San Miguel Pale Pilsen | San Miguel Brewery Inc.

Log in or Sign up to start rating.
BA SCORE
66
poor
95 Reviews
THE BROS
-
no score
Send samples
San Miguel Pale PilsenSan Miguel Pale Pilsen
BEER INFO

Brewed by:
San Miguel Brewery Inc.
Philippines | website

Style: German Pilsener

Alcohol by volume (ABV): 5.00%

Availability: Year-round

Notes / Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

Added by rastaman on 08-09-2002

BEER STATS
Reviews:
95
Ratings:
215
Avg:
2.75
pDev:
33.45%
 
 
Wants:
4
Gots:
32
For Trade:
0
View: Beers | Events
User Reviews
Sort by:  Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
Reviews: 95 | Ratings: 215
Photo of Pipmeister
2.73/5  rDev -0.7%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Pours a clear straw color with a white foamy head. The smell is a slight mixture of hops/skunk/tire, not the mist pleasant smelling beer ever. The taste is pretty crisp with average body, alot of malt breadiness with a clean finish. It lacks complexity however, A's expected. Overall it's a sub average pils that lacks in the flavor dept but I can see it being an enjoyable and easy drinking on a hot afternoon or evening.

 422 characters

Photo of Mdog
2.08/5  rDev -24.4%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

Appearance: Yellow, ok head that fades out quickly.

Smell: Not much, a little corn.

Taste: Some mild sweetness, then a vegetal bitterness.

Drinkability: If it was an adjunct lager it would be barely passable, as a pilsner it doesn't cut it.

Beer review #2 from Hong Kong. Not too impressed with this, I thought it was another adjunct lager, but if it's supposed to be a pilsner it misses the mark.

 402 characters

Photo of biboergosum
2.56/5  rDev -6.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

330ml squat bottle. 'Enjoyed for over a century', proclaims the back label.

This beer pours a crystal clear, pale golden straw colour, with two fat fingers of puffy, rocky, and cushioned white head, which leaves a nice display of drooping sudsy lace around the glass as it fades away.

It smells of semi-sweet corn and a lesser grainy malt, a musty, um 'fruitiness', and earthy, herbal hops. The taste is more sweet, pithy corn and wan bready malt, some mildly interesting, indistinct spice (if only for its obfuscated point of origin), stale lemon juice, and vegetal, dead flower hops.

The carbonation is moderate, just a weak edginess throughout, the body on the light side of medium weight, and smooth in the most lenient sense of the word. It finishes off-dry, the now evidently stale, corn-flecked malt waging a bland offensive against a mild booze and earthy bitterness offset.

San Miguel's offering is hardly reminiscent of pilseners of the old world, and generally just another foreign watering down of the style. A bit here, a bit there, trying to prove itself, but still pretty unimpressive overall. I can't imagine where this one would suffice, but hey, maybe that's my imagination's fault. Nah.

 1,210 characters

Photo of RonaldTheriot
3.72/5  rDev +35.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

San Miguel has a very thick, frothy, white head and a clear, yellow appearance, with a good amount of sticky lacing down the glass. The aroma is overwhelmingly of bread (white bread). Taste is again bready barley malt, but some sweet hop spiciness is strong across the middle and end of the sip. It's spicy, so-to-speak. Mouthfeel is light and watery, and San Miguel finishes crisp, refreshing, and a tad cloying. Overall, this is a pretty good, and certainly interesting beer. I'd say it's worth trying.

RJT

 509 characters

Photo of Everydayoff
3/5  rDev +9.1%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

330ml bottle poured into a pils glass.

A:
Pale yellow color with decent thick white head, it stands for a long time then leaves small lacings behind, medium active carbonation.

S:
The smell contains lager's yeast, grainy malt sweetness and faint floral hop spiciness.

T:
Moderate hop bitterness licks at the first touch then slight malt sweetness follows up until the end, very clean taste.

M:
Light body, fizzy and crisp mouthfeel, clean and dry.

O:
Refreshing and good palate cleanser, would be okay to sweep your palate with it in order to prepare for other highlight beers in your list.

 595 characters

Photo of jsprain1
2.91/5  rDev +5.8%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

A- Has to be one of the clearest beers I've ever seen. Golden straw with a one and a half finger head that holds on pretty will. Spots of foam struggle to cling to the glass.
S- Smells sweet, but more of a sugary way than a malty way. To be sure, there is a definite malted grain presence. Some vegetal aromas, but not completely offputting.
T- Again it is sweet throughout, but I can't help thinking that it is not quite the right kind of sweetness. It's sort of like honey, but just minorly artificial tasting. That being said, the beer tastes ok, just there's something not quite right with where the sugars are at in this one. Again light, but noticable, vegetal notes.
M- A bit too much light bodied, and was a bit undercarbed.
O- A decent import lager, and a step above many Asian lagers that I have had, but nothing I'll search out to retry.

 848 characters

Photo of woodychandler
4.15/5  rDev +50.9%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 5

A college chum of mine recently did some overseas charity work and brought back various southeast Asian CANs for me. More proof that it pays to advertise where The CANQuest (tm) is CANcerned!

From the CAN: "Since 1890"; "Expertly Brewed Origial Full-Flavored"; "A truly satisfying beer with a refined, well-balanced flavor. Perfected and brewed following over a century-old tradition of brewing excellence."; "Expertly Brewed and Produced by San Miguel Brewery Inc. for Domestic Sale Only"; "Keep the Philippines clean. Dispose of properly." The reverse of the CAN depicted one of the stubby bottles of my memory! I do not remember this ever being CANned, frankly.

It was a tougher Crack! than usual, perhaps because the vent was more oval-shaped than circular, plus I got a little squirt across my fingertips since it was a brimful CAN. I got excited and went with a heavier Glug than I had originally intended, raising three fingers of rocky, foamy, bone-white head with decent retention. Color was Straw-Yellow (SRM = > 2, < 4) with NE-plus quality clarity, allowing me to see through the walls. It is windy & cold out there! Today is Sa, 13 Feb 2016. Nose held a slight lemony tang along with a metallic twang that is more like what I remember. Mouthfeel was thin-to-medium, not really watery, but not much beyond it, either. The taste was actually quite clean, belying the nose. It had a very light malt sweetness and there were not any appreciable hops, but it was much like I remember it. It was always great cold out of the cooler on those swelteringly hot, humid days in the PI. I like that they are CANning it now and if it were available stateside, I would put some in my summer cooler.

My original bottle review, dtd 10 March 2011 follows:

San Miguel?!? Hoo haa! How about SammyGooGoo, as that is how it was pronounced on hangover-ridden mornings in the PI (Philippine Islands)? I was once a young man with a sensibility that might have done me proud, but after my first (of many) liberty port visits to Subic Bay/Olongopo City on Luzon, my boundaries were stripped away. Barrio Baretto and Uncle Sam's Saloon were the sites of both my first Around the World and my first public sexual act (in a hammock to loud applause). Blewed, screwed and tattooed all for less than $20. was the battle cry and SammyGooGoo fueled the madness. Hell, we called it Flip (sorry) Roulette, because it was often "Green" - underfermented and ready to finish fermentation in your gut and erupt at the most inopportune moment. You never knew until it was time. I won a LOT of money for my prowess with this beer and the squat little bottle still fits my hand like a glove. I miss the painted label bottles, though, and God help you if you broke one. They were like gold for their Deposit/Return value and were closely watched. That and they were the perfect height for the Peso/Banana/Lotion Dancers. Use your imagination.

From the (paste-on) Label/Bottle: : "A truly satisfying beer with a refined, well-balanced flavor. Perfected and brewed following over a century tradition of brewing excellence."

A finger of bone-white head with limited retention. Color was a deep golden-yellow with NE-plus quality, allowing me to look into the neighbor's kitchen. Nose was surprisingly malty and lager-like. Nice! Mouthfeel was medium and it had a really pleasant German-Pilsner taste in the mouth. Not a lot of hops, but not diluted with adjuncts, either. Frankly, I do not remember it being this good! Finish was clean, semi-dry, refreshing. Suddenly, I was back with my brown honey-honeys, jaggin' the Marines, lolling in the oppressive heat just before monsoon season. Good times, bro, good times.

 3,693 characters

Photo of tone77
3.07/5  rDev +11.6%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Poured from a 12 oz. bottle. Has a pale yellow color with a 1 inch head. Smell is rather mild, some grains. Taste is crisp, refreshing, a bit mild, some grains, bitterness at the finish. Feels light in the mouth and has good drinkability. Overall this is a mediocre beer, much better when I was drinking it on an isolated beach one night in Bohol with some locals.

 364 characters

Photo of AWolfAtTheDoor
2.47/5  rDev -10.2%
look: 2 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Doing a cleaning out my beer fridge session of the lesser quality beers. My bottle looks vastly different than the one on here, perhaps it's an old picture.

Vigorous pour yields a 1.75 finger white foamy head that doesn't take long to recede. I give it about a 1/10 for lacing. Looks like pure urine. Luckily it tastes a hair better.

For such a low ABV beer, im getting a lot of alcohol on the nose. Overwhelming anything else that might be there. Maybe a little malts after several deep whiffs.

Really doesn't taste like much. I'm honestly not a big german pils fan. My heart belongs to the bocks and dunkles of Bavaria. Really not feeling this beer. Hint of malts, with a just a flutter of pepper or some spice.

Not all that drinkable. Leaving an unpleasant aftertaste that will not leave me reaching for an other.

 820 characters

Photo of faroutadventure
3.43/5  rDev +24.7%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Poured from a 12 oz bottle into a clear pint glass.

A-Poured a very translucent yellow color with a two finger frothy white head with good retention and ample lacing.

S-Grainy malts with slight fruity hops.

T-Malty sweetness that finishes with crisp, clean hop bitterness. Taste is very clean and straightforward and quite refreshing.

M-Very crisp yet smooth and well balanced. Vigorous carbonation contributes to its thirst quenching attribute on a hot afternoon.

D-This went down very easily and I would readily reach for another. Best cold as it doesn't improve as it warms. Very refreshing.

 601 characters

Photo of chefhatt
3/5  rDev +9.1%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

I poured the beer into a pint glass. The color is a pale yellow color with huge white head on top of it. I smell a little bit of malts but no hops. It taste very nice and smooth, not much to talk about. It has a nice mouth feel to it. I could use this beer as my go to beer when i don't have any craft beer.

 307 characters

Photo of velosuds
3.41/5  rDev +24%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Poured from a 12 oz bottle into a clear pint glass. Purchased at John's Market for $1.69.

A-Poured a very translucent yellow color with a two finger frothy white head with good retention and ample lacing.

S-Grainy malts with slight fruity hops.

T-Malty sweetness that finishes with crisp, clean hop bitterness. Taste is very clean and straightforward and quite refreshing.

M-Very crisp yet smooth and well balanced. Vigorous carbonation contributes to its thirst quenching attribute on a hot afternoon.

D-This went down very easily and I would readily reach for another. Best cold as it doesn't improve as it warms. Very refreshing.

San Miguel was my favorite import for as long as I can remember, long before I became a BA. This is very much as I remember it and it is much better than any BMC or the most ubiquitous import swill.

 838 characters

Photo of r0nyn
2.86/5  rDev +4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Poured into a mug from a bottle.

Appearance is a pale golden hue, transparent and full of bubbles. Big, fat white head that takes its sweet time in dissipating. Smell is decent, with malts and grains easily detectable, but not really much else happening. Wasn't expecting too much out of a pilsner anyway.

Taste is malty upfront, with a bitter bite and just a hint of hoppiness. There is a very mild sweetness behind it all, providing some contrast to the astringency. Aftertaste is just lightly bitter and on the dry side. Mouthfeel is light and crisp, as expected of a pilsner, but quite bubbly, so much so that the carbonation was a bit of a distraction. Not that it took away from my overall enjoyment of the beer, but it certainly has to be noted.

With a low ABV and an easy-to-stomach taste, San Miguel is a great beer for a social gathering, especially one with Filipinos. It's a decent, if unspectacular brew that does its job.

 938 characters

Photo of Metalmonk
3.05/5  rDev +10.9%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3.5

Wow, a pull tab? Cool! I'm not ancient, but old enough to remember having to avoid those damn things on the beach unless you wanted your feet sliced to shreds. But still: cool! And thanks to msubulldog25 for this rarity.

Pull tab pulled, and the pour results in a snow-white head that starts out thick then minimizes and stays for the duration at a quarter-inch. Pale lemon-juice yellow color, and super clear.

Suspiciously sugary and corny smells, although that grainy and sweet essence of a decent German pils comes through a little. A bit doughy, some steamed veggie character...all in all, not bad, but not super-impressive either.

Flavor is no surprise, and no world-class medal winner. But it's not a total failure either. Watery grains, watery honey, a touch of lemon, boiled veggies, faint sulphur, and Corn Pops cereal sweetness all intermingled. There's very little depth, and maybe no depth, if such a thing can be measured. But far from atrocious.

Texturally this kind of turned me off. Too watery, lacking the prickle and roundness of a good pils. Not a disaster, but with a flavor that could use an assist, the mouthfeel doesn't pull through.

Expected worse, but there are enough traits here that make it a better option than your typical U.S. corporate piss-lager. Of course, it's not much of an option when you can't get your hands on it, not to mention that lots of U.S. craft brewers are offering kick-ass pilsners, both traditional and imperialized. Better yet, travel to Germany or Czech Republic and experience the real deal...

 1,555 characters

Photo of AgentMunky
3.92/5  rDev +42.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 5

Poured from a 355mL bottle into a pilsner glass.

A: Transparent dull gold with very impressive thick, chunky head with decent retention. Heavy lacing. Lots and lots of bubbles.

S: Fruity and floral. A seriously strong smell. Beery/grainy scents underneath. Impressive range and depth of smells for a pilsner.

T: Light-bodied and vaguely fruity with a mild sweetness. Carbonation initiates a tingliness which provokes the beerier grain and malt flavours before a watery-smooth aftertaste carries it out. Very nice.

M: Light, refreshing, enjoyable. Smooth in the mouth and easy going down.

D: Insanely drinkable. The most quaffable pilsner I've come across. Easily sessionable, sippable, or consumable in any manner you choose. Definitely worth picking a few up.

 765 characters

Photo of msubulldog25
2.54/5  rDev -7.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

330mL gold can, complete with pull tab (geez, haven't seen one of those in, like, twenty years...). Best before date: 22/04/11. My buddy brought back a 4-pack for me when he returned from his trip back home to Hong Kong. &#35874;&#35874;, Peter!

This was brewed by San Miguel Brewery, Hong Kong Ltd.

A: Poured to a tall/tapered pilsner glass, it's crystal-clear and straw-golden. Shows off plenty of carbonation, some of the fattest bubbles I've seen. Starts with a sudsy topping, a finger or so of crackling whiteness. Dwindles to a barely-covering film, leaves patchy flakes of lace.

S: Fairly strong aroma, but one of old bread, kinda processed and starchy...I remember a similar scent when I worked at a pizza joint years ago and the lumps of cold dough smelled very much like this in the cooler. Otherwise, a grassy/floral sweetness, big and 'creamed corn'-like, sugared cereal.

T: Quite sweet when compared to a typical German Pilsner, lots of honey and sweet roll. Buttered biscuit, slight vegetable green-ness, mineral and a little tinny. Barely a trace of anything remotely hoppy/bitter. Kind of a mess.

M: Texture is slick and oily after a crispness that disappears almost instantly. Body is light. Weird gumminess, a lasting starchiness that eventually envelops what had been a decent drying finish. Gassy burps, where did those come from?

D: Not off-putting, just not all that appealing either. A mass-produced 'PREMIUM BEER' ('expertly brewed from the finest ingredients') that has a mushy feel and flavor. I'm guessing this could make a decent pairing with a cuisine that's spicy and local; by itself, it's a 'pass'.

 1,636 characters

Photo of eschbach
2.21/5  rDev -19.6%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2

Presentation: 12 ounce stumpy brown bottle. It has the name written in old english font which is sort of unique.

Appearance: It looks allrgiht. It's a pale golden color with a frothy head that vanishes fast.

Smell: It doesn't smell very good. It smells like malt and alcohol. I cannot smell hops.

Taste. It doesn't taste very good. It has a malty taste. And I cannot really taste hops. It doesn't taste the way a German Pilsner should taste.

Drink: It feels alright on the palate. A little creamy and smooth. The drink is not very good. It doesn't go down very smoothly. It's kind of a chore for me to drink this beer. I don't really like it.

Notes: Not a good beer! It smells weird, and it tastes weird, and it's a chore to drink.

 736 characters

Photo of eduardolinhalis
2.78/5  rDev +1.1%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

330ml bottle (like the picture) poured in a chalice.

A: Light yellow color with a small white head that dissipates quikly
S: Smells like an adjunct lager with some more hops
T: Tastes also like an adjunct lager with a littel bit more hops. Light bitter end. Not a big deal
M: Very light body. Light carbonation too
D: Refreshing after all but the weak taste does not contributes to improve its drinkability

 407 characters

Photo of Spineypanda
3.06/5  rDev +11.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Has a light straw color, with a little head that does not last long.
Smells a bit like every pilsner I have had before. Nothing special.
Tastes really light and has a little sweetness but nothing much else. A decent beer that is quite refreshing.

Not horrible but I do not think I would drink it again over other beers.

 320 characters

Photo of BeerSingh
2.92/5  rDev +6.2%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Chose this over Lowenbrau..

A : Typical golden coloured lager. Poured a thick fluffy head at first but immediately disappeared without a trace. No retention and hardly any lacing

S : Smell was dominated by toffee and malts. It got me very interested. No hoppiness at all

T : The taste was quite bland, except that the zing from the carbonation was poking you everywhere. Faint maltiness and sweet - matching the toffee smell. But just no hops at all, I mean what happened - did they forget to add them ?

M : Thin and quite watery, except for the nagging carbonation (should have been accompanied with some body)

D : A standard lager / pils to boot

 652 characters

Photo of benfons
2.54/5  rDev -7.6%
look: 3 | smell: 4 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Looks very pale. The head is big, but very fragile. Clean grainy smell. Plain but very bitter taste, certainly the aftertaste. Almost no carbonation, very thin beer.
I really don't like this one. Their is nothing that would make me take this beer again.

 254 characters

Photo of DrJay
3.28/5  rDev +19.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Very clear and light gold with a fluffy white head. Good retention compared to many of the light lagers I tried in asia, with some spotty lacing. The aroma was malty sweet, some maize and cereal grains, with a hint of fruit. Bitterness was on the light side and it had a mild malt sweetness, light fruitiness, some maize and spicy hops. Light bodied with plenty of carbonation. It started crisp, then ended with a more creamy finish. Some dryness. Refreshing and clean, really quite drinkable in the tropical heat and humidity.

 527 characters

Photo of atis
2.36/5  rDev -14.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Appearance is good enough, light golden colour with good head.

Smell is quite malty and the same can be felt in the taste. Very little hops and the taste is rather plain and not varied. Also very light carbonation, I would prefer more of it - saw in some reviews that carbonation is high, no idea why.... Aftertaste is sweet and dry.

Maybe it tastes good in the tropics, but now in Europe it didn't.

 401 characters

Photo of LittleCreature
2.98/5  rDev +8.4%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Appearance - 3.0
Poured a finger of bubbly white head over a pale gold body that looks lightly carbonated.

Smell - 2.5
Slight skunk upon opening that quickly disappeared, leaving very little smell whatsoever, just a little husk and grain.

Taste - 3.0
Not exactly bursting with flavour, but it is certainly refreshing. A little sweet pale malt in the start, plain cracker-like in its mild flavour and dry finish. Hop profile is low to moderate and slightly grassy in flavour.

Mouthfeel - 3.0
Light to moderate carbonation is fine but feels somewhat rough over the tongue. Light weight in the mouth.

Drinkability - 3.5
For me this is too boring to want to come back to, but it is certainly sessionable for most. I wouldn't turn one down.

OVERALL - 2.95
I see this as a middle of the road pilsener. I'd certainly choose it over a (Australian brewed) Heineken or Corona, but there are better, cheaper pilseners out there. Try a Konig!

 935 characters

Photo of rec
2.61/5  rDev -5.1%
look: 1.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 4

The pour is an immediate let-down, with a cyrstal yellow body and luck-lustre soapy white head that dissipates exceptionally fast.

Hopps and grass are the only real distinguishable scents, but when my imagination wanders I believe I can almost smell a touch of honey way back there somewhere.

The taste is as plain and boring as the predecessing fields of review, a sharp sweetness and not much else at all.

The mouthfeel is completely unentertaining, adding to the super-nothingness of this brew.

Great for sessions, and one to buy for parties as people in these environments tend to be happy drinking beer that tastes like nothing (eg. Corona) - you can't really upset anyone without distinct flavours.

 708 characters

San Miguel Pale Pilsen from San Miguel Brewery Inc.
66 out of 100 based on 95 ratings.
  • About Us

    Your go-to website for beer (since 1996), publishers of BeerAdvocate magazine (since 2006) and hosts of world-class beer events (since 2003). Respect Beer.
  • Return of the Belgian Beer Fest

    BeerAdvocate Brings its All-Belgian Fest to Portland, Maine on September 17, 2016. Tickets are on sale now.

    Learn More
  • Get the Mag

    Become a BeerAdvocate magazine print subscriber today.

    Subscribe