Samuel Adams Imperial White | Boston Beer Company (Samuel Adams)

BA SCORE
79
okay
1,283 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score
Send samples
Samuel Adams Imperial WhiteSamuel Adams Imperial White
BEER INFO

Brewed by:
Boston Beer Company (Samuel Adams)
Massachusetts, United States
samueladams.com

Style: Witbier

Alcohol by volume (ABV): 10.30%

Availability: Year-round

Notes / Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

Added by Jason on 01-16-2009

BEER STATS
Ratings:
1,283
Reviews:
643
Avg:
3.46
pDev:
19.36%
 
 
Wants:
35
Gots:
70
For Trade:
0
View: Beers | Events
User Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
first ← prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | nextlast
Ratings: 1,283 |  Reviews: 643
Photo of Sammy
3.65/5  rDev +5.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Better than your average wheat beer. Sweetish aromas. Pours creamy head, and creamy above-average thick mouthfeel. Carbonation greater than average. Satisfying and drinkable. Some orange, spices. Some sweetness, fruitiness, the bias is not too sweet.

 250 characters

Photo of Texasfan549
4/5  rDev +15.6%

Photo of kylehay2004
3.58/5  rDev +3.5%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

A: 2 finger head with decent retention on a murky copper body. some lacing.

S: caramel, orange citrus, caandy sugar, some earthy hops and caramel.

T: honey, candied oranges, mollasses, caramel, brown sugar... all together make this very sweet, too sweet... with lots of booze.

M: medium body and moderate carbonation. a little chewy

Overall: this one is pretty hard to drink. very boozy. its too sweet too. Not really able to finish this one.

 446 characters

Photo of jaydoc
2.75/5  rDev -20.5%

Photo of spycow
3.25/5  rDev -6.1%

Photo of djrn2
2/5  rDev -42.2%

Photo of kjkinsey
3/5  rDev -13.3%

Photo of Knapp85
3.88/5  rDev +12.1%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

The Imperial White Ale was probably my favorite of the three that came out in this series. I thought that the Stout and Bock would have taken the crown but they didn't. This beer pours out much darker orange than I expected it to for being a white ale. The head was pretty thick looking and left behind some good lacing. The smell of the beer has the typical coriander and yeasty citrus aromas along with some spice. The taste translates the aroma into flavor and even gives off some floral flavors as a bonus. The mouthfeel is much thicker than expected as well. The be isn't all that heavy but it had some serious body to it. Overall it's a really nice brew and really worth looking into.

 690 characters

Photo of nmann08
3.5/5  rDev +1.2%

Photo of westcoastbeerlvr
3/5  rDev -13.3%

Photo of metter98
3.58/5  rDev +3.5%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

A: The beer is very hazy dark yellowish amber in color and has a moderate amount of carbonation along with some yeast particles visible floating in suspension. It poured with a two finger high off white head that gradually died down and left lots of lacing down the sides of the glass.
S: There are aromas of candi sugar, orange citrus and wheat in the nose.
T: The taste is similar to the smell and is slightly sweet with flavors of alcohol and spices in the finish.
M: It feels a bit higher than medium-bodied and smooth on the palate with a moderate amount of carbonation.
O: The sweetness and alcohol flavors can make this beer a bit difficult to drink.

 657 characters

Photo of oriolesfan4
2.41/5  rDev -30.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 4 | overall: 2

Finally got around to trying some of the new SA Imperial Series. Bought a 4 pack for $8.99.

Pours a cloudy orange, small head to it with a small amount of patchy lacing. Smell is very spicy, also very boozy. Tastewise, nice body to it.. the spiciness really comes through here. A VERY strong alcohol kick to it as well... this tastes stronger than a DFH 120 minute. Any typical witbier characteristics are just over-matched by the spiciness and mixed-drink type alcohol flavor. Kinda bummed about this one, there is no flavor detectable besides the ethanol... too bad.

 569 characters

Photo of BEERchitect
3.5/5  rDev +1.2%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

It's exciting to see a ground-roots brewery break out their molds with some daring and energetic beers. Nothing is more a leap of faith than an Imperial Witbier.

The beer begins with a surprisingly copperish-orange-golden hue that has a viscous character to the sight. A thin head forms and then lasts the session. Lacing and legging evident on the sides of the chalice.

Juicy aromas of fresh oranges jump out at the nose. A cotton-candy maltiness then follows along with a heavy dose of soft, spicy corriander. An unexpected ethanol scent burns the nose hairs and warns to take it slowly.

Extremely sweet flavor hit the palate with a sugary, malty, honey-like flavor. Orange juice, pineapples, and a plethera of esters build on one another and continue to develop the flavors deep into the finish. No hop presence to mention, but the peppery phenols give the complexity and a valid attempt to balance the sweetness.

Again, very sweet, heavy, and somewhat oily to the feel because of the extraordinary amount of unresolved sugars. Alcoholic heat pushes the beer further than expected. The beer looses the classic cool, soft, delicate, creamy mouthfeel that original Witbiers showcase well.

Rather than an Imperial Witbier, this could easily be considered a Barleywine with a Witbier influence. Interesting nonetheless.

 1,323 characters

Photo of biboergosum
3.88/5  rDev +12.1%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4

Oh look, another hefty American beer dwelling in the back of my fridge, ripe for playing a close second fiddle in my tribute to Repeal Day...

This beer pours a cloudy, sediment-rife orange-brown colour, with two fingers of foamy, creamy off-white head, which leaves a beautiful thin cobweb of lace around the glass as it recedes. It smells of sweet wheat malt, bananas stewed in vodka, and some mild yeast and spice. The taste is sweet fruity wheat malt - banana, principally, some vanilla/caramel adding to the sweetness, slightly astringent warming alcohol, and coriander and pepper spice. The carbonation is the low, unmiddling side, the body medium-full in weight, smooth, slightly addled by the undeniable booze, but still creamy, from caramel, grain, sugar, and phenols alike. It finishes still mostly sweet, from the usual suspects, tempered just enough by the somewhat unknown drying element.

There seems to be an "Imperial" category for many a style, but not witbiers, which you would think makes pretty good sense. That is, until you run head-on into this offering from the BBC (confusion with this acronym only exposes one's non-American upbringing here...)

 1,170 characters

Photo of kojevergas
2.11/5  rDev -39%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

12 fl oz brown glass bottle with standard pressure cap served into a N'Ice Chouffe stem beerflute in low altitude Los Angeles, California. Reviewed live. Expectations are above average; I don't think I've had Samuel Adams' imperial series before and I tend to like witbiers.

Served refrigerator cold. Acquired at Ralph's market.

A: Pours a two finger head of fair cream, nice thickness, and great retention for the high ABV. Colour is a hazy nontransparent copper. Strange looking for a witbier, but I'll go with it.

Sm: Heavy malt content, with some orange esters and clove. A bit like a tripel, actually. Some yeasty notes - which I didn't expect. Not like any witbier I've ever had. A moderately strong aroma.

T: Lemon and orange esters over a clean malt foundation. Clove. Quite simple, but pleasant. No layering. A bit heavyhanded, especially for the style. Doesn't feel fully fermented by any means. Some yeast comes through, but no alcohol. Poorly built for the style. Imbalanced. I'm not very fond of it at all.

Mf: Smooth and wet, suiting the style and the flavours generally. A touch too thick for what the flavours require. By no means overcarbonated.

Dr: I find it difficult to consume on account of its rather poor quality. This is built all wrong for the style, even if it's "imperial". The extra malt required to increase the ABV severely damaged the flavour profile. Now I know why I've never seen an imperial witbier before; it's a terrible idea. Not refreshing at all.

What happened to the delicate lemon tinges and refreshing character of the style? This is a disgrace, especially from Sam Adams.

D

 1,632 characters

Photo of emerge077
2.66/5  rDev -23.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 2.5

Pours a dark orange copper, odd for a witbier. Thin layer of white foam that dissipates quickly, to be expected considering the abv.

Smells like circus peanuts candy, super sweet with artificial oranges, though there is something still vaguely resembling beer here too. Sharp isopropyl alcohol rears its ugly head as the beer warms.

Very sweet and somewhat boozy, candied orange and crystal malt reminds me more of a faded imperial IPA than Witbier. Extra sweet and caramelly. Dry prickly finish, alcohol is way too forward here, just unapologetically boozy. Slick and syrupy feel, high gravity largesse, it coats the mouth and nearly triggers the gag reflex... that's no good. Yuck. Going to be a drainpour for the last bit of it. Not recommended.

 752 characters

Photo of largadeer
2/5  rDev -42.2%

Photo of zeff80
3.99/5  rDev +15.3%
look: 3.75 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

A - Poured out a cloudy, orange color with amber highlights near the top of the glass. It had a small, foamy, off-white head that left soapy trails of lace.

S - It smelled of clove and tons of yeast. It had some nice banana aromas mixed with wheat.

T - It tasted spicy with hints of nut. It had nice sweet wheat flavors with yeast and clove taste, too.

M - It was crisp and very sharp. It was medium-bodied with a warm alcohol presence.

D - This is quite possibly the best wheat beer I've ever had. It really is finely crafted with great aroma and flavor.

 559 characters

Photo of WillieThreebiers
3.5/5  rDev +1.2%

Photo of zestar
3/5  rDev -13.3%

Photo of LXIXME
3.5/5  rDev +1.2%

Photo of olradetbalder
3.5/5  rDev +1.2%

Photo of superspak
3.78/5  rDev +9.2%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

12 ounce bottle into tulip glass, bottled on 6/1/2013. Pours moderately hazy/cloudy golden orange color with a 2 finger fairly dense off white head with good retention, that reduces to a small cap that lingers. Spotty soapy lacing clings around the glass, with a moderate amount of streaming carbonation. Aromas of lemon zest, orange peel, pear, apple, wheat, bread, honey, caramel, coriander, clove, pepper, herbal, and yeast earthiness. Nice and pleasant aromas with good balance and complexity of malt, spice, and yeast ester notes; with decent strength. Taste of lemon zest, orange peel, pear, apple, honey, wheat, bread, caramel, coriander, clove, pepper, herbal, grass, and yeast earthiness. Lingering notes of lemon/orange zest, pear, apple, honey, caramel, wheat, bread, coriander, herbal, light clove, and yeast earthiness on the finish for a while. Very nice balance, robustness, and complexity of malt, spice, and yeast ester flavors; with zero cloying sweetness after the finish. Light-medium carbonation and fairly full bodied; with a very slick and slightly syrupy mouthfeel that is good. Alcohol is very well hidden with only a small warming present after the finish. Overall this is a very good imperial witbier. Good balance and complexity of malt, spice, and yeast ester flavors; and very smooth to sip on for the big ABV. A nicely enjoyable offering.

 1,369 characters

Photo of Thorpe429
2.28/5  rDev -34.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 2

Reviewed from notes.

Pours a cloudy moderate golden color with a white head. Nose brings a lot of booze and some stone fruits, peaches, and a bit of banana and spice. The taste is really dominated by booze with some slight peach flavors in the background. Feel is very poor, nearing on awful, with some cloying sugar and booze. Way too thick, even for an imperial wheat beer. Much thicker and more boozy than the typical wheatwine. Not a good beer.

 449 characters

Photo of mothman
3.47/5  rDev +0.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Poured into Sam Adams Sensory Glass

Appearance: hazy golden dull brown. 2 finger head. Some thin lace marks. No sediment (as compared to SA white ale).

Smell is of lemons, apples, and cranberries. Very zesty. I am diggin' the smell.

Taste is boozy and fruity. Same fruits as in the smell. I enjoy the taste, but there is just way too much booze for a witbier.

Mouthfeel comes of slightly bitter. Very boozy on the palate, too boozy. Leaves an alcohol flavored aftertaste mixed with apples and fruity flavors. Very dry.

Overall, I actually enjoyed the original white over this (I drank them side-by-side). It was a lot easier to drink and more enjoyable than this. I really was looking forward to trying this beer, but I think SA went in the wrong direction here.

 767 characters

first ← prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | nextlast
Samuel Adams Imperial White from Boston Beer Company (Samuel Adams)
3.46 out of 5 based on 1,283 ratings.
  • About Us

    Your go-to website for beer (since 1996), publishers of BeerAdvocate magazine (since 2006) and hosts of world-class beer events (since 2003). Respect Beer.
  • BeerAdvocate Microbrew Invitational

    Join us June 2-3, 2017 in Boston, Mass. for beer, cider, mead, kombucha and sake from over 70 small producers.

    Learn More
  • Subscribe to BeerAdvocate Magazine

    Support uncompromising beer advocacy and award-winning, independent journalism with a print subscription to BeerAdvocate magazine.

    Subscribe