Wasatch Polygamy Porter | Utah Brewers Cooperative

Your Rating: None
Want it   Got it 
Wasatch Polygamy PorterWasatch Polygamy Porter
BA SCORE
3.33/5
Okay
Wasatch Polygamy PorterWasatch Polygamy Porter
BEER INFO

Brewed by:
Utah Brewers Cooperative

utahbeers.com

Style: American Porter

Alcohol by volume (ABV): 4.00%

Availability: Year-round

Notes / Commercial Description:
None provided.

BEER STATS
Ranking:
#44,664
Reviews:
242
Ratings:
622
pDev:
15.62%
 
 
Wants:
16
Gots:
86
Trade:
1
 
View: Beers | Events
User Reviews & Ratings
first ← prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | nextlast
Reviews: 242 | Ratings: 622
Photo of GeoAggie
3.24/5  rDev -2.7%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3.25

Overall not bad. I got it on draft at a pub in Salt Lake and it looked great. The taste was very chocolatey, almost overwhelmingly chocolate, but this makes it after fun nod to Mormon culture. The aftertaste is artificial tasting.

 230 characters

Photo of Franziskaner
3.68/5  rDev +10.5%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.75

Deep brown in color and nearly impenetrable to light. There’s a fingernail of creamy beige on top. Heavy lacing. The aroma is tough to seek out, but with some effort i’m detecting some dark malt and dark chocolate. I’m tasting bitter coffee and dark chocolate. The mouth is very creamy and due to the addition of nitrogen. There’s also a light chalkiness.

 369 characters

Photo of Elwoody
4.47/5  rDev +34.2%
look: 4.25 | smell: 4.75 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 4.5

Great porter on nitro, with dark chocolate and coffee notes and slight hint of cherry. Wish the Abv was higher as it is it almost has a bread taste but it’s great bread. A little light on body but drinks easy year round.

 224 characters

Photo of Red5StandingBy
3.02/5  rDev -9.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 2.75 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3

Poured from 12oz can into Seidel Mug.

L: Deep dark brown, light shines through to show mahogany hues. thin khaki head fades into nothing.

S: Lots of chocolate, some sherry, faint coffee.

T: Chocolate, sherry, coffee, weird tastes at the end.

F: Medium body, crisp, weird after taste.

O: Bad.

 297 characters

Photo of UtahBeerPleb
3.31/5  rDev -0.6%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.25

Pours a very very dark brown - not quite opaque, but pretty close. The head is pretty good. It has a very good look. The smell is fairly muted, but there's definite chocolatey and faint coffee notes. The flavor matches the nose - lots of dark chocolatey malts, maybe a bit of coffee. The texture is quite creamy, so while the body is thin, it hides it decently well, at least at first. It gets harder to hide that as you work your way through it though. It has good flavor, but the lighter body definitely hurts it. It's difficult to make a session porter, and it's not bad for what it is - an approachable, crushable, somewhat sweet dark beer.

Of course, the artwork and taglines are a Utah classic.

 701 characters

Photo of flagmantho
3.66/5  rDev +9.9%
look: 4.25 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 3.75

I had this beer on-tap in a pint glass at Squatters Pub Brewery, the sister company of Wasatch.

Appearance: dark, hazy brown with a finger of tenacious and creamy tan foam due to the nitro. Great.

Smell: a little roasty, but really it's way too light, even after warming up.

Taste: sweet and caramelly with a light roastiness. Not bad if you like the caramel/toffee character in porters.

Mouthfeel: medium body with a decent carbonation and creaminess.

Overall: not a bad porter, but the aroma isn't great. Still, very drinkable if you like the sweeter porter varieties.

 580 characters

Photo of andrewh995
2.98/5  rDev -10.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Pours a medium brown that lets ruby light through. No head. Smells of chocolate, mild coffee, and malt. Tastes of light chocolate, light coffee, and roasted malts. Medium-light body with almost zero carbonation... Overall this is a below average Porter, mostly hurt by the fact that there is little to no carbonation and a very average flavor.

 343 characters

Photo of Jimbob-gbr
4.09/5  rDev +22.8%
look: 4.25 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4.5

A very good mild porter. Has a dark brown poor with nice off white tan head. Bready and chocolate and light toffee smell. Milld roast, chocolate, caramel and coffee flavors. Feel is a bit thin but is also only 4% abv. Can have more than one like the label says. Mild enough to enjoy year round

 293 characters

Photo of poisoneddwarf
3.11/5  rDev -6.6%
look: 4.75 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Backlog. 12 oz bottle. Halfway decent porter. The most special thing about this beer is the label. Smells like wheat bread gone bad. Seems to get less interesting as it warms. No detectable aftertaste. Doesn’t leave much of an impression. By the time I finished it, I thought it was the worst porter I’d ever had. Started decent, ended poorly.

 347 characters

Photo of bwood06
3.5/5  rDev +5.1%
look: 4 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 3.5

Since I decided to have dessert after the Ironman 70.3 in St. George, UT, I figured a good porter, especially one as famous as this one, would go well with something sweet.

This beer pours an opaque black hue that has mahogany edges and a thin khaki head that dissipates quickly to a ghostly cream layer. Carbonation is not visible. 4/5 The aroma is very muted but notes of toffee and dark chocolate/coffee do come through, although it is tough to distinguish these notes. 3.25/5 The flavor profile, unlike the aroma, is nice and flavorful with the same toffee and dark chocolate/coffee coming though, but much more strongly here. Bitterness is light and comes across as espresso bitterness that does not linger after swallowing for very long at all. 3.5/5 This is a lighter porter (medium body) that is more akin to the English style than the American. It is actually a bit crisp with a slight drying that lingers only slightly after swallowing. Carbonation is fairly light. 3.75/5 This is a decent porter, especially with food, and has a good flavor profile, but the aroma drags the score down a bit due to the lack of strength. Still, I'm always more than happy to try out a famous beer. 3.5/5

 1,213 characters

Photo of BucannonXC5
3.52/5  rDev +5.7%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Type: 16-oz. draft (I think)
Glass: Wasatch Brewery slightly curved shaker glass
From: Gordon Biersch in the Salt Lake City, Utah airport
Price: $6.50
Purchased: April 30, 2017
Consumed: April 30, 2017
Reviewed as: American Porter
Misc.: N/A

Grabbed this while on a layover in the Salt Lake City, Utah airport. Went for here because most of the underage people I was traveling with were at different concourses. Had seen this before, but I think this was the first time I had tried it. Maybe way back in the day on another trip to Utah.

Poured a dark brown color with 3-to-4 fingers of rocky khaki head when I got it. Serene setting underneath. Outstanding spotty lacing. Almost perfect retention. (Sight - 4.50)

Smelled cocoa, milk chocolate, toffee, brown bread, nutty malts and maybe even a touch of vanilla. A tad light, but that is expected for 4.0 pct. ABV. (Smell - 3.75)

Taste was not quite as good. Hard to get that much flavor into a 4.0 pct. porter I bet. Got cocoa, chocolate milk, nutty malts, light coffee, even hints of vanilla, and semi-char wood. (Taste - 3.25)

Medium body. Creamy texture. Average carbonation. Long slightly roasty finish. (Feel - 3.50)

Not as bad as I thought it would be. Not quite as thick as I’d want it, but I enjoyed it. (Overall - 3.50)

3.52 | 80 | B

 1,302 characters

Photo of MAB
3.19/5  rDev -4.2%
look: 3.25 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3.25

Finally got to taste a "classic" in the beer world. The label and concept alone is enough to give this a passing grade.
The beer is dark, but not realy dark. The feel is thin and a touch watery, but the flavors there are just fine.
I could drink a lot of this and be happy. But it isn't earth-shattering or particularly impressive for the style.

 345 characters

Photo of boilermakerbrew
3.3/5  rDev -0.9%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.25

A- Dark with a ton of red coming through in the glass. Not a very long lasting head, and no lacing as a result of that.

S- Dry, just a touch of bitterness, and a decent dose of dry chocolate are the primary scents that hit the nostrils. Not much else here, very simple and straight forward.

T- Lightly hoppy and dry right off the bat. The burnt malts provide a dry chocolate flavor that borderlines on slightly chalky. Just a touch of a light hopping is detectable on the tongue. Chocolate rides out the flavor as it leaves the tongue. Overall flavor is simple and one dimensional.

M- Being a 3.2 beer, this isn't really a fair comparison to other porters, as this one is well short of creamy or thick. That being said, it is still a very smooth, lighter drinking beer. Great balance of full flavor and light feel is a solid combo despite its relatively light body.

Overall, solid, but nothing to write home about. If you are looking for a smooth, easy drinking beer with a darker flavor profile, this fits the bill.

 1,020 characters

Photo of mallardip
3.93/5  rDev +18%
look: 5 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 4.25 | overall: 4

If there was an IPA version of a porter, this is it. Hoppy notes on nose and palate. Not a bad beer, enjoyable for sure. Just did not expect the hoppyness of this beer.

 171 characters

Photo of rodbeermunch
3.1/5  rDev -6.9%
look: 3.25 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3

Brown pour, lighter than your average American stout, but a giant head that was impressive at least.

Lots off roast dark malt notes in the aroma. Simple enough.

Taste is a somewhat hoppy, earthy, roasty porter edging over to the bitter side of porters. Not overly hopped, its just a less than average amount of malt to make a 4% porter kind of beer.

 357 characters

Photo of vw72
2.94/5  rDev -11.7%
look: 3 | smell: 2.75 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

For a porter, this seemed a little light. Perhaps because this is from Utah, where they limit the alcohol content (at least for beers bought in Utah). Overall, okay, but seemed like a light "dark" beer.

 202 characters

Photo of fishyakLA
3.48/5  rDev +4.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3.5

Utah = old Indian word for lightweight beer. I spent a few days in Springdale UT next to Zion Nat'l Park. It seemed like there was only one beer distributor in town and Polygamy Porter was everywhere, even T-shirts. I had two of these with Mexican food at Oskars in Springdale. It's hard to put this beer in the same name class as Ballast Point's Victory at Sea. For me, it's just a small step up from an amber ale. There is some good roasted grain flavor in this beer. But it lacks the richness and complexity of many other porters. As a paring with Mexican food, it is a small step up from say a Dos XX Amber and was fine to drink. But this is a lite-Porter and should be advertised as such. Cute names are sometimes a marketing ploy. There is lots of ploy in this brew.

 783 characters

Photo of smbslt
3.88/5  rDev +16.5%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4.25 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.75

Pours dark brown with sienna hi lites, sand colored head
Some roasted aroma but mostly faint noble hops
Taste roasted grain with slight hop finish smooth no bitterness. Very true to style
Not much fullness in the feel - not watery but not chewable.
Overall nicely done.

 271 characters

Photo of Anacross
3.43/5  rDev +3%
look: 4.75 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.25

A= Brown color with a nice lacing. Beautiful artwork on the label.
S= Caramels and nuts, chocolate ruling.
T= Watery chocolate. Not dry but not over sweet either. Not too flavorful. Unremarkable. I've drank better nitro porters than this.
MF= Very light and watery for a porter.
O= Forgettable. Not offensive but there are better options available in our stores.

 363 characters

Photo of BigDaddyWarbuxx
4.03/5  rDev +21%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4.25 | overall: 4

It's got a decent amount of coffee in its aroma. The roastiness is relatively mild, which lends to it being a pretty laid-back porter. Very approachable.

 155 characters

Photo of Libeertarian
3.34/5  rDev +0.3%
look: 4.25 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.25

Clear dark brown with lovely ruby hue. Tan, foamy head of low or medium retention for the style. Smoky malt aroma, nuttiness along the lines of a brown ale, and the slightest hint of hop fruitiness. Smokey-tart to the taste, but being on the lower end of medium-bodied, with almost no hop bitterness, fine carbonation, and only mild smokey or toasty aftertaste, not overpowering. As smooth as it is crisp. One of the more "drinkable" porters out there, but not quite what I'm looking for.

 488 characters

Photo of TheSixthRing
3.28/5  rDev -1.5%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.25

Had on tap @ Squatters in the Salt Lake City Airport

Appearance - Served up in a pint glass with a light tan, 2 finger head. The brew itself is a ruby brown color. Fantastic retention, never really dying past a quarter finger's width. Lacing is streaky across the glass with a few spots between.

Smell - Nutty aroma, with touches of earth and faint chocolate.

Taste - Lacks a lot of flavor. What is there is very light walnut shell earthiness backed by faint chocolate. Not much change in the flavor apart from it fading quickly.

Mouthfeel - Light to medium body with a smooth, velvety texture as provided by the nitro. Slightly watery finish.

Overall - Fair brew. Opted for the 6% bottle version on my way back through and found it much better than the tap version, though it was no World Beater itself. If you just need to have a porter, though, go with the bottle.

 872 characters

Photo of garrettdeanjohnson
3.1/5  rDev -6.9%
look: 4 | smell: 2.75 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.25

Hops on the front end, and tasteless on the back end. Looks decent, a little thin, but decent. Nothing too special. If you're into beers, this doesn't quench your palate.

Overall, you can get way better porters for the same price.

 231 characters

Photo of barczar
3.47/5  rDev +4.2%

Deeply toasted, lightly roasted, chocolatey malt forms the aroma, with lightly roasted and deeply toasted malt dominating the flavor profile. Chocolate weaves throughout, along with raw barley. There's a bit if an acrid character that is slightly offputting.

 258 characters

Photo of The-Adjunct-Hippie
3.39/5  rDev +1.8%
look: 4 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

I'm giving Wasatch ONE MORE chance!!! Don't let me down please!!

Appearance (4) : Pours a 2 fingered beige head with sticky webs of lacing on the glass. The body is a deep, rich cranberry red/chocolate brown color with only a little bit of transparency. I can see my fingers on the other side if I hold it up to the light (which also gives way to the cranberry color).

Aroma (4) : Some chocolate hard candy (like those chocolate/caramel creme savers), mocha coffee beans, a little whiff of peppermint, plant, and a faint hint of woody char as well. Soy sauce. Bouquet is fairly strong.

Taste (3) : At the front, there's nothing. I mean literally nothing. Water. Maybe (and I'm stretching) some faint black licorice. This yields itself to easy drinkability but it's a porter, not a lager. Towards the middle you get a little roast coffee bean, and then some mocha, finally a char finish with some woody notes.

Out of the bottle, the coffee notes are more pronounced up front, and the finish is subdued. Overall there's not much of a difference.

Mouthfeel (3.5) : Creamy and carbonated, slightly charred finish.

Overall (3.39) : A porter-lite. Easy drinking but nothing phenomenal. Easy to pass up.

 1,206 characters

first ← prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | nextlast
Wasatch Polygamy Porter from Utah Brewers Cooperative
Beer rating: 3.33 out of 5 with 622 ratings