Melbourne Bitter | Carlton & United Breweries, Ltd.

Melbourne BitterMelbourne Bitter
BA SCORE
2.41/5
49 Ratings
Melbourne BitterMelbourne Bitter
BEER INFO

Brewed by:
Carlton & United Breweries, Ltd.
Australia
fosters.com.au

Style: American Adjunct Lager

Alcohol by volume (ABV): 4.60%

Availability: Year-round

Notes / Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

Added by brewdlyhooked13 on 06-04-2002

BEER STATS
Ranking:
#43,733
Reviews:
25
Ratings:
49
pDev:
37.76%
Bros Score:
0
 
 
Wants:
3
Gots:
6
Trade:
0
HISTOGRAM
 
View: Beers | Events
User Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
first ← prev | 1-25 | 26-50  | nextlast
Ratings: 49 |  Reviews: 25
Photo of dmorgan310
2/5  rDev -17%

Photo of stevoj
2.31/5  rDev -4.1%
look: 2.75 | smell: 2.25 | taste: 2.25 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.25

Pours out clear golden with high fluffy head. Musty cardboard aroma, tastes like white school paste. At least a hint of bitterness at the finish, but a tough drink to get down.

 176 characters

Photo of lacqueredmouse
1.21/5  rDev -49.8%
look: 2.5 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 1 | feel: 1 | overall: 1

Uncaps with a weedy little sizzle, and pours surprisingly flat and lifeless for an Aussie macro lager—a dull golden colour, with a wispy film of white on the top and very little visible carbonation. Body is quite fine, and what carbonation is there actually looks quite dense.

Nose is what you expect from the genre, with perhaps a little more tilt towards the American macro style, with a strong aroma of cereal adjuncts coming through. Still some metallic twinges to it, and a hint of that muddy, gritty yeast character characteristic of these beers.

Taste is repugnant. Along with the classic CUB yeast dirge, there's a lilting organic character like worm-eaten unripened tomatoes, still containing the pesticides whose job it was to keep the worms off in the first place. Rank and fetid and lingering, leaving a really unsavoury taste in the mouth. Finish is dry and weak, except for that lingering malignancy.

Horrid beer. In some ways, even though it's not as bad all over as some other beers I have, this is worse, because the appearance and the smell don't warn you about how terrible is the thing you're about to put in your mouth.

Well, let this review be your warning instead. Stay away.

 1,204 characters

Photo of drpimento
2.33/5  rDev -3.3%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.25 | feel: 2.25 | overall: 2.25

Poured at a good temperature with a mammoth, thick, foamy, frothy, billowy, off-white head (suspect foaming agents) and lots of lace. Color is a clear yellow. Aroma reminds me of a common lager with a bit o hop. Flavor’s like nose, bitter, sweet, and tang are actually fairly balanced, adjuncts are present, as are off flavs, body/carbonation are soft. Finish is like flavor. I just want to get it over.

 405 characters

Photo of dirtylou
2.6/5  rDev +7.9%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Must be related to Victoria Bitter, a beer often consumed in Sydney

Appearance: pours into hotel glass, clear dull copper body, light fizzy head with no main character and no retention/lacing.

Smell: smell is of a macro lager…herbal hop presence, bready malts, nothing too complex here

Taste: this is pretty mass-produced stuff but how can one be sure until they try it? Plus, I am in Melbourne so I figured I’d give it a shot. The taste is mildly bitter, light saaz presence, bready…watery and rather dull

Mouthfeel: carbonation is too high, watery

Drinkability: fine, just not very good

 610 characters

Photo of CrazyDavros
2.04/5  rDev -15.4%
look: 3 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

Pale gold pour with a small head that fades rapidly.
Dirty aroma of stale beer, grainy malt and cardboard, that's all.
Cooked corn and cardboard make up the entirety of the flavours.
Pretty high carbonation.
Utter rubbish. Does anyone drink this any more?

 255 characters

Photo of braican
3/5  rDev +24.5%

Photo of rastaman
1/5  rDev -58.5%
look: 1 | smell: 1 | taste: 1 | feel: 1 | overall: 1

Really awful stuff, tastes like chemicals and is a bit sweet, give this a big f'in miss, nothing to see here.

109 characters

Photo of XsoldoutX
2/5  rDev -17%

Photo of soju6
2/5  rDev -17%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

A: Pours a dark yellow color with a small head that fades to no real lacing.

S: Aromais musty. Blend of yeast and hops with a bit of sweetness in the background. Has that old stale beer smell.

T: Taste is not much better, sort of funky with yeast and malt sweetness. Coarse bitterness and a sticky finish.

F: Light body, has a lot of rough edges and high carbonation.

O: Not a decent drinker, but then you can't expect too much from a poor step sister of Victoria Bitter.

 475 characters

Photo of benloho
2.5/5  rDev +3.7%

Photo of probert
3/5  rDev +24.5%

Photo of Andrewharemza
3.03/5  rDev +25.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

I find this beer to be very sessionable it's a lager that's good to smash down at a bbq on a hot day.i get a earthy bitter taste and finishes very crisp.

 153 characters

Photo of JohnnyBarman
1.97/5  rDev -18.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Single bottle picked up at a Canberra grocery store.

Poured into a small tumbler. My first clue that I had erred in my purchasing decision was the colour and appearance of this brew, which is all macro lager. Pale golden, loads of visible carbonation, thin soapy head. Doesn't look great. Even though it looks like a lager should, when a beer decidees to call itself a 'Bitter' I can't help but be disappointed when it looks like a lager. Then again, another Carlton product - Victoria Bitter - does the exact same thing. Should have guessed...

Nose is almost non-existent - pale malts, a bit of lemon, chemical. Smells like Bud.

My first sip from the bottle reminded me of those first sips of beer from my dad's nearly empty bottles when I was a kid. Not a good sign. The taste of the poured out stuff was not much better, just a macro lager with a foul, chemical character. Hard to finish. Thin-bodied, harsh carbonation. Yellow fizzy water.

Never again, nor anything else from Carlton and United. Avoid!

 1,011 characters

Photo of Boilermaker88
2.46/5  rDev +2.1%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 3

Presented in a 375ml bottle and poured into a standard pint glass. Clear bronze color topped with a fizzy white head that left a hint of lace at the top of the glass.
Smell: a bit of soggy grain and some grassy hops but nothing that really stood out in any way.
Taste: ditto, except there was a more immediate grassy hops bite and a mild husky maltiness in the back of the throat.
Feel: limp, watery and light...*yawn*
Overall, nothing to separate this brew from the hordes of (for me) nasty macro lagers that permeate the beer world. Smells, tastes, and feels like most Aussie brews I've tried. Nothing here to run out and hunt down.

 634 characters

Photo of joecast
2.8/5  rDev +16.2%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

small bubbly head over generic fizzy yellow colored beer.
aroma is very light, but somewhat hoppy.
taste is rathe crisp while still fridge-cold.
this one heads pretty well down hill as it warms though. mouthfeel becomes slick and aroma turns a bit sulphery. also, the taste loses its crispness.
the trick with this one, drink it cold and out of the bottle. like that, not bad at all really.

 394 characters

Photo of diablo14
1.88/5  rDev -22%
look: 2 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

i think its quite funny that the people who actually like some of carltons beers hate this one the most, because i think of all their drivel this is the best. id choose a melbourne over any of carltons other lagers (unless theres the rare occasion you can find diamond). ok it would be the lesser of several evils, but nevertheless.

i think the bitterness everone despises so much is what makes this better. at least it justifies the harsh back body and aftertaste you always get from CUB. it actually resembles something vaguely hoppy. and in a taste test of carlton beers, this is the one you could pick out from the rest. it doesnt look any different really, althought the head retention is better and i reckon thats a sign of hops.

having said all this, its still a shit beer in anyones language. end of story.

 820 characters

Photo of LittleCreature
2.03/5  rDev -15.8%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

Appearance - 3.0
Poured a finger and a half of foamy white head that reduced to a thin, patchy layer over a clear yellow body that has a tinge of brown.

Smell - 2.5
Grain, metal and a little vaguely fruity hop and yeast character.

Taste - 1.5
Very similar to VB, although a little more pleasant (or less nasty) to my taste. Similar stale, grain, husk and metal flavour as VB, with more hops and yeast, providing a beer that is stronger flavoured, more bitter, and still a pretty generic macro lager.

Mouthfeel - 2.5
Low to moderate level of carbonation, somewhat astringent.

Drinkability - 2.0
Strong flavour means it is less drinkable than most macro lagers.

OVERALL - 2.15
I think this is quite similar to Toohey's New - it dares to have more flavour than your regular macro lager, yet still tastes pretty bad. Not quite awful, but for from being a good beer. Another one to drink cold, it just gets worse with warming.

 926 characters

Photo of magpieken
3.25/5  rDev +34.9%

Photo of 54V4G3
2.24/5  rDev -7.1%
look: 2 | smell: 2.25 | taste: 2.25 | feel: 2.25 | overall: 2.25

Photo of jarmby1711
2.23/5  rDev -7.5%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

As a University student I wa attracted to Long neck Melbournes and the Hawking Brothers song about them.Thankfully things have changed.
It has a dull honey colour with a very loose head.The smell is like old tank water, which is not necesarily unpleasanrt but is more so when the taste backs up your nose.I could get no depth of taste throughout it started and ended the same.Tinny.
Probably at its best mid February after a hot day of playing cricket.

 454 characters

Photo of Macca
2.29/5  rDev -5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Do not judge a book by its cover could not be more apt then when applied to this beer. It looks great. A good finger of head, nice retention and good lacing. Unfortunately that is where the positive elements sort of stop.
The aroma is of grains - Weet bix. The taste is metallic and husky. Some bitterness. A low carbonation.
The beer actually gets more drinkable as it goes on. Perhaps the taste buds deaden? This is not undrinkable, and I have been known to have more than one at the footy but only because there are no other options.

 536 characters

Photo of magnusdave
2.75/5  rDev +14.1%

Photo of NorCalAussie
2.25/5  rDev -6.6%

Photo of DaveFL1976
2.35/5  rDev -2.5%
look: 1.5 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 2.5

Melbourne Bitter – bottle
September 14 2005
Duke of Wellington Hotel
Melbourne Bitter pours a moderately darkish-straw color with a white, soap-foam-like head that quickly settles down and the beer is pretty boring to look at, with few carbonation bubbles floating up through the beer. The smell reminds you of every other inexpensive CUB product, with a metallic-like smell. The taste starts out watery, but then offers a bit of the metallic taste, followed by crisp bitterness possibly offered by a chemical equivalent of hops. I’m not quite sure.
Mouthfeel is actually pretty good. It’s thin-bodied, which is great for a hot Melbourne day, and carbonation is good. Drinkability has the possibility to be awesome, if not impeded by the weird, patented CUB metallic taste. This makes Bud and Miller Light taste acceptable. I think CUB’s version of “bitter” is actually copper oxide.
I’m kinda feeling ripped off for this $4.50 beer, but at least now I know that I should avoid it in the future.

 1,007 characters

first ← prev | 1-25 | 26-50  | nextlast
Melbourne Bitter from Carlton & United Breweries, Ltd.
Beer rating: 2.41 out of 5 with 49 ratings
  • About Us

    Founded in Boston in 1996, BeerAdvocate (BA) is your go-to resource for beer powered by an independent community of enthusiasts and professionals dedicated to supporting and promoting better beer.

    Learn More
  • Our Community

    Comprised of consumers and industry professionals, many of whom started as members of this site, our community is one of the oldest, largest, and most respected beer communities online.
  • Our Events

    Since 2003 we've hosted over 60 world-class beer festivals to bring awareness to independent brewers and educate attendees.
  • Our Magazine

    Support uncompromising beer advocacy and award-winning, independent journalism with a print subscription to BeerAdvocate magazine.