Molson Golden | Molson Coors Canada

Molson GoldenMolson Golden
640 Ratings
Molson GoldenMolson Golden

Brewed by:
Molson Coors Canada
Ontario, Canada

Style: American Pale Lager

Alcohol by volume (ABV): 5.00%

Availability: Year-round

Notes / Commercial Description:
A smooth, mellow beer of moderate sweetness, not too bitter and slightly malty.

Added by BeerAdvocate on 08-20-2001

Bros Score:
User Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Recent | High | Low | Top Raters | Alström Bros
Ratings: 640 |  Reviews: 226
Photo of dacrza1
1.88/5  rDev -30.6%
look: 2 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

The Moment: Enjoying the return of smell and taste, long shelved since allergies took their toll...
Glassware: Cleveland Browns pilsner...
Appearance: Pours a pale, tawny yellow, the color of dead grass; head quickly settles to a thin, uneven bubbly white...
Aroma: corn and malt that together is omewhat pungeant; airy, oxygenated vapor sits in the doughy strength...
Palate: approximates seltzer with its late fiz and medium-bodied tongue--almost like an Italian soda...
Taste: late pilsner accents with an aftretaste that lingers; syrupy aroma invades the sip; looking forward to ChexMix to marry this beer to its purpose...
Overall: As cases go, this can work; as fortunate as I feel to be able to rate beer again, I was a bit foolish to welcome myself back with this watery fare; mouth-quenching with a bit of beef bite that doesn't make the beer as easy-drinking as it should be...

 889 characters

Photo of mynie
2.38/5  rDev -12.2%
look: 2 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

I went as a Canadian guy for Halloween and so I carried around and drank a six pack of this.

It was skunked Molson. That's it. Skunks must be made of gold, I guess.

People complain too much about some skunkiness. I don't mind it, in the right context. Back when Heineken's bottles were more translucent, that skunkiness was damn pleasant. But, you see, Heineken is actually a very well brewed european lager. Molson is a shittily brewed American adjunct, only I could tell whether or not this was adjunct because of all the skunkiness.

All things considered, though, the flavor wasn't *that* offputting. I slugged down a sixer. It's remarkably smooth, gave me no indigestion, and the back end was void of the burning fizziness that you get from a truly awful macro. Still, I won't be buying it again any time soon.

 818 characters

Photo of daliandragon
2.63/5  rDev -3%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

This was one of my parents' favorite beers when i was growing up. Still cheap and drinkable after all these years. Pours its name with no head, lace, or frills at all. Light, corny nose with a touch of grassy fruit.

Tastes like macro town although a little svelter and less clumsy than the American versions. Thin but not too watery in the mouth. Easy to drink and uncomplicated, but not completely lacking soul.

 414 characters

Photo of sliverX
3.6/5  rDev +32.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Poured a light golden hue with a huge rocky head that faded fairly quickly bubbles streaming upward at a constant quick pace. Looks slightly better than every other macro.
Smelled of sweet light malt and not much else.
Tasted sweet malty and unlike a macro I picked up only a slight corn taste but this has more of a sweetness to it like good late summer sweet corn.
Mouthfeel is a thicker light not much wateriness in this one.
This ones not too bad I'd be happy to drop a few in the cooler for friends and give them a slightly better option over "cold water"

 560 characters

Photo of mikesgroove
2.56/5  rDev -5.5%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

and the quest to get the worst continues on. doing traveling most of this week, but managed to spot this one in a local bilo. served cold and poured into a pint glass, consumed on 08/18/2010.

actually a decent pour with a pale golden yellow that was simply loaded with carbonation. a nice head of white capped it off and reached a height of around two inches.

light aroma, mostly light grain and hints of corn. slight grassy hops, but very very light. this carried right over in the flavor which was again far too light for my tastes, but what can you do. small hop presence in the finish and a light cereal grain balance. nice feel, was not too light at all and overall not a terrible expierence by any means.

 713 characters

Photo of NODAK
3.28/5  rDev +21%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

Somehow, this beer ended up being different than what I had expected. It had been a long time since I had one, and certainly don't recall this.

Smell was a bit skunky....a little bit of corn sweetness. Nothing special nor out of the ordinary. The taste, however, was full of corn adjunct sweetness followed by a somewhat pronounced graininess. Very little hop profile here at all. Finish and aftertaste are pretty sweet with a twinge of the grain. One of the sweeter finishes I've had with a lager.

All in all, not a remarkable beer as far as flavor is concerned but it's drinkable from the sheer standpoint that it will not offend.

 634 characters

Photo of jsprain1
2.52/5  rDev -7%
look: 2 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 2

A- Pale golden, straw colored even. Weak head.
S- Corn, with just a shade of toasted malt. weak smell.
T- The taste is of corn with just a shade of hop flavor.
M- Actually pretty rich and smooth for what it is.
D- This beer is just unimpressive. And is it really a blonde ale?

 277 characters

Photo of BigIrishman
3.02/5  rDev +11.4%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3.5

Appearance: Pours straw yellow with little head that dissapears quickly

Smell: Corn chips over a bed of cooked veggies, not all that powerful but surprisingly not skunky for a green bottled beer.

Taste: Similar to the smell but pretty mild and not offensive.

Mouthfeel: Thin and crisp

Drinkability: Fairly decent for a macro lager, not too offensive which makes it fine for drinkingon a hot summer day.

 406 characters

Photo of ribby
3.3/5  rDev +21.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Upon opening, the almost skunky characteristic Molson aroma is just as I remember it from 30 years ago. It shows plenty of bubbles, but the head does not last long. The taste is mildly hoppy, with a hint of malt, but the excessive fizziness makes it hard to evaluate all the subtleties. A nice amount of floral hoppiness lingers on the palate. Mouthfeel is okay with the bubbles, as well as decent flavor for the style. This would be really nice on an 85 degree day.

 466 characters

Photo of twiggamortis420
3.18/5  rDev +17.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

12 oz green bottle without any freshness coding. Pours a clear yellow color with a decent cap of white head. Retention is not too shabby and does not leave any lacing.

Smells more like a lager, than the listed blonde ale. Stale grainy malts and a hint of sugary sweetness. I do not get any fruit or bread yeast esters usually present in some form or fashion in an ale or much in the way of hops.
I think back in the day Molson Golden was an ale, but I dont think that is the case now.

Taste is pretty standard Euro Pale Lager fare, sweet and grainy adjuncts with a light touch of sulfur and hops in the finish to balance things out somewhat. Nothing really off-putting about this one, but there is nothing here that makes you crave more. Tastes pretty fresh and crisp, with a decent amount of flavor. Body is medium, maybe even bordering on thin for a EPL (which I am rating this as), as a blonde ale it would fail miserably. Not too much different from the Canadian Lager IMHO.

 980 characters

Photo of rfgetz
2.95/5  rDev +8.9%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Pours a clean but dulled gold color with a quick puff of white, frothy head. No retention or lacing. Smell is very faint whiff of adjunct grains with no impurities or skunkyness. Taste is a very faint bite of mildly sweet adjunct grains, hint of hops with no impurities or skunyness. Body is light and watery, not over carbonated like other beers in its demographic. A very adequate substitute for the typical BMC fare for a backyard BBQ or tailgate.

 450 characters

Photo of BEERchitect
2.45/5  rDev -9.6%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

I am a bit surprised to see this beer classified as a Blonde Ale. Though it has a sweeter fruitier side, it does still drink like an American style Lager.

The beer pours with a strong straw color, bright clarity, airy yet froathy head, fair retainage, and light on lacing. Par for the course I guess.

Aromas are predominantly of pilsner malt with raw grain scents and with pungent European hops giving a big earthy, nearly skunk character.

Flavors of sweet grains are much more than I expected; not all malt, maybe additions of corn or rice are lingering on the palate. Hops give light flavors and bitterness but no where matches the character found in the nose. Pears, apples, and light mangos give a fruity note that amplifies the sweetness, but this could be attributed to aged ester character.

The body is a bit more full because of the impressions from sweetness and more moderate carbonation. Sometimes seemingly a bit too heavy to drink easily.

In the end, the beer fares about as well as Budweiser- where we are giving up on crispness and cleanliness we are adding fruity complexity and slightly more maltiness.

 1,124 characters

Photo of woodychandler
3.83/5  rDev +41.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

A CAN from CANada's oldest brewery! CAN you dig it?!?

Wow, did my pour ever result in some nice head - two finger's worth of thick, foamy, bone-white head with decent retention! Color was a golden-yellow with NE-quality clarity. Talk about truth in advertising ... Nose had a slightly sweet cast to it, more lager-like than ale. Mouthfeel was medium with a slightly sweet taste, not much hops in evidence, but not overwhelmed by malt, either, striking a nice balance. Finish was slightly dry, and quite tasty, especially compared to Molson CANadian. If you did not enjoy this in a bottle, I urge you to give it a re-visit in a CAN!

 632 characters

Photo of mtnbikerpa
3.18/5  rDev +17.3%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Poured from a 12 ounce bottle into a pint glass. Freshness date on bottle May 16 10. Basic gold/yellow color. About an inch of head that soon disappeared. Scents of corn and rice in the smell. Flavor is pretty plain and bland. Some maltlike notes, with also a very basic hop flavor. Not bad. Mouthfeel is pretty light and drinkable.

 332 characters

Photo of h00dak
3.28/5  rDev +21%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

Twisted off the cap of one of these last night.

Took a whiff - sweet-smelling, not a good smell. No complexity.

Took a swig - Adjunct and skunk. Medium to high carbonation. Pleasant aftertaste of alcohol and something like watermelon. More complexity than I expected.

This is a boring beer. I won't get it again. I don't what makes it so golden that's for sure.

 366 characters

Photo of katan
3.61/5  rDev +33.2%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4.5

12 oz bottle into a pint

A - Extremely clear, golden color. Light white head formation, turns into a film. Well retained. Bubbling is at a minimum. Looks like a pils.

S - Speaking of pils, I detect the grainy essence of pilsner malt. Light malt sweetness with that almost "funk" of pilsner. No hops detected here.

T - Starts off with a light malt note, which quickly turns to a pilsner malt dominated nose. Almost skunky at times. Mid-stream does show some bitterness, but hops are nowhere to be found. This beer intends to be non-offensive, and succeeds. Finishes with a pilsner malt hit. Aftertaste is non-existent.

M - Light, thin beer body. Some carbonation bite, edge. Little to no retained sensation on the palette.

D - Very drinkable. Smooth, moderate and manageable abv. I would think if i was in a pils mood this beer would certainly suffice.

Nothing at all wrong with this beer, besides I'm sure in many folks opinion, the label. That and the stupidly skunk inducing green bottle that is.

 1,004 characters

Photo of Stunner97
3.51/5  rDev +29.5%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Appearance- pours a very golden yellow color, nice clear and golden color, nice bubbles stream up the glass to what starts as a nice white foam head

Smell- very slight malts and hops can be lightly noticed, a slight grain smell,

Taste- very short finish but has a good slight hop bitterness more so then the regular lager, slight grain and malt, overall and enjoyable flavor,

Mouthfeel- medium to light bodied with decent carbonation, feels very smooth

Drinkability- very drinkable and for the price especially a very nice sessionable lager, I really thing to most of the mass produced things molson puts out a pretty solid product, and served up ice cold you would have no problem enjoying a few of these, a refreshing lager when looking for a no fuss cheaper priced beer

 776 characters

Photo of erosier
2.88/5  rDev +6.3%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

L: Pours a golden yellow color with a short and thin white colored head that laces the glass on the way down.
S: Smells faintly of sweet smelling malts and some light hops but nothing that is over powering.
T: Tastes like the aroma with light sweet smelling malts up front and a hint of hops at the end. There isn't much else to it.
M: Very crisp and refreshing as there is not much to taste.
D: Very drinkable because there really isn't too much to this beer.

 460 characters

Photo of goblue3509
2.63/5  rDev -3%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Pours a light golden yellow color with a faint head. The smell is of malt grains and some floral hops. Taste is of sweet corn and some floral hops, the taste is fairly weak, not offensive and not good. The mouthfeel is watery and moderately high carbonation. The drinkability is average nothing offensive and nothing very good.

 327 characters

Photo of tone77
3.64/5  rDev +34.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.75

I had this before from a bottle, but liked it more from a can. Poured from a 12 oz. can.Has a bright golden color with a 1 inch head. Smell is sweet, malts, grains. Taste is crisp, malts, sweet, very easy drinking. Feels medium bodied in the mouth and overall is a refreshing and solid beer.

 292 characters

Photo of kshankar
2.8/5  rDev +3.3%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 3 | feel: 2 | overall: 4

Pours golden strawish. Small head, if any, retention is lacking.

Aroma of faint grains

Taste: Bland..mostly draws its taste from light malts, some minimal sweetness, corn and grain

Mouthfeel: Carbonation is okay, and its a bit watery

Drinkability: Um, yea. Only because its so bland that drinking it is akin to water. This is a beer to be had while grilling, or at a game. Or getting trashed and not wanting to spend much.

Overall: Blonde Ale? Really? No. I wouldn't mind giving it a higher rating if it was more run of the mill, but by labeling itself as an American Blonde Ale..I'm going to have to review it relative to that. Fails.

 641 characters

Photo of DoctorStrangiato
3.4/5  rDev +25.5%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

Poured a 341-ml bottle into a pint glass.

Appearance - pale straw yellow colour with bright white 1/2-inch head of fine bubbles, definitely reduces to the surface. Does feature some lacing.

Smell - smells of corn, grass and light hops and malt, all notably fresh. For certain this will be an uncomplex taste.

Taste - a pretty non-chalant taste in terms of the fact that it's a balance of light malt sweetness and some even hops throughout. A bit of a quick finish with some dryness. Inoffensive but rather bland.

Mouthfeel - the smoothness of this beer is notable. It is marketed this way, but the smoothness also makes up for the mediocre taste in a lot of ways. I remember the "Smooth as Golden" commercials from years ago and it's true! A smooth, even beer it is (even if it lacks taste).

Drinkability - this is another baffling aspect of this beer. Why would anyone put away several of these? But the key is - you do! It's like being beside a shrimp ring or a bowl of chips. Each "last one" leads to "another one". Boring as it may be, several more of these will be going down tonight.

 1,095 characters

Photo of hardy008
2.23/5  rDev -17.7%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

Appearance - Pours a golden color, decent head, poor retention. Very average.

Smell - Corn and a little bit of sweetness from the malt. Also some skunk.

Taste - Some sweetness, bit not much. Bland.

Mouthfeel - Watery and thin, not much going on.

Drinkability - Below average, not the worst.

 294 characters

Photo of tempest
2.56/5  rDev -5.5%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Had a green bottle at Italiano Delight in Emmaus, PA. The bartender set it down with a frosted mug. Upon pouring the beer the a cloud of skunk hit the air. Man, this was bad, especially for a beer that was just in a cooler under a bar. Eventually the skunk cleared and I was left with a plain, light amber ale with a bready sweetness and not a lot of much else. Easy drinking, skunk aside.

 389 characters

Photo of OtherShoe2
2.73/5  rDev +0.7%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Pours clear yellow with a decent white foam head. No lacing.

A bit of skunk and some sweet malt aroma. A bit of boiled grain as well.

Flavors are a bit stronger than typical American macro, with some twists. Light sweet grain, then some corn, then some mineral bitterness. Some grassiness as well. Finishes with a sour/bitter edge.

Some decent carbonation, and actually not bad bodied.

Overall, this is lawnmower beer. Bought it on a lark, mostly out of fond memories of teenage drinking binges when this was considered "high end" beer. Luckily I'm no longer in that phase. This is better than the Corona/Bud/Coors group of brews, but not much better. Some bitterness and balance put it a step above, but it is a shallow step. So much for the trip down memory lane.

 769 characters

Molson Golden from Molson Coors Canada
Beer rating: 2.71 out of 5 with 640 ratings
  • About Us

    Founded in Boston in 1996, BeerAdvocate (BA) is your go-to resource for beer powered by an independent community of enthusiasts and professionals dedicated to supporting and promoting better beer.

    Learn More
  • Our Community

    Comprised of consumers and industry professionals, many of whom started as members of this site, our community is one of the oldest, largest, and most respected beer communities online.
  • Our Events

    Since 2003 we've hosted over 60 world-class beer festivals to bring awareness to independent brewers and educate attendees.
  • Our Magazine

    Support uncompromising beer advocacy and award-winning, independent journalism with a print subscription to BeerAdvocate magazine.