Welcome to BeerAdvocate!

Looking to talk, rate or trade beer? Join today by creating your free account.

Dismiss Notice
Curious about recent updates to the site and app? Check the Announcements forum for updates.
Dismiss Notice
Love Belgian Beer?

Join us Sep 17 in Portland, Maine for Return of the Belgian Beer Fest, featuring hundreds of authentic Belgian beers and Belgian-inspired offerings.

Tickets + more: beeradvocate.com/belgian

Budweiser | Anheuser-Busch

1,632 Reviews
no score
Send samples

Brewed by:
Missouri, United States | website

Style: American Adjunct Lager

Alcohol by volume (ABV): 5.00%

Availability: Year-round

Notes / Commercial Description:
Brewed using a blend of imported and classic American aroma hops, and a blend of barley malts and rice. Budweiser is brewed with time-honored methods including “kraeusening” for natural carbonation and Beechwood aging, which results in unparalleled balance and character.

Added by kbub6f on 11-21-2000

For Trade:
View: Beers | Events
User Reviews
Sort by:  Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
Reviews: 1,632 | Ratings: 5,953
Photo of hopflyer
1.75/5  rDev -28%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 1.75

awful to say the least. would much rather go for a light lager instead of this. it has a medicinal taste and the aftertaste is worse, not to mention the wicked hangovers this produces.

 186 characters

Photo of Harveybird
1.7/5  rDev -30%
look: 1 | smell: 1 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

This is not lager. It is not beer. It is soda water with alcohol. They make such a fuss about the way they make it and claim it is the king of beers, reality is it has no taste. It what kids drink at house parties before they like beer (in the UK anyway) because they've seen Americans drinking it on TV and film. If you drink budweiser you're not drinking beer

 361 characters

Photo of KJT1393
1.63/5  rDev -32.9%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 1 | overall: 1.5

It's a very clear pale beer with an ok head. The taste was very... barley, or grain like. One distinct notice about the flavor was that it seemed watered down mixed with citrus or lemon. I guess a more blunt description would be that it tasted like... beer. Nothing too special about it. I mean, it tasted like it smells... like beer. The feel was fizzy, and my overall judgment was that it is a good beer if you're not looking for a lot of complexity.

 453 characters

Photo of q33jeff
1.25/5  rDev -48.6%
look: 1.25 | smell: 1.25 | taste: 1.25 | feel: 1.25 | overall: 1.25

Hello?; Hey Lou, ’Sup? Nothin’ Pete, watchin’ the game, havin’ a Bud. ’Sup with you? Nothin’, watchin’ the game, havin’ a Bud. True, True. Wassup? Wassssup? Yo, who dat? Yo Yo, pick up the phone. Hello? Wasssup? Wassssup? Suuuppppp? Yo, where’s Dukey? Yo, Dukey. Yo. Wassup? Waaaaassssssuuupppp, wassssuuupppp, suuuuupppppppppp!!!!!!!! Aaaaaahhhhh!!!!!. Yo, hold on. Hello? WWWWWAAAAAASSSSSSZSUUUUUPPPPPPPPPP?????????? Wassssupppp, wasssuuujpppppp. AAAAAAAAHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!! So, what’s up with you? Nothin’. Watching the game, havin’ a Bud. True, True.

 594 characters

Photo of Beerdrinker7
1.93/5  rDev -20.6%
look: 2 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

Your standard beer. Although mostly tasteless, there is a slight sweetness akin to that present in Coors Light. The ever so slight sweetness and taste of nothing make this beer very drinkable. Although it is the premium older brother of Bud Light, it is much more defined in its taste, whereas Bud Light could easily be mistaken for water, piss, and alcohol. I've drank at least 30 of these, and when I can't afford a six-pack of craft beer, I alternate between this Budweiser and Coors Light.

 493 characters

Photo of Libeertarian
2.2/5  rDev -9.5%
look: 2.25 | smell: 2.25 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.75 | overall: 2.25

Clear, pale golden color with fine, fizzy, quickly shrinking white head. Smell is grainy, not quite bready, and a touch sweet. Taste is much the same. Lots of adjuncts, virtually no hop bitterness, watered down lemon. Not very good for a beer, or even really for the style, lowly as it is, but there is nothing about it that I would describe as nasty, either. It is, in any case, very refreshing and very drinkable. Light-bodied, but not too thin. More sudsy than I expected, figured carbonation would be a little more on the spritzy side. This helps with the smoothness and crispness I think.

 593 characters

Photo of mmmbeer89
2.91/5  rDev +19.8%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.75 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

obviously it's not the best beer you can buy but it's honestly not that bad. it would be nice if it was a little cheaper though because it's a little overpriced in my opinion, so i rarely drink it.

 197 characters

Photo of thebeerman25
3.18/5  rDev +30.9%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 1 | overall: 4

appearance-its a very clear and bubbly golden beer.

smell- smells like beer. which is what i expect when i smell a budweiser. if you have never smelt a budweiser before but you have smelt any other of the big beers then you know what budweiser smells like.

feel-i dont even know what this means but it feels very fizzy if thats what "feel" means

taste- tastes like beer. pretty much all that can describe this beer and in my opinion thats a good thing. absolutly zero hop flavor from this beer but there is a bitterness everytime i drink budweiser. its very sweet with a slight bitterness but overall i enjoy the taste of budweiser.

overall-is this the best beer in the world? no. is this the king of beers? no. is it my favorite beer? yes. of the beers i have had which are budweiser, bud light, coors banquet, miller lite, pabst blue ribbon, busch light, heineken light, keweenaw brewing company blonde ale, keweenaw brewing brown ale, keweenaw black ale, bells two hearted ale, and some of the hard ciders i would say that budweiser is my favorite. it doesnt taste the best but it goes down smooth and you can pound alot of them

 1,138 characters

Photo of Kevin_Langford
1.93/5  rDev -20.6%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 1.75 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

The only thing going for this "king of beers" beer is that it's easy to drink. It's lighter, but not nearly as light as Bud Light or other light beers. It's simple in flavor - nothing fancy, but not too watered down. I get it in China on occasion when the only other options are Dali or Snow beer - two Chinese brands that I can do without.

 343 characters

Photo of Bonkinishwa
2.96/5  rDev +21.8%
look: 3.25 | smell: 2.75 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Anheuser-Busch - Budweiser. 5.0% ABV. Standard pint glass ordered at a restaurant.

Look: Transparent golden/copper color, small white foamy head that dissolves quickly.

Smell: Very bold wheat and grain aroma, with yeast also strongly noticeable.

Feel: Thin with some medium amount of carbonation.

Taste: Typical American Lager. Yeast and grain are the most prominent flavors. Wheaty aftertaste, with no presence of alcohol taste. Not bitter at all, although it does not have much flavor either.

Overall: This was the first Budweiser that I had tried. Usually everyone starts with this style of beer, however I started with Porters and Stouts. This is one of the big name beers that everyone seems to drink everywhere. It is nothing special to me, just a standard watery, wheaty, yeast beer. Its easy to drink since it has a subtle flavor.

 844 characters

Photo of jamesroses
2.09/5  rDev -14%
look: 2.25 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.25 | overall: 2.25

Appearance: another pale golden coloured beer with light/medium carbonation. A bit more dense than others of it's same status.

Smell: malty, some bready character, little alcohol and some slight peanut presence.

Taste: malts, very light, and a grassy aftertaste. It's very drinkable, the alcohol doesn't seem to be there.

Mouthfeel: slightly fizzy at first, then clean and a bit dry. Smooth, but with more body than a Brahma and less than a Miller.

Overall: here in the land of mediocre beers, this is one of my prefered choices when it comes to having a drink. Anyway, I usually end up having a Miller.

 608 characters

Photo of Pantalones
2.91/5  rDev +19.8%
look: 3.25 | smell: 2.75 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.75

Finally tried "the king of beers," due to me feeling like having beer when I just happened to be in a Pizza Hut that only had Bud, Bud Light, and Michelob Ultra. Ended up drinking two glasses of regular Bud. "Born on" date on both bottles was clearly marked as September 10th, 2015.

Pale golden color; looked about the color of a Bud Light when pouring but was darker once settled into the glass. Perfectly clear, and with some bubbles rising up from the bottom here and there. A decent layer of bubbly white foam forms on top at first, but then it vanishes almost immediately, hardly even leaving a trace behind.

Does not have all that much of a smell at all. Maybe a very faint "beery" smell and some sweetness; something in there almost seems appley, oddly enough. Just very weak all around as far as smell goes.

Flavor is very light, but there's certainly more to standard Budweiser than there is to the Light version. Sweetness, a little hint of something that seemed almost nutty at times, and some of that appley thing again. When ice cold the appley thing doesn't stand out as much, but when the frost has cleared from the frosted pint glass and the beer is allowed to warm up a little it starts go come out more. Starting to think that appley thing is a yeast thing, which wouldn't be out of place at all in a Belgian-style ale but seems a little unusual for a lager like this. Its presence does make the beer more interesting, though, as without it... there wouldn't be much to this. Are there hops in this? Because I don't taste any. Doesn't seem to have the same "bigger gulps = worse taste" problem that its Light cousin had at all, though, which is definitely a plus.

Feel is light and VERY fizzy. Not super watery like the Light version, thankfully! Actually comes across as slightly thicker/heavier than Coors, so I *would* give it a little higher marks for mouthfeel... but the fizz is just absurdly strong here, to the point where it feels a little too prickly at times. When the fizz calms down a bit it's pretty nice.

Overall... "king of beers" not so much, but this was not nearly as bad as I've heard it made out to be. The apple-like taste was unexpected, and that gives this beer a bit of its own unique spin compared to a lot of the other adjunct lagers. I notice that my scores for this are ending up exactly the same as Coors, even though I think Coors is probably the better beer overall... maybe tweaking the "overall" score could fix that, though I suppose it's not too big a problem if they end up with the same score from me.

 2,579 characters

Photo of JustLikeMyDad
2.3/5  rDev -5.3%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2.75

I don't think I need to review this, but I'll throw my opinion out there.
Poured it into a glass so I could look at the color I knew it was. It's a basic straw yellow color of its beer kind.
Doesn't smell anything special, smelled better than Coors though.
Tastes a little better than Coors, less watery than Busch, but not as carbonated or flavorful as Miller High Life.
It's smooth and easy to drink, mild to moderate carbonation, not much of a foam head to speak.
Overall, I had a Coors yesterday and thought it was insulting and offensive to my taste buds.
But this Budweiser I have isn't, I could easily drink these compared to other cheap macro beers. For a cheap beer, lets try to be fair, it isn't as bad as it could be.

 729 characters

Photo of frothy_80
3.41/5  rDev +40.3%
look: 4.25 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3.75

Perfectly clear yellow with a white head. No trace of hops in either aroma or taste. Slight grain in the aroma. The taste is the same, but with a rice sweetness. There are also some fruit esters at the end. The mouthfeel is carbonated fizzy water. Take it for what it is, a simple no frills beer.

 296 characters

Photo of caseymconley
2.71/5  rDev +11.5%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

You know what you're getting with Bud, but that's not necessarily a bad thing. It's clean, easy-drinking, unoffensive and a nice alternative to many of the over-hopped, high ABV and overpriced micros or "Crafts" out there.

I'll always prefer a hoppy IPA or strong porter, but there are times when I don't want to spend $17 on a 12-pack or don't want a 7.5-percent beer on a weeknight.

Bud pours light golden color, tastes relatively thin on the palette with ample carbonation. The flavor is unique, which could be attributed to the beechwood or the rice, and very lightly hopped. Almost no hop flavors here. Again, it's unoffensive but also not particularly memorable.

That said, it's a good option at $12 for an 18-pack bottles.

 735 characters

Photo of James954
1/5  rDev -58.8%
look: 1 | smell: 1 | taste: 1 | feel: 1 | overall: 1

(25 oz can chilled) Zero rating if possible. It makes other American Adjuncts look good (aside from Natty Light).

This is literally the homeopathic method of beer-making. There's virtually nothing but carbonated water and alcohol, and yet by utilizing the most minuscule concentrations possible, there is a touch of stale grains and metal.

The success of American Adjunct Breweries with beers like this are a testament to the fact that Americans are truly guilt-ridden self-loathing masochists at their very core. Hopefully this abomination that is blasphemously referred to as "beer" will die in due time with the brewing renaissance that has occurred in America lately and we can all learn to love ourselves again!

 719 characters

Photo of Fantasy_Draught
4.1/5  rDev +68.7%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.25 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Don't be fooled. This is a beer.

In spite of the lackluster character of this beverage, one cannot deny the proud stature of its commercial significance.

When you need a cold-ass soda water that is secretly a beer, this liquid consumable will certainly suffice.

 265 characters

Photo of Wer34truh
3.03/5  rDev +24.7%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3

Definitely my favorite of the big three. Has a crisp red apple flavor in additional to the generic macro-lager taste. I would say that this is the sweetest of the big macros, which I welcome but see how others might not.

 220 characters

Photo of hopphead31415
1.12/5  rDev -53.9%
look: 1.25 | smell: 1 | taste: 1 | feel: 1 | overall: 1.5

Look-It looks like a beer that you shouldn’t drink.

Smell-It smells of grass and some yeast and has hints of malts.

Taste-The taste reminds you of Bud Light which is also not very good at all.

Mouthfeel-There is not much to feel of this beer other than watery moistness and light-bodied let down.

Overall-I’ve heard them say that you don’t drink it to enjoy, but just to get drunk. If that is the case then you are doing it wrong. Drink better beers, please. You’ll thank me.

 488 characters

Photo of vette2006c5r
2.28/5  rDev -6.2%
look: 2 | smell: 2.75 | taste: 2.25 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 2.25

Budweiser pours a fizzy golden color, with a quickly dissipating head. There is a grainy and sugary aroma. The taste is grainy, watery, and has a harsh sugary aftertaste. Flat body. Overall, it is what you expect, the adjunct flavors come out strong, and way too sweet.

 273 characters

Photo of RabbleRouserRye
1.82/5  rDev -25.1%
look: 2 | smell: 1.25 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Excluding the light versions from AB this is about as generic a beer as you could ever have. The only redeeming quality is that it is consistent although I am not sure consistently generic is a redeeming quality.

 213 characters

Photo of J_Chavez15
3.84/5  rDev +58%
look: 3.25 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Pours our piss yellow. Decent lacing. Carbonation bubbles streaming up the glass. Smells like America, adjunct and some apple. Taste Grains and yeast. I get no hops. Light watery body. Very Drinkable. Clean crisp refreshing dry finish, but not like budlight.

 258 characters

Photo of Kubishark
2.5/5  rDev +2.9%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

A few days ago I had this on tap at a generic sports bar and now I'm having it in the 10 oz. cans that are so popular in St. Mary's County, Maryland for no explicable reason.

It looks yellow, like light piss. Er, I mean straw. It smells... like almost nothing. It tastes... like a light beer. When I had it on tap I actually asked to make sure they gave me regular Bud instead of Bud Light. The use of very rice is noticeable compared to other AALs. The "corn flakes" taste I've even come to enjoy a bit with beers like National Bohemian is completely absent, replaced by qualities that remind me rather of rice milk.

Overall this beer is okay. I'd say it's no better or worse than PBR. Budweiser is what my dad always drank and it sure caused more than a few arguments between him and my mother. Thanks for the childhood memories, Bud.

 839 characters

Photo of yEaRiGhTissiK
5/5  rDev +105.8%
look: 5 | smell: 5 | taste: 5 | feel: 5 | overall: 5

The look is a straw yellow color with a 2 finger head. Beers of this genre tend to all look similar.

The smell is of rice and grains, one doesn't pick up much of a hoppy smell at all, maybe slightly in the background, but this beer doesn't smell bitter whatsoever.

The taste is the best part about Budweiser aka the King of Beers. It is a simply delicious taste that is smooth and crisp EVERY TIME. It tastes of grain and rice not hops. This beer doesn't taste bitter or hoppy whatsoever. It is just the perfect beer for every occasion that one can think of. The taste is always the same, they get it right every time.

The feel is a great part about drinking Budweiser. It has a nice carbonation and is as drinkable as water. Although it's as drinkable as water, it definitely has flavor. The mouthfeel is bubbly and smooth and each one goes down faster than the last.

Budweiser is an amazing beer. People look down on it because it's a macro beer mass produced not craft etc. There's a reason why this beer is the King of Beers, because they have made the perfect beer for every occasion. Beer snobs step aside and grab one while watching the game or grilling out. I guarantee you won't be disappointed. It just goes with everything, everywhere, every situation. The Budweiser Brewery Tour in St. Louis was amazing also. Much more appreciation for this beer when you see the steps needed to brew this beer in person.

 1,422 characters

Photo of Strat58cat
2.5/5  rDev +2.9%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

This is not a rating for a beer. Budweiser is not beer, as defined by the Germans, and they ought to know. The first American brew to qualify as a beer under the German purity laws in decades was Samuel Adams Boston Lager in 1985. This is a rating for an alcoholic malted beverage with some characteristics that are reminiscent of a lager. Of course, that's true for every one of the adulterated/adjunct macro brews - especially any Miller, any Coors, any product of the company formerly known as Pabst, and the Pennsylvania stuff that managed to be called "craft" in the latest definition. Bud avowedly is not craft. It also is not beer, per German law, although it claims to be in the U.S.

Here's what's crazy about Bud. The Busch family is insanely proud of it. They think it's awesome. Shortly before they were forced out by Inbev, they even checked cryogenically frozen beer, discovered that Bud got too light on the hops over the past 40 years, and ordered more. They went to extreme lengths to insure that every Bud is brewed with the same yeast. Sure they want uniformity, but uniformly bad can't be it. What's all the fuss about?

Imho, without question Budweiser is the best of the mega brews. There's good reason why Budweiser has owned the market for industrial beer since 1957. Bud is cut with rice. The other industrial brews are cut with corn. They're all cut with something. Rice lightens the flavor, but does not add the skunk and faint garbage taint of the other adjunct lagers. Bud reportedly is cut with up to 30% rice. It's not just a grain or two. Every Bud is the same, so if one is cut 30% they all are cut 30%. Still, under Japanese purity laws Budweiser does not qualify as saki.

Budweiser always should be decanted. Sure, it's a cheap beer. I saw 30 cans for $14 at Wal-Mart. This price suggests that you should not, under any circumstances, drink it. On the other hand, if you're broke or don't have any other options at the ball game or at Coco's, go for it. Why not?

The color is light yellow. It's not completely clear like water. They use some barley - enough to give it a slight tint. For a beverage that is advertised as beer, Budweiser is absurdly pale and clear. My little kid mentioned he could see my whole hand through the glass when I was holding the beer mug at Coco's. The head has no chance at all, foaming up briefly and calling it quits. Rice neither retains nor laces, apparently. The carbonation level is absurd, with big fat bubble streaming wildly the entire time. Still, Budweiser looks very clean. Perfect industrial QC in action.

Budweiser has a smell that's not unattractive, but it's not like beer. If you smell a Samuel Adams Boston Lager, you smell noble hops, malt, perhaps a hint of cracker. Bud doesn't smell like anything. It's a slightly flowery and grassy, or nutty smell if you try real hard to detect anything, and there's something pleasant there, but basically it's closest to nothing at all. However, Bud doesn't stink. Take a good whiff of the other macro brews or Corona, especially if their temperatures rise at all. Generally, they stink. They actually smell bad. That's the Bud advantage in that mix. It's nothing, instead of bad. Why do people drink this? Oh yeah, it's Bud or the one that smells like garbage at the stadium. Although I put away gallons of Miller and Coors in my youth, I won't touch any macro other than Bud, since they smell faintly of garbage. I'm pretty sure that's not good for you. Bottom's up, King of Beers - unless I can find anything else at all.

Budweiser has a taste that's not unattractive. It's not a beer flavor. It's a very, very mild sweetness, and a very mild bitterness. Many macro drinkers will say Bud is bitter. I've heard it. It's like below 8 on the IBU. So, I don't know why they say Bud's bitter. It must be less sweet than the other macros, which use sweet corn instead of rice. If you try really hard to detect it, you might stretch and say that Bud's flavor is a little bit nutty, and a little bit fresh, but that's not it. Bud's flavor is nothing. Bud's flavor is closest to nothing at all, but with some sort of sweet-sour effect mixed in with the nothing almost enough for it to be something.

Budweiser is an extraordinarily light malted beverage. It's insubstantial. What if feels most like is just plain water, which probably explains Bud's popularity on a hot day. This water, however, is 5% ABV.

Overall, drink a good craft lager. Samuel Adams isn't 50 cents per can, but it's not that much. Drink less, and enjoy it more. If all you've got to choose is an industrial brew, specifically including hipster Pabst Blue Ribbon, Lone Star, or anything from Shiner, Bud's the lesser evil.

 4,787 characters

Budweiser from Anheuser-Busch
58 out of 100 based on 1,632 ratings.
  • About Us

    Your go-to website for beer (since 1996), publishers of BeerAdvocate magazine (since 2006) and hosts of world-class beer events (since 2003). Respect Beer.
  • Return of the Belgian Beer Fest

    BeerAdvocate Brings its All-Belgian Fest to Portland, Maine on September 17, 2016. Tickets are on sale now.

    Learn More
  • Get the Mag

    Become a BeerAdvocate magazine print subscriber today.