San Miguel Premium Lager | San Miguel Brewery Inc.

Your Rating: None
Want it   Got it 
San Miguel Premium LagerSan Miguel Premium Lager
429 Ratings
San Miguel Premium LagerSan Miguel Premium Lager

Brewed by:
San Miguel Brewery Inc.

Style: American Adjunct Lager

Alcohol by volume (ABV): 5.00%

Availability: Year-round

Notes / Commercial Description:
None provided.

View: Beers
User Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
first ← prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | nextlast
Ratings: 429 |  Reviews: 179
Reviews by prototypic:
Photo of prototypic
2.93/5  rDev +6.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 2 | overall: 3

In true adjunct fashion, it's very clear and light gold in color. It doesn't stand out from the crowd much thus far, but the head gives it a nice bump. It's foamy white and is easily two fingers tall. No to mention, it took quite a while to dissipate. Lacing was on the lighter side. Easily above average.

As I suspected, it drops off here. But, not as dramatically as I expected. Grains and grassy notes are prominent. There's quite a bit of malt sweetness that doesn't smell bad at all. It has a very faint vegetal smell, but it's not offensive. It's not good either, but it's not nearly as bad as some I've encountered. Some light hops are noted. It's weak and lacks diversity. Ultimately, it's average, but exceeds my expectations.

The flavor profile is on par with the nose. It has a decent sweet, malty flavor. Grains, grass, and earthy flavors linger throughout. There's a light hop flavor that adds a little buzziness and drys it out a decent bit. It has a slight corn-like flavor, but it's not prominent by any means. That bodes well for this beer. It finishes sweet and a little dry. There's not a lot of flavor here, but it's really not bad. Average describes the flavor pretty well.

The feel is probably its worst feature. It's light, watered down, and isn't remotely smooth. Carbonation's buzzy and crisp. Needs some work here. Drinkability is average at best. This bottle's disappearing quickly, but I can't say I'm enjoying. There's worse out there, but I won't be having any another.

Honestly, this beer surprised me a little. I believe it's my first beer from the Phillipines and I was expecting it to be a disaster. That's not the case. It's not good by any means, but it's not bad either. There's far worse adjuncts. No doubt about that. Still, I can't exactly recommend buying any. It's not quite "good" beer.

 1,833 characters

More User Reviews:
Photo of jnjander
2.5/5  rDev -9.4%

Photo of rolltide8425
2.75/5  rDev -0.4%

Photo of RollTide05
3/5  rDev +8.7%

Photo of Loveyourbeer
2.5/5  rDev -9.4%

Photo of InfernoBoss
2.75/5  rDev -0.4%

Photo of Avatar113
2.93/5  rDev +6.2%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.75 | overall: 2.75

Photo of avisong
2.5/5  rDev -9.4%

Photo of EmperorBevis
1.86/5  rDev -32.6%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 1.75 | feel: 1.75 | overall: 1.75

Dodgy yellow body with foaming & fleeting white head
the aroma or lacking is tinny and metallic
the flavour also lacking is slightly sweet and slightly metallic
Ticking beer

 182 characters

Photo of shoop12
3/5  rDev +8.7%

Photo of marcosiahaan
3/5  rDev +8.7%

Photo of TGS
2.43/5  rDev -12%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

Photo of eye2
3/5  rDev +8.7%

Photo of VaterRoss
2/5  rDev -27.5%

Photo of bostonryan
2/5  rDev -27.5%

Photo of soonerlight
3.5/5  rDev +26.8%

Photo of 1Sundown2C
3.5/5  rDev +26.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Photo of sd123
3.19/5  rDev +15.6%
look: 3.25 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3.25

Photo of sh00ky
4/5  rDev +44.9%

Photo of Whiskeydeez
2.75/5  rDev -0.4%

Photo of samparkique4
3.25/5  rDev +17.8%

Photo of LJWalker
2.5/5  rDev -9.4%

Photo of Lare453
1.25/5  rDev -54.7%

Photo of Ktmktm01
3.5/5  rDev +26.8%

Photo of PaulH
3/5  rDev +8.7%

first ← prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | nextlast
San Miguel Premium Lager from San Miguel Brewery Inc.
Beer rating: 2.76 out of 5 with 429 ratings