Nepenthe Ales LOTUS - Eater | Candia Road Brewing Company

Your Rating: None
Want it   Got it 
42 Ratings

Brewed by:
Candia Road Brewing Company
New Hampshire, United States

Style: American Double / Imperial IPA

Alcohol by volume (ABV): 8.20%

Availability: Rotating

Notes / Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

Added by johnnnniee on 10-06-2012

Bros Score:
User Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Recent | High | Low | Top Raters | Alström Bros
first ← prev | 1-25 | 26-50  | nextlast
Ratings: 42 |  Reviews: 11
Photo of BrianC
2.32/5  rDev -33.9%
look: 2 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

It looked like beginner homebrew. And it tasted like beginner homebrew. It was way overcarbonated. I poured gently after a loud release of co2 upon opening, but ended up with more than half a glass of foam. It was very clowdy, which I really don't mind at all, but it did contribute to the homebrew quality of this beer. And when I say "homebrew" I'm not referring to those that know what they're doing. I'm referring to the guy that just made his first or second bacth. At $8 a 22oz there's just too many really good choices out there. Hey, I gave it a shot.

 559 characters

Photo of DmouthCaliBrewz
2.33/5  rDev -33.6%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

Interesting....saw this guy at the local coop and having never tried any of their offerings, thought I would give this one a go.

A: pours a cloudy golden orange with a MASSIVE head that absolutely refused to go down. This guy was unbelievably carbonated, noticeable from the moment I cracked the bottle to a resounding hiss. Hmmm...interesting.

S: Not getting much in the way of aroma, but there is some herbal spiciness, and a hint of bready malts. Also, I don't know what C02 smells like, but this might be it. A bit of a chemical scent.

T: Really not getting anything here. Once you get past the biting carbonation, it is a watery mess. I get some spicy herbs, maybe a slight bit of clove, but absolutely nothing in the ballpark of what I would expect from this style. Tastes like a bitter and over-carbonated witbier, or maybe a poorly constructed saison, from the herbal spiciness. Hint of pepper and phenol at the end.

M: Thin and fizzy, with a stinging carbonation.

O: Fizzy and poorly made. I'm not one to drainpour, but if I was, this would be a candidate.

***REVISIT: ***

I just revisited this beer after a few months, and it is marginally better but still unbelievably sub-par. Just a hint more malt backbone than I remember but still just tastes like dirty fizzy hop water. I might as well just steep some hops in my club soda next time...

 1,363 characters

Photo of coombski
2.83/5  rDev -19.4%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.75 | feel: 2.75 | overall: 2.75

Photo of BeerAdvocate
3/5  rDev -14.5%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

From BeerAdvocate Magazine #79 (Aug 2013):

We can fully appreciate bottle-conditioned brews, but Candia Road really should tighten up production as this character—or to narrow it down, the yeast—takes over a bit too much. Another case of “yeast gone wild,” the potential is there, though falls way short of what we expected.

ABV: 8.2%

LOOK: Deep amber, hazed, massive head

SMELL: Intensely floral, lots of yeast, toasted grain, faint caramel, exotic fruit, hemp seeds, rose water

TASTE: Juicy hoppiness, faintly dank, slightly biscuity grain, sharp bitterness, chalky yeast, estery, apple skin, astringent; extremely dry, very bitter finish

 696 characters

Photo of RRC03
3/5  rDev -14.5%

Photo of NHbeerfishing
3/5  rDev -14.5%

Photo of garyloveman
3.03/5  rDev -13.7%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3

Photo of Massbmx
3.04/5  rDev -13.4%
look: 3 | smell: 2.75 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Photo of NHSTEVE
3.05/5  rDev -13.1%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Photo of BastardFromABasket
3.15/5  rDev -10.3%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.25

Photo of Basshooker
3.25/5  rDev -7.4%

Photo of westcoastbeerlvr
3.25/5  rDev -7.4%

Photo of Screper
3.25/5  rDev -7.4%

Photo of Gosox8787
3.37/5  rDev -4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 1 | overall: 3.5

Presentation: Chilled poured bottle poured into a pint glass. Cannot find a bottling date anywhere on the bottle, but I think this is most likely pretty fresh as I have never seen this on shelves before.

Appearance: Medium orange to light brown in color. Slightly cloudy. Pours a really aggressive, three finger beige head that sticks very nicely. Nice retention all around.

Aroma: Lots of sweet pineapple and tropical fruit notes are present upfront. Really light malt background. Some citrus and pine notes from the hops as well. Almost lemony. Very interesting.

Taste: More tropical hop notes really take hold here. Some mango, lemon, and orange zest notes. A sharp bite of bitter pine on the back end. Some very light caramel notes from the malt. Definitely appears to be very fresh and have plenty of hop flavors. A bit on the sweet end of the spectrum.

Mouthfeel: This is where this really falls short in my opinion. Extremely thin, watery body. Distractingly thin. The carbonation is almost completely absent, despite the really aggressive head it pours. The lack of bosy really pulls down the rest of the beer.

Overall, this double IPA has some nice hop flavors. The problem comes in with the carbonation that completely holds back some of the other aspects of the beer. Overly watery and almost syrupy. The hop profile is pretty solid though. Not something I am likely to revisit.

 1,396 characters

Photo of Brad007
3.41/5  rDev -2.8%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

Wow, too much foam, man. It's cloudy with a strong amber hue. Reminds me of one of my homebrews.

Musty pine aroma greets the nose. I think I know what's in store.

That pine dose is mirrored in the flavor. Coats the mouth. Just a touch of sweet malt underneath.

Carbonation level is too damn high. A beer that is more head than beer is not a beer.

When it settles down, it's still a decent stab at the style. It just needs a hell lot more refinement.

 454 characters

Photo of Durge
3.5/5  rDev -0.3%

Photo of metapod
3.5/5  rDev -0.3%

Photo of JeremyScott
3.5/5  rDev -0.3%

Photo of Kelp
3.5/5  rDev -0.3%

Photo of Satchboogie
3.5/5  rDev -0.3%

Photo of REVZEB
3.5/5  rDev -0.3%

Photo of hopley
3.5/5  rDev -0.3%

Photo of botchla
3.5/5  rDev -0.3%

Photo of VelvetExtract
3.74/5  rDev +6.6%
look: 4 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.75

Unsure as to if this sample was from a bottle or draft. Poured a hazy orange color. Aroma was of sharp pine hops along with a fruity hoppiness as well. Lots of citrus. Floral hops as well. Some light, malty sweetness. Flavor is an initially stinging dose of pine and grapefruit. Then I get a little more of the fruitiness. Behind the hops is a candied sweetness. High bitterness. Chewy mouthfeel. Rather intense. Pretty well done.

 430 characters

Photo of lordofthewiens
3.75/5  rDev +6.8%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 3.75

Poured into a snifter the beer was a hazy dark orange color. There was a fairly small off white head that left a minimal amount of lace.

Mostly a pine aroma, a tiny bit of citrus. Faint sweet malt.

Piney, resiney taste. I thought I could taste some grapefruit. Not sure where the malt went.

A hop-forward beer. I wanted a little more malt presence, and found this to be a difficult DIPA to drink.

 399 characters

first ← prev | 1-25 | 26-50  | nextlast
Nepenthe Ales LOTUS - Eater from Candia Road Brewing Company
Beer rating: 3.51 out of 5 with 42 ratings