion, it's not worth buying;

 387 characters

Photo of MichaelProcton
3.21/5  rDev -6.1%
look: 3.25 | smell: 2.75 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.25

Golden and clear with a small (but decent for style) head that is retained to a decent degree. Smell's a bit funky, but not awful. Flavor has some depth, and the carbonation makes for a nice mouthfeel. Pretty straightforward, run of the mill AAL, but nothing about it gives me a NEGATIVE impression. Good for what it is.

 324 characters

Photo of PatrickCT
4.09/5  rDev +19.6%
look: 4 | smell: 4.25 | taste: 4 | feel: 4.25 | overall: 4

Poured from a 12 ounce can into a can glass. Rating based on AAL style.

a: A clear, pale but shimmering gold body. A finger and a half of sudsy, soapy, white head.

s: Faint crisp malts. Corn husk, grassiness, and an earthy smell that I imagine is the hops.

t: Clean flavors of crisp malts, faint buttery grits and husk and just enough hop bitterness to notice and balance it out.

mf: Medium light body with medium high carbonation. Very smooth and crisp.

o: Again, please note I rated this to style. For me it is at the top of the heap. Easy to drink, balanced, refreshing...and fun to drink if you want to take a break from thinking about every sip of beer you take.

 673 characters

Photo of ordybill
4.54/5  rDev +32.7%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4.25 | taste: 4.75 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4.5

Poured from a 16 OZ can into a pint glass. Appearance is a clear pale golden color with a medium sized white head. Aroma is your basic AAL with some extra grain tossed in. The flavor caught me off guard, it was really good not just for an AAL but compared to any style. Really refreshing with a crisp flavor of grain and no aftertaste. This is an excellent beer.

 367 characters

Photo of Burnthedevice
3.28/5  rDev -4.1%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.25

Rated to style. Light amber appearance is definitely a pleasant departure from your everyday mass produced AAL. Smell is very mild, grassy, and most notable for its lack of unpleasant off-aromas present in your typical AAL. Taste is pretty bland, but again, stands above your everyday AAL due to the fact that there are no off-flavors, and no unnecessary sweetness in the aftertaste: a huge plus for me. There is a delicate citrus flavor present mid-sip which is pleasant on the palate. There is actually a very very slight creamy taste at the end, which is a huge surprise for this style. (Again..it is slight.) Mouthfeel is pretty thin, but carbonation is at an appropriate level. Not something I would pursue, but at the same time non-offensive, and must be given credit for standing far above your typical mass-produced AAL in every category.

 846 characters

Photo of ThisWangsChung
3.24/5  rDev -5.3%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3.25

The amber color throws me for a loop compared to other adjunct lagers (that's good), though the nose is more along the lines of what I'd expect. There are some palpable cereal grain notes, but also some caramel peeking through. Hoppiness is very mild. While the flavor doesn't come together as well as the smell, it strikes me as being good for the standards of the style. Basically, cereal grains, caramel, and a vaguely hoppy finish (and I do mean vaguely - still, better than nothing/BMC). This goes down easily, and that's all one can ask for from this style. Not complex, not contemplative, but I'll be damned if this isn't a great fishing or hot weather beer.

3.24/5: Run BMC

 682 characters

Photo of chicagoish
2.63/5  rDev -23.1%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.75

Brought back a six from my trip to New England. Saw it at trader Joes and figured a lot of my relatives enjoy adjunct lagers. Not my cup of tea. My Homestate PA's Yuengling tastes much better to me in that category. This is still better than Miller or Coors or any of the other large Macros, but it's what you would expect.

 323 characters

Photo of jasonfrantz
3.6/5  rDev +5.3%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.75

Not my favorite style but this brew had decent ratings for a macro brew. Brand new beer to central PA so I've been dying to try it from a 16 oz pounder.

Hey, this beer ain't bad at all....very smooth and goes down with no nasty after taste. I hate to say this as a HUGE Orioles fan but this got Natty Boh beat so since this is the beer of the Red Sox then it looks like the Red Sox won this battle.

Oh yeah paid around $22 for a case of pounder cans.

 454 characters

first ← prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | nextlast
Narragansett Lager from Narragansett Brewing Co.
78 out of 100 based on 368 ratings.
  • About Us

    Your go-to website for beer (since 1996), publishers of BeerAdvocate magazine (since 2006) and hosts of world-class beer events (since 2003). Respect Beer.
  • Return of the Belgian Beer Fest

    BeerAdvocate Brings its All-Belgian Fest to Portland, Maine on September 17, 2016. Tickets are on sale now.

    Learn More
  • Get the Mag

    Become a BeerAdvocate magazine print subscriber today.

    Subscribe