Wit
Brouwerij St. Bernardus NV

WitWit
Write a Review
Beer Geek Stats: | Print Shelf Talker
Style:
Belgian Witbier
Ranked #2
ABV:
5.5%
Score:
93
Ranked #1,824
Avg:
4.18 | pDev: 11%
Reviews:
706
Ratings:
1,680
From:
Brouwerij St. Bernardus NV
 
Belgium
Avail:
Year-round
Wants
  382
Gots
  260
SCORE
93
Outstanding
WitWit
Notes:
firstprev| 651-675 | 676-700 | 701-725  | next → last
Reviews: 706 | Ratings: 1,680
Photo of rastaman
2.74/5  rDev -34.4%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

No big deal. Yeasty, thin and boring, no depth, or complexity. Lightly spicy and citrusy, yeasty, lightly tart, with a real stale, stagnant character, really nothing special at all, the flavour is one dimentional, the flavour is very thin, and well, just plain boring. Its drinkable though.

 290 characters

Photo of PlutonowyManiek
2.7/5  rDev -35.4%
look: 3 | smell: 1.75 | taste: 2.75 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Straw color, very cloudy, a bit like a compote of apples and pears.
Head white, not very durable.
Unfortunately, a terrible aroma, a little wheat, and plenty of suds, some perfume or something.
The taste is better but not great. We have a wet wheat is damp barn, a little food acid lemon, a bit of metal that's all.
Gentian light at the finish, alcohol is not perceptible.
Saturation high.

 389 characters

Photo of kojevergas
2.3/5  rDev -45%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

33cl bottle served into a St. Bernardus Goblet. Reviewed from notes.

A: No head at all. Cloudy non-transparent lemon-yellow colour.

Sm: Lemon citrus ester hops are muted by present. Aroma is mild in strength.

T: Muted lemon-orange esters and bland barley. Very muted and simple for a witbier. Where's the flavour? Badly built and of mediocre balance.

Mf: Smooth and wet. Far too wet; borderline watery.

Dr: Easy to drink, but of poor quality. ABV is average. Nothing special here.

 490 characters

Photo of BeerStyx
2.25/5  rDev -46.2%

Did not enjoy too much. The first thing I noticed was a strong iron smell (like a strong mineral smell). Supposed yeast bear, but does not taste like bread. Initial taste is like mineral water (almost no flavour) then it has a "yeast" taste that becomes kinda strong, which was slightly bitter.

 294 characters

Photo of JudgeRoughneck
2.1/5  rDev -49.8%
look: 1 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 1

There is minimal head on this dirty-ditch-water beer. This is maybe the most unappealing color I've ever seen. The aroma is very hefe-like with huge bubblegum dominating over clove, lemon, and pepper.

The flavor is opressively heavy with some kind of mineral taste. once someone said Flintstones vitamins", it was very hard to think of anything else when drinking this beer. That is totally what it taste like. I get some spice and orange pith in the background. Aftertaste is awful...like I've been chewing notebook paper to make spitballs.

Mouthfeel is flat, save the mineral astringency. I found this beer almost undrinkable, and wit is one of my favorite styles. It was interesting, but not pleasant. I'm wondering if we got a bad bottle, but the freshness date said it was good for a few more months. Guess I'm just not into this.

 842 characters

Photo of goochpunch
1.64/5  rDev -60.8%
look: 2 | smell: 3 | taste: 1 | feel: 2 | overall: 1

Best before 9/28/07.

Pours out like a cloudy, melted creamsicle. Head is small and disappears quickly. Lots of protein chunks. The yeast stands out in the nose but there isn't much spicing, I find. I get some stone fruits and pale wheat. Flavor is of a Dino Flinstone Vitamin with a salty/mineraly finish. Coriander is around there somewhere, but the chewable vitamin overtakes everything. Mouthfeel is light to moderate and rather flat. Mouthfeel is kind of slick from the soft tasting and mineraly water. Drain pour.

 521 characters

firstprev| 651-675 | 676-700 | 701-725  | next → last
Wit from Brouwerij St. Bernardus NV
Beer rating: 93 out of 100 with 1680 ratings