Imperial Pilsner | Chattanooga Brewing Company

no score
Awaiting 10 Reviews
no score
Send samples

Brewed by:
Chattanooga Brewing Company
Tennessee, United States

Style: German Pilsener

Alcohol by volume (ABV): 5.50%

Availability: Year-round

Notes / Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

Added by firkinhophead on 01-24-2012

For Trade:
View: Beers | Events
User Reviews
Sort by:  Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
first ← prev | 1-25 | 26-50  | nextlast
Reviews: 6 | Ratings: 40
Reviews by mothman:
Photo of mothman
3/5  rDev -12.8%

More User Reviews:
Photo of mte1972
3/5  rDev -12.8%

Photo of chinchill
3.58/5  rDev +4.1%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

On tap at the brewery. IBU - 30.

Excellent clarity in the golden body; good head and very good lacing.

Aroma: spicy baked bread.

This is malty for style (the "imperial" part?) despite a normal hop load. Hints of toffee and baked fruits.

O: a fine looking, very malty pilsner.

 284 characters

Photo of javlin624
3/5  rDev -12.8%

Photo of themonk
1.51/5  rDev -56.1%
look: 2.75 | smell: 1.75 | taste: 1 | feel: 2.75 | overall: 1.25

On tap at Drafting Table in Atlanta. I am only reviewing this beer because it was surprisingly terrible. In fact, I only finished 3 ounces of this beer and sent it back. Although I would not consider myself a Pilsner expert, I have had enough to know what they ought to taste like. I strongly suspect that either the keg or line was bad at the bar. It tasted of wet cardboard and a bit of funk in the worst way possible. Maybe a hint of soggy grass and butter. There was no trace of hops nor the usual, slight pilsner bite. There was zero head retention. I completely understand that this is an "imperial" pils but it didn't resemble anything close to a drinkable beer. Based on my conversations and research, this beer could have a case of the "too much diacetyl" problem. I am definitely going to seek out this beer in a different medium and hope that it is better because no brewer would knowlingly sell that thing I drank this past weekend.

 944 characters

Photo of Keith_R
3.5/5  rDev +1.7%

Photo of ckr1451
3.02/5  rDev -12.2%
look: 3.25 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Photo of st9647v3
3.5/5  rDev +1.7%

Photo of jerefreakinmiah
3.25/5  rDev -5.5%

Photo of TheBishopco
3.75/5  rDev +9%

Photo of GABrew
3.5/5  rDev +1.7%

Photo of JohnBender
3.25/5  rDev -5.5%
look: 3.25 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3.25

Photo of sapper1252
3.92/5  rDev +14%
look: 4 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

First beer I've tried from this brewery. Powerful hop nose from the get-go, crystal clear pale golden malt. Delicate sweetness, well-balanced with hops (Hallertau I think, though it could have been Saaz). Impressive enough to give these guys another shot down the road.

 269 characters

Photo of highwayempire
3.37/5  rDev -2%
look: 4 | smell: 2 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.75

Photo of jakethal
3.73/5  rDev +8.4%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.75

Photo of relynnjr
3.24/5  rDev -5.8%

Photo of firkinhophead
3.9/5  rDev +13.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4

Pours straw colored yellow with minimal head. No lacing to speak of.

Aroma is mild grass, hay, with a hint of corn sweetness. Slightly sour biscuit note, as well.

Taste of pale malts and cornbread upfront with a pleasant grassy bitterness rising in the finish. A bit of chalkiness and mineraly tang lingers. Very nice. Not particularly peppery. Sweetness starts to get a bit heavy near the end.

Mouthfeel is spot on. Round and solid without being thick or sweet. Malt is definitely there, but clean and smooth. Moderate carbonation and no peppery bite might leave true pilsner lovers complaining, but as an American interpretation it holds up well.

Very impressed with this one. Not imperial in the sense of high gravity, but in terms of a solid malt presence. Called a flagship brew that pays tribute to the original Chattanooga Brewing, which made an imperial pils (although I am sure it was not called that). Well made American lagers are hard to come by and this one fits the bill. An everyday beer worthy of the craft label. Look forward to trying more of their creations.

 1,081 characters

Photo of Zach136
3.5/5  rDev +1.7%

Photo of sendbeer
2.75/5  rDev -20.1%

Photo of Mknght
2.25/5  rDev -34.6%

Photo of MattFox
4/5  rDev +16.3%

Photo of heerboth
3/5  rDev -12.8%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Photo of rudabegga9
3.25/5  rDev -5.5%

Photo of Beerstorian
3.64/5  rDev +5.8%
look: 4.75 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

This has a nice appearance, with a good straw/gold color to it.

Smell is a bit thin, with some corn tortilla notes, and a big of malt.

Little head retention, in fact it was non-evident by the time it arrived at the table. Soapy glass?

Taste was full of cooked corn and corn tortillas. It wasn't unpleasant, but it wasn't great.

 331 characters

Photo of RavenForBeer
3.5/5  rDev +1.7%

first ← prev | 1-25 | 26-50  | nextlast
Imperial Pilsner from Chattanooga Brewing Company
3.44 out of 5 based on 40 ratings.
  • About Us

    Your go-to website for beer (since 1996), publishers of BeerAdvocate magazine (since 2006) and hosts of world-class beer events (since 2003). Respect Beer.
  • BeerAdvocate Microbrew Invitational

    Join us June 2-3, 2017 in Boston, Mass. for beer, cider, mead, kombucha and sake from over 70 small producers.

    Learn More
  • Subscribe to BeerAdvocate Magazine

    Support uncompromising beer advocacy and award-winning, independent journalism with a print subscription to BeerAdvocate magazine.