Dismiss Notice
We're celebrating 10 years of BeerAdvocate magazine with $10 print subscriptions for US residents.

Subscribe now!

Peroni Nastro Azzurro | Birra Peroni Industriale S.p.A.

Log in or Sign up to start rating.
685 Reviews
Read the review
Peroni Nastro AzzurroPeroni Nastro Azzurro

Brewed by:
Birra Peroni Industriale S.p.A.

Style: Euro Pale Lager

Alcohol by volume (ABV): 5.10%

Availability: Year-round

Notes / Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

Added by Todd on 01-03-2001

For Trade:
View: Beers | Events
User Reviews
Sort by:  Recent | High | Low | Top Raters | Alström Bros
Reviews: 685 | Ratings: 1,938
Photo of Naerhu
1.97/5  rDev -28.9%
look: 1.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Clear yellow fizzy beer with frighteningly white tiny head. Score for appearance downgraded 0.5 points for falsely claiming to be a premium beer on the label.
Non-discript grain aroma, no, not aroma, smell. No hops apparent.
No malt flavor to speak of, definately no hops. Fizzy yellow pre-urine.
Thin mouthfeel. This beer, if I may call it beer, is to be avoided for its stunning blandness. I was very happy that I was able to pass the bottle on to my father-in-law and have to pour it down the drain.

 505 characters

Photo of Tang07
2.9/5  rDev +4.7%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Not very exciting.

I poured it into a pint glass, starting with the standard technique, then I started to get a bit more agressive with it when I noticed that no head was forming. I ended up practically dumping the beer into the glass.

So, not much head to speak of. The little bit arond the edge did somehow lace the glass as I drank it.

The beer is a standard yellow euro-lager color. Very clear.

The smell is nothing exciting. Malt, with a hint of green bottle euro-skunk.

The taste is nothing special either. It is light on the flavor and not much of a hop finish.

The mouthfeel and drinkablity is very average as well.

I don't think that I'll buy more of this.

 686 characters

Photo of walleye
1.5/5  rDev -45.8%
look: 1.5 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 1.5

from the bottle. poured a nice golden color with a meduim sized head that didn't last. aroma light malts some sweetness. flavor malts some sweetness to it a hint of bitterness with a hint of skunk. went ok with my Italian dinner I am glad it was a speial for $2.00

 264 characters

Photo of steinlifter
2.6/5  rDev -6.1%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

poured an unimpressive pale golden, no head or retention to speak of, smell was grainy and sweet, typical euro-lager taste, slight hops, slight malt, and very unimpressive, watery mouthfeel, I guess this is their equivalent of a Budweiser, nothing to seek out!

 260 characters

Photo of claytri
3.05/5  rDev +10.1%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

The beer poured a clear straw gold. It had a basic sour malt aroma. The taste was also of sour malt with a banana finish. It was light and dry, yet slightly oily. This is a solid decent beer that stacks up well with other macros. It reminded me of Ballantine's.

 261 characters

Photo of kindestcut
2.66/5  rDev -4%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

When in Rome, eh? I decided to have an Italian beer with a nice Italian meal. I settled on Peroni over Moretti.

The Peroni poured straw yellow with a tiny white head. The beer looks fizzy and has very active carbonation. The aroma is nearly non-existent...faint grain but none of the sweetness I would want in a lager.

The taste is very thin, bordering on watery. There is a subtle sweetness however, there is also a definite graininess that is not pleasant at all.

This is nothing more than a mediocre beer. I can imagine it would be fine as a thirst quencher but nothing more.

 581 characters

Photo of brewdlyhooked13
2.46/5  rDev -11.2%
look: 2.5 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2

Appearance - light golden yellow, one finger of creamy, bubbly white froth, holds at a thin covering.

Aroma - initial skunkiness has me wincing but fades after a minute. Nothing beyond that, odorless.

Taste - it's okay. Kind of a bland start, some faint hops show up around the aftertaste. Somewhat sweet, dry finish. Not a bad brew, better than the smell indicated anyway.

Mouthfeel - a little lighter and crisper than the Moretti, pretty refreshing.

Drinkability - my skunk-averseness prevents me from actively pursuing this beer.

 544 characters

Photo of RoyalT
2.98/5  rDev +7.6%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Appearance – This one poured a deep, rich yellow in color with some live carbonation and a big, full, white head.

Smell – One of the only decent good grain aromas that I’ve found. The grain smells as good as it looks. The nose is sweet and very pleasing.

Taste – The wheels started falling off this wagon at the taste. The sweetness, which I enjoyed in the nose, completely took over the beer. The grain just faded away and left me with a mouthfeel of overly sweetened tonic water.

Mouthfeel – This light-bodied birra has some subtle carbonation and is mildly crisp.

Drinkability – This one starts off well enough but lost its structure and felt kind of strung out to me in the end.

 700 characters

Photo of EvilFlyingCow
3.42/5  rDev +23.5%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

This particular lager has a smell which is slightly skunky though not overwhelming. It is similar in its aroma to that of the Dutch beers Grolsch and Heineken, although the taste is far from identical. The easy drinking quality of this particular brew makes it similar to Pilsner Urquell, but even smoother. Not on my to-do list, but definitely preferred over Budweiser or Miller any day.

 388 characters

Photo of oggg
2.2/5  rDev -20.6%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

My bottle was in green glass.

The beer pours a deep yellow color, and is nice and clear. I couldn't get a head to form. The aroma is lacking. The beer is nice and fizzy. The start is all carbonation and thin beer. Perhaps a bit of bitterness under the fizz, but very short lived. No hop flavor. Towards the end there's a decent mellow maltiness.

Not exciting, but there's surprising malt.

 395 characters

Photo of tjd25
3.47/5  rDev +25.3%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

The head is foamy but a bit irregular on an almost transparent golden color body. The smell I found hard to describe but pleasing, enjoyably grassy maybe. The taste is ok, quite refreshing, better than many other european lagers. Malty but not annoyingly grainy, round with some caramel and some sweetness. The mouthfeel is smooth, a bit salted and dry, but not overly. Ok.

 373 characters

Photo of necoadam
2.13/5  rDev -23.1%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 2

This beer poured out a gold color with some decent amount of carbonation in there. Smell was a little buttery, also some skunkiness to it as well. Some very light grain to it but that was about it. Taste wasn't all too good either. Malts and grains hit the palate very lightly. Some buttery aftertaste kicked in as well which made this beer feel a little heavy to drink. This would probably beat out a Bud or Corona, well everything beats an Corona, but not worth buying a six pack of this stuff.

 496 characters

Photo of granger10
3.39/5  rDev +22.4%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3

I had this today at Uccello's while watching the Euro Championship Finals. The pour left something to be desired. It had a pale light color with a fizzy head that dissipated very quickly. Carbonation seemed low for a lager. The smell was definitely on the sweet side with pale malts being noticeable. The taste however seemed more hoppy upfront. There was a definite grassy hoppiness the dominated my palate with sweet malts coming in underneath. The finish was slightly sweet and decently crisp. This beer was quite thick in body but not too smooth. It seemed like a Czech Pils to me in many ways. All in all, I liked it.

 622 characters

Photo of Puddleglum
2.68/5  rDev -3.2%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

It goes without saying that the Italians are wine-drinkers and this beer proves it. Nevertheless I did partake of this beer frequently as it is absolutely ubiquitous in Rome and is often the only and/or best choice. The head is fizzy and quickly dissipated to nothing. There was a straw, dried grain flavor throughout with no real detectable hops and very little malty quality. It smells much the same way it tastes. The mouthfeel is light and the drinkability is this beers saving grace. I would certainly choose this beer over a budweiser or anything of that ilk.

 565 characters

Photo of Shiloh
3.14/5  rDev +13.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

This is different..
Once you get past the initial skunky aroma this brew is actually pretty good.
Arrived a medium golden hue with a full finger head and lively carbonation.
The head was quickly replaced by ring, cling and thin island lace.
The body is medium.
The taste has a nice balance with the edge going to the malts.
Only linger here is the (tail end of the) skunk...

 380 characters

Photo of jvajda
2.18/5  rDev -21.3%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

I had this one at a fancy Italian restaraunt in the North End in Boston. My first experience with Italian beer made it clear why wine is the drink of choice in Italy.

Appearance: Looks like a crummy American macro. Translucent yellow with a minimal head.
Smell: Faintly detectable malt, pretty bland smell.
Taste: Light on hops, malt, and any realy flavor, this is a really watery, boring beer. I could easily confuse it with any number of American macros. Very dissapointing.
Mouthfeel: Watery and very lightly carbonated.
Drinkabilty: A fine session beer if you just want to drink a lot, but not a beer I can see drinking again.

 637 characters

Photo of Globetrotter
1.78/5  rDev -35.7%
look: 2 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 1.5

Green fairly long neck 33cl bottle with a yellow, gold and bluish green label featuring a coat of arms and a few prize medals. The only ingredient info is the banner across the top of the front label stating: "All natural ingredients." That doesn't say much. Best before 11/30/04, I opened it on 3/27/04 - still fairly fresh. Somehow, though, I don't think aging would help much.

Clear greenish gold under a slightly contoured snow white one finger head that fades very quickly to nothing but collar. The nose is nasty - rusty tin can and corn. The mouth is a bit heavy with sourness and fairly well carbonated. The taste is comprised of sour grapes, stale bread and rusted metal. The rusted metal wins the battle for the aftertaste. This reminds me of way too many bad macros. Perhaps the sink will enjoy it more than I have...

 831 characters

Photo of coasterfreak75
2.83/5  rDev +2.2%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

The pour was golden yellow with absolutely no head and nothing left on the glass. There seemed to be a total lack of smell, save a slight hint of fruit. The taste, I'm sorry, I have to rank behind Budweiser. There was, to me, a total lack of taste. It bordered on carbonated water. But on the same lines, it was refreshing and had good mouthfeel. I won't be stocking this one for lawnmowing season, or any other season for that matter.

 435 characters

Photo of cypressbob
2.7/5  rDev -2.5%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3.5

Green 330ml bottle

Pours with an unimpressive fizzy yellow, with a thin straw head, disappating quickly

Smell is typical of pale lagers, dry, heavily carbonated, malty

Taste is simple, some grassy hops, little bitterness, some adjunct dry bud like flavour on the finish

A fair macro lager, drinkable but not exactly pushing the tastebuds

 349 characters

Photo of LiquidBreadMan
3.28/5  rDev +18.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

I had this beer at Johnny Carino's Restaurant, poured in a frosted pint glass. (The server could not provide me with a room-temperature glass. For this reason, and the fact that he trash talked his previous employer, another restaurant, I left him only a 15% gratuity.)

It poured a rich gold -- in their soft incandescent lighting -- with no head to speak of and no lace. The aroma was hard to nail down but I eventually decided it was most reminiscent of chocolate and citrus. The taste was suprisingly hoppy for a lager, which immediately moved this brew up a notch, in my book. The finish was good -- dry and fairly 'edgy' -- which is why I rated it only 'average' in the drinkability for this beer style.

As soon as Johnny Carino's realizes that Chicken Picatta is supposed to have lemon in it, I'll visit them again. If and when I do, I'll sample this brew again. Overall, it was a decent beer.

 906 characters

Photo of watermelonman
3.03/5  rDev +9.4%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

This poured to an extremely light color and smelled similar to some of the cheap macro products, but the taste was nice. It's got a snappy flavor to it. The mouthfeel is similar, light and snappy. Not too shabby, and it goes down easily.

Nothing too special, but one can certainly do much worse.

 298 characters

Photo of resirob
2.97/5  rDev +7.2%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

Had this in the 12 oz. Green bottle at Olive Garden. When in Rome, right?

Pours pale golden with a short-lived active head. No lacing.

Weak earthy/grassy nose. Slight pale malt aroma at first, then a tease from the hops.

Crisp, clean beer. Malt base seems a bit subdued, but there is a nice hop note in the finish.

Medium mouthfeel with an easy, clean finish makes for a drinkable beer.

 399 characters

Photo of JoEBoBpr
2.92/5  rDev +5.4%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

appearance: Golden straw, light almost non-excistent head

smell: malty with hints of hops and earth

taste: a little sharp sour taste as soon as it hits your tounge but it develops into a mouthfilling sweetnes.

mouthfeel: a little too fizy for my taste

drinkability: overall it can be done, pretty good beer, beeter than alot of the american Pale Lagers

 365 characters

Photo of BeerResearcher
2.91/5  rDev +5.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

This light Lager from Rome pours a pale copper color with fizzy-bubbled white head.
The aroma is mostly of fresh cut hay with a faint smell of Euro hops.
The lightly roasted malt is dry and crisp with faint taste of wheat crackers.
The mildly applied hops have a light lemony bitterness and mild metallic bite. Lots of fizzy, seltzery carbonation. Would improve greatly if drank on the Isle of Corsica!

 406 characters

Photo of StevieW
3.6/5  rDev +30%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

12 oz bottle at Mario's in Stuart, FL.
Golden color, a shade darker than you would expect. Fresh cut grass and snappy hop smell. Inviting. Fresh tasting lager flavors. Undertones of bready malt, hints of grass, and tasty bitter hopping in the finish. I don't know if it's saaz or what. Tastes like a very traditional European lager, without the nasty skunky smell. Light to moderate body, very crisp and refreshing finish. Paired nicely with a big bowl of Pasta Fagoli and Chicken Parmagiana. I would have it again here, but would go searching for it.

 552 characters

Peroni Nastro Azzurro from Birra Peroni Industriale S.p.A.
2.77 out of 5 based on 1,938 ratings.
  • About Us

    Your go-to website for beer (since 1996), publishers of BeerAdvocate magazine (since 2006) and hosts of world-class beer events (since 2003). Respect Beer.
  • Extreme Beer Fest® Cometh

    February 3-4, 2017. Boston, Mass. Limited tickets available. Prepare for epicness.

    Learn More
  • 10 Years of BeerAdvocate Magazine

    We're celebrating 10 years of BA mag with $10 print subscriptions for US residents!