La Bête Des Vosges | Brasserie Artisanale des Vosges

Your Rating: None
Want it   Got it 
La Bête Des VosgesLa Bête Des Vosges
35 Ratings
La Bête Des VosgesLa Bête Des Vosges

Brewed by:
Brasserie Artisanale des Vosges

Style: Belgian Strong Pale Ale

Alcohol by volume (ABV): 8.00%

Availability: Year-round

Notes / Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

Added by mattmaples on 08-20-2003

Bros Score:
View: Beers
User Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
first ← prev | 1-25 | 26-50  | nextlast
Ratings: 35 |  Reviews: 30
Photo of GRG1313
1.74/5  rDev -47.1%
look: 1.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 1.5

Amber ale; Light brown; no head.

Smells like very lightly carbonated lightly sweetened carmel water.

No body in the mouth and light sweet simple flavor. Faint burnt toast flavor.

A sweet lightly carmel finish that is not appealing. Almost not drinkable and virtually no appeal whatsoever.

 294 characters

Photo of JBogan
2.32/5  rDev -29.5%
look: 2 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Poured a cloudy apple juice color. Only a very thin film for a head, which left a tiny amount of lacing.

Smelled of alcohol, butter, maybe a bit of apple.

Again, almost a buttery taste with some alcohol present as well. Also some outdated bread.

Mouthfeel was probably the best thing about this beer. Not great but acceptable. Slightly on the heavy and grainy side with very little carbonation.

Not a real drinkable beer, at least to my taste. I didn't notice anything outstanding about it, in fact in most respects it was below average. This is the last time I will be putting this beer to my lips.

 603 characters

Photo of DogFood11
2.34/5  rDev -28.9%
look: 1.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

Ruddy copper color that is hazy w/ yeast particles and little to no carbonation. Head has little size or retention.

Some lighter fruits in the beginning. Fruit presence is rather lackluster and soft. Caramel towards the backend is not rich but rather soft as well. Bakers chocolate although subtle give this a quick dry job but it ends lingering. Candied as it warmed.

Notes: Whoaa back up the plane Air France this needs some work. The characteristics for the most part were there but completely off balance and unrefined. This recipe needs some work.

 558 characters

Photo of TheLiterati
2.53/5  rDev -23.1%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

The bottle says Amber Ale, and sure enough, it pours a deep, cloudy amber, with a barely discernable head. Dotted throughout with yeast particles.

For the life of me, I can’t place a finger – or a nose – on the smell. What the heck is it? I thought I caught a whiff of banana, but then there was plum, or maybe even Juicy Fruit gum.

As for taste…words fall infinitely short. Again I ask: what the heck is it? Amber ale? Barley wine? Cola – flat - as others have suggested?

I just don’t know.

I want this beer to work. I want it to be good. But honestly, it’s really not. Can’t say I’ll have this one again.

 628 characters

Photo of brentk56
2.61/5  rDev -20.7%
look: 2.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 1 | overall: 2

Appearance: Pours a hazy amber color and, after a hard pour, releases some bubbles that quickly disappear.

Smell: Beguiling brandy aroma of raisins - in fact this smells like the Dogfish Head Raison d'Extra

Taste: Swirling around my mouth is an apple raisin brandy character that, after the swallow dissipates into a watery, though fusel alcohol filled blend with a touch of brown sugar that leads to a sweet finish

Mouthfeel: Slightly viscous, but watery and flat; alcoholic warmth after the swallow

Drinkability: Not that I'm a fan of the Dogfish Head Raison series, but this beer is clearly the red haired stepchild of that family. Perhaps we are all tasting beers from the same shipment that is now years old and needs to be dumped before it causes more defamation to the brewery's character

 807 characters

Photo of RoyalT
2.69/5  rDev -18.2%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

Appearance – Where’s the head? This is flatter than a pancake. I almost threw out my elbow trying to work some foam up in the glass. The body is a dingy brown. Not pretty.

Smell – This one has a nice, fruity bouquet. I can pick up a lot of summer fruits like peaches, watermelon, star fruit, and a few others. There’s some light cinnamon spicing in there and a bit of alcohol. I can’t pick up much of a malt base and the hops are almost AWOL but otherwise this is a pleasing nose.

Taste – The fruits from the nose make their way to the taste, but the lack of a good backbone and absence of hops disappoints.

Mouthfeel – Way too flat for a BSPA and barely medium-bodied. It seems by reading a few other reviews that this is common and not a “bad bottle” situation, otherwise I wouldn’t post the review.

Drinkability – This was tough to drink, but the nice fruits and complimentary alcohol kept things going. I hate to be the lowball here but I’ve had first time homebrew efforts at this style that were better.

 1,033 characters

Photo of champ103
2.72/5  rDev -17.3%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

A: Pours a murky and unattractive brownish/orange. A very small bubbly white head forms with pour retention. No lace.
S: Dark fruits of cherries and bananas. Caramel malt and yeast. Simple but enjoyable.
T: Pale and sweet malts. Light/thin banana flavor. Yeast and diacetyl. Blah.
M/D: A medium body that is way under carbonated. Really thin and watery. Not hard to drink. Not much alcohol, but just not very interesting.

Just blah. Nothing that is really good, and nothing that is really bad. Huh hum in every way. Not something I would recommend.

 549 characters

Photo of flagmantho
2.81/5  rDev -14.6%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2.5

Poured from 330mL bottle into a tulip.

Appearance: rich brown-amber hue with very little effervescence and some yeasty floaties, but not too many. Head is a thick finger of frothy ivory foam.

Smell: interesting floral nose; very soapy like floral gum candies. Sweet, but not much else going on. Not my favorite, but not repulsing in any way.

Taste: the same as the aroma in just about every way. Some malt backs up the floral taste, but the overall effect is quite cloying. I'm not a fan.

Mouthfeel: medium body with a decent carbonation factor. Not too bad.

Overall: this beer has its ups and its downs. If you like this kind of floral flavor, it may work for you. It doesn't work for me.

 694 characters

Photo of TheLongBeachBum
2.87/5  rDev -12.8%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Presentation: 11.2 fluid ounce (330ml) brown bottle sealed with a simple brass colored crown cap. Main label is just as the one pictured in the DB, though I note that my bottle is sans neck label. “La Bête Des Vosges” is listed at Alc. 8%. By Vol. Described as an Amber Ale. No freshness or Best Before Date.

Appearance: ‘Allo ‘Allo, what do we have here!? Hmmm shocking looks, flat and limpid with a murky amber torso that has a flabby demure presentation. The last top-up from the bottle raises a hint of activity but it’s only a beige colored broken head that lasts as long as a French Cavalry charge. It’s soon vanished into thin air and leaves only a bubbled mass. Zero carbonation.

Nose: Some feint hops mix with soft Devon toffees in the caramel entrance…..and middle…..and erm ending….hmmm….well that was easy, what’s next, oh yeah, Taste….

Taste: Caramel and some sweet malts with a fruity finish and……OK now I’m struggling, I know I could add toffee again even though I added it for the nose and I hate repeating myself but it adds some words so what the heck. Rather simple and easy to figure out, unlike Les Français. No really I love France, no I do, don’t laugh, we have to have somewhere to send our Nuclear Waste.

Mouthfeel: None of the declared Huit% alcohol anywhere, maybe it surrended!? Oh there I go again. Oh well, nuff said, no more Frenchie Jokes….hey how many French Soldiers does it take to change a Lightbulb!?? Four American Ones! I’m here all week……

Drinkability: Nothing off-putting at all about this one, yet it just bores me after only half the 11 ounce bottle. Nice enough but I may as well be drinking a Soda. Fair enough, Mon Ami.

Overall: The Beast of Vosges is a bit of a soft Pussy to be honest. It is another interesting French newbie though, the second this week after the incredibly intriguing but far more appealing Cimes Yeti. I may pick up another Yeti (or rather wake up with one like I usually do after a heavy nights drinking) but I’ll pass on this one. I’m not sure what’s funnier, my jokes or the apparent seriousness of this beer. And I never mentioned Frogs once……

Music: AC/DC - Highway to Hell ……’bout time I got back home.

 2,230 characters

Photo of mwar
3/5  rDev -8.8%

Photo of clickpush
3.09/5  rDev -6.1%
look: 2 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Pour: 33cl bottle to tulip glass. Beer fizzes upon pour but leaves absolutely no head. Cloudy ruby brown body that seems to have a lot of sediment in it. No bubbles, no head. Quite boring.

Nose: cider spices: apples, cinnamon, nutmeg, caramel. Crisp yet faint.

Mouth: Slightly bitter with a warm finish. A touch of watered down sweetness with a seltzer mouthfeel. Caramel and brown sugar, some grass notes in the hops. Boring and unrewarding, definitely not worth the price.

 480 characters

Photo of RonaldTheriot
3.1/5  rDev -5.8%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3.5

La Bete Des Vosges has almost no head, just a thin, off-white film. The appearance is a dark, murky orange, with lots of brown solids floating about. Some bubbles are streaming up, but no lacing is left behind. There is coffee-like sediment left at the bottom of the glass. The aroma is of over-ripe fruit, like prunes. It also tastes like prune juice more than beer, and is closer to brandy or wine than beer, as far as flavor goes. Mouthfeel is medium to heavy, and it’s a gamy liquid. The finish is not unlike fruit juice, but there is a barley presence in the aftertaste. Well, this is an unusual beer, to say the least. However, I did slowly sip it, and enjoyed it more as it went. I say it’s worth a try, if you can stomach it.


 743 characters

Photo of thierrynantes
3.12/5  rDev -5.2%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Beer bottle (33cl.), tasted in 2006.

Appearance : amber/brown color (slightly veiled), with tan foam head (not persistent).
Smell : alcohol, caramel, honey.
Taste and mouthfeel : sweet and malty, bitterness.
Drinkabiity : an average beer in the style Belgian strong ale.

 271 characters

Photo of silenius
3.19/5  rDev -3%
look: 3 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

I never know what to expect when I find a beer from a smaller Eurpoean brewery that I've never sampled. Could it have been sitting on the shelf for years? There is no date on the label, and is that dust I see on the bottle? Nope. Or at least it is a lot less that some of the other bottles I see around it. That's about the only way I know to judge how long a bottle has been sitting around if it is not something that would turn over quickly. Glad to say that this bottle doesn't appear to be too old.

Pours a foggy tea-brown amber with an active head that doesn't do much lacing.

Smell is a bit complex with sweet malts, honey, candy and nutty smells mixed with some spicing that kind of reminds me of apple pie - or a least a little apple tart. Pretty good.

Taste confirms the nose with sweet syrup like flavors with a nutty drying and dark spice to cut the cloying flavor. It isn't too sweet, but it is verging on it. Aftertaste is more like a coke than a beer.

Mouthfeel is on the slick side with a general lack of carbonation - kind of like a slighly flat cola.

The more I drink, the less I like it.

 1,120 characters

Photo of Zorro
3.2/5  rDev -2.7%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Clear amber colored ale with basically no head formation.

Smell is sweet and a mix of sweet tea and faint fruity apple. Slight toffee candy scent.

The taste starts out sweet and quite malty close in flavor to a Scotch Ale than anything else.

Mouthfeel is OK.

Average drinkability is being generous here. Tastes like it needs more time in the fermenter to finish.

 366 characters

Photo of Satyr179
3.25/5  rDev -1.2%

Photo of blakesell
3.27/5  rDev -0.6%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Poured from the 12oz bottle into a brandy snifter.

Appearance- Beer pours a darkened gold with foam lacing the sides. Lacing rings the sides of the glass, no head outside of that. Beer looks fairly flat.

Smell- Rich and malty sweet with alcoholic phenols. A hint of sweet fruits like raspberry. Malts dominate. A bit wortlike in the scent.

Taste- Malty and lightly oxidized with a bit of paper on the tongue. Malted sweetness coats the mouth. Some hops but hardly noticable, noble hops. The beer claims to be an amber? I suppose.

Mouthfeel- Creamy, lightly carbonated, slightly warming, not overly warming. Medium bodied.

Drinkability- For the price, I would not repeat. But not a bad beer overall.

 704 characters

Photo of AAG
3.31/5  rDev +0.6%
look: 3.25 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3.25

Photo of Muddybuddy
3.4/5  rDev +3.3%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

I picked this bottle up today in order to expand my horizons and try somthing not only new to me, but from out of the country as well. There is no date on the bottle and no clue to its age.

Appearance: Light amber that would have been translucent, but I poured about a third of the yeast remaining in the bottle in on purpose. It has a very light head that mostly dissipates quickly, but leaves a dense island in the middle of my pint.

Smell: Smells highly of banana and vanilla. There is no hops aroma present and very little malt aroma present.

Taste: There is a distinct malty flavor to this beer which is accented by some slight alcohol warming. The bananas that were present in the aroma make their way to the taste as well as possibly an "oaky" taste that isn't entirely unpleasant. There is a little "roasty" flavor that comes through on the end of the taste that makes this a more robust flavor than I would have guessed from the aroma.

Mouthfeel: Thick and slick, with restrained carbonation.

Drinkability: This is, for me, only a one/per night type of beer. I don't think two of these would hold up well for me.

**My French is rusty. Can anyone tell me what the name is, translated to English? I can get "The Beast of the ___" and that's it. Thanks in advance!**

 1,290 characters

Photo of BuckeyeNation
3.45/5  rDev +4.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3

Dark orange with a small storm of particulates. The head is small (even after a semi-vigorous pour), is pale golden beige and is soft and nearly featureless. It's currently sitting at a fat one finger with an abbreviated collar of lace as the only glass coverage.

Even with repeated sniffs, the characteristics of the nose aren't obvious. It's sweet and fruity (apples? peaches? apricots?) with a significant alcohol presence; like fruit brandy, or more accurately, fruit liqueur. There's a hint of spice as well, but no more than that.

The flavor is... different. La Bete Des Vosges doesn't taste much like a BSPA, but then I'm always open to interesting variations on the theme as long as they're still good. The jury's still out on whether this one qualifies as good. Sweet, fruity and alcoholic is the Cliff's Notes version of the flavor profile. Unfortunately, the various elements don't fit together as tightly as I'd like. The seams are definitely showing.

This is another one of those beers that lacks a center. The various flavors go this way and that, in and out of focus, never really making a commitment. The finish is marginally better because it's more aggressively fruity. Although the incompletely masked alcohol is consistent with the 'S' in BSPA, I prefer the power of this style to be due to flavor rather than arrogant booziness.

Like the French themselves, I have a hard time figuring out French beer. It isn't often that I score drinkability lower than taste. I did so in this case because this offering is more interesting and odd than it is pleasurable. I love the big orange dog on the label, the exact color of the beer by the way, but he's more 'La Batard Des Vosges' (mutt of the Vosges) than 'La Bete Des Vosges' (beast of the Vosges).

 1,776 characters

Photo of djeucalyptus
3.49/5  rDev +6.1%
look: 3 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

poured from a 330ml labeled as an "amber ale" into a goblet. Only "foam" was comprised of bubbles created by agitation from a vigorous pour. Quickly popped into a subtle ring with a bit of haze. Earthy greenish amber in color, similar to apple cider... or more apple cider vinegar. A bit of haze from the yeast poured in. Just a touch of spots of lacing down the glass. Funky overall.

aroma is somewhere between a strong american amber, a scotch ale, and a dopplebock with some malt sweetness, malt breadiness, and a definite golden fruit sweetness on the nose. Apricots, figs, golden raisins, pears and banana aroma fill out the malt profile. Hints of fermenting fruit with a touch of sour and belgian-esque funk mixing in there.

taste is slightly unexpected given the aroma. Smells mostly like a strong, malty and sweet amber, but the taste is significantly odd. The caramel malt and candi sugar is definitely there, but there's a subtle yet definite belgian yeastiness. Caramel sweetness keeps the yeast at bay, and the fruit notes re-emerge hearkening apple fritters and scones with fig jam. A finish with a touch of bitterness, a touch of yeast, and a touch of warming alcohol.

Fairly thick body with a surprising amount of carbonation given the lack of foam and head. Still relatively low carbonation with some sugary slickness that allows the sweetness to linger with the alcohol warming burn. Not a bad one for sipping.

Funky is the first thing that comes to mind overall. Both in a good and bad way. The yeastiness adds an interesting note to an otherwise fairly neutral beer. Nothing way out of the ordinary in any area, but its all just a touch funky and different. A solid and warming beer for sipping, although I can't really say what this one has over other beers (of multiple styles). maybe worth a try?

 1,824 characters

Photo of Westsidethreat
3.5/5  rDev +6.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

A: Apricto colored with rootbeer highlights. Cloudy with a very small head that fell white with a blue tint.

S: Molasses, caramel, brown sugar, almonds and prunes

T: Toasted nuts and clover honey start things off. Has some sensations of pecan pie filling with fig. Finishes with vanilla, lightly bitter with some melon. Overall very simplistic and not a lot of depth.

M: Medium body, soft and somewhat thin

D: Good flavor but watery. Could have gone further with this beer...has a decent base to start with.

 531 characters

Photo of Zet
3.55/5  rDev +7.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 3.5

Amber colour with a decent head of foam. Lovely smell of fresh grassy meadows: hopped in a good way i guess. Taste is not so special though: grass again and some fruits (peach?) in the background, but pilsner malts are quite dominating in the taste. Perhaps a longer maturation might do this beer some good, because esters seem to be in low supply. It is quite refreshing though, which is enhanced by the grassy smell, so this would make a good springtime terrace beer, if the abv doesn't scare you.

 499 characters

Photo of kinger
3.55/5  rDev +7.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

O-la-la this is a dandy. Murky orange-brown pour, nice creamy white film sits atop the beer and leaves spotty lacing. Thick malt nose with a prominant sour fruitiness, I'm thinking fermented peaches, apricots, and a little banana. Mouthfeel is also thick and creamy with a very noticeable alcohol bite that finishes with a smooth burn. Sour malt flavors complimented by a strong sweet alcohol kick. The fruits are still there, I keep thinking of this as being "Harry Buffalo-ish" for beer. Really warming and satisfying, it took me quite some sippin' time to finish this treat.

 577 characters

Photo of GCBrewingCo
3.59/5  rDev +9.1%
look: 3 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

The beer poured into the chalice lightly murky and amber with practically no head at all and nothing lasting to lace at the glass.

The aroma was strongly nutty and malty with dark fruits, raisins most notable. The aroma contained a very slight bit of tartness and some Belgian yeast spice presence.

The flavor was lighter than expected with caramel, slightly sweet in flavor, but not overly so and not cloying. The caramel also had a bit of chocolate and a strong candy character. Some light spice was present but was not pronouced since the beer was essentially flat. At times some light butterscotch flavor was notable.

The finish was even heading toward dry with just a light bit of caramel and spice lasting into the aftertaste. The body was medium and the carbonation was minimal. The beer did contain a sizeable alcohol presence and left a strong warming impression after consumption. Carbonate this puppy and we might have something, as is, kinda lifeless.

11.2 ounce bottle.

 994 characters

first ← prev | 1-25 | 26-50  | nextlast
La Bête Des Vosges from Brasserie Artisanale des Vosges
Beer rating: 3.29 out of 5 with 35 ratings