Stroh's | Pabst Brewing Company

190 Reviews
no score
Send samples

Brewed by:
Pabst Brewing Company
California, United States

Style: American Adjunct Lager

Alcohol by volume (ABV): 4.60%

Availability: Year-round

Notes / Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

Added by Mitchster on 08-24-2001

For Trade:
View: Beers | Events
User Reviews
Sort by:  Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
first ← prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | nextlast
Reviews: 190 | Ratings: 569
Photo of BEERchitect
2.83/5  rDev +1.4%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Pretty average for a weekend-at-the-lake beer. Typical of American Macro Lagers in that it has a pronounced pilsner malt base that shows moderately high grain flavors, lightened body, straw colors and lacking head retention. A bit special in a lemon-zest, green apple skin, character that adds to the refreshing quality. Quite efforvescent on the toung and dry in the finish. Though not a great beer, I have had worse from some good craft breweries.

 449 characters

Photo of emerge077
2.29/5  rDev -17.9%
look: 3 | smell: 2.75 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.25

It's probably been a few decades since I last had Stroh's, sneaking sips off of adult's beers at some backyard bbq function in the early 80's. There are still a couple old Stroh's signs around town, a relic of the past at neighborhood corner taverns like Mickeys.

Pale anemic gold, racing carb trails, feeble head that fades after the first sip to a broken patchy skim on the surface.

It doesn't smell bad, but it doesn't smell good either. Swilly wet grains, manila folders.

Taste is astringent and watery, slightly harsh. Papery grainy "flavor" that's extremely hard to pick up. Bland and only slightly offensive. Has little redeeming value, it's not one of the better nostalgia macros out there, PBR is far better for a generic macro.

 742 characters

Photo of mothman
2.36/5  rDev -15.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 2

Poured into a mini weizen/pint like glass.

Pours 1 finger of light off white head. Color is a clear straw yellow. Head fades down, but manages to leave some light lacing. Active carbonation in the glass.

Aroma: Grains, corn, and blandness. Some light grassy hops but not much here.

Taste: Pretty much identical to the nose. I really can't tell much of a difference other than it being slightly creamy.

Mouthfeel: Crisp, creamy, and blank. Lighter bodied with a larger amount of carbonation. Ends with some grain flavors. It also ends very dry.

Overall, there just isn't too much to write on a beer like this. Not a lot of flavors here, no surprise. Not something I plan on drinking again, but I could if I had to.

 720 characters

Photo of TheManiacalOne
3.15/5  rDev +12.9%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Poured from a 12oz. can into a US tumbler pint glass.

A: The beer is a light gold color with a thin white head that fades quickly and leaves a thin on the glass.

S: The aroma is faint but contains light malts, adjuncts and a touch of hops.

T: The taste is bready with flavors of grain and barley along with the typical adjunct & light malt sweetness, but it not as sweet as other adjunct lagers and seems a little more balanced. The hops presence is mild but a bit complementary. The after-taste is slightly bready.

M: Smooth and a little crisp, light body, medium-to-high carbonation, finish is clean.

D: More flavorful than most others in the style, goes down very easily, not too filling, mild kick, very good representative of a lackluster style, if I were forced to drink pick a beer in this style to drink, this one would be at the top of that list.

 863 characters

Photo of BuckeyeNation
2.92/5  rDev +4.7%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Welcome to Macro Smackdown X, the tenth in my series of grudge matches between the 'less appreciated' members of the beer world. I've been looking forward to this particular matchup since the beers involved (Pabst Blue Ribbon is the challenger) are true classics of the style. It took a little effort to bring these bad boys together. I had to trade for the Stroh's and I had to go to Madison, WI for the PBR.

Lightly flecked rich golden amber topped by a soft, fluffy head of unpure white. The cap isn't as creamy or as sticky as it could be, and more importantly, isn't as creamy or as sticky as the cap on its competitor. It also falls more quickly and leaves less lace.

There's almost no difference in the noses. Stroh's smells of lightly sweet grain with a moderate amount of musky hops. There's no trace of the nastiness that is present in A-B's products, but that doesn't mean that the aroma is anything to write home about.

Actually, this is pretty decent beer for the style. I'm amazed at the difference between both of these beers and similar products from BMC. Pabst Brewing/Heileman Brewing blows the big boys away. The flavor is simple, grain-like, lightly sweet, modestly bitter and clean. Again, no hint of offensiveness. I'd never drink this stuff on a regular basis--even if it was available--but I'd pick it in a heartbeat over most other macros.

The body is light-medium and holds up well on the swallow. The word 'watery' doesn't enter into the mouthfeel equation at all. Nothing wrong with the carbonation; it's fine enough and subdued enough to get the job done without calling attention to itself.

I haven't yet entered the scores, but it looks as though Pabst Blue Ribbon will take the blue ribbon in Macro Smackdown X by a slight margin. That's not to say that Stroh's is a dog. If matched against almost any beer in the MacSmack series, it would probably emerge victorious. I'm surprised, and pleased, by both of these Old School brews.

 1,977 characters

Photo of TMoney2591
2.83/5  rDev +1.4%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Served in an Ohio State shaker pint glass.

Oh, you'd better believe this is part of a Spelunky fest! It pours a clear yellow topped by a finger of lightly off-white foam. The nose comprises corn and very light wheat. The taste holds notes of corn, flowers, and a slightly odd and vague sweetness. The body is quite light, with a moderate carbonation and a watery feel. Overall, one of the better adjunct lagers I've had in a while, though still a good distance away from a truly good beer.

 490 characters

Photo of Gagnonsux
3.3/5  rDev +18.3%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Picked a sixer up in Mississippi while on vacation. Stroh's color is golden yellow with an average-sized head. Aroma is very light on the adjuncts, mainly a grassy sweet smell is noted. The taste is fairly average overall, but very good for a macro product. This is very smooth without adjunct nastiness. Stroh's flavor starts off crisp and finishes lightly malty. This probably the best macro I've had, just a little ahead of PBR. I wish I could get this in Houston, I would make it my standard lawnmower beer.

 511 characters

Photo of woodychandler
2.12/5  rDev -24%
look: 4 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

CAN I do it? Yes, I CAN!

Wow, does this ever transport me to my misspent youth. Cans of Stroh's, purchased on the sly out front of the R&R Tavern or the Little Dutch Cafe, and surreptitiously consumed in various places around the city. Those were the days ...

Today, I got a rocky, bone-white head from the pour with good retention throughout. The color was a light yellow with NE-plus quality clarity. The nose was somewhat sweet, nowhere near as bitter as I remember it as being. Mouthfeel was thin-to-medium. There was very little flavor associated with this beer. It was very bland, even more than the Corona that I had consumed a little while previously. To think that this was what used to routinely kick my sixteen year-old ass ... No wonder my Pops used to laugh at all of us Bill Badass wannabes. The finish had a slight metallic aspect. I'm done with Stroh's after this. Short's on the other hand, now there's some good beer.

 937 characters

Photo of WVbeergeek
2.69/5  rDev -3.6%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Stroh's in a can, why not let's do this...appears a golden clear bubbly quote, unquote beer look to it with large heavily carbonated bright white head floating above body dwindling at a moderate pace leaves some nice patches of sporadic lacing around my Duvel chalice...sorry Duvel. Aroma is heavy on the cooked veggie quality often described with these types of brews, mild corn sweetness something gives me the notion that there's just a touch of mild hop herbal quality going on which says alot when compared to most American light lagers. Taste not overly sweet definitely ridden with adjuncts but it's somewhat enjoyable combo of mild sweetness with corn and rice finish and a light herbal undertow of hop flavor not much bitterness of course but balanced and finishes with a touch of offness grainy/metallic combo...while the drinkability of this brew is solid all around "American" or "old timer" beer I'm proud to still be able to drink this over Bud, Miller, Coors just to be different, sometimes you get enjoyment with that as far as the mouthfeel goes it's light bodied heavy with the carbonation prepare to say excuse me honey...and yeah I know this one doesn't smell as good as my usual IPAs but come on our grandfathers drank a version of this beer.

 1,263 characters

Photo of tdm168
3.2/5  rDev +14.7%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Drank this from the can at a Christmas Eve get together. Usually I wouldn't review under these circumstances, but when else am I going to have a Stroh's handed to me.

The nose was grainy and a bit metallic, but there's a noticeable hop aroma. The taste is mildly grainy with a really nice grassy, earthy, bitter hop characteristic. There are also some fruity notes, but not necessarily off flavors. This is a very crisp, light beer that's a little heavily carbonated.

Surprisingly, I enjoyed this. For the style the hops were impeccable. The grainy qualities were kept to a minimum and it was easy to drink.

 609 characters

Photo of Tone
3.44/5  rDev +23.3%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Pours a clear, straw color. 1/4 inch head of a white color. Slight retention and slight lacing. Smells of slight sweet malt, pale malt, grain, and slight citrus hops. Fits the style of an American Adjunct Lager. Mouth feel is sharp and crisp, with an average carbonation level. Tastes of grain, pale malt, hint of sweet malt, and a hint of citrus hops. Overall, decent aroma, blend, and body for an American Adjunct Lager.

 422 characters

Photo of tempest
3.15/5  rDev +12.9%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Picked up a 30-pack from Shangy's for, well, not much, to share with friends that enjoy cheap beer. I was pleasantly surprised to discover I could actually enjoy a can. Sure, it tastes a little like cooked corn and white bread, but it's smooth enough without any off-flavors (I figure DMS/corn adjunct is acceptable for the style). It's simple, it's kinda tasty. It's not... that.. bad. I said.

 394 characters

Photo of tone77
3.05/5  rDev +9.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2.75 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Poured from a can into a weizen glass. Very pale yellow color with virtually no head. Smell is of corn, malts. The taste was very light, mild corn, not much to it, but nothing offensive. This is a good beer for chugging on a hot day but not a good tasting beer. At $3.39 for a six-pack, I can't complain to much.

 312 characters

Photo of Wasatch
2/5  rDev -28.3%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Pours a light yellow color, nice carbonation, small white head, with some sticky lacing left behind. The nose is malty, with some hops, slight caramel. The taste is slightly sweet, malty, slight hop note. Light body. Not drinkable, would not buy again.

 252 characters

Photo of WesWes
2.65/5  rDev -5%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

The beer pours a pale gold color with a thin white head that fades to lacing. The aroma is average. It has a light pilsner malt and adjunct scent along with a dry lager yeast aroma. There is little hop aroma to speak of. The taste is below average. It has a weak and watery mlat flavor that's really telling of the amount of adjuncts present. It's a quick drinker with a dry, musty finish. The mouthfeel is below average as well. It's a low bodied beer with tons of carbonation. This is a forgettable brew and very low on my list of top macro lagers.

 550 characters

Photo of Stinkypuss
2.25/5  rDev -19.4%

Light corn grist, faint hops, near toffee like malt. Light bitterness, coupled with corn cob. Ever so faint diactel but not too bad, I've had dirtier lagers but can't call it clean. Light bodied watery brew. Overall, this is an ok adjunct lager.

 248 characters

Photo of plaid75
3.4/5  rDev +21.9%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

Poured a light straw hue with a two finger foamy bone white head. There was decent retention and lacing.

The smell featured a pretty solid soft malt with the obvious cooked corn element.

The taste was light, but fuller than most macros. Mild corn sweetness, but for the most part relatively dry.

The mouthfeel was thin and well carbonated.

Overall a pretty decent beer. Much better than any other macro I have tried. Drinkability is high with this one.

 464 characters

Photo of puboflyons
2.46/5  rDev -11.8%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Sampled on New Year's Day 2009 and poured from can no. 12018-E50503. This used to be available everywhere in New Hampshire but now it is a challenge to find it. However the local distributor must be doing some kind of push because I am seeing more of it. It pours a carbonated yellow tone with fizzy white head that bubbles lively and then slowly diminishes during the course of the tasting. Aroma is grassy and metallic. The taste is slightly bolder than most macros and finishes on the dry side. This is pretty typical of American macros. You either like 'em or hate 'em. This is more tolerable on my wallet at $2.99 a six pack.

 630 characters

Photo of clayrock81
2.58/5  rDev -7.5%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

I can't believe they still make this stuff. Well, I can actually. As long as people drink like my departed grandfather and my uncle, there will be a market for this "upper end" cheap macro. Gave it a 3 just because I didn't pour it out into a glass. Of course the can smelled metallic, but also like dewey grass and grainy adjuncts. Despite its wateriness, there was some sweetness in this otherwise pale immitation of a real beer. It is a real American macro though. Not harsh at all on the aftertaste and in fact goes down smooth. This is one of those beers that people my age pass over for Bud or Natty or Corona at a BBQ, but people the generation or 2 above us take. That is what it is. A light drinking, summer beer really.

 729 characters

Photo of jdhilt
2.65/5  rDev -5%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Pours a three-fingered white head that fades quickly leaving some lace. Clear, light amber color. Light carbonation and light bodied. Slightly sweet and clean, tastes like a light, good lawnmower beer. $1.00 for a 12oz bottle from LiquorBarn, Lexington, KY

 256 characters

Photo of Bitterbill
3.3/5  rDev +18.3%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

I haven't had a Strohs in years..

Bright yellow gold in the glass with a small head of foam, it has a lightly malted flavour with a pretty nice hop bite. Easy to drink and cheap(for here) at $4 a six pack. A pretty good value for what you get, imo, and would certainly pass as a good summer time thirst quencher.

 313 characters

Photo of rodbeermunch
2.81/5  rDev +0.7%
look: 2.75 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.75 | feel: 2.75 | overall: 2.75

Feels like I should be playing "Do You Remember?" from E40 & Too $hort while I write this review. Dem feelz.

Yellow adjunct beer, a little more hearty of a yellow appearance than most adjunct lagers. Or is it an adjunct lager? Perhaps not. Anyways, looks like you'd expect for the most part. Aroma was mostly neutral. A little sweet, a little bitter. You're not going into this for lots of malt or hops, and they're downplayed appropriately for their demographic.

Easy drinking corporate beer. Is what it is. Kid Rock was right.

 541 characters

Photo of pat61
3/5  rDev +7.5%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

My first taste of beer was a Stroh's and it has a little more character than many of the other BMC beers and PBR but not a lot more. I use it for boiling brats.

 160 characters

Photo of Bighuge
2.68/5  rDev -3.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Clear sun yellow. Not a lot of carbonation noticeable on viewing. Big airy white head. Lace is definitely there. Moderate in quantity. Aroma is all corn. And a little grainy sweetness too. This tastes to me the way Old Mil used to taste to me when I was a youngin. Very bluntly sweet and grainy. The mouthfeel isn't quite as fizzy as most macros, but rather subdued in its carbonation. Not one I'm gonna hit up again and again...

 429 characters

Photo of Beerandraiderfan
2.69/5  rDev -3.6%
look: 2 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

New a guy back in the day that swore by this stuff, all he drank. I have a bar light up in my place of this stuff. Yellow beer, sudsy white head, more than your average adjunct, but it goes the way of the dodo right quick. Lager yeast, corn aroma, smelled worse.

Not much going on here, barely a malt and hop presence, balanced in terms of its sweetness. Maybe a little more bitter than most in its style. Seems like the stuff gets sold over brand loyalty moreso than uniqueness of the product, most comparable to Coors banquet beer I'd say.

A decent mass produced beer, dependable for some mass drinking where you don't want to bother wasting your $ and palate on high end brews after you're already trashed.

I wonder how many people referenced '30 pack of Stroh's, 30 pack of ho's' in their review?

 804 characters

first ← prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | nextlast
Stroh's from Pabst Brewing Company
2.79 out of 5 based on 569 ratings.
  • About Us

    Your go-to website for beer (since 1996), publishers of BeerAdvocate magazine (since 2006) and hosts of world-class beer events (since 2003). Respect Beer.
  • BeerAdvocate Microbrew Invitational

    Join us June 2-3, 2017 in Boston, Mass. for beer, cider, mead, kombucha and sake from over 70 small producers.

    Learn More
  • Subscribe to BeerAdvocate Magazine

    Support uncompromising beer advocacy and award-winning, independent journalism with a print subscription to BeerAdvocate magazine.