Pale | Southern Tier Brewing Company

BA SCORE
86
very good
226 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score
Send samples
PalePale
BEER INFO

Brewed by:
Southern Tier Brewing Company
New York, United States
southerntierbrewing.com

Style: American Pale Ale (APA)

Alcohol by volume (ABV): 6.00%

Availability: Year-round

Notes / Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

Added by BeerAdvocate on 06-21-2009

This beer is retired; no longer brewed.

BEER STATS
Ratings:
226
Reviews:
145
Avg:
3.83
pDev:
10.44%
 
 
Wants:
3
Gots:
4
For Trade:
0
User Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
first ← prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | nextlast
Ratings: 226 |  Reviews: 145
Photo of OriolesFan1008
2/5  rDev -47.8%

Photo of wedgie9
2.64/5  rDev -31.1%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Tasted from 12oz bottle. Pours pale golden with a very thin white head. Nose of hops, pale malt, and light yeast. Flavor is maltier than expected with bitter hops and yeast on the back. There are also dusty and acidic qualities. Body is light with heavy carbonation and a medium-length bitter finish.

 300 characters

Photo of xpoweruser
2.72/5  rDev -29%
look: 2 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Appearance: Golden straw color, clear body. White fluffy head.

Aroma: Light flowery hops with some sweet grainy malts.

Taste: Light hop bite, a bit dry. Grainy malt flavor balances the hops. Not full bodied at all, somewhat watery.

Mouthfeel: Easy drinking and crisp. Very light body. Good carbonation.

Drinkability: Pale ales are not the heaviest beers in the world, but they can still be great beers with lots of flavor. This beer is just not doing it, boring beer, needs more character.

 493 characters

Photo of engagechad
2.95/5  rDev -23%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Purchased as a single from Tom Leonards in Richmond, VA - tulip

Pours a kind of un pale ale looking yellow straw color with wimpy head.

Smells faint and kind of uninspiring. Almost pissy.

Tastes faintly hoppy without much going on.

Feels corny and slimy

Overall this was lame. Not going to buy it again.

 309 characters

Photo of Cloaked_Phantom
3/5  rDev -21.7%

Photo of civicm87
3/5  rDev -21.7%

Photo of cfalovo97
3/5  rDev -21.7%

Photo of vicsju1991
3/5  rDev -21.7%

Photo of wpreynolds
3/5  rDev -21.7%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Photo of jbierling
3/5  rDev -21.7%

Photo of adamette
3/5  rDev -21.7%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

Live review. Poured from the 12 oz. bottle that I bought at Wine and Beverage Depot in Mentor a few days ago for $1.69. The following printed just below the right side of the label: 103 A3. I am not sure what that means but there you have it. I have no idea how old this beer is. Poured into my Orval silver rimmed goblet since my other glasses were not cleaned.

A Pretty basic straw yellow translucent body under an all too brief off white head (it lasted about 10 seconds after a vigorous pour). 3.0

S Grain heavy barley smell with distant hops. This is pretty much what I expected. 3.0

T Tastes flows right from the smell in this one. Barley husks in front with an annoying grapefruit bitterness that collapses in the back of my mouth, making my molars ache and my mouth sort of cringe. Again here, this is what I expected. I will bump it one half point for being more flavorful than most Pales. At least it offers slightly better taste than the others. 3.5

M Pretty thin. Only the lingering hops bitterness and distinctive taste of barley husks keeps it from being very thin. That being said, it is true to style. 3.0

D Not that good. This style is supposed to be sessionable but I would rather reach for many, many other beers brewed by Southern Tier, most especially Uber Sun. Too bad that one is no longer brewed. 2.0

Notes: I expected an average beer for the style and that is pretty much what I got.

 1,414 characters

Photo of Blakaeris
3.03/5  rDev -20.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Pours clear golden-yellow with a decent creamy head.

Aroma is grainy malt and lemony citrus. Not much there.

Taste is similar to the nose. Grainy malt up front. Then the lemony, floral hop quality takes over. Finish is relatively sweet with some pineapple notes.

Mouthfeel is medium bodied.

No off flavor, but not anything I find exciting or interesting either. Worth a try.

 379 characters

Photo of alexgash
3.06/5  rDev -20.1%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

12 oz. bottle.

Mostly clear golden yellow body. Two fingers of whipped, lacy, almost-white head. Nice lacing. Candied fruit and butterscotch on the nose, with some very light herbal hop accents.

Soft, bready malts up front. Earthy, slightly herbal hop flavors follow. Fruit and bread malts mid-palate. Light bitterness trickles in. Finish is kind of dry, with lingering bitterness and light fruitiness. Moderate body, with a slightly oily feel. Not bad, but not one of ST's better beers.

 489 characters

Photo of amanofbeer
3.13/5  rDev -18.3%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

From a snifter (which I think I may regret), fair lacing, and nice larger bubbles in some spots. Pale gold.

It smells of intense piny-ness. I'm not partial to piney beers, but it smells nice.

I am a little underwhelmed by the flavor of this beer. It has huge hop flavors that linger awkwardly. It lacks depth and maltiness, especially for a pale ale. This really tastes more like an ipa, but the body is that of a pale ale. This is unbalanced to me.

As this beer has so much hop flavor already, the mouthfeel is mismatched. Back off on the hops and it would be good, but not with such a huge flavor.

It's hopped like a sipping beer, but the malts are not. The lingering is very intense. I will not buy this beer again.

 722 characters

Photo of Satchboogie
3.17/5  rDev -17.2%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

12oz bottle poured into a pint glass

A: Pours clear pale yellow with about a finger and half of white head. Leaves a little lacing.

S: Lemon peel, a little orange, floral notes, biscuit malt.

T: Very light floral hop notes with a touch of citrus, a decent amount of bitterness up front, but not much in the finish. Biscuit malts dominates the middle. Finish is light and clean with a hint of metal.

M: Light bodied, high level of carbonation. Feels a little hollow.

O: A bit on the weak side for an APA. Hollow biscuit malt taste with just a little hops (and again, not much depth of flavor). The plus side is it's easy drinking and there are no unpleasant alcohol esters to speak of, but I could definitely use more flavor and body.

 741 characters

Photo of olradetbalder
3.25/5  rDev -15.1%

Photo of jaxon53
3.25/5  rDev -15.1%

Photo of jmdrpi
3.25/5  rDev -15.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

12 oz bottle, no date.

appears a bright clear golden color, with bone-white colored head. decent head retention.

mild hoppy aroma, with a touch of citrus. taste is balanced biscuity malt and light hopping. clean aftertaste. body is thin, with fizzy carbonation.

overall, an easy drinking beer. good for warm weather.

 322 characters

Photo of hozersr
3.25/5  rDev -15.1%

Photo of tommyguz
3.25/5  rDev -15.1%

Photo of mafiasentinel21
3.3/5  rDev -13.8%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

This is a great session beer and compliments the summer well.

Pours a bright wheaty golden crispy-looking brew. Average head & retention quick to fade.

Smells like a box of wheat with faint citrus & esters.

Great, crisp, and very refreshing beer, but didn't have enough balancing hop influence.

Good beer. Wouldn't purchase a sixer for myself but I would be pleased if it happened to be at a friends' house.

 412 characters

Photo of TheFightfan1
3.33/5  rDev -13.1%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Poured this into my mug. Pours an almost neon yellow clear color with a heavy thick tightly bubbled heading. Leaves some legs but only in the beginning.

Smell is kind of fruity with a slight hoppy aroma and a doughy maltiness. Seems well rounded.

Taste is well deceiving hoppy at first,then a bit fruity, and finishes a little doughy.

Mouth is smooth and bitter,light bodied and good carbonation.

This is a drinkable session like Pale ale.

 444 characters

Photo of ujsplace
3.33/5  rDev -13.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Poured into a pub glass.

Thick, white foamy head sitting on top of a bright yellow body.

Smells of mild hops, slightly buttery.

Tastes of bright citrusy fruits with mild bitters and possibly a hint of floral hops.

Light mouthfeel, crisp and clean.

Good and drinkable. Truly a pale ale. Very mild and drinkable by anyone.

 325 characters

Photo of JerzDevl2000
3.38/5  rDev -11.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Yet another beer that I picked up from Buy Rite in Jersey City recently. This was one of the few Southern Tier offerings that I had yet to try and even though I've had enough Pale Ales for one lifetime, I figured that I'd give it a shot since I like most of what Southern Tier puts out. Suffice to say, I feel like this beer was mislabeled since it was not as dark, hoppy, or strong as other examples of this style, and I think I liked this better the first time...when I had the Hop Sun.

Sure enough, this beer poured light in more than one way. The hue was golden and there wasn't much of an aroma to be had here either. There were hops here, to be sure, but they weren't heavy or of a dry sort. Because this beer was so balanced, they were overshadowed by the biscuit and bread flavors and the typical pine and citrus flavors aren't really found here. While this isn't a bad beer, this is about the weakest APA that I've ever had, or could possibly find on any retail shelf.

All that this is good for is having a session beer that doesn't burn and goes down easily. There's just enough carbonation here to take any edge off but if you're looking for an edgy beer, this sure isn't it. Fans of Southern Tier are bound to be disappointed like this and with so many other offerings by them and other APA's to choose from, why even bother with something as generic as this?

 1,374 characters

Photo of davidaubrey
3.39/5  rDev -11.5%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 4

Appearance - This beer has great clarity and is a light orange/amber color; I can't believe how filtered & clear this beer is.

Smell - Smells hoppy and spicy;

Taste - The bitterness of perhaps either cascade or centennial hops is apparent immediately. The flavor is not very complex; perhaps a different, darker malt would help this beer.

Mouthfeel - This beer is has great clarity, but little substance to the mouthfeel. I would prefer a beer that is less filtered with a thicker body.

Drinkability - Excellent, however, when choosing pale ale next time, I'll probably go for a different one next time.

 609 characters

first ← prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | nextlast
Pale from Southern Tier Brewing Company
3.83 out of 5 based on 226 ratings.
  • About Us

    Founded in Boston in 1996, BeerAdvocate (BA) is your go-to resource for beer powered by an independent community of enthusiasts and professionals dedicated to supporting and promoting better beer.

    Learn More
  • Our Community

    Comprised of consumers and industry professionals, many of whom started as members of this site, our community is one of the oldest, largest, and most respected beer communities online.
  • Our Events

    Since 2003 we've hosted over 60 world-class beer festivals to bring awareness to independent brewers and educate attendees.
  • Our Magazine

    Support uncompromising beer advocacy and award-winning, independent journalism with a print subscription to BeerAdvocate magazine.